And another analyst said that analyst's testimony was faked using CGI and a voice synthesizer.Also, ISIS is secretly run by the Lizard People.
lol, guess who crreated isis?the us government
Quote from: DisturbedMind883 on January 26, 2015, 07:48:56 AMlol, guess who crreated isis?the us governmentLol, guess who's wrong?You.ISIS was founded in 1999 by a Jordanian-Iraqi militant.
Quote from: Meta Cognition on January 26, 2015, 10:52:46 AMQuote from: DisturbedMind883 on January 26, 2015, 07:48:56 AMlol, guess who crreated isis?the us governmentLol, guess who's wrong?You.ISIS was founded in 1999 by a Jordanian-Iraqi militant.no you idiot obama created it
who told you that?
Quote from: DisturbedMind883 on January 26, 2015, 03:22:21 PMwho told you that? I get understanding of a situation by looking at various sources of information; not from somebody's word. It was set up by a man named al-Zarqawi, who often took refuge in Iraq and took a leading role in the Insurgency post-2003.
it was a direct response to usa involvement
Quote from: DisturbedMind883 on January 26, 2015, 03:35:02 PMit was a direct response to usa involvementU.S. involvement in 1999? What the hell are you talking about, exactly? These groups exist, primarily, as a result of their religious beliefs. You can't claim things like the existence of ISIS, Saddam's harbouring of people like Abu Nidal or the rampant fundamentalism among the Arab--and even parts of the European--nations are a direct result of U.S. action. That's even more naive than the Bushite Neocons who claim we can set up democracies on a whim.
Quote from: Meta Cognition on January 26, 2015, 03:41:33 PMQuote from: DisturbedMind883 on January 26, 2015, 03:35:02 PMit was a direct response to usa involvementU.S. involvement in 1999? What the hell are you talking about, exactly? These groups exist, primarily, as a result of their religious beliefs. You can't claim things like the existence of ISIS, Saddam's harbouring of people like Abu Nidal or the rampant fundamentalism among the Arab--and even parts of the European--nations are a direct result of U.S. action. That's even more naive than the Bushite Neocons who claim we can set up democracies on a whim.no these groups exist primarily as a product of US involvment since the 1950s. all those years of the usa butting into the bussiness of others especially the mid east has caused the back blow we see today. whether or not they are Muslim
no these groups exist primarily as a product of US involvment since the 1950s.
Quote from: DisturbedMind883 on January 26, 2015, 04:03:35 PMno these groups exist primarily as a product of US involvment since the 1950s.That's just not true. Not only is it naive, but it's fundamentally masochistic to think the actions of people, who will hate you for not allowing them to commit genocide, are the direct product of your own actions. Not even considering that, however, what about the anti-Semitism rife among pre-1950s Palestine? What about the Barbary Pirates using the Qur'an as the justification for their actions in the early 1800s? Are you seriously going to try and tell me that such things are the result of U.S. (or any other Western country's involvement for that matter) actions? No. Of course you aren't.
ISIS It IS what it IS
JAPAN ISIS HOSTAGE - Analyst Says VIDEO FAKE & Manipulated With Green Screen
