They armed Al Qaeda when the USSR invaded Afghanistan. I think it was AQ, anyway.
Quote from: Bacon on November 25, 2015, 08:03:10 AMThey armed Al Qaeda when the USSR invaded Afghanistan. I think it was AQ, anyway.It was either them or the Taliban......or was it both?
No? No one has directly armed ISIS, most of what they have is acquired when they take ground from opposition.
Quote from: gatsby on November 25, 2015, 08:12:25 AMNo? No one has directly armed ISIS, most of what they have is acquired when they take ground from opposition.Didn't Russia reveal that America helped? I'm probably on about something completely different
Quote from: SuperIrish on November 25, 2015, 08:04:50 AMQuote from: Bacon on November 25, 2015, 08:03:10 AMThey armed Al Qaeda when the USSR invaded Afghanistan. I think it was AQ, anyway.It was either them or the Taliban......or was it both?Honestly though, it's better to check a reliable news source than here.It was neither. They armed the Mujahideen, of which the Taliban broke off and became their own evil little group. This is also over exaggerated, because if you noticed they have far more Russian weapons than American. However, the point here is that America has funded and armed the Syrian Rebels which have been taken over by various terror groups, ISIS being one of the main ones.
Quote from: Bacon on November 25, 2015, 08:03:10 AMThey armed Al Qaeda when the USSR invaded Afghanistan. I think it was AQ, anyway.It was either them or the Taliban......or was it both?Honestly though, it's better to check a reliable news source than here.
I feel like we're responsible for arming a lot of Middle Eastern groups or countries we hate. Am I wrong?
There's videos of ISIS using American weapons and vehicles.
Quote from: Winy on November 27, 2015, 10:15:25 AMI feel like we're responsible for arming a lot of Middle Eastern groups or countries we hate. Am I wrong?Nope. If I had to take a guess, I'd say it's because people don't understand the political atmosphere in the Middle East as much as they think they do.
Quote from: Winy on November 27, 2015, 01:05:33 PMQuote from: Prime Megaten on November 27, 2015, 10:28:41 AMQuote from: Winy on November 27, 2015, 10:15:25 AMI feel like we're responsible for arming a lot of Middle Eastern groups or countries we hate. Am I wrong?Nope. If I had to take a guess, I'd say it's because people don't understand the political atmosphere in the Middle East as much as they think they do.I'm not disagreeing, but didn't Al-Qaeda have a bunch of US military equipment? Where'd they get it? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Wilson_%28Texas_politician%29
Quote from: Prime Megaten on November 27, 2015, 10:28:41 AMQuote from: Winy on November 27, 2015, 10:15:25 AMI feel like we're responsible for arming a lot of Middle Eastern groups or countries we hate. Am I wrong?Nope. If I had to take a guess, I'd say it's because people don't understand the political atmosphere in the Middle East as much as they think they do.I'm not disagreeing, but didn't Al-Qaeda have a bunch of US military equipment? Where'd they get it?
Quote from: Big Boss on November 25, 2015, 08:15:42 AMQuote from: gatsby on November 25, 2015, 08:12:25 AMNo? No one has directly armed ISIS, most of what they have is acquired when they take ground from opposition.Didn't Russia reveal that America helped? I'm probably on about something completely differentLol that'd be rich coming from the Russians considering that they've mostly only bombed rebels and not ISIS. But yeah the US hasn't supported ISIS, publicly anyway. They may have done behind closed who knows.