What if the South had won the Civil War?

 
cxfhvxgkcf-56:7
| Marty Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: SoporificSlash
IP: Logged

15,656 posts
 
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


PSU | Legendary Invincible!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: PSU
IP: Logged

6,089 posts
 
Well it'd be much better.


Nascent Email | Heroic Posting Riot
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Trojanlord
IP: Logged

819 posts
 
From the few books I've read on the subject the best the south could have hoped for was to remain independent of the USA until a later date.


 
Luis
| Legendary Invincible!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam: exige
ID: Luis
IP: Logged

6,172 posts
 
I wouldn't have gone to Virginia for my 7th grade trip a few years back.


Mordo | Mythic Invincible!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Madman Mordo
IP: Logged

7,249 posts
emigrate or degenerate. the choice is yours
Instead of machines doing everything for us it'd be black people.


Jocephalopod | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: joecephalopod
PSN:
Steam: j0cephalopod
ID: Jocephalopod
IP: Logged

8,352 posts
 
YouTube



commercials would be better


 
Alternative Facts
| Mythic Forum Ninja
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: IcyWind
IP: Logged

9,381 posts
 
Well it'd be much better.

Yes. Continuing slavery, the concept of nullification, and a divided United States is surely better.


Turkey | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: Viva Redemption
PSN: HurtfulTurkey
Steam: HurtfulTurkey
ID: HurtfulTurkey
IP: Logged

8,077 posts
 
I imagine they'd follow the rest of the civilized world and eventually abolish slavery as well, ultimately rejoining with the North.


Kinder Graham | Respected Invincible!
 
more |
XBL: TFL Blazing
PSN:
Steam:
ID: IchEsseKinder
IP: Logged

7,291 posts
TUNNEL SNAKES RULE
(ง ͡͡ ° ͜ ʖ ͡ °)ง
Countless possibilities really

The South was fighting a defensive war and won many battles. If Jackson wasn't killed and Lee not attack Gettysburg on a uphill battle then the Union, especially the citizens, would have lost great moral and call for an end to hostilities.
By this time a cease-fire would take place and both sides would meet and work out a treaty. The Union realizing it has western lands that would be suitable enough for agriculture would be okay with the Confederacy leaving and forming their own nation. However it could be in the next couple years or decades where Texas would leave the Confederacy and form their own nation, leaving three nations in the lower 48

Now head back to the South fighting a defensive war. Key loses such as Gettysburg ended any hope of France and Britain to aid support to the South and give it recognition. If the South did win these key battles then these European powers would put pressure on the Union, aiding in the ability of the war ending shortly. However, Europe would also put pressure on the South to outlaw slavery

Slavery wouldn't exist into the 20th century, that's for sure. The South even allowed blacks to serve in the military and there were black plantation owners that owned slaves, including white slaves. In dire need of man power along with pressure on foreign powers and introduction of technology, slavery could have very well ended during the war or transition to the point where slaves were still such but imitated ancient world civilizations where slaves could own land, make money, and buy themselves out of freedom; indentured servants would be the best way to explain

Oh, Lincoln wouldn't have been assassinated since Booth had no motivation to do so and the KKK wouldn't exist because it was created after the Civil War. Eventually equal right would have occurred in the South the same way it was in South Africa. The North and South would also form a union similar to the E.U


Mad Max | Mythic Invincible!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam: madmax0808
ID: Mad Max
IP: Logged

7,519 posts
 
>implying the South lost the Civil War


 
challengerX
| custom title
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: challengerX
IP: Logged

41,942 posts
I DONT GIVE A SINGLE -blam!- MOTHER -blam!-ER ITS A MOTHER -blam!-ING FORUM, OH WOW, YOU HAVE THE WORD NINJA BELOW YOUR NAME, HOW MOTHER -blam!-ING COOL, NOT, YOUR ARE NOTHING TO ME BUT A BRAINWASHED PIECE OF SHIT BLOGGER, PEOPLE ONLY LIKE YOU BECAUSE YOU HAVE NINJA BELOW YOUR NAME, SO PLEASE PUNCH YOURAELF IN THE FACE AND STAB YOUR EYE BECAUSE YOU ARE NOTHING BUT A PIECE OF SHIT OF SOCIETY
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


Assassin 11D7 | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: Assassin 11D7
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Assassin 11D7
IP: Logged

10,059 posts
"flaming nipple chops"-Your host, the man they call Ghost.

