Obama's ISIS War Powers Request Heads to Congress President Barack Obama on Wednesday formally asked lawmakers for a three-year authorization for the use of force against ISIS. The broad outline sent to Capitol Hill prohibits "enduring offensive ground forces" and limits engagement to three years. The White House hopes that the limitations will assuage the concerns of skeptics on both sides of the aisle who are wary of another conflict in the Middle East, while offering broad enough language to facilitate the demise of the terror organization. In a letter accompanying the document, Obama emphasized that the draft proposal "would not authorize long-term, large-scale ground combat operations like those our Nation conducted in Iraq and Afghanistan." "Local forces, rather than U.S. military forces, should be deployed to conduct such operations," he wrote. "The authorization I propose would provide the flexibility to conduct ground combat operations in other, more limited circumstances, such as rescue operations involving U.S. or coalition personnel or the use of special operations forces to take military action against ISIL leadership." Congress has not approved such authorization for the use of force since 2002, when George W. Bush pushed for strikes in Iraq. Senate Democrats were briefed on the plans Tuesday by White House Counsel Neil Eggleston. Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois said that some Democrats are concerned that the term "enduring offensive ground operations" might be too vague. "What does it mean, how long, how big is 'enduring'? 'Offensive,' what's 'offensive' when it comes to the Department of Defense? And 'ground operations,' I guess that's a little easier to describe," he told reporters after the briefing. "But we have some legitimate questions about whether we open this up with a loophole that could lead to another major war." GOP Sen. Bob Corker, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said in a statement that "rigorous hearings" will soon begin "where the administration will have an opportunity to provide Congress and the American people greater clarity on the U.S. strategy to address ISIS, particularly in Syria." Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine, a Democrat who has sometimes clashed with the president on war powers issues, said in a statement that he supports the draft measure's repeal of the 2002 authorization and the three-year sunset. "But," he added, "I am concerned about the breadth and vagueness of the U.S. ground troop language and will seek to clarify it."
>Going to war against an organization like ISISlmaoIt's like the US learned absolutely nothing from the Taliban and Al Qaeda
More than 2 bombs was needed
Quote from: Naru (γ£ββΏβ)γ£ on February 11, 2015, 12:06:14 PMMore than 2 bombs was neededDepends on the size of the bomb.
*Nobel Peace Prize intensifies*
bring people in for war crimes
It's about time.We never should've left Iraq when we did.
Quote from: Luciana on February 12, 2015, 08:13:03 PMbring people in for war crimesConsidering Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld aren't locked up, I doubt that'll ever happen.