no one won this
And that yeah, they've already said everything they could. That was an interesting point on TV. All it is now is just lots of cheap shots because they've already said everything, so they're just tired of having to re-re-re-re-explain things they've said 1000 times over.
Quote from: Luciana on October 09, 2016, 09:42:48 PMAnd that yeah, they've already said everything they could. That was an interesting point on TV. All it is now is just lots of cheap shots because they've already said everything, so they're just tired of having to re-re-re-re-explain things they've said 1000 times over.don't you just hate it when this happens
The most interesting thing to come out of this whole thing, is the Pence x Trump relationship. Very very icy between the two. He was asked if he disagreed with Pence, and it was a simple "Yes" and that was it. And there is large talks he might drop out as his running mate. Who knows.
Quote from: Verbatim on October 09, 2016, 09:42:55 PMno one won thisWe all know who won this.
If Trump wins, what're the chances he'll resign and just let Pence take over?
Quote from: Luciana on October 09, 2016, 09:41:35 PMThe most interesting thing to come out of this whole thing, is the Pence x Trump relationship. Very very icy between the two. He was asked if he disagreed with Pence, and it was a simple "Yes" and that was it. And there is large talks he might drop out as his running mate. Who knows.If Trump can't even keep his fucking running mate, how would he handle a whole administration?
All that matters^
Quote from: Alpha on October 09, 2016, 09:35:11 PMQuote from: challengerX on October 09, 2016, 09:33:11 PMQuote from: Alpha on October 09, 2016, 09:29:01 PMQuote from: challengerX on October 09, 2016, 09:27:11 PMQuote from: Alpha on October 09, 2016, 09:23:01 PMDid you not see how American jets killed over 100 Syrian soldiers that are on the front line against ISIS? Right before the bombings, there was a large buildup of ISIS soldiers.So they're bombing a military target made up of enemy personnel to clear the way for rebels they publicly support? OH WOW WTF THATS WEIRDQuoteAnd there are unconfirmed reports of contacts between ISIS and the US. That is too great of a coincidence to ignore.I blame the Jews tbhQuoteAlso, US reports stated that they had been mistaken and had been watching the Syrian forces for several days or a week. How do you somehow mistake the Syrian forces for ISIS? That means they would have to miss any Syrian flags that were being flown, or somehow believe they were seeing an ISIS flag. The two flags look nothing alike.Where are you getting all this from?It's simple logic. http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/09/17/us-halts-air-raid-after-learning-syrian-forces-may-have-been-hit.html"It marked the first known direct American strike on President Bashar Assad's forces."Read between the lines. Even Fox News knows what's going on. I already said in my previous post that of course America is attacking Assad. Why do you think the CIA indirectly armed and funded the rebels 5 years ago?I know America is fighting Assad. The point I'm trying to make is how that attack clearly benefitted ISIS the most. If your implication here is that America supports ISIS because of one attack in a 5 year long civil war which has become regional with multiple countries and forces involved, then you understand nothing about this conflict.
Quote from: challengerX on October 09, 2016, 09:33:11 PMQuote from: Alpha on October 09, 2016, 09:29:01 PMQuote from: challengerX on October 09, 2016, 09:27:11 PMQuote from: Alpha on October 09, 2016, 09:23:01 PMDid you not see how American jets killed over 100 Syrian soldiers that are on the front line against ISIS? Right before the bombings, there was a large buildup of ISIS soldiers.So they're bombing a military target made up of enemy personnel to clear the way for rebels they publicly support? OH WOW WTF THATS WEIRDQuoteAnd there are unconfirmed reports of contacts between ISIS and the US. That is too great of a coincidence to ignore.I blame the Jews tbhQuoteAlso, US reports stated that they had been mistaken and had been watching the Syrian forces for several days or a week. How do you somehow mistake the Syrian forces for ISIS? That means they would have to miss any Syrian flags that were being flown, or somehow believe they were seeing an ISIS flag. The two flags look nothing alike.Where are you getting all this from?It's simple logic. http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/09/17/us-halts-air-raid-after-learning-syrian-forces-may-have-been-hit.html"It marked the first known direct American strike on President Bashar Assad's forces."Read between the lines. Even Fox News knows what's going on. I already said in my previous post that of course America is attacking Assad. Why do you think the CIA indirectly armed and funded the rebels 5 years ago?I know America is fighting Assad. The point I'm trying to make is how that attack clearly benefitted ISIS the most.
Quote from: Alpha on October 09, 2016, 09:29:01 PMQuote from: challengerX on October 09, 2016, 09:27:11 PMQuote from: Alpha on October 09, 2016, 09:23:01 PMDid you not see how American jets killed over 100 Syrian soldiers that are on the front line against ISIS? Right before the bombings, there was a large buildup of ISIS soldiers.So they're bombing a military target made up of enemy personnel to clear the way for rebels they publicly support? OH WOW WTF THATS WEIRDQuoteAnd there are unconfirmed reports of contacts between ISIS and the US. That is too great of a coincidence to ignore.I blame the Jews tbhQuoteAlso, US reports stated that they had been mistaken and had been watching the Syrian forces for several days or a week. How do you somehow mistake the Syrian forces for ISIS? That means they would have to miss any Syrian flags that were being flown, or somehow believe they were seeing an ISIS flag. The two flags look nothing alike.Where are you getting all this from?It's simple logic. http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/09/17/us-halts-air-raid-after-learning-syrian-forces-may-have-been-hit.html"It marked the first known direct American strike on President Bashar Assad's forces."Read between the lines. Even Fox News knows what's going on. I already said in my previous post that of course America is attacking Assad. Why do you think the CIA indirectly armed and funded the rebels 5 years ago?