To say, 'nothing is true', is to realize that the foundations of society are fragile, and that we must be the shepherds of our own civilization. To say, 'everything is permitted', is to understand that we are the architects of our actions, and that we must live with their consequences, whether glorious or tragic.
>implying the South lost the Civil War
Well, the Union is still together. So...


Mad Max | Mythic Invincible!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam: madmax0808
ID: Mad Max
IP: Logged

7,519 posts
 
>implying the South lost the Civil War
Well, the Union is still together. So...
I know. It was just for lols. I'm not good at pretending to believe things that I don't believe.


Korra | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Avatar Korra
IP: Logged

19,117 posts
uhhh...

- korrie
Well it'd be much better.
Hahahahaha, that's a good joke.


Kinder Graham | Respected Invincible!
 
more |
XBL: TFL Blazing
PSN:
Steam:
ID: IchEsseKinder
IP: Logged

7,291 posts
TUNNEL SNAKES RULE
(ง ͡͡ ° ͜ ʖ ͡ °)ง
Countless possibilities really

The South was fighting a defensive war and won many battles. If Jackson wasn't killed and Lee not attack Gettysburg on a uphill battle then the Union, especially the citizens, would have lost great moral and call for an end to hostilities.
By this time a cease-fire would take place and both sides would meet and work out a treaty. The Union realizing it has western lands that would be suitable enough for agriculture would be okay with the Confederacy leaving and forming their own nation. However it could be in the next couple years or decades where Texas would leave the Confederacy and form their own nation, leaving three nations in the lower 48

Now head back to the South fighting a defensive war. Key loses such as Gettysburg ended any hope of France and Britain to aid support to the South and give it recognition. If the South did win these key battles then these European powers would put pressure on the Union, aiding in the ability of the war ending shortly. However, Europe would also put pressure on the South to outlaw slavery

Slavery wouldn't exist into the 20th century, that's for sure. The South even allowed blacks to serve in the military and there were black plantation owners that owned slaves, including white slaves. In dire need of man power along with pressure on foreign powers and introduction of technology, slavery could have very well ended during the war or transition to the point where slaves were still such but imitated ancient world civilizations where slaves could own land, make money, and buy themselves out of freedom; indentured servants would be the best way to explain

Oh, Lincoln wouldn't have been assassinated since Booth had no motivation to do so and the KKK wouldn't exist because it was created after the Civil War. Eventually equal right would have occurred in the South the same way it was in South Africa. The North and South would also form a union similar to the E.U
FUCKING LOL

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA OH MY GOD THIS IS THE STUPIDEST SHIT IVE EVER READ IN MY LIFE
Actually it's not

For one, this is a "what-if" situation and there's no way to prove if anything in the situation is fact. That means saying aliens will invade and build giant dildo statues is just as credible as what a person that's profound to study the Civil War will now

Secondly, I don't see you giving an opinion as to what will happen so you really have no room to talk. I;m basing this as of what I know about the South and the Civil War, which is probably far more in-depth than what you know

Thirdly, get reported. Enjoy your 3 month ban :^)


 
Alternative Facts
| Mythic Forum Ninja
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: IcyWind
IP: Logged

9,381 posts
 
Slavery wouldn't exist into the 20th century, that's for sure. The South even allowed blacks to serve in the military and there were black plantation owners that owned slaves, including white slaves. In dire need of man power along with pressure on foreign powers and introduction of technology, slavery could have very well ended during the war or transition to the point where slaves were still such but imitated ancient world civilizations where slaves could own land, make money, and buy themselves out of freedom; indentured servants would be the best way to explain

Yeah, no.


 
challengerX
| custom title
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: challengerX
IP: Logged

41,942 posts
I DONT GIVE A SINGLE -blam!- MOTHER -blam!-ER ITS A MOTHER -blam!-ING FORUM, OH WOW, YOU HAVE THE WORD NINJA BELOW YOUR NAME, HOW MOTHER -blam!-ING COOL, NOT, YOUR ARE NOTHING TO ME BUT A BRAINWASHED PIECE OF SHIT BLOGGER, PEOPLE ONLY LIKE YOU BECAUSE YOU HAVE NINJA BELOW YOUR NAME, SO PLEASE PUNCH YOURAELF IN THE FACE AND STAB YOUR EYE BECAUSE YOU ARE NOTHING BUT A PIECE OF SHIT OF SOCIETY
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


Kinder Graham | Respected Invincible!
 
