President Trump hits majority disapproval in record time, Gallup finds

🍁 Aria 🔮 | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: D4C
IP: Logged

10,560 posts
His eyebrows sparkling, his white beard hangs down to his chest. The thatched mats, spread outside his chise, spread softly, his splendid attos. He polishes, cross-legged, his makiri, with his eyes completely absorbed.

He is Ainu.

The god of Ainu Mosir, Ae-Oine Kamuy, descendant of Okiku-Rumi, He perishes, a living corpse. The summers day, the white sunlight, unabrushed, ends simply through his breath alone.
Is this the same gallup that said Hillary has 98% chance of winning the election.
Yes, 98%, not 100%. Probability is funny like that; as it turns out, "unlikely" doesn't mean "impossible".

Approval ratings aren't probability, though. You could argue that it's not quite as low as seen given the ±3% margin of error, but then you're still looking at a 46% approval rating at the highest as of the 29th of January. It's not localized in say, Atlanta or Los Angeles, where they would likely be much lower; 1,500 US Adults have been surveyed nationally on a daily basis since the 23rd.

I understand being skeptical of news media given the awful coverage of the election, but if you're going to throw a source out entirely because they didn't start shouting to the public that Trump was a sure thing then you're only hurting yourself intellectually.


Korra | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Avatar Korra
IP: Logged

19,117 posts
uhhh...

- korrie
Bernies still has a chance!


 
challengerX
| custom title
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: challengerX
IP: Logged

41,942 posts
I DONT GIVE A SINGLE -blam!- MOTHER -blam!-ER ITS A MOTHER -blam!-ING FORUM, OH WOW, YOU HAVE THE WORD NINJA BELOW YOUR NAME, HOW MOTHER -blam!-ING COOL, NOT, YOUR ARE NOTHING TO ME BUT A BRAINWASHED PIECE OF SHIT BLOGGER, PEOPLE ONLY LIKE YOU BECAUSE YOU HAVE NINJA BELOW YOUR NAME, SO PLEASE PUNCH YOURAELF IN THE FACE AND STAB YOUR EYE BECAUSE YOU ARE NOTHING BUT A PIECE OF SHIT OF SOCIETY
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


Genghis Khan | Heroic Unstoppable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Karjala takaisin
IP: Logged

2,054 posts
 
Is this the same gallup that said Hillary has 98% chance of winning the election.
Yes, 98%, not 100%. Probability is funny like that; as it turns out, "unlikely" doesn't mean "impossible".

Approval ratings aren't probability, though. You could argue that it's not quite as low as seen given the ±3% margin of error, but then you're still looking at a 46% approval rating at the highest as of the 29th of January. It's not localized in say, Atlanta or Los Angeles, where they would likely be much lower; 1,500 US Adults have been surveyed nationally on a daily basis since the 23rd.

I understand being skeptical of news media given the awful coverage of the election, but if you're going to throw a source out entirely because they didn't start shouting to the public that Trump was a sure thing then you're only hurting yourself intellectually.
It was a question. I still don't trust that. I think the approval rate will rise when he begins to deliver his promises.


 
Alternative Facts
| Mythic Forum Ninja
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: IcyWind
IP: Logged

9,381 posts
 
Is this the same gallup that said Hillary has 98% chance of winning the election.
Yes, 98%, not 100%. Probability is funny like that; as it turns out, "unlikely" doesn't mean "impossible".

Approval ratings aren't probability, though. You could argue that it's not quite as low as seen given the ±3% margin of error, but then you're still looking at a 46% approval rating at the highest as of the 29th of January. It's not localized in say, Atlanta or Los Angeles, where they would likely be much lower; 1,500 US Adults have been surveyed nationally on a daily basis since the 23rd.

I understand being skeptical of news media given the awful coverage of the election, but if you're going to throw a source out entirely because they didn't start shouting to the public that Trump was a sure thing then you're only hurting yourself intellectually.
It was a question. I still don't trust that. I think the approval rate will rise when he begins to deliver his promises.

What's he been doing this first week?


Genghis Khan | Heroic Unstoppable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Karjala takaisin
IP: Logged

2,054 posts
 
Is this the same gallup that said Hillary has 98% chance of winning the election.
Yes, 98%, not 100%. Probability is funny like that; as it turns out, "unlikely" doesn't mean "impossible".

