Awesome.
Just another step in making our military weaker. China is laughing right now.
Quote from: εANUDDA SHOAHε on June 30, 2016, 07:00:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:56:20 PMQuote from: εANUDDA SHOAHε on June 30, 2016, 06:54:47 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:22:50 PMQuote from: εANUDDA SHOAHε on June 30, 2016, 05:54:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 05:09:51 PMThis doesn't cause ANY problems with unit cohesion, I'm sure. But god forbid we let women serve in combat roles.Co-ed combat units are simply less effective. The IDF proved it. Get bent out of shape elsewhere.Less effective =/= not effective at allOur country would be "more effective" if we executed all the homeless people on welfare. Doesn't make it right.You have to have a permanent residence to get welfare.You understand the sentiment of my comment. Efficacy isn't morality. We could kill all the jobless people who use state benefits and our country would be better off, but it's still evil as hell.Efficiency keeps you alive. The military is an inherently discriminatory environment and needs to be to operate at peak in mission critical areas. fuckin civies REEEEEEEEEEEELol, nope. The US military is bloated as hell. It could be half the size and efficient and we would still be fine defense-wise.
Quote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:56:20 PMQuote from: εANUDDA SHOAHε on June 30, 2016, 06:54:47 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:22:50 PMQuote from: εANUDDA SHOAHε on June 30, 2016, 05:54:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 05:09:51 PMThis doesn't cause ANY problems with unit cohesion, I'm sure. But god forbid we let women serve in combat roles.Co-ed combat units are simply less effective. The IDF proved it. Get bent out of shape elsewhere.Less effective =/= not effective at allOur country would be "more effective" if we executed all the homeless people on welfare. Doesn't make it right.You have to have a permanent residence to get welfare.You understand the sentiment of my comment. Efficacy isn't morality. We could kill all the jobless people who use state benefits and our country would be better off, but it's still evil as hell.Efficiency keeps you alive. The military is an inherently discriminatory environment and needs to be to operate at peak in mission critical areas. fuckin civies REEEEEEEEEEEE
Quote from: εANUDDA SHOAHε on June 30, 2016, 06:54:47 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:22:50 PMQuote from: εANUDDA SHOAHε on June 30, 2016, 05:54:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 05:09:51 PMThis doesn't cause ANY problems with unit cohesion, I'm sure. But god forbid we let women serve in combat roles.Co-ed combat units are simply less effective. The IDF proved it. Get bent out of shape elsewhere.Less effective =/= not effective at allOur country would be "more effective" if we executed all the homeless people on welfare. Doesn't make it right.You have to have a permanent residence to get welfare.You understand the sentiment of my comment. Efficacy isn't morality. We could kill all the jobless people who use state benefits and our country would be better off, but it's still evil as hell.
Quote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:22:50 PMQuote from: εANUDDA SHOAHε on June 30, 2016, 05:54:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 05:09:51 PMThis doesn't cause ANY problems with unit cohesion, I'm sure. But god forbid we let women serve in combat roles.Co-ed combat units are simply less effective. The IDF proved it. Get bent out of shape elsewhere.Less effective =/= not effective at allOur country would be "more effective" if we executed all the homeless people on welfare. Doesn't make it right.You have to have a permanent residence to get welfare.
Quote from: εANUDDA SHOAHε on June 30, 2016, 05:54:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 05:09:51 PMThis doesn't cause ANY problems with unit cohesion, I'm sure. But god forbid we let women serve in combat roles.Co-ed combat units are simply less effective. The IDF proved it. Get bent out of shape elsewhere.Less effective =/= not effective at allOur country would be "more effective" if we executed all the homeless people on welfare. Doesn't make it right.
Quote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 05:09:51 PMThis doesn't cause ANY problems with unit cohesion, I'm sure. But god forbid we let women serve in combat roles.Co-ed combat units are simply less effective. The IDF proved it. Get bent out of shape elsewhere.
This doesn't cause ANY problems with unit cohesion, I'm sure. But god forbid we let women serve in combat roles.