more |
XBL: TFL Blazing
PSN:
Steam:
ID: IchEsseKinder
IP: Logged

7,291 posts
TUNNEL SNAKES RULE
(ง ͡͡ ° ͜ ʖ ͡ °)ง
Countless possibilities really

The South was fighting a defensive war and won many battles. If Jackson wasn't killed and Lee not attack Gettysburg on a uphill battle then the Union, especially the citizens, would have lost great moral and call for an end to hostilities.
By this time a cease-fire would take place and both sides would meet and work out a treaty. The Union realizing it has western lands that would be suitable enough for agriculture would be okay with the Confederacy leaving and forming their own nation. However it could be in the next couple years or decades where Texas would leave the Confederacy and form their own nation, leaving three nations in the lower 48

Now head back to the South fighting a defensive war. Key loses such as Gettysburg ended any hope of France and Britain to aid support to the South and give it recognition. If the South did win these key battles then these European powers would put pressure on the Union, aiding in the ability of the war ending shortly. However, Europe would also put pressure on the South to outlaw slavery

Slavery wouldn't exist into the 20th century, that's for sure. The South even allowed blacks to serve in the military and there were black plantation owners that owned slaves, including white slaves. In dire need of man power along with pressure on foreign powers and introduction of technology, slavery could have very well ended during the war or transition to the point where slaves were still such but imitated ancient world civilizations where slaves could own land, make money, and buy themselves out of freedom; indentured servants would be the best way to explain

Oh, Lincoln wouldn't have been assassinated since Booth had no motivation to do so and the KKK wouldn't exist because it was created after the Civil War. Eventually equal right would have occurred in the South the same way it was in South Africa. The North and South would also form a union similar to the E.U
FUCKING LOL

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA OH MY GOD THIS IS THE STUPIDEST SHIT IVE EVER READ IN MY LIFE
Actually it's not

For one, this is a "what-if" situation and there's no way to prove if anything in the situation is fact. That means saying aliens will invade and build giant dildo statues is just as credible as what a person that's profound to study the Civil War will now

Secondly, I don't see you giving an opinion as to what will happen so you really have no room to talk. I;m basing this as of what I know about the South and the Civil War, which is probably far more in-depth than what you know

Thirdly, get reported. Enjoy your 3 month ban :^)
I didn't personally insult you, so I'm not getting banned.

What you know about the civil war is biased southern bullshit. That's why I'm laughing. You literally called it the "War of Northern Aggression".

And no, somebody saying aliens will invade is not as credible as saying something that actually makes sense, like slavery continuing and the U.S. not being a superpower.
Yeah, you did

Boo-hoo, I call a war a certain name. That makes me the most biased person ever. The North was being aggressive to the South by trying to enforce high taxation that Southerners couldn't afford, along with trying to expand big government and quell the concept of a limited central government. What you know of the civil war is biased northern bullshit

Except slavery wouldn't continue till the 20th and 21st century. That is the end-result of a biased learning institution. The facts are Europe would put pressure on the South to deal away with slavery if they wanted their help, along with the introduction of machinery that could do the job of an entire plantation in a shorter amount of time

Do I need to remind you about the "Great Emancipator's" decision to free the slaves for the benefit of a military victory? Or how about his initial plan to send them all to Africa?


 
Alternative Facts
| Mythic Forum Ninja
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: IcyWind
IP: Logged

9,381 posts
 
Boo-hoo, I call a war a certain name. That makes me the most biased person ever. The North was being aggressive to the South by trying to enforce high taxation that Southerners couldn't afford, along with trying to expand big government and quell the concept of a limited central government. What you know of the civil war is biased northern bullshit

> War of Northern Aggression
> South initiated the War

My sides are in orbit


 
challengerX
| custom title
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: challengerX
IP: Logged

41,942 posts
I DONT GIVE A SINGLE -blam!- MOTHER -blam!-ER ITS A MOTHER -blam!-ING FORUM, OH WOW, YOU HAVE THE WORD NINJA BELOW YOUR NAME, HOW MOTHER -blam!-ING COOL, NOT, YOUR ARE NOTHING TO ME BUT A BRAINWASHED PIECE OF SHIT BLOGGER, PEOPLE ONLY LIKE YOU BECAUSE YOU HAVE NINJA BELOW YOUR NAME, SO PLEASE PUNCH YOURAELF IN THE FACE AND STAB YOUR EYE BECAUSE YOU ARE NOTHING BUT A PIECE OF SHIT OF SOCIETY
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


Kinder Graham | Respected Invincible!
 
