Reality clearly has a liberal bias
Quote from: MyNameIsCharlie on October 21, 2016, 09:57:37 PMReality clearly has a liberal biasSUUUUURE
Quote from: Meta Cognition on October 21, 2016, 09:59:21 PMQuote from: MyNameIsCharlie on October 21, 2016, 09:57:37 PMReality clearly has a liberal biasSUUUUUREYeah, we're gonna read 34 pages of that shit.
Quote from: Luciana on October 21, 2016, 10:17:14 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on October 21, 2016, 09:59:21 PMQuote from: MyNameIsCharlie on October 21, 2016, 09:57:37 PMReality clearly has a liberal biasSUUUUUREYeah, we're gonna read 34 pages of that shit.If you can't read a 34 page article you don't deserve to claim reality has a bias in your favour.
Quote from: Meta Cognition on October 21, 2016, 10:30:25 PMQuote from: Luciana on October 21, 2016, 10:17:14 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on October 21, 2016, 09:59:21 PMQuote from: MyNameIsCharlie on October 21, 2016, 09:57:37 PMReality clearly has a liberal biasSUUUUUREYeah, we're gonna read 34 pages of that shit.If you can't read a 34 page article you don't deserve to claim reality has a bias in your favour.
Quote from: Azumarill on October 21, 2016, 11:29:36 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on October 21, 2016, 10:30:25 PMQuote from: Luciana on October 21, 2016, 10:17:14 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on October 21, 2016, 09:59:21 PMQuote from: MyNameIsCharlie on October 21, 2016, 09:57:37 PMReality clearly has a liberal biasSUUUUUREYeah, we're gonna read 34 pages of that shit.If you can't read a 34 page article you don't deserve to claim reality has a bias in your favour. Nice edit, faggot.
Quote from: CIS on October 21, 2016, 11:30:59 PMQuote from: Azumarill on October 21, 2016, 11:29:36 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on October 21, 2016, 10:30:25 PMQuote from: Luciana on October 21, 2016, 10:17:14 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on October 21, 2016, 09:59:21 PMQuote from: MyNameIsCharlie on October 21, 2016, 09:57:37 PMReality clearly has a liberal biasSUUUUUREYeah, we're gonna read 34 pages of that shit.If you can't read a 34 page article you don't deserve to claim reality has a bias in your favour. Nice edit, faggot.i felt that it may have been a little too far but i mean if you insist i can put what i originally said back in and also tell you to kill yourself. would you like for me to do that friendo?
Well, you see, a tax rate of zero still implies that the tax exists, which Dr Paul would be wrong about, where as Jim Webb is more correct in saying that a tax created by the 1913 Federal Reserve act didn't exist before the act.
Quote from: DAS B00T x2 on October 21, 2016, 08:31:01 PMWell, you see, a tax rate of zero still implies that the tax exists, which Dr Paul would be wrong about, where as Jim Webb is more correct in saying that a tax created by the 1913 Federal Reserve act didn't exist before the act.no it doesn't
Quote from: Tyger on October 22, 2016, 09:38:10 AMQuote from: DAS B00T x2 on October 21, 2016, 08:31:01 PMWell, you see, a tax rate of zero still implies that the tax exists, which Dr Paul would be wrong about, where as Jim Webb is more correct in saying that a tax created by the 1913 Federal Reserve act didn't exist before the act.no it doesn'tyes it does
Quote from: DAS B00T x2 on October 22, 2016, 10:04:31 AMQuote from: Tyger on October 22, 2016, 09:38:10 AMQuote from: DAS B00T x2 on October 21, 2016, 08:31:01 PMWell, you see, a tax rate of zero still implies that the tax exists, which Dr Paul would be wrong about, where as Jim Webb is more correct in saying that a tax created by the 1913 Federal Reserve act didn't exist before the act.no it doesn'tyes it does no you're a puppet
"Politifact is reliable and unbiased"
