Sexual orientation thread

I don't see why that isn't the case. Sexual attraction explicitly means that you would like sex with the person; no sexual attraction means no want.

I've been attracted to people without wanting to have sex with them. Most of my male-attractant's I wouldn't want to have sex with.

When I was a kid, I found the act of sex appalling and I never wanted to do more than kiss with a girl. Obviously that's changed, but it's entirely possible to be attracted to someone without wanting to have sex with them.

i mean, the existence of gloryholes kinda proves you right, sure

Kinsey Scale disagrees.

elaborate

Beware, this website might just be your kryptonite.

but you know what people do if they're having sex with someone they don't consider attractive?
or someone they can't see?

they fantasize

What about someone who jerks off while doing nothing? They don't fantasize, they just stroke themselves? You can still come from that.

but you know what people do if they're having sex with someone they don't consider attractive?
or someone they can't see?

they fantasize

What about someone who jerks off while doing nothing? They don't fantasize, they just stroke themselves? You can still come from that.

That'd be caused by stimulation. Rape victims can orgasm from the intercourse, but that doesn't mean they like it. That's what I've been saying a lot here: stimulation does not guarantee enjoyment.

That'd be caused by stimulation. Rape victims can orgasm from the intercourse, but that doesn't mean they like it. That's what I've been saying a lot here: stimulation does not guarantee enjoyment.

It doesn't necessarily mean that they won't enjoy it, either.

Well I mean, that's different. The person doesn't want to be raped. This person wants to come.

Beware, this website might just be your kryptonite.

i'm aware of the kinsey scale, i'm just confused as to how it ties into my statement about gloryholes

the man you could be fellating could be one ugly motherfucker behind that stall
but as long as he remains hidden, it doesn't matter--you can let your fantasies go wild

so there's still sexual attraction there
it's just all in your head

but as long as he remains hidden, it doesn't matter--you can let your fantasies go wild

but you don't necessarily need to fantasize to enjoy it.

You could be playing angry birds or something while he takes you from behind

and you could enjoy it i reckon

Beware, this website might just be your kryptonite.

i'm aware of the kinsey scale, i'm just confused as to how it ties into my statement about gloryholes

the man you could be performing fellatio on could be one ugly motherfucker behind that stall
but as long as he remains hidden, it doesn't matter--you can let your fantasies go wild

It ties in because it provides an understanding that many people aren't strictly gay or straight; there's a difference between wanting something up the poop-shoot and wanting a guy to do it.

I also just realized you were specifically referring to attraction on a person-by-person basis rather than by sex; in which case, yeah, it allows the two participants to create ideal fantasy partners.

but you don't necessarily need to fantasize to enjoy it.

You could be playing angry birds or something while he takes you from behind

and you could enjoy it i reckon

explain

i mean, you've been making a lot of wild statements here, and you've thusfar qualified 0 of them

explain

i mean, you've been making a lot of wild statements here, and you've thusfar qualified 0 of them

well i mean what is there to explain

it's not impossible for someone to simply like things shoved up the ass without the emotional sentiment of a man doing it

not sure how you'd want me to qualify that

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

I also just realized you were specifically referring to attraction on a person-by-person basis rather than by sex; in which case, yeah, it allows the two participants to create ideal fantasy partners.

exactly

It ties in because it provides an understanding that many people aren't strictly gay or straight; there's a difference between wanting something up the poop-shoot and wanting a guy to do it.

i'm well-aware

what snake seems to be saying is that there IS no difference between those two things

in the sense that wanting a guy to fuck you in the ass (as a male) can be not gay

which is just like
what

well i mean what is there to explain

it's not impossible for someone to simply like things shoved up the ass without the emotional sentiment of a man doing it

not sure how you'd want me to qualify that

i've already conceded (years ago, and at least twice in this very thread) that prostate stimulation isn't necessarily gay

but if you want another MAN to do it, because he's a MAN

then it is.

what snake seems to be saying is that there IS no difference between those two things

well there is a difference between wanting things up your ass and wanting a guy to do it, sure

but it's not inherently gay to have a man shove his dick up your ass if you just want something up your ass

but if you want another MAN to do it, because he's a MAN

then it is.

okay, i agree with that

yeah, that makes sense

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

okay, i agree with that

yeah, that makes sense

the reason i hate this discussion is because it needlessly complicates what should be an incredibly simple topic

most people who are straight wouldn't want to have their prostate stimulated by another man

that's why people attach a stigma to the whole gay-sex thing

and that's why when you start saying shit like "gay sex isn't necessarily gay", it kinda makes people go

"uhhhhh... what?"

and that's why when you start saying shit like "gay sex isn't necessarily gay", it kinda makes people go

"uhhhhh... what?"

Well tbh fam that was kinda the point lol. i'm texting this girl that takes forever to reply and i was bored lol

it is a thought i've been entertaining for awhile so i thought i'd try it out on yall

everybody is gay tbh

you guys have quite a rigid definition of sexuality

I mean it's such an unknown topic yet you guy seemed to have it figured out.

quoted for truth

you guys have quite a rigid definition of sexuality

I mean it's such an unknown topic yet you guy seemed to have it figured out.

Storms Scale, yo.

This thread would make him proud.

the kinsey scale is weird

what the fuck does "incidentally homosexual" mean

This thread would make him proud.

Freud had a number of silly ideas tbh. Probably doesn't help that he was such a narcissist.

the kinsey scale is weird

what the fuck does "incidentally homosexual" mean

"whoops, i put it in the butt"
?

the kinsey scale is weird

what the fuck does "incidentally homosexual" mean

If that's a 2, it would mean heterosexual with a few homosexual leanings.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

the kinsey scale is weird

what the fuck does "incidentally homosexual" mean

When you fuck a man in the ass and don't realize you like fucking men in the ass until later.

the kinsey scale is weird

what the fuck does "incidentally homosexual" mean

If that's a 2, it would mean heterosexual with a few homosexual leanings.

but what would make someone look at that scale and say, "oh, yeah, i'm definitely a 1--i'm incidentally homosexual"

like, what are "homosexual leanings"

i guess as a 0, it's kind of a bizarre concept to me

Kinsey isn't a god.