Quote from: Risay117 on December 21, 2014, 08:55:49 PMQuote from: CAESAR JIHADIVS on December 21, 2014, 08:01:49 PMQuote from: Risay117 on December 21, 2014, 07:58:35 PMHonestly i personally believe that since the beginning SAA has changed slowly but changed, and become a strong anti-insurgency force. With time we will start to see them do better, and if the oil value comes back up next year well guess what? Russia is back in the game as well as Iran.New trained units have sprung from the SAA side that have changed the game and honestly if one year is given and certain gains are made, well the SAA wins. Honestly the bases they lost in Idlib were undersieged and were expected to fall. Most of the troops retreated to SAA lines and the only if i remember SAA base in enemy lines is Deir-e-Azor. That the SAA can win maybe in a year or more. So now we have trenches.The battles in the west and south will decide how the future will end up.I guess the SAA will never truly lose the war since Iran and Russia have made it clear that they will never allow Assad to fall...Well they may not, the question though i have is when does the war end.I used to support Assad until I thought of this very question. The answer is that the war never ends as long as Assad remains in power. He's like Maliki. Literally having any leader other than Assad would do wonders for the broken peace process.
Quote from: CAESAR JIHADIVS on December 21, 2014, 08:01:49 PMQuote from: Risay117 on December 21, 2014, 07:58:35 PMHonestly i personally believe that since the beginning SAA has changed slowly but changed, and become a strong anti-insurgency force. With time we will start to see them do better, and if the oil value comes back up next year well guess what? Russia is back in the game as well as Iran.New trained units have sprung from the SAA side that have changed the game and honestly if one year is given and certain gains are made, well the SAA wins. Honestly the bases they lost in Idlib were undersieged and were expected to fall. Most of the troops retreated to SAA lines and the only if i remember SAA base in enemy lines is Deir-e-Azor. That the SAA can win maybe in a year or more. So now we have trenches.The battles in the west and south will decide how the future will end up.I guess the SAA will never truly lose the war since Iran and Russia have made it clear that they will never allow Assad to fall...Well they may not, the question though i have is when does the war end.
Quote from: Risay117 on December 21, 2014, 07:58:35 PMHonestly i personally believe that since the beginning SAA has changed slowly but changed, and become a strong anti-insurgency force. With time we will start to see them do better, and if the oil value comes back up next year well guess what? Russia is back in the game as well as Iran.New trained units have sprung from the SAA side that have changed the game and honestly if one year is given and certain gains are made, well the SAA wins. Honestly the bases they lost in Idlib were undersieged and were expected to fall. Most of the troops retreated to SAA lines and the only if i remember SAA base in enemy lines is Deir-e-Azor. That the SAA can win maybe in a year or more. So now we have trenches.The battles in the west and south will decide how the future will end up.I guess the SAA will never truly lose the war since Iran and Russia have made it clear that they will never allow Assad to fall...
Honestly i personally believe that since the beginning SAA has changed slowly but changed, and become a strong anti-insurgency force. With time we will start to see them do better, and if the oil value comes back up next year well guess what? Russia is back in the game as well as Iran.New trained units have sprung from the SAA side that have changed the game and honestly if one year is given and certain gains are made, well the SAA wins. Honestly the bases they lost in Idlib were undersieged and were expected to fall. Most of the troops retreated to SAA lines and the only if i remember SAA base in enemy lines is Deir-e-Azor. That the SAA can win maybe in a year or more. So now we have trenches.The battles in the west and south will decide how the future will end up.
