Rand is irrelevant.

Huckabee's a nice enough guy but batshit insane.

Rubio is incredibly strong on foreign policy, and managed to finish well.

Cruz is just nuts.

Carson is a likable guy, but he doesn't seem to have the temperament to be President.

Trump is trump.

Bush was probably the strongest performer; he managed to defend his record well, especially on the issue of drugs. The fact that Republicans are cheering for rehabilitation and treatment is a godsend to US politics. However, he finished incredibly weakly.

Scott Walker is just as irrelevant as Rand Paul.

Carly Fiorina reminds me of Margaret Thatcher; principled and resolute. When it comes down to it though, she seems to be largely spinning shit. Rebuilding the sixth fleet? Jesus.

Kasich was weak throughout the entire debate. He didn't open or close strongly, and he seemed to fumble about a lot. Ultimately, he was just rather boring. He has a solid record, but he doesn't stand out.

Christie just came off as sanctimonious.

Thus far, it seems Bush would be the best choice. Although his polls are dropping; it seems like the strongest contender who isn't Trump or Fiorina is Rubio, and he has the largest capacity to drag the Republican Party into modernity despite his lunatic views on Cuba.

But no, Rubio > Bush.

Bush easily for me.

Quote from: challengerX on September 20, 2015, 07:54:58 PM

If I was in a room with Stalin, Hitler, and a republican candidate for the presidency and was given a gun that has 30 shots I would shoot the republican 30 times.

Eh I would've shot Toby Flenderson.

OT: I'd say Bush.

Your avatar was incredibly relevant to that post.

At least you guys have a chance of something happening. Maybe even half decent.

You know what's going on in Canada right now? Either vote our current shit PM in again, or vote for other parties who are worse and will likely drag everything down into shit more than it already is.

Obama