Theology hasn't asserted the ontological argument for hundreds of years.
m8 do u evn plntinga
I don't, actually. I've never read any of his works, and I don't really count his Wikipedia page and a few links , like I just read, as such. So he took the original argument and tried to justify it using modern logic techniques? I haven't studied modal logic so I'm not familiar with it.
He tried to use the form of modal logic to obfuscate the arguments obvious flaws.