more |
XBL: TFL Blazing
PSN:
Steam:
ID: IchEsseKinder
IP: Logged

7,291 posts
TUNNEL SNAKES RULE
(ง ͡͡ ° ͜ ʖ ͡ °)ง
Boo-hoo, I call a war a certain name. That makes me the most biased person ever. The North was being aggressive to the South by trying to enforce high taxation that Southerners couldn't afford, along with trying to expand big government and quell the concept of a limited central government. What you know of the civil war is biased northern bullshit

> War of Northern Aggression
> South initiated the War
And why did the South initiate the war? Because it was tired of the North's aggression, hence the term War of Northern Aggression. South was on a primarily defensive campaign to protect their land

My sides are in orbit


 
 
Mr. Psychologist
| Imperial Forum Ninja
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Mr Psychologist
IP: Logged

17,215 posts
<.<
You literally just said European tyranny is preferable to what we have today.

>Implying you don't secretly want to live in a glorious monarchy like us britbongs do


 
challengerX
| custom title
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: challengerX
IP: Logged

41,942 posts
I DONT GIVE A SINGLE -blam!- MOTHER -blam!-ER ITS A MOTHER -blam!-ING FORUM, OH WOW, YOU HAVE THE WORD NINJA BELOW YOUR NAME, HOW MOTHER -blam!-ING COOL, NOT, YOUR ARE NOTHING TO ME BUT A BRAINWASHED PIECE OF SHIT BLOGGER, PEOPLE ONLY LIKE YOU BECAUSE YOU HAVE NINJA BELOW YOUR NAME, SO PLEASE PUNCH YOURAELF IN THE FACE AND STAB YOUR EYE BECAUSE YOU ARE NOTHING BUT A PIECE OF SHIT OF SOCIETY
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


 
Alternative Facts
| Mythic Forum Ninja
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: IcyWind
IP: Logged

9,381 posts
 
Boo-hoo, I call a war a certain name. That makes me the most biased person ever. The North was being aggressive to the South by trying to enforce high taxation that Southerners couldn't afford, along with trying to expand big government and quell the concept of a limited central government. What you know of the civil war is biased northern bullshit

> War of Northern Aggression
> South initiated the War

My sides are in orbit
And why did the South initiate the war? Because it was tired of the North's aggression, hence the term War of Northern Aggression. South was on a primarily defensive campaign to protect their land


I love how you honestly think this. The South had no place to start a war - they were wrong about the entire thing. They seceded because they couldn't accept that Lincoln won the election and were so afraid he would take their slaves and money away.


Kinder Graham | Respected Invincible!
 
more |
XBL: TFL Blazing
PSN:
Steam:
ID: IchEsseKinder
IP: Logged

7,291 posts
TUNNEL SNAKES RULE
(ง ͡͡ ° ͜ ʖ ͡ °)ง
Slavery wouldn't exist into the 20th century, that's for sure. The South even allowed blacks to serve in the military and there were black plantation owners that owned slaves, including white slaves. In dire need of man power along with pressure on foreign powers and introduction of technology, slavery could have very well ended during the war or transition to the point where slaves were still such but imitated ancient world civilizations where slaves could own land, make money, and buy themselves out of freedom; indentured servants would be the best way to explain

Yeah, no.
Uh, yeas

http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/confederacy-approves-black-soldiers
Blacks fight for the Confederacy

http://americancivilwar.com/authors/black_slaveowners.htm
Black slave owners and slave owners in general were a small minority in the South

http://www.americanforeignrelations.com/A-D/Civil-War-Diplomacy-The-slavery-issue-and-the-end-of-confederate-diplomacy.html
Europe ignored the South because the North was going to free the slaves

http://listverse.com/2010/12/06/10-surprising-facts-about-the-confederacy/
Slavery was being rid away with in the south by 1864


Kinder Graham | Respected Invincible!
 
more |
XBL: TFL Blazing
PSN:
Steam:
ID: IchEsseKinder
IP: Logged

7,291 posts
TUNNEL SNAKES RULE
(ง ͡͡ ° ͜ ʖ ͡ °)ง
Boo-hoo, I call a war a certain name. That makes me the most biased person ever. The North was being aggressive to the South by trying to enforce high taxation that Southerners couldn't afford, along with trying to expand big government and quell the concept of a limited central government. What you know of the civil war is biased northern bullshit

> War of Northern Aggression
> South initiated the War

My sides are in orbit
And why did the South initiate the war? Because it was tired of the North's aggression, hence the term War of Northern Aggression. South was on a primarily defensive campaign to protect their land