Quote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 07:02:54 PMQuote from: εANUDDA SHOAHε on June 30, 2016, 07:00:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:56:20 PMQuote from: εANUDDA SHOAHε on June 30, 2016, 06:54:47 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:22:50 PMQuote from: εANUDDA SHOAHε on June 30, 2016, 05:54:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 05:09:51 PMThis doesn't cause ANY problems with unit cohesion, I'm sure. But god forbid we let women serve in combat roles.Co-ed combat units are simply less effective. The IDF proved it. Get bent out of shape elsewhere.Less effective =/= not effective at allOur country would be "more effective" if we executed all the homeless people on welfare. Doesn't make it right.You have to have a permanent residence to get welfare.You understand the sentiment of my comment. Efficacy isn't morality. We could kill all the jobless people who use state benefits and our country would be better off, but it's still evil as hell.Efficiency keeps you alive. The military is an inherently discriminatory environment and needs to be to operate at peak in mission critical areas. fuckin civies REEEEEEEEEEEELol, nope. The US military is bloated as hell. It could be half the size and efficient and we would still be fine defense-wise.No, we wouldn't. Do you not realize just where we put our troops around the world?Slicing it in half would bankrupt us in a lot of places.
Quote from: Luciana on June 30, 2016, 09:34:40 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 07:02:54 PMQuote from: εANUDDA SHOAHε on June 30, 2016, 07:00:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:56:20 PMQuote from: εANUDDA SHOAHε on June 30, 2016, 06:54:47 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:22:50 PMQuote from: εANUDDA SHOAHε on June 30, 2016, 05:54:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 05:09:51 PMThis doesn't cause ANY problems with unit cohesion, I'm sure. But god forbid we let women serve in combat roles.Co-ed combat units are simply less effective. The IDF proved it. Get bent out of shape elsewhere.Less effective =/= not effective at allOur country would be "more effective" if we executed all the homeless people on welfare. Doesn't make it right.You have to have a permanent residence to get welfare.You understand the sentiment of my comment. Efficacy isn't morality. We could kill all the jobless people who use state benefits and our country would be better off, but it's still evil as hell.Efficiency keeps you alive. The military is an inherently discriminatory environment and needs to be to operate at peak in mission critical areas. fuckin civies REEEEEEEEEEEELol, nope. The US military is bloated as hell. It could be half the size and efficient and we would still be fine defense-wise.No, we wouldn't. Do you not realize just where we put our troops around the world?Slicing it in half would bankrupt us in a lot of places.Yeah, and we don't need to have troops in all those places.
lmao no
Good rebuttal let's just leave South KoreaIs the word 'deterrent' foreign to you? That's what the US military is at this point.
Quote from: Luciana on June 30, 2016, 11:19:38 PMGood rebuttal let's just leave South KoreaIs the word 'deterrent' foreign to you? That's what the US military is at this point.you know there's no problems when we spend a third of our budget on defense
Quote from: Tyger on July 01, 2016, 12:06:17 AMOnly about 20% of military spending is payroll The problem with military spending isn't its size, it's that we spend crazy shit like an estimated trillion dollars for the f-35 jsf program when we have perfectly good jets alreadyHello boeingThe F35 itself is fucking fine, although care should be taken to keep such a money sink from happening in the future. Someone should have known it would be this costly.You MUST be vigilant in keeping your advanced aircraft development ahead. Air superiority is THE deciding factor in modern warfare. It is incredibly essential that we be as far ahead of the Chinese as possible.
Only about 20% of military spending is payroll The problem with military spending isn't its size, it's that we spend crazy shit like an estimated trillion dollars for the f-35 jsf program when we have perfectly good jets already
Quote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 05:09:51 PMThis doesn't cause ANY problems with unit cohesion, I'm sure. But god forbid we let women serve in combat roles.Why do you want women to have more roles for killing other humans so badly? Instead of encouraging violence why not instead fight to end wars or have less of them?
Pentagon ends transgender ban