Quote from: challengerX on October 09, 2016, 09:27:11 PMQuote from: Alpha on October 09, 2016, 09:23:01 PMDid you not see how American jets killed over 100 Syrian soldiers that are on the front line against ISIS? Right before the bombings, there was a large buildup of ISIS soldiers.So they're bombing a military target made up of enemy personnel to clear the way for rebels they publicly support? OH WOW WTF THATS WEIRDQuoteAnd there are unconfirmed reports of contacts between ISIS and the US. That is too great of a coincidence to ignore.I blame the Jews tbhQuoteAlso, US reports stated that they had been mistaken and had been watching the Syrian forces for several days or a week. How do you somehow mistake the Syrian forces for ISIS? That means they would have to miss any Syrian flags that were being flown, or somehow believe they were seeing an ISIS flag. The two flags look nothing alike.Where are you getting all this from?It's simple logic. http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/09/17/us-halts-air-raid-after-learning-syrian-forces-may-have-been-hit.html
Quote from: Alpha on October 09, 2016, 09:23:01 PMDid you not see how American jets killed over 100 Syrian soldiers that are on the front line against ISIS? Right before the bombings, there was a large buildup of ISIS soldiers.So they're bombing a military target made up of enemy personnel to clear the way for rebels they publicly support? OH WOW WTF THATS WEIRDQuoteAnd there are unconfirmed reports of contacts between ISIS and the US. That is too great of a coincidence to ignore.I blame the Jews tbhQuoteAlso, US reports stated that they had been mistaken and had been watching the Syrian forces for several days or a week. How do you somehow mistake the Syrian forces for ISIS? That means they would have to miss any Syrian flags that were being flown, or somehow believe they were seeing an ISIS flag. The two flags look nothing alike.Where are you getting all this from?
Did you not see how American jets killed over 100 Syrian soldiers that are on the front line against ISIS? Right before the bombings, there was a large buildup of ISIS soldiers.
And there are unconfirmed reports of contacts between ISIS and the US. That is too great of a coincidence to ignore.
Also, US reports stated that they had been mistaken and had been watching the Syrian forces for several days or a week. How do you somehow mistake the Syrian forces for ISIS? That means they would have to miss any Syrian flags that were being flown, or somehow believe they were seeing an ISIS flag. The two flags look nothing alike.
Mrs. Powel of Philadelphia asked Benjamin Franklin, “Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?” With no hesitation whatsoever, Franklin responded, “A republic, if you can keep it.”
How the fuck does she think Russia is paying no attention to ISIS? Russia had bombed ISIS 10x more than the US
http://qz.com/805160/presidential-debate-donald-trump-threatened-to-prosecute-hillary-if-hes-elected-president/QuoteMrs. Powel of Philadelphia asked Benjamin Franklin, “Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?” With no hesitation whatsoever, Franklin responded, “A republic, if you can keep it.”Gotta love jailing political opponents
Quote from: Luciana on October 09, 2016, 10:32:42 PMhttp://qz.com/805160/presidential-debate-donald-trump-threatened-to-prosecute-hillary-if-hes-elected-president/QuoteMrs. Powel of Philadelphia asked Benjamin Franklin, “Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?” With no hesitation whatsoever, Franklin responded, “A republic, if you can keep it.”Gotta love jailing political opponentsIn fairness, he's proposing a prison sentence because she broke the law, not because she holds beliefs that don't run contingent with him.I mean, literally anyone else would be serving jail time had they done what she did.
Quote from: Mordo on October 10, 2016, 04:19:57 AMQuote from: Luciana on October 09, 2016, 10:32:42 PMhttp://qz.com/805160/presidential-debate-donald-trump-threatened-to-prosecute-hillary-if-hes-elected-president/QuoteMrs. Powel of Philadelphia asked Benjamin Franklin, “Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?” With no hesitation whatsoever, Franklin responded, “A republic, if you can keep it.”Gotta love jailing political opponentsIn fairness, he's proposing a prison sentence because she broke the law, not because she holds beliefs that don't run contingent with him.I mean, literally anyone else would be serving jail time had they done what she did.OJ did murder his wife but he got away with it for simply being OJ, then there's Bush who got away with war crimes. If she's going to be sent to jail then those other two people should be going as well for their crimes.
Without looking it up I'm going to assume Clinton won again.
then there's Bush who got away with war crimes.
(((Jill Stein)))
Trump looked presidential as fuck in this debate, and he, in my opinion, was the clear winner. If I was American I'd likely be voting for him come election time if he keeps up this demeanor.
Debate Number 2
