Quote from: Mordo on May 03, 2016, 08:33:34 PMWe have like two threads on this already faggot.Yeah but Class was acting like a smug shit in both so I wanted a Fair and Balanced thread.Plus muh statistics
We have like two threads on this already faggot.
Quote from: HYPE MAN on May 03, 2016, 08:35:30 PMQuote from: Mordo on May 03, 2016, 08:33:34 PMWe have like two threads on this already faggot.Yeah but Class was acting like a smug shit in both so I wanted a Fair and Balanced thread.Plus muh statisticskeep holding this false hope that Trump has more than a zero percent chance of winning a general electionit will just be all the more fun when he loses in a landslide
Quote from: SecondClass on May 03, 2016, 08:37:54 PMQuote from: HYPE MAN on May 03, 2016, 08:35:30 PMQuote from: Mordo on May 03, 2016, 08:33:34 PMWe have like two threads on this already faggot.Yeah but Class was acting like a smug shit in both so I wanted a Fair and Balanced thread.Plus muh statisticskeep holding this false hope that Trump has more than a zero percent chance of winning a general electionit will just be all the more fun when he loses in a landslideYou want to give us some empirical data that shows his supposedly abysmal chance of winning a general election?
Quote from: CIS on May 03, 2016, 08:41:36 PMQuote from: SecondClass on May 03, 2016, 08:37:54 PMQuote from: HYPE MAN on May 03, 2016, 08:35:30 PMQuote from: Mordo on May 03, 2016, 08:33:34 PMWe have like two threads on this already faggot.Yeah but Class was acting like a smug shit in both so I wanted a Fair and Balanced thread.Plus muh statisticskeep holding this false hope that Trump has more than a zero percent chance of winning a general electionit will just be all the more fun when he loses in a landslideYou want to give us some empirical data that shows his supposedly abysmal chance of winning a general election?mark my wordsthat's my empirical databookmark this thread and come back when he loses terriblyand you'll all see how right I am
Quote from: SecondClass on May 03, 2016, 08:37:54 PMQuote from: HYPE MAN on May 03, 2016, 08:35:30 PMQuote from: Mordo on May 03, 2016, 08:33:34 PMWe have like two threads on this already faggot.Yeah but Class was acting like a smug shit in both so I wanted a Fair and Balanced thread.Plus muh statisticskeep holding this false hope that Trump has more than a zero percent chance of winning a general electionit will just be all the more fun when he loses in a landslideIt's funny how you cucks have been saying this ever since he entered the race.LITURARLY ZERO PERCENT CHANCE HE'LL WIN DELEGATESZERO PERCENT CHANCE HE'LL WIN THOSE STATESZERO PERCENT CHANCE HE'LL WIN THE PRIMARY JUST YOU WAIT HAHA S-SERIOUSLY GUYS LITERALLY ZERO R-RIGHT?
The system utilizes the performance of a candidate within their own political party along with "patterns in the electoral cycle" to predict its winner. According to the school's newspaper, the latter factor "studies a pattern of voting in the presidential election that makes it less likely for an incumbent party to hold the presidency after two terms in office." That portion of the formula doesn't take into account who each party nominates or the condition of the country at the time.
If I'm going to be a jerk in SC's thread, I'll be a jerk in this thread as well. I gotta balance it out. QuoteThe system utilizes the performance of a candidate within their own political party along with "patterns in the electoral cycle" to predict its winner. According to the school's newspaper, the latter factor "studies a pattern of voting in the presidential election that makes it less likely for an incumbent party to hold the presidency after two terms in office." That portion of the formula doesn't take into account who each party nominates or the condition of the country at the time.
Put in uneducated layman's terms?
The formula used to predict Trump doesn't take into account the current state of the country or whose running. You could literally have Hitler (GOP) run against Jesus (Dem) and it'll still say Hitler will win. Quote from: CIS on May 03, 2016, 08:52:30 PMPut in uneducated layman's terms?
Quote from: CIS on May 03, 2016, 08:52:30 PMPut in uneducated layman's terms?Most unedecuated laymen would be able to understand that.