The Pentagon said Thursday it was ending the ban on transgender people being able to serve openly in the U.S. military.The announcement -- which removes one of the last barriers to military service by any individual -- was made by Defense Secretary Ash Carter, who had been studying the issue for almost a year. The decision comes as the military has witnessed major changes in the role of women and the inclusion of gays, lesbians and bisexual service members in recent years.
[Inflammatory contrarian remark used to incite discussion instead of sheep posting]
hi mordo
Okay but when are sodomy and crossdressing going to be dropped from the UCMJ?
This doesn't cause ANY problems with unit cohesion, I'm sure. But god forbid we let women serve in combat roles.
Quote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 05:09:51 PMThis doesn't cause ANY problems with unit cohesion, I'm sure. But god forbid we let women serve in combat roles.Co-ed combat units are simply less effective. The IDF proved it. Get bent out of shape elsewhere.
Quote from: Ian on June 30, 2016, 01:32:22 PM[Inflammatory contrarian remark used to incite discussion instead of sheep posting]hi mordo
Quote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 05:54:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 05:09:51 PMThis doesn't cause ANY problems with unit cohesion, I'm sure. But god forbid we let women serve in combat roles.Co-ed combat units are simply less effective. The IDF proved it. Get bent out of shape elsewhere.Less effective =/= not effective at allOur country would be "more effective" if we executed all the homeless people on welfare. Doesn't make it right.
Quote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:22:50 PMQuote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 05:54:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 05:09:51 PMThis doesn't cause ANY problems with unit cohesion, I'm sure. But god forbid we let women serve in combat roles.Co-ed combat units are simply less effective. The IDF proved it. Get bent out of shape elsewhere.Less effective =/= not effective at allOur country would be "more effective" if we executed all the homeless people on welfare. Doesn't make it right.You have to have a permanent residence to get welfare.
Quote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 06:54:47 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:22:50 PMQuote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 05:54:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 05:09:51 PMThis doesn't cause ANY problems with unit cohesion, I'm sure. But god forbid we let women serve in combat roles.Co-ed combat units are simply less effective. The IDF proved it. Get bent out of shape elsewhere.Less effective =/= not effective at allOur country would be "more effective" if we executed all the homeless people on welfare. Doesn't make it right.You have to have a permanent residence to get welfare.You understand the sentiment of my comment. Efficacy isn't morality. We could kill all the jobless people who use state benefits and our country would be better off, but it's still evil as hell.
Quote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:56:20 PMQuote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 06:54:47 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:22:50 PMQuote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 05:54:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 05:09:51 PMThis doesn't cause ANY problems with unit cohesion, I'm sure. But god forbid we let women serve in combat roles.Co-ed combat units are simply less effective. The IDF proved it. Get bent out of shape elsewhere.Less effective =/= not effective at allOur country would be "more effective" if we executed all the homeless people on welfare. Doesn't make it right.You have to have a permanent residence to get welfare.You understand the sentiment of my comment. Efficacy isn't morality. We could kill all the jobless people who use state benefits and our country would be better off, but it's still evil as hell.Efficiency keeps you alive. The military is an inherently discriminatory environment and needs to be to operate at peak in mission critical areas. fuckin civies REEEEEEEEEEEE
Quote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 07:02:54 PMQuote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 07:00:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:56:20 PMQuote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 06:54:47 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:22:50 PMQuote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 05:54:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 05:09:51 PMThis doesn't cause ANY problems with unit cohesion, I'm sure. But god forbid we let women serve in combat roles.Co-ed combat units are simply less effective. The IDF proved it. Get bent out of shape elsewhere.Less effective =/= not effective at allOur country would be "more effective" if we executed all the homeless people on welfare. Doesn't make it right.You have to have a permanent residence to get welfare.You understand the sentiment of my comment. Efficacy isn't morality. We could kill all the jobless people who use state benefits and our country would be better off, but it's still evil as hell.Efficiency keeps you alive. The military is an inherently discriminatory environment and needs to be to operate at peak in mission critical areas. fuckin civies REEEEEEEEEEEELol, nope. The US military is bloated as hell. It could be half the size and efficient and we would still be fine defense-wise.That isn't what he was talking about at all you autist.
Quote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 07:00:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:56:20 PMQuote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 06:54:47 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:22:50 PMQuote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 05:54:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 05:09:51 PMThis doesn't cause ANY problems with unit cohesion, I'm sure. But god forbid we let women serve in combat roles.Co-ed combat units are simply less effective. The IDF proved it. Get bent out of shape elsewhere.Less effective =/= not effective at allOur country would be "more effective" if we executed all the homeless people on welfare. Doesn't make it right.You have to have a permanent residence to get welfare.You understand the sentiment of my comment. Efficacy isn't morality. We could kill all the jobless people who use state benefits and our country would be better off, but it's still evil as hell.Efficiency keeps you alive. The military is an inherently discriminatory environment and needs to be to operate at peak in mission critical areas. fuckin civies REEEEEEEEEEEELol, nope. The US military is bloated as hell. It could be half the size and efficient and we would still be fine defense-wise.
