Quote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 07:44:00 PMthe two of you are really acting quite petty. You thought it was "worth mentioning" that I liked one of his posts because he pointed out how you ignored my point in favour of answering a question that was obviously rhetorical. I then explained this to you. I'm not the petty one here, mate.
the two of you are really acting quite petty.
Quote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 07:44:00 PMQuote from: i cum in peace on January 10, 2017, 07:33:26 PMQuote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 07:28:38 PMQuote from: i cum in peace on January 10, 2017, 07:13:46 PMQuote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 07:03:35 PMworth noting: meta only responded to 1/2 of my OP so him liking chally's post is v funny/10. i love you guysBecause my issue was with you claiming he was a martyr, which was the focal point of your post. You ignored the focal point of my post to answer a rhetorical question, the entire purpose of which was to lead on to the next point. The two aren't comparable.oh no its the end of the worldMe explaining to you why you're an idiot does not mean I think it's a big deal. You're making something of a habit of stupidity. I'd advise against it.i didnt originally respond to the second part of your post because i dont consider the point you made to be invalid. they dont need martyrs to motivate them, but that's not what i was saying- the idea is that a cause can be made stronger with a martyr, even if the change is subtle. if you dont consider that to be a big enough issue to waive the death penalty, so be it. im not trying to evangelize my belief that he should be kept alive and made to labor. i didnt come in here looking to argue with people over whether we should kill this piece of shit or make him work.chally nitpicking the way i responded to you was unnecessary and the two of you are really acting quite petty. fuck you too pal.You don't want to argue yet you come in here with your snarky tone and condescend to us.Be respectful and I'm more than happy to have a civil discussion with you about this subject and any other.
Quote from: i cum in peace on January 10, 2017, 07:33:26 PMQuote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 07:28:38 PMQuote from: i cum in peace on January 10, 2017, 07:13:46 PMQuote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 07:03:35 PMworth noting: meta only responded to 1/2 of my OP so him liking chally's post is v funny/10. i love you guysBecause my issue was with you claiming he was a martyr, which was the focal point of your post. You ignored the focal point of my post to answer a rhetorical question, the entire purpose of which was to lead on to the next point. The two aren't comparable.oh no its the end of the worldMe explaining to you why you're an idiot does not mean I think it's a big deal. You're making something of a habit of stupidity. I'd advise against it.i didnt originally respond to the second part of your post because i dont consider the point you made to be invalid. they dont need martyrs to motivate them, but that's not what i was saying- the idea is that a cause can be made stronger with a martyr, even if the change is subtle. if you dont consider that to be a big enough issue to waive the death penalty, so be it. im not trying to evangelize my belief that he should be kept alive and made to labor. i didnt come in here looking to argue with people over whether we should kill this piece of shit or make him work.chally nitpicking the way i responded to you was unnecessary and the two of you are really acting quite petty. fuck you too pal.
Quote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 07:28:38 PMQuote from: i cum in peace on January 10, 2017, 07:13:46 PMQuote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 07:03:35 PMworth noting: meta only responded to 1/2 of my OP so him liking chally's post is v funny/10. i love you guysBecause my issue was with you claiming he was a martyr, which was the focal point of your post. You ignored the focal point of my post to answer a rhetorical question, the entire purpose of which was to lead on to the next point. The two aren't comparable.oh no its the end of the worldMe explaining to you why you're an idiot does not mean I think it's a big deal. You're making something of a habit of stupidity. I'd advise against it.
Quote from: i cum in peace on January 10, 2017, 07:13:46 PMQuote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 07:03:35 PMworth noting: meta only responded to 1/2 of my OP so him liking chally's post is v funny/10. i love you guysBecause my issue was with you claiming he was a martyr, which was the focal point of your post. You ignored the focal point of my post to answer a rhetorical question, the entire purpose of which was to lead on to the next point. The two aren't comparable.oh no its the end of the world
Quote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 07:03:35 PMworth noting: meta only responded to 1/2 of my OP so him liking chally's post is v funny/10. i love you guysBecause my issue was with you claiming he was a martyr, which was the focal point of your post. You ignored the focal point of my post to answer a rhetorical question, the entire purpose of which was to lead on to the next point. The two aren't comparable.
