Quote from: HurtfulTurkey on March 27, 2015, 01:24:41 PMI don't like to bring it up here because few have shown any understanding of the topic.It astounds me how many people equate WMDs with "nukes". Hussein categorically did have WMDs, and we have found some. It's frustrating, more than anything else. Thank God for Christopher Hitchens.
I don't like to bring it up here because few have shown any understanding of the topic.
Quote from: challengerX on March 27, 2015, 04:04:29 PMQuote from: Verbatim on March 26, 2015, 06:48:34 PMaccording to you, we're all already killing babies by not having them, soI said forcing people to not have babies is genocide, not whatever the fuck it is you're saying.If it has specific intent, yes.
Quote from: Verbatim on March 26, 2015, 06:48:34 PMaccording to you, we're all already killing babies by not having them, soI said forcing people to not have babies is genocide, not whatever the fuck it is you're saying.
according to you, we're all already killing babies by not having them, so
Quote from: Meta Cognition on March 27, 2015, 05:30:14 PMQuote from: Flee on March 27, 2015, 05:28:34 PMQuote from: challengerX on March 27, 2015, 04:04:29 PMQuote from: Verbatim on March 26, 2015, 06:48:34 PMaccording to you, we're all already killing babies by not having them, soI said forcing people to not have babies is genocide, not whatever the fuck it is you're saying.If it has specific intent, yes.I still don't agree. If nobody is being killed, it's not genocide.Well, the core idea behind genocide is the intention to completely destroy a group, whether national, racial, religious or ethnical. If you forcibly stop said group from reproducing and furthering their lineage, you are effectively ending destroying it by the next generation.I can understand why you say that, but there is a general and international legal consensus on this.
Quote from: Flee on March 27, 2015, 05:28:34 PMQuote from: challengerX on March 27, 2015, 04:04:29 PMQuote from: Verbatim on March 26, 2015, 06:48:34 PMaccording to you, we're all already killing babies by not having them, soI said forcing people to not have babies is genocide, not whatever the fuck it is you're saying.If it has specific intent, yes.I still don't agree. If nobody is being killed, it's not genocide.
Yes
And for the record, I know that anti-natalism doesn't count as genocide.
Fair enough. You are welcome to disagree, it won't change a thing.
Question though. What if a government would round up all members of a certain group (jews, gypsies, blacks...) and put them in prison, keeping them completely isolated from one another, with the specific and vocalized intent of ending this race / ehtnical group. They don't actually kill anyone, but they just keep them locked up and force them into labor and separation. A few decades down the line, the last member of this group will have died, and thereby this race / ethnical group seizes to exist because of what the government did to them. What would you consider this?