Quote from: challengerX on June 30, 2016, 07:12:28 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 07:02:54 PMQuote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 07:00:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:56:20 PMQuote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 06:54:47 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:22:50 PMQuote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 05:54:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 05:09:51 PMThis doesn't cause ANY problems with unit cohesion, I'm sure. But god forbid we let women serve in combat roles.Co-ed combat units are simply less effective. The IDF proved it. Get bent out of shape elsewhere.Less effective =/= not effective at allOur country would be "more effective" if we executed all the homeless people on welfare. Doesn't make it right.You have to have a permanent residence to get welfare.You understand the sentiment of my comment. Efficacy isn't morality. We could kill all the jobless people who use state benefits and our country would be better off, but it's still evil as hell.Efficiency keeps you alive. The military is an inherently discriminatory environment and needs to be to operate at peak in mission critical areas. fuckin civies REEEEEEEEEEEELol, nope. The US military is bloated as hell. It could be half the size and efficient and we would still be fine defense-wise.That isn't what he was talking about at all you autist.Lives - of soldiers, civilians, men, women, or children - isn't as important as morality and human rights.
Quote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 07:20:13 PMQuote from: challengerX on June 30, 2016, 07:12:28 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 07:02:54 PMQuote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 07:00:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:56:20 PMQuote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 06:54:47 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:22:50 PMQuote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 05:54:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 05:09:51 PMThis doesn't cause ANY problems with unit cohesion, I'm sure. But god forbid we let women serve in combat roles.Co-ed combat units are simply less effective. The IDF proved it. Get bent out of shape elsewhere.Less effective =/= not effective at allOur country would be "more effective" if we executed all the homeless people on welfare. Doesn't make it right.You have to have a permanent residence to get welfare.You understand the sentiment of my comment. Efficacy isn't morality. We could kill all the jobless people who use state benefits and our country would be better off, but it's still evil as hell.Efficiency keeps you alive. The military is an inherently discriminatory environment and needs to be to operate at peak in mission critical areas. fuckin civies REEEEEEEEEEEELol, nope. The US military is bloated as hell. It could be half the size and efficient and we would still be fine defense-wise.That isn't what he was talking about at all you autist.Lives - of soldiers, civilians, men, women, or children - isn't as important as morality and human rights.Except they are far more important. If black people fucked up unit cohesion then get fucked dindus. Couldn't care less about bullshit moral values.
Quote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 07:28:45 PMQuote from: challengerX on June 30, 2016, 07:26:42 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 07:20:13 PMQuote from: challengerX on June 30, 2016, 07:12:28 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 07:02:54 PMQuote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 07:00:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:56:20 PMQuote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 06:54:47 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:22:50 PMQuote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 05:54:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 05:09:51 PMThis doesn't cause ANY problems with unit cohesion, I'm sure. But god forbid we let women serve in combat roles.Co-ed combat units are simply less effective. The IDF proved it. Get bent out of shape elsewhere.Less effective =/= not effective at allOur country would be "more effective" if we executed all the homeless people on welfare. Doesn't make it right.You have to have a permanent residence to get welfare.You understand the sentiment of my comment. Efficacy isn't morality. We could kill all the jobless people who use state benefits and our country would be better off, but it's still evil as hell.Efficiency keeps you alive. The military is an inherently discriminatory environment and needs to be to operate at peak in mission critical areas. fuckin civies REEEEEEEEEEEELol, nope. The US military is bloated as hell. It could be half the size and efficient and we would still be fine defense-wise.That isn't what he was talking about at all you autist.Lives - of soldiers, civilians, men, women, or children - isn't as important as morality and human rights.Except they are far more important. If black people fucked up unit cohesion then get fucked dindus. Couldn't care less about bullshit moral values.This opinion is evil.If men are allowed to do something, women should be allowed to do it. Otherwise, that's a sexist miscarriage of justice.If whites are allowed to do something, blacks should be allowed to do it. Otherwise, that's a racist miscarriage of justice.
