"Moral Considerations" test - really fucking short.

 
More Than Mortal | d-d-d-DANK ✑ πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯ 🌈πŸ‘
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam: MetaCognition
ID: Meta Cognition
IP: Logged

15,060 posts
This is the way the world ends. Not with a bang but a whimper.
I'll put the results in spoilers. This is based on the work of Jonathan Haidt, who's extensively studied political implications of morality.

You must rate them from 0 to 4.5, in intervals of 0.5 in how important they are in moral considerations, and I will post the average results in spoilers. Then, you'll tell us which group you're closest to in moral considerations. Being a "moral conservative" doesn't necessarily infer you must be politically conservative.
Spoiler
So rate them as 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4 or 4.5.
So, in other words, if somebody were to violate these foundations below, how important would they be in your condemnation of them?

Care/Harm Foundation: Protecting others from harm and being empathetic towards fellow humans. Usually follows with protecting them from abstract oppression like poverty or hunger.

Justice/Fairness Foundation: Treating people in proportion to their actions. Can be associated with things like advocacy for a living wage or, on the flip side, capital punishment. Such results are usually contingent on your score for the care foundation.

Loyalty/Ingroup Foundation: Devotion to an associated group, such as family, nation, community.

Authority/Respect: Taking things like tradition and certain authorities - like parents, the State, the law, a police officer - seriously and paying them due respect; in other words, how disturbed you are by people who act in an apparently flagrant or disrespectful manner to objects or agents of authority.

Sanctity/Purity: Avoidance of degrading things like actions - such as promiscuous behaviour - or foods - like GMOs. Also, making certain things sacred (such as the Constitution, for a civil example) or the Bible, or the Flag et cetera and whether or not somebody disgraces "sacred" objects.

Liberal Results
Care - 3.7
Fairness - 3.8
Loyalty - 2
Authority - 1.8
Sanctity - 1.3

Conservative Results
Care - 2.9
Fairness - 3.2
Loyalty - 2.8
Authority - 3.1
Sanctity - 2.4

Libertarian
Care - 2.6
Fairness - 3.2
Loyalty - 2.1
Authority - 1.7
Sanctity - 1

I came out as closer to Conservatives.



 
ΞšΞ‘Ξ€Ξ‘ΞΞ‘Ξ›Ξ©Ξ€Ξ—Ξ£ | Mythic Invincible!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: TrussingDoor
IP: Logged

7,667 posts
"A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him saying, 'You are mad, you are not like us'."
-Saint Anthony the Great
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.
Last Edit: September 14, 2014, 02:11:44 PM by TrussingDoor

 
BrenMan 94 | Heroic Unstoppable!
 
more |
XBL: BrenMan 94
PSN:
Steam: BrenMan 94
ID: BrenMan 94
IP: Logged

1,886 posts
 
2.0
2.5
2.5
1.0
1.5

Libertarian
Last Edit: September 19, 2014, 04:14:41 PM by BrenMan 94

 
 
More Than Mortal | d-d-d-DANK ✑ πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯ 🌈πŸ‘
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam: MetaCognition
ID: Meta Cognition
IP: Logged

15,060 posts
This is the way the world ends. Not with a bang but a whimper.
If you're going to post your results, at least fucking check to see which results your closest to.

Also Door, there is no fucking five you idiot.

 
ΞšΞ‘Ξ€Ξ‘ΞΞ‘Ξ›Ξ©Ξ€Ξ—Ξ£ | Mythic Invincible!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: TrussingDoor
IP: Logged

7,667 posts
"A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him saying, 'You are mad, you are not like us'."
-Saint Anthony the Great
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

 
Verbatim | Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,049 posts
❧
4.5 Liberal
4.5 Liberal
0.0 Liberal
0.0 Libertarian
3.0 Conservative

Why the intervals?
Last Edit: September 14, 2014, 02:22:48 PM by Verbatim

 
 
More Than Mortal | d-d-d-DANK ✑ πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯ 🌈πŸ‘
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam: MetaCognition
ID: Meta Cognition
IP: Logged

15,060 posts
This is the way the world ends. Not with a bang but a whimper.
Quote from: Verbatim on September 14, 2014, 02:21:51 PM
4.5 Liberal
4.5 Liberal
0.0 Liberal
0.0 Libertarian
3.0 Conservative

Why the intervals?
I was using a graph for reference, and it was based on those numbers.