worth noting: meta only responded to 1/2 of my OP so him liking chally's post is v funny/10. i love you guys
Quote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 07:51:54 PMQuote from: challengerX on January 10, 2017, 07:49:24 PMQuote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 07:44:00 PMQuote from: i cum in peace on January 10, 2017, 07:33:26 PMQuote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 07:28:38 PMQuote from: i cum in peace on January 10, 2017, 07:13:46 PMQuote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 07:03:35 PMworth noting: meta only responded to 1/2 of my OP so him liking chally's post is v funny/10. i love you guysBecause my issue was with you claiming he was a martyr, which was the focal point of your post. You ignored the focal point of my post to answer a rhetorical question, the entire purpose of which was to lead on to the next point. The two aren't comparable.oh no its the end of the worldMe explaining to you why you're an idiot does not mean I think it's a big deal. You're making something of a habit of stupidity. I'd advise against it.i didnt originally respond to the second part of your post because i dont consider the point you made to be invalid. they dont need martyrs to motivate them, but that's not what i was saying- the idea is that a cause can be made stronger with a martyr, even if the change is subtle. if you dont consider that to be a big enough issue to waive the death penalty, so be it. im not trying to evangelize my belief that he should be kept alive and made to labor. i didnt come in here looking to argue with people over whether we should kill this piece of shit or make him work.chally nitpicking the way i responded to you was unnecessary and the two of you are really acting quite petty. fuck you too pal.You don't want to argue yet you come in here with your snarky tone and condescend to us.Be respectful and I'm more than happy to have a civil discussion with you about this subject and any other.im being condescending and snarky in this thread? thats an interesting appraisal of the situation.Reread the thread
Quote from: challengerX on January 10, 2017, 07:49:24 PMQuote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 07:44:00 PMQuote from: i cum in peace on January 10, 2017, 07:33:26 PMQuote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 07:28:38 PMQuote from: i cum in peace on January 10, 2017, 07:13:46 PMQuote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 07:03:35 PMworth noting: meta only responded to 1/2 of my OP so him liking chally's post is v funny/10. i love you guysBecause my issue was with you claiming he was a martyr, which was the focal point of your post. You ignored the focal point of my post to answer a rhetorical question, the entire purpose of which was to lead on to the next point. The two aren't comparable.oh no its the end of the worldMe explaining to you why you're an idiot does not mean I think it's a big deal. You're making something of a habit of stupidity. I'd advise against it.i didnt originally respond to the second part of your post because i dont consider the point you made to be invalid. they dont need martyrs to motivate them, but that's not what i was saying- the idea is that a cause can be made stronger with a martyr, even if the change is subtle. if you dont consider that to be a big enough issue to waive the death penalty, so be it. im not trying to evangelize my belief that he should be kept alive and made to labor. i didnt come in here looking to argue with people over whether we should kill this piece of shit or make him work.chally nitpicking the way i responded to you was unnecessary and the two of you are really acting quite petty. fuck you too pal.You don't want to argue yet you come in here with your snarky tone and condescend to us.Be respectful and I'm more than happy to have a civil discussion with you about this subject and any other.im being condescending and snarky in this thread? thats an interesting appraisal of the situation.
i humored you
Quote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 07:49:50 PMi humored you Why should I offer you anything given how you've been nothing but a condescending twat since you first replied? You made a point about him being a martyr, I then challenged it and instead of saying "I don't disagree, I just don't think it's worth killing him" you gave me a non-response trying to feign some kind of disagreement. Challenger pointed out how you utterly ignored my argument, then you were like LOL GUYS META FUCKING IGNORED HALF OF MY POST TOO when your point about the 13th Amendment was an explicit follow on from the point about martyrdom. . .I mean, what the fuck conversation are you reading? Because it's not the one I'm reading.