Approval ratings aren't probability, though. You could argue that it's not quite as low as seen given the ±3% margin of error, but then you're still looking at a 46% approval rating at the highest as of the 29th of January. It's not localized in say, Atlanta or Los Angeles, where they would likely be much lower; 1,500 US Adults have been surveyed nationally on a daily basis since the 23rd.

I understand being skeptical of news media given the awful coverage of the election, but if you're going to throw a source out entirely because they didn't start shouting to the public that Trump was a sure thing then you're only hurting yourself intellectually.
It was a question. I still don't trust that. I think the approval rate will rise when he begins to deliver his promises.

What's he been doing this first week?
More than Obama in the last 8 years.


Ian | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Gaara444
IP: Logged

9,246 posts
Signature goes here.
I was still in high school eight years ago. How active was Obama in his first couple of weeks?


 
Alternative Facts
| Mythic Forum Ninja
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: IcyWind
IP: Logged

9,381 posts
 
Is this the same gallup that said Hillary has 98% chance of winning the election.
Yes, 98%, not 100%. Probability is funny like that; as it turns out, "unlikely" doesn't mean "impossible".

Approval ratings aren't probability, though. You could argue that it's not quite as low as seen given the ±3% margin of error, but then you're still looking at a 46% approval rating at the highest as of the 29th of January. It's not localized in say, Atlanta or Los Angeles, where they would likely be much lower; 1,500 US Adults have been surveyed nationally on a daily basis since the 23rd.

I understand being skeptical of news media given the awful coverage of the election, but if you're going to throw a source out entirely because they didn't start shouting to the public that Trump was a sure thing then you're only hurting yourself intellectually.
It was a question. I still don't trust that. I think the approval rate will rise when he begins to deliver his promises.

What's he been doing this first week?
More than Obama in the last 8 years.

Not too sure you understand American politics.


 
Luciana
| Mythic Forum Ninja
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Luciana
IP: Logged

13,232 posts
 
I was still in high school eight years ago. How active was Obama in his first couple of weeks?
That's a very good question. I myself was pretty young.


 
Luciana
| Mythic Forum Ninja
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Luciana
IP: Logged

13,232 posts
 


 
Alternative Facts
| Mythic Forum Ninja
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: IcyWind
IP: Logged

9,381 posts
 
I was still in high school eight years ago. How active was Obama in his first couple of weeks?
That's a very good question. I myself was pretty young.

First 100 day stuff here

Couldn't find anything smaller than that


MyNameIsCharlie | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: MyNameIsCharlie
IP: Logged

7,789 posts
Get of my lawn
1) The polling data wasn't inaccurate. How it was interpreted was. Hillary won the popular vote by a landslide. She just ignored where she needed electorate votes.

2) This isn't a prediction. It's a poll on his performance.

3) This data is expected. More than half of Trump's now constituents hate him because of point 1.


Ian | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Gaara444
IP: Logged

9,246 posts
Signature goes here.
3 Million out of 128 million that was cast is not a landslide, nor was it her ignoring where she needed the electoral votes. Trump merely was able to flip states that were considered blue strongholds.

Hillary won the popular vote by a landslide.


Genghis Khan | Heroic Unstoppable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Karjala takaisin
IP: Logged

2,054 posts
 
Alex Jones has a video where Trump won the popular vote when you ignore the illegal immigrants that voted.


Ian | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Gaara444
IP: Logged

9,246 posts
Signature goes here.
What sources are there of illegal immigrants voting? I only see mere speculation on the matter.

Alex Jones has a video where Trump won the popular vote when you ignore the illegal immigrants that voted.


 
Alternative Facts
| Mythic Forum Ninja
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: IcyWind
IP: Logged

9,381 posts
 
Alex Jones has a video where Trump won the popular vote when you ignore the illegal immigrants that voted.

He really just used Alex Jones as a source.



 
Luciana
| Mythic Forum Ninja
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Luciana
IP: Logged

13,232 posts
 
Alex Jones has a video where Trump won the popular vote when you ignore the illegal immigrants that voted.

He really just used Alex Jones as a source.
I thought it was sarcasm lol


MyNameIsCharlie | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: MyNameIsCharlie
IP: Logged

7,789 posts
Get of my lawn
3 Million out of 128 million that was cast is not a landslide, nor was it her ignoring where she needed the electoral votes. Trump merely was able to flip states that were considered blue strongholds.

Hillary won the popular vote by a landslide.

One of the largest differences in election history. Three million is significant. And Hillary fucked up. Big time. Her "firewall" strategy was stupid.

But none of this refutes any of my points.