 
 
Verbatim | Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,049 posts
❧
If you scored on the lower end of fairness, what would you pick?
Would you say both Libertarian and Conservative?

Also, the way it is now, it's impossible to score Libertarian in Loyalty.
Last Edit: September 14, 2014, 02:34:11 PM by Verbatim

 
 
More Than Mortal | d-d-d-DANK ✑ πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯ 🌈πŸ‘
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam: MetaCognition
ID: Meta Cognition
IP: Logged

15,060 posts
This is the way the world ends. Not with a bang but a whimper.
The results are meant to be taken as an aggregate to reach a single conclusion, not to compare each foundation individually. I suppose there's no particular downside to it.

How is it impossible? Never mind, I see. Like I say, it's merely to get an aggregate picture. I can't help the similarities between liberal and libertarian morality in a certain foundation.

Last Edit: September 14, 2014, 02:38:31 PM by Meta Cognition

 
Yu | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Yutaka
IP: Logged

12,707 posts
Almost always, with moderation
Quote
Care/Harm Foundation:
4
Quote
Justice/Fairness Foundation: .
4
Quote
Loyalty/Ingroup Foundation: Devotion to an associated group, such as family, nation, community.
3.5
Quote
Authority/Respect:
3
Quote
Sanctity/Purity:
3

 
 
challengerX | custom title
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: challengerX
IP: Logged

41,942 posts
I DONT GIVE A SINGLE -blam!- MOTHER -blam!-ER ITS A MOTHER -blam!-ING FORUM, OH WOW, YOU HAVE THE WORD NINJA BELOW YOUR NAME, HOW MOTHER -blam!-ING COOL, NOT, YOUR ARE NOTHING TO ME BUT A BRAINWASHED PIECE OF SHIT BLOGGER, PEOPLE ONLY LIKE YOU BECAUSE YOU HAVE NINJA BELOW YOUR NAME, SO PLEASE PUNCH YOURAELF IN THE FACE AND STAB YOUR EYE BECAUSE YOU ARE NOTHING BUT A PIECE OF SHIT OF SOCIETY
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

 
 
Mr. Psychologist | Imperial Forum Ninja
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Mr Psychologist
IP: Logged

17,215 posts
<.<
This bit was a little vague when put with the rest of it 'So, in other words, if somebody were to violate these foundations below, how important would they be in your condemnation of them? '

But I think I get the point, so going on the assumption that it's a 'how pissed off would you be if someone violated X rule?' game <.<

Here we go.

Care/Harm Foundation: 4.5

Justice/Fairness Foundation: 4.0

Loyalty/Ingroup Foundation: (Two answers for this one)
2.0 and 4.5
I loathe rebels and traitors as a rule of thumb, but that's not a blanket detestation. If someone has a good enough reason for their actions then I wouldn't judge them harshly. However, this is on a smaller scale than treasonous acts and the like but Betraying your family, friends and the like is a 4.5 easily.

Authority/Respect: 3.5

Sanctity/Purity: a dual answer again I'm afraid.
2.0 and 4.5
Idolising and worshipping things like a constitution is fucking sad, putting a scrap of paper on such a pedestal is just idiotic so if it came to people being disrespectful to a flag/constitution/inanimate object then I'm not really going to care too much, it does speak volumes about someone's character if they feel the need to desecrate something for the sake of it though. 2.0

As for things like promiscuity, substance use/abuse and the like... I give that a 4.5 for my personal disgust of it. But ultimately if someone wishes to act like that, I'm not going to stop them or give them shit for it.

Quote
Condensed version for results
C/H 4.5
J/F 4.0
L/I 2.0 + 4.5
A/R 3.5
S/P 2.0 + 4.5
Last Edit: September 14, 2014, 04:35:59 PM by Mr Psychologist

 
 
𝑺𝒆𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒅π‘ͺ𝒍𝒂𝒔𝒔 | π‘ͺπ’‚π’“π’Žπ’†π’
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: ModernLocust
Steam:
ID: SecondClass
IP: Logged

30,022 posts
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
β€”Judge Aaron Satie
β€”β€”Carmen
4.5 for care
2 for justice
0 for everything else