Quote from: CAESAR JIHADIVS on December 21, 2014, 08:57:47 PMQuote from: Risay117 on December 21, 2014, 08:55:49 PMQuote from: CAESAR JIHADIVS on December 21, 2014, 08:01:49 PMQuote from: Risay117 on December 21, 2014, 07:58:35 PMHonestly i personally believe that since the beginning SAA has changed slowly but changed, and become a strong anti-insurgency force. With time we will start to see them do better, and if the oil value comes back up next year well guess what? Russia is back in the game as well as Iran.New trained units have sprung from the SAA side that have changed the game and honestly if one year is given and certain gains are made, well the SAA wins. Honestly the bases they lost in Idlib were undersieged and were expected to fall. Most of the troops retreated to SAA lines and the only if i remember SAA base in enemy lines is Deir-e-Azor. That the SAA can win maybe in a year or more. So now we have trenches.The battles in the west and south will decide how the future will end up.I guess the SAA will never truly lose the war since Iran and Russia have made it clear that they will never allow Assad to fall...Well they may not, the question though i have is when does the war end.I used to support Assad until I thought of this very question. The answer is that the war never ends as long as Assad remains in power. He's like Maliki. Literally having any leader other than Assad would do wonders for the broken peace process.Personally i disagree on this. Assad can stay in power now, and actually can garner support that is necessary to remain. Mainly the long war will tire everyone out and people will prefer to keep the status quo than to start another struggle. Honestly it depends on who you listen to but due to the war and atrocities by ISIS and the likes, the actions of the SAA is very welcoming to the people. While on the other hand you have the SAA barrel bombing places and causing havoc.Honestly the problem in Syria is that the pro-regime forces have grown a cult following behind Assad and his Generals, and the removal of Assad would have a devastating blow to the the regime forces morally. Assad seems to most people the solution to some progress and a new start.Anyway enough of this debate, personally i feel like Assad will remain in power till the end of the war and after the end he will step down after some time and let someone else in.
Quote from: Risay117 on December 22, 2014, 12:12:51 AMQuote from: CAESAR JIHADIVS on December 21, 2014, 08:57:47 PMQuote from: Risay117 on December 21, 2014, 08:55:49 PMQuote from: CAESAR JIHADIVS on December 21, 2014, 08:01:49 PMQuote from: Risay117 on December 21, 2014, 07:58:35 PMHonestly i personally believe that since the beginning SAA has changed slowly but changed, and become a strong anti-insurgency force. With time we will start to see them do better, and if the oil value comes back up next year well guess what? Russia is back in the game as well as Iran.New trained units have sprung from the SAA side that have changed the game and honestly if one year is given and certain gains are made, well the SAA wins. Honestly the bases they lost in Idlib were undersieged and were expected to fall. Most of the troops retreated to SAA lines and the only if i remember SAA base in enemy lines is Deir-e-Azor. That the SAA can win maybe in a year or more. So now we have trenches.The battles in the west and south will decide how the future will end up.I guess the SAA will never truly lose the war since Iran and Russia have made it clear that they will never allow Assad to fall...Well they may not, the question though i have is when does the war end.I used to support Assad until I thought of this very question. The answer is that the war never ends as long as Assad remains in power. He's like Maliki. Literally having any leader other than Assad would do wonders for the broken peace process.Personally i disagree on this. Assad can stay in power now, and actually can garner support that is necessary to remain. Mainly the long war will tire everyone out and people will prefer to keep the status quo than to start another struggle. Honestly it depends on who you listen to but due to the war and atrocities by ISIS and the likes, the actions of the SAA is very welcoming to the people. While on the other hand you have the SAA barrel bombing places and causing havoc.Honestly the problem in Syria is that the pro-regime forces have grown a cult following behind Assad and his Generals, and the removal of Assad would have a devastating blow to the the regime forces morally. Assad seems to most people the solution to some progress and a new start.Anyway enough of this debate, personally i feel like Assad will remain in power till the end of the war and after the end he will step down after some time and let someone else in.It's actually really funny. Back when I used to post on B.net, there was a person I would always debate about what to do in Syria, and we could never agree or compromise. The funny part is that I was extremely pro-Assad and he was extremely anti-Assad. And for me to defend the anti-Assad side only 6 months later...