Quote from: challengerX on June 30, 2016, 07:26:42 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 07:20:13 PMQuote from: challengerX on June 30, 2016, 07:12:28 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 07:02:54 PMQuote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 07:00:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:56:20 PMQuote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 06:54:47 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:22:50 PMQuote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 05:54:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 05:09:51 PMThis doesn't cause ANY problems with unit cohesion, I'm sure. But god forbid we let women serve in combat roles.Co-ed combat units are simply less effective. The IDF proved it. Get bent out of shape elsewhere.Less effective =/= not effective at allOur country would be "more effective" if we executed all the homeless people on welfare. Doesn't make it right.You have to have a permanent residence to get welfare.You understand the sentiment of my comment. Efficacy isn't morality. We could kill all the jobless people who use state benefits and our country would be better off, but it's still evil as hell.Efficiency keeps you alive. The military is an inherently discriminatory environment and needs to be to operate at peak in mission critical areas. fuckin civies REEEEEEEEEEEELol, nope. The US military is bloated as hell. It could be half the size and efficient and we would still be fine defense-wise.That isn't what he was talking about at all you autist.Lives - of soldiers, civilians, men, women, or children - isn't as important as morality and human rights.Except they are far more important. If black people fucked up unit cohesion then get fucked dindus. Couldn't care less about bullshit moral values.This opinion is evil.If men are allowed to do something, women should be allowed to do it. Otherwise, that's a sexist miscarriage of justice.If whites are allowed to do something, blacks should be allowed to do it. Otherwise, that's a racist miscarriage of justice.
Quote from: challengerX on June 30, 2016, 07:29:42 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 07:28:45 PMQuote from: challengerX on June 30, 2016, 07:26:42 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 07:20:13 PMQuote from: challengerX on June 30, 2016, 07:12:28 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 07:02:54 PMQuote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 07:00:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:56:20 PMQuote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 06:54:47 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:22:50 PMQuote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 05:54:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 05:09:51 PMThis doesn't cause ANY problems with unit cohesion, I'm sure. But god forbid we let women serve in combat roles.Co-ed combat units are simply less effective. The IDF proved it. Get bent out of shape elsewhere.Less effective =/= not effective at allOur country would be "more effective" if we executed all the homeless people on welfare. Doesn't make it right.You have to have a permanent residence to get welfare.You understand the sentiment of my comment. Efficacy isn't morality. We could kill all the jobless people who use state benefits and our country would be better off, but it's still evil as hell.Efficiency keeps you alive. The military is an inherently discriminatory environment and needs to be to operate at peak in mission critical areas. fuckin civies REEEEEEEEEEEELol, nope. The US military is bloated as hell. It could be half the size and efficient and we would still be fine defense-wise.That isn't what he was talking about at all you autist.Lives - of soldiers, civilians, men, women, or children - isn't as important as morality and human rights.Except they are far more important. If black people fucked up unit cohesion then get fucked dindus. Couldn't care less about bullshit moral values.This opinion is evil.If men are allowed to do something, women should be allowed to do it. Otherwise, that's a sexist miscarriage of justice.If whites are allowed to do something, blacks should be allowed to do it. Otherwise, that's a racist miscarriage of justice.using words to communicate is hard
Quote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 07:53:43 PMQuote from: challengerX on June 30, 2016, 07:29:42 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 07:28:45 PMQuote from: challengerX on June 30, 2016, 07:26:42 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 07:20:13 PMQuote from: challengerX on June 30, 2016, 07:12:28 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 07:02:54 PMQuote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 07:00:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:56:20 PMQuote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 06:54:47 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 06:22:50 PMQuote from: 卐ANUDDA SHOAH卐 on June 30, 2016, 05:54:44 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 30, 2016, 05:09:51 PMThis doesn't cause ANY problems with unit cohesion, I'm sure. But god forbid we let women serve in combat roles.Co-ed combat units are simply less effective. The IDF proved it. Get bent out of shape elsewhere.Less effective =/= not effective at allOur country would be "more effective" if we executed all the homeless people on welfare. Doesn't make it right.You have to have a permanent residence to get welfare.You understand the sentiment of my comment. Efficacy isn't morality. We could kill all the jobless people who use state benefits and our country would be better off, but it's still evil as hell.Efficiency keeps you alive. The military is an inherently discriminatory environment and needs to be to operate at peak in mission critical areas. fuckin civies REEEEEEEEEEEELol, nope. The US military is bloated as hell. It could be half the size and efficient and we would still be fine defense-wise.That isn't what he was talking about at all you autist.Lives - of soldiers, civilians, men, women, or children - isn't as important as morality and human rights.Except they are far more important. If black people fucked up unit cohesion then get fucked dindus. Couldn't care less about bullshit moral values.This opinion is evil.If men are allowed to do something, women should be allowed to do it. Otherwise, that's a sexist miscarriage of justice.If whites are allowed to do something, blacks should be allowed to do it. Otherwise, that's a racist miscarriage of justice.using words to communicate is hard the message was pretty clear, thoughit was a stupid message, but it was a clear message
Pentagon ends transgender ban
