]I've seen plenty, she practically babies you. It's really awkward.
Pretty sure I didn't.
Please point out a single instance where I called you anything other than naive, which isn't an insult. I'm asking for fair and consistent moderation. If they're going to ban Slash, then they should have banned you too.
Quote from: Mr Psychologist on October 15, 2015, 11:21:26 AMQuote from: challengerX on October 15, 2015, 11:16:52 AMQuote from: Mr Psychologist on October 15, 2015, 11:12:17 AMThank you meta for saving the thread from itself.Let's try those last few posts again shall we?Oh but of course when I say it its bullshit that needs to be proven. Yes. Thank you Meta. For saying the exact same thing I just said.No, I mean for continuing the discussion from the point you made rather than just letting the flaming carry on.I know what you said was correct because I actually read that same article when it came out <_<I've never read that article in my life. I know what I'm saying is true because it's simple psychology and it's an easy conclusion to reach. Of course let's all pat Meta on the back though because he copy and pasted a link.
Quote from: challengerX on October 15, 2015, 11:16:52 AMQuote from: Mr Psychologist on October 15, 2015, 11:12:17 AMThank you meta for saving the thread from itself.Let's try those last few posts again shall we?Oh but of course when I say it its bullshit that needs to be proven. Yes. Thank you Meta. For saying the exact same thing I just said.No, I mean for continuing the discussion from the point you made rather than just letting the flaming carry on.I know what you said was correct because I actually read that same article when it came out <_<
Quote from: Mr Psychologist on October 15, 2015, 11:12:17 AMThank you meta for saving the thread from itself.Let's try those last few posts again shall we?Oh but of course when I say it its bullshit that needs to be proven. Yes. Thank you Meta. For saying the exact same thing I just said.
Thank you meta for saving the thread from itself.Let's try those last few posts again shall we?
This is the Serious forum. We supposedly have strict moderation now. You insulted me on at least 4 maybe 5 occasions now. You should be banned. That, or unban Slash.
Being watched while getting unchanged or w/e would be uncomfortable, but it's a worthwhile sacrifice to catch literally every criminal ever.
I've seen enough.
Well, I've already amended my opinion to exclude mandatory surveillance indoors.
It's the way she agrees and coddles you so you don't get mad at her. Because she's afraid of having an argument with you.
Quote from: Prehistoric on October 15, 2015, 11:35:45 AMBeing watched while getting unchanged or w/e would be uncomfortable, but it's a worthwhile sacrifice to catch literally every criminal ever.It's like you guys have never heard of a ski mask.
Quote from: Verbatim on October 15, 2015, 11:38:38 AMWell, I've already amended my opinion to exclude mandatory surveillance indoors.The problem with consent-based surveillance is that the people who don't have anything to hide will allow it, and everyone else won't. We don't need to surveil the people who are okay with being watched as much as everyone else.
Exactly. She doesn't stand her ground on what she says.
Quote from: Verbatim on October 15, 2015, 12:04:02 PMQuote from: challengerX on October 15, 2015, 12:00:42 PMExactly. She doesn't stand her ground on what she says.So what. Not everyone is as opinionated as you or I, and she does actually have a set of convictions of her own. She's just conflict-averse, and there's nothing wrong with that.I personally think it's really lame. But my point is that's how she interacts, especially with you. Hence, coddling. Just drop the subject already bro.
Quote from: challengerX on October 15, 2015, 12:00:42 PMExactly. She doesn't stand her ground on what she says.So what. Not everyone is as opinionated as you or I, and she does actually have a set of convictions of her own. She's just conflict-averse, and there's nothing wrong with that.
You realize that's impossible right?
Quote from: Verbatim on October 15, 2015, 12:15:24 PMQuote from: challengerX on October 15, 2015, 12:01:32 PMYou realize that's impossible right?If you honestly can't see the utility in discussing hypothetical scenarios, then kindly get the fuck out. It's not as pointless as it seems.It's as fruitful as arguing about mythological creatures.
Quote from: challengerX on October 15, 2015, 12:01:32 PMYou realize that's impossible right?If you honestly can't see the utility in discussing hypothetical scenarios, then kindly get the fuck out. It's not as pointless as it seems.
friends =/= circle jerkBro
Or you can just ask them and cut out the filler.
Quote from: challengerX on October 15, 2015, 12:24:11 PMOr you can just ask them and cut out the filler.I don't think that's possible with Verb; pages upon pages of his arguments are more about semantics and definitions than the topic itself. If you just ask him "what do you mean by x" and argue on that, it saves hours of time on pointless bickering. Really, most of his positions require fillers (and filters) to discuss in the first place.
Quote from: Prime Megaten on October 15, 2015, 12:35:35 PMQuote from: challengerX on October 15, 2015, 12:24:11 PMOr you can just ask them and cut out the filler.I don't think that's possible with Verb; pages upon pages of his arguments are more about semantics and definitions than the topic itself. If you just ask him "what do you mean by x" and argue on that, it saves hours of time on pointless bickering. Really, most of his positions require fillers (and filters) to discuss in the first place.people should just learn what shit means tbh