Oh do explain this one.
Quote from: Magos Domina on May 06, 2015, 03:38:54 PMOh do explain this one.I really wouldn't need to if you weren't so fucking irreverent all the time.
Quote from: Meta Cognition on May 06, 2015, 03:40:04 PMQuote from: Magos Domina on May 06, 2015, 03:38:54 PMOh do explain this one.I really wouldn't need to if you weren't so fucking irreverent all the time. Oh dry your eyes
Quote from: Magos Domina on May 06, 2015, 03:44:07 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on May 06, 2015, 03:40:04 PMQuote from: Magos Domina on May 06, 2015, 03:38:54 PMOh do explain this one.I really wouldn't need to if you weren't so fucking irreverent all the time. Oh dry your eyesLOL GUYSMETA CARES ABOUT IMPORTANT MORAL AND POLITICAL ISSUESWHAT A FUCKING PUSSY
Quote from: SexyBarracuda on May 05, 2015, 07:16:31 PMQuote from: Magos Domina on May 04, 2015, 10:29:10 AMQuote from: Meta Cognition on May 04, 2015, 10:27:59 AMQuote from: Magos Domina on May 04, 2015, 10:25:00 AMIt's called "Talk shit get hit". You're a disgusting person. Being morally right doesn't make someone "disgusting". Being a bigot however, does.>I think murdering someone over a drawing is wrong >bigot> Not realising I was trolling Meta
Quote from: Magos Domina on May 04, 2015, 10:29:10 AMQuote from: Meta Cognition on May 04, 2015, 10:27:59 AMQuote from: Magos Domina on May 04, 2015, 10:25:00 AMIt's called "Talk shit get hit". You're a disgusting person. Being morally right doesn't make someone "disgusting". Being a bigot however, does.>I think murdering someone over a drawing is wrong >bigot
Quote from: Meta Cognition on May 04, 2015, 10:27:59 AMQuote from: Magos Domina on May 04, 2015, 10:25:00 AMIt's called "Talk shit get hit". You're a disgusting person. Being morally right doesn't make someone "disgusting". Being a bigot however, does.
Quote from: Magos Domina on May 04, 2015, 10:25:00 AMIt's called "Talk shit get hit". You're a disgusting person.
It's called "Talk shit get hit".
It's unfortunate what happened, but hasn't this always been a reaction when Muhammad was involved? I feel like the whole thing really could have been avoided with a little respect for their religion. But, it's a little late. Really a shame though.
Quote from: Lord Starch on May 08, 2015, 04:28:03 AMIt's unfortunate what happened, but hasn't this always been a reaction when Muhammad was involved? I feel like the whole thing really could have been avoided with a little respect for their religion. But, it's a little late. Really a shame though.I think it turned out better than anyone expected Minus that one guy getting injured
Quote from: Lord Starch on May 08, 2015, 04:28:03 AMIt's unfortunate what happened, but hasn't this always been a reaction when Muhammad was involved? I feel like the whole thing really could have been avoided with a little respect for their religion. But, it's a little late. Really a shame though.Good old victim blaming. How about they respect our culture, where we value freedom and not censorship instead of killing us.
Quote from: challengerX on May 08, 2015, 05:45:33 PMQuote from: Lord Starch on May 08, 2015, 04:28:03 AMIt's unfortunate what happened, but hasn't this always been a reaction when Muhammad was involved? I feel like the whole thing really could have been avoided with a little respect for their religion. But, it's a little late. Really a shame though.Good old victim blaming. How about they respect our culture, where we value freedom and not censorship instead of killing us.I'm just being realistic. You can't poke a lion and expect him not to maul you. We live in an imperfect world so we need to adjust our actions accordingly.
Quote from: Lord