I love how you honestly think this. The South had no place to start a war - they were wrong about the entire thing. They seceded because they couldn't accept that Lincoln won the election and were so afraid he would take their slaves and money away.
I love how you deny this. The South did have a place to start a war - they felt the government and half the country was an entire different entity that didn't represent the idea of small government the founding fathers had and with that, felt the social contract between and and government was shredded by the government

Lincoln didn't care about freeing the slaves, he only did so for strategic purposes and supported the idea of sending them to Africa


 
challengerX
| custom title
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: challengerX
IP: Logged

41,942 posts
I DONT GIVE A SINGLE -blam!- MOTHER -blam!-ER ITS A MOTHER -blam!-ING FORUM, OH WOW, YOU HAVE THE WORD NINJA BELOW YOUR NAME, HOW MOTHER -blam!-ING COOL, NOT, YOUR ARE NOTHING TO ME BUT A BRAINWASHED PIECE OF SHIT BLOGGER, PEOPLE ONLY LIKE YOU BECAUSE YOU HAVE NINJA BELOW YOUR NAME, SO PLEASE PUNCH YOURAELF IN THE FACE AND STAB YOUR EYE BECAUSE YOU ARE NOTHING BUT A PIECE OF SHIT OF SOCIETY
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


Kinder Graham | Respected Invincible!
 
more |
XBL: TFL Blazing
PSN:
Steam:
ID: IchEsseKinder
IP: Logged

7,291 posts
TUNNEL SNAKES RULE
(ง ͡͡ ° ͜ ʖ ͡ °)ง
>Admits South started war
>it was a defensive declaration of aggression

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOL
That stupid lol shit makes you look incredibly stupid and a waste of time to have a civil discussion with. Really, either actually make some sense and contribute to the thread or fucking don't

It was a defensive declaration. And actually, the South simply seceded and only attacked because Unions troops were illegally in their territory 


Jocephalopod | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: joecephalopod
PSN:
Steam: j0cephalopod
ID: Jocephalopod
IP: Logged

8,352 posts
 
i can smell it...




 
Alternative Facts
| Mythic Forum Ninja
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: IcyWind
IP: Logged

9,381 posts
 
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/confederacy-approves-black-soldiers
Blacks fight for the Confederacy

http://americancivilwar.com/authors/black_slaveowners.htm
Black slave owners and slave owners in general were a small minority in the South

http://www.americanforeignrelations.com/A-D/Civil-War-Diplomacy-The-slavery-issue-and-the-end-of-confederate-diplomacy.html
Europe ignored the South because the North was going to free the slaves

http://listverse.com/2010/12/06/10-surprising-facts-about-the-confederacy/
Slavery was being rid away with in the south by 1864

Question - Do you actually read your sources, or just Google something, see a title that helps your argument, and post it?

From your first source, SECOND paragraph, about the South using slaves as soldiers:

Quote
The situation was bleak for the Confederates in the spring of 1865. The Yankees had captured large swaths of Southern territory, General William T. Sherman's Union army was tearing through the Carolinas, and General Robert E. Lee was trying valiantly to hold the Confederate capital of Richmond, Virginia, against General Ulysses S. Grant's growing force. Lee and Confederate President Jefferson Davis had only two options. One was for Lee to unite with General Joseph Johnston's army in the Carolinas and use the combined force to take on Sherman and Grant one at a time. The other option was to arm slaves, the last source of fresh manpower in the Confederacy.

As you can see by my bolded portions for you, the South did not let slaves serve out of the goodness of their hearts. They had to let slaves serve because they didn't have more men to actually fight the North. You can twist it how you want and say the South was good for it, but they didn't even let the men who serve be free, as from the same source.

Quote
Lee asked that the slaves be freed as a condition of fighting, but the bill that passed the Confederate Congress on March 13, 1865, did not stipulate freedom for those who served.

So, there goes that point for you. Onto your third source, where you say that Europe ignored the South over slaves, you're partially incorrect. Slavery was a reason that came far later in 1862. Prior to that, Europe never recognized the South as an independent state, the Northern agriculture was far more beneficial to Europe during a grain shortage, and cotton could be made in India and Asia.

And source four. Your "The South was getting rid of slavery, they were good!" Directly from your source...

Quote
Most historians believe that the Confederacy only started to abandon slavery once their defeat was imminent.

Slavery wasn’t abolished until 1868, 3 years after the war. Thus Kentucky, Missouri, Maryland and Delaware still had slaves.