Quote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 07:54:08 PMQuote from: challengerX on January 10, 2017, 07:53:23 PMQuote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 07:51:54 PMQuote from: challengerX on January 10, 2017, 07:49:24 PMQuote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 07:44:00 PMQuote from: i cum in peace on January 10, 2017, 07:33:26 PMQuote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 07:28:38 PMQuote from: i cum in peace on January 10, 2017, 07:13:46 PMQuote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 07:03:35 PMworth noting: meta only responded to 1/2 of my OP so him liking chally's post is v funny/10. i love you guysBecause my issue was with you claiming he was a martyr, which was the focal point of your post. You ignored the focal point of my post to answer a rhetorical question, the entire purpose of which was to lead on to the next point. The two aren't comparable.oh no its the end of the worldMe explaining to you why you're an idiot does not mean I think it's a big deal. You're making something of a habit of stupidity. I'd advise against it.i didnt originally respond to the second part of your post because i dont consider the point you made to be invalid. they dont need martyrs to motivate them, but that's not what i was saying- the idea is that a cause can be made stronger with a martyr, even if the change is subtle. if you dont consider that to be a big enough issue to waive the death penalty, so be it. im not trying to evangelize my belief that he should be kept alive and made to labor. i didnt come in here looking to argue with people over whether we should kill this piece of shit or make him work.chally nitpicking the way i responded to you was unnecessary and the two of you are really acting quite petty. fuck you too pal.You don't want to argue yet you come in here with your snarky tone and condescend to us.Be respectful and I'm more than happy to have a civil discussion with you about this subject and any other.im being condescending and snarky in this thread? thats an interesting appraisal of the situation.Reread the threadok i snarked to you a bit after your petty ass post. wow. how damning.If you read from the beginning, you cut Meta's posts knowing you're basically ignoring his rebuttal to your statement then drawing a little arrow pointing to yourself. You're being snarky. Then you continued to be condescending with the rest of your replies. What's funny is that you're surprised at our reactions and that you think we are the ones behaving that way. Honestly, you're projecting.
Quote from: challengerX on January 10, 2017, 07:53:23 PMQuote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 07:51:54 PMQuote from: challengerX on January 10, 2017, 07:49:24 PMQuote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 07:44:00 PMQuote from: i cum in peace on January 10, 2017, 07:33:26 PMQuote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 07:28:38 PMQuote from: i cum in peace on January 10, 2017, 07:13:46 PMQuote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 07:03:35 PMworth noting: meta only responded to 1/2 of my OP so him liking chally's post is v funny/10. i love you guysBecause my issue was with you claiming he was a martyr, which was the focal point of your post. You ignored the focal point of my post to answer a rhetorical question, the entire purpose of which was to lead on to the next point. The two aren't comparable.oh no its the end of the worldMe explaining to you why you're an idiot does not mean I think it's a big deal. You're making something of a habit of stupidity. I'd advise against it.i didnt originally respond to the second part of your post because i dont consider the point you made to be invalid. they dont need martyrs to motivate them, but that's not what i was saying- the idea is that a cause can be made stronger with a martyr, even if the change is subtle. if you dont consider that to be a big enough issue to waive the death penalty, so be it. im not trying to evangelize my belief that he should be kept alive and made to labor. i didnt come in here looking to argue with people over whether we should kill this piece of shit or make him work.chally nitpicking the way i responded to you was unnecessary and the two of you are really acting quite petty. fuck you too pal.You don't want to argue yet you come in here with your snarky tone and condescend to us.Be respectful and I'm more than happy to have a civil discussion with you about this subject and any other.im being condescending and snarky in this thread? thats an interesting appraisal of the situation.Reread the threadok i snarked to you a bit after your petty ass post. wow. how damning.
QuoteβSometimes sitting in my cell,β Mr. Roof wrote while in jail, βI think about how nice it would be to watch a movie or eat some good food or drive my car somewhere, but then I remember how I felt when I did these things, and how I knew I had to do something. And then I realize it was worth it.βhttps://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/10/us/dylann-roof-trial-charleston.html
βSometimes sitting in my cell,β Mr. Roof wrote while in jail, βI think about how nice it would be to watch a movie or eat some good food or drive my car somewhere, but then I remember how I felt when I did these things, and how I knew I had to do something. And then I realize it was worth it.β
the hostility is stifling proper communication.
ah fuck you and your edits gringo
but i maintain that you have been overreacting to a minor sleight.
Quote from: Azumarill on January 10, 2017, 08:10:39 PMthat apology really is sincere, by the by. im willing to admit mistakes, but i maintain that you have been overreacting to a minor sleight.Call of Duty perks won't help you here
that apology really is sincere, by the by. im willing to admit mistakes, but i maintain that you have been overreacting to a minor sleight.
Can we get back to discussing the white supremacist mass shooter now?
Dylann Roof was sentenced to death
