Except I know exactly what I'm talking about which is why you can't even make an argument and have no idea what you're talking about.
You fantasize and imagine yourself being intelligent over most of the other losers here, some major accomplishment that is, when in reality you're just another pathetic squirt that wants to be special and whore attention on internet forums because your life is that miserable.
Your entire argument is invalid because the very fabric of it does not work. The economy of the world has already failed, and it will never be corrected without completely starting anew.
I know you will never accept the truth and will continue remaining in your cognitive dissonance as always.
It HAS failed, did you seriously not see our debt?
Clinton only increased the debt, what are you talking about? He increased it by trillions.
Quote from: Camnator on January 17, 2015, 08:17:18 AMClinton only increased the debt, what are you talking about? He increased it by trillions.
To add to that, Clinton left us with a $200 BILLION surplus.
Exactly, he still increased the debt.
That is different then increasing the overall debt.
After he baselessly questioned my intelligence after I was correcting him and explaining why he was wrong
I care about problems and desire actual solutions to them that won't make things worse. It's blatantly obviously you have no grasp of economics which is why you're not even beginning to see reality here.
Of course you want to think that because you realize you're wrong.
The economy didn't "grow" under Clinton, we simply lived a bigger lie as our money became even more worthless.
. . .
Quote from: Meta Cognition on January 17, 2015, 05:02:42 PMQuote from: Camnator on January 17, 2015, 04:56:25 PM. . . You keep espousing this idea that your arguments are based on history and experience, and are appreciative of facts, but I'm yet to lay witness to this awe-inspiring rationality. I'm still waiting for you to say some even remotely meaningful when it comes to what we know about the economy. Now, the fact that you want to claim some sort of epistemic authority while making cryptic statements about picking up a 'bigger stick' and robbing from the entire world, then all it does is demonstrate your sheer lack of understanding. Inflation was stable during Clinton's tenure, and the economy did grow. If you had the appreciation of facts you claim to have, you'd know this and understand that everything I'm telling you is based in evidence and looking at prior monetary policy to see what works, and what economic indicators actually tell us what is working. So far, however, nobody has been fortunate enough to lay witness to your clear superiority on this issue. So--much like God--you must forgive us when we question its existence.All you have to do is look at the world around you and do a little research. Follow the money. I've said many meaningful things, you just can't grasp the concept. I recommend you read this entire thread three or four times, it may help you. The only one lacking understanding is you. Look at all of the recent wars we've been in. You want me to give you a history lesson because you're slow? Sorry, not going to happen. I've said what needs to be said. If you think what we currently have is working, there is no helping you.
Quote from: Camnator on January 17, 2015, 04:56:25 PM. . . You keep espousing this idea that your arguments are based on history and experience, and are appreciative of facts, but I'm yet to lay witness to this awe-inspiring rationality. I'm still waiting for you to say some even remotely meaningful when it comes to what we know about the economy. Now, the fact that you want to claim some sort of epistemic authority while making cryptic statements about picking up a 'bigger stick' and robbing from the entire world, then all it does is demonstrate your sheer lack of understanding. Inflation was stable during Clinton's tenure, and the economy did grow. If you had the appreciation of facts you claim to have, you'd know this and understand that everything I'm telling you is based in evidence and looking at prior monetary policy to see what works, and what economic indicators actually tell us what is working. So far, however, nobody has been fortunate enough to lay witness to your clear superiority on this issue. So--much like God--you must forgive us when we question its existence.
Quote from: Κγ£β’α΄₯β’Κγ£ Nick Mc Κγ£β’α΄₯β’Κγ£ on January 17, 2015, 07:49:56 PMQuote from: Camnator on January 17, 2015, 07:47:54 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on January 17, 2015, 05:02:42 PMQuote from: Camnator on January 17, 2015, 04:56:25 PM. . . You keep espousing this idea that your arguments are based on history and experience, and are appreciative of facts, but I'm yet to lay witness to this awe-inspiring rationality. I'm still waiting for you to say some even remotely meaningful when it comes to what we know about the economy. Now, the fact that you want to claim some sort of epistemic authority while making cryptic statements about picking up a 'bigger stick' and robbing from the entire world, then all it does is demonstrate your sheer lack of understanding. Inflation was stable during Clinton's tenure, and the economy did grow. If you had the appreciation of facts you claim to have, you'd know this and understand that everything I'm telling you is based in evidence and looking at prior monetary policy to see what works, and what economic indicators actually tell us what is working. So far, however, nobody has been fortunate enough to lay witness to your clear superiority on this issue. So--much like God--you must forgive us when we question its existence.All you have to do is look at the world around you and do a little research. Follow the money. I've said many meaningful things, you just can't grasp the concept. I recommend you read this entire thread three or four times, it may help you. The only one lacking understanding is you. Look at all of the recent wars we've been in. You want me to give you a history lesson because you're slow? Sorry, not going to happen. I've said what needs to be said. If you think what we currently have is working, there is no helping you."My only argument here is to say that I'm right, you're wrong. I don't need any basis or statistics to back it up, I'm just out here for a sTROLL."I have backed up my argument, which you'd realize if you actually read the thread.
Quote from: Camnator on January 17, 2015, 07:47:54 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on January 17, 2015, 05:02:42 PMQuote from: Camnator on January 17, 2015, 04:56:25 PM. . . You keep espousing this idea that your arguments are based on history and experience, and are appreciative of facts, but I'm yet to lay witness to this awe-inspiring rationality. I'm still waiting for you to say some even remotely meaningful when it comes to what we know about the economy. Now, the fact that you want to claim some sort of epistemic authority while making cryptic statements about picking up a 'bigger stick' and robbing from the entire world, then all it does is demonstrate your sheer lack of understanding. Inflation was stable during Clinton's tenure, and the economy did grow. If you had the appreciation of facts you claim to have, you'd know this and understand that everything I'm telling you is based in evidence and looking at prior monetary policy to see what works, and what economic indicators actually tell us what is working. So far, however, nobody has been fortunate enough to lay witness to your clear superiority on this issue. So--much like God--you must forgive us when we question its existence.All you have to do is look at the world around you and do a little research. Follow the money. I've said many meaningful things, you just can't grasp the concept. I recommend you read this entire thread three or four times, it may help you. The only one lacking understanding is you. Look at all of the recent wars we've been in. You want me to give you a history lesson because you're slow? Sorry, not going to happen. I've said what needs to be said. If you think what we currently have is working, there is no helping you."My only argument here is to say that I'm right, you're wrong. I don't need any basis or statistics to back it up, I'm just out here for a sTROLL."
The European Central Bank is finally doing something--but it won't be enough