Quote from: CAESAR JIHADIVS on December 22, 2014, 12:15:02 AMQuote from: Risay117 on December 22, 2014, 12:12:51 AMQuote from: CAESAR JIHADIVS on December 21, 2014, 08:57:47 PMQuote from: Risay117 on December 21, 2014, 08:55:49 PMQuote from: CAESAR JIHADIVS on December 21, 2014, 08:01:49 PMQuote from: Risay117 on December 21, 2014, 07:58:35 PMHonestly i personally believe that since the beginning SAA has changed slowly but changed, and become a strong anti-insurgency force. With time we will start to see them do better, and if the oil value comes back up next year well guess what? Russia is back in the game as well as Iran.New trained units have sprung from the SAA side that have changed the game and honestly if one year is given and certain gains are made, well the SAA wins. Honestly the bases they lost in Idlib were undersieged and were expected to fall. Most of the troops retreated to SAA lines and the only if i remember SAA base in enemy lines is Deir-e-Azor. That the SAA can win maybe in a year or more. So now we have trenches.The battles in the west and south will decide how the future will end up.I guess the SAA will never truly lose the war since Iran and Russia have made it clear that they will never allow Assad to fall...Well they may not, the question though i have is when does the war end.I used to support Assad until I thought of this very question. The answer is that the war never ends as long as Assad remains in power. He's like Maliki. Literally having any leader other than Assad would do wonders for the broken peace process.Personally i disagree on this. Assad can stay in power now, and actually can garner support that is necessary to remain. Mainly the long war will tire everyone out and people will prefer to keep the status quo than to start another struggle. Honestly it depends on who you listen to but due to the war and atrocities by ISIS and the likes, the actions of the SAA is very welcoming to the people. While on the other hand you have the SAA barrel bombing places and causing havoc.Honestly the problem in Syria is that the pro-regime forces have grown a cult following behind Assad and his Generals, and the removal of Assad would have a devastating blow to the the regime forces morally. Assad seems to most people the solution to some progress and a new start.Anyway enough of this debate, personally i feel like Assad will remain in power till the end of the war and after the end he will step down after some time and let someone else in.It's actually really funny. Back when I used to post on B.net, there was a person I would always debate about what to do in Syria, and we could never agree or compromise. The funny part is that I was extremely pro-Assad and he was extremely anti-Assad. And for me to defend the anti-Assad side only 6 months later...Are you per chance a new member or a throwaway alt?
Quote from: Risay117 on December 22, 2014, 12:16:07 AMQuote from: CAESAR JIHADIVS on December 22, 2014, 12:15:02 AMQuote from: Risay117 on December 22, 2014, 12:12:51 AMQuote from: CAESAR JIHADIVS on December 21, 2014, 08:57:47 PMQuote from: Risay117 on December 21, 2014, 08:55:49 PMQuote from: CAESAR JIHADIVS on December 21, 2014, 08:01:49 PMQuote from: Risay117 on December 21, 2014, 07:58:35 PMHonestly i personally believe that since the beginning SAA has changed slowly but changed, and become a strong anti-insurgency force. With time we will start to see them do better, and if the oil value comes back up next year well guess what? Russia is back in the game as well as Iran.New trained units have sprung from the SAA side that have changed the game and honestly if one year is given and certain gains are made, well the SAA wins. Honestly the bases they lost in Idlib were undersieged and were expected to fall. Most of the troops retreated to SAA lines and the only if i remember SAA base in enemy lines is Deir-e-Azor. That the SAA can win maybe in a year or more. So now we have trenches.The battles in the west and south will decide how the future will end up.I guess the SAA will never truly lose the war since Iran and Russia have made it clear that they will never allow Assad to fall...Well they may not, the question though i have is when does the war end.I used to support Assad until I thought of this very question. The answer is that the war never ends as long as Assad remains in power. He's like Maliki. Literally having any leader other than Assad would do wonders for the broken peace process.Personally i disagree on this. Assad can stay in power now, and actually can garner support that is necessary to remain. Mainly the long war will tire everyone out and people will prefer to keep the status quo than to start another struggle. Honestly it depends on who you listen to but due to the war and atrocities by ISIS and the likes, the actions of the SAA is very welcoming to the people. While on the other hand you have the SAA barrel bombing places and causing havoc.Honestly the problem in Syria is that the pro-regime forces have grown a cult following behind Assad and his Generals, and the removal of Assad would have a devastating blow to the the regime forces morally. Assad seems to most people the solution to some progress and a new start.Anyway enough of this debate, personally i feel like Assad will remain in power till the end of the war and after the end he will step down after some time and let someone else in.It's actually really funny. Back when I used to post on B.net, there was a person I would always debate about what to do in Syria, and we could never agree or compromise. The funny part is that I was extremely pro-Assad and he was extremely anti-Assad. And for me to defend the anti-Assad side only 6 months later...Are you per chance a new member or a throwaway alt?Neither.You may know me as Comms Officer or Weed Commando though.
SYRIA THREAD TIME!!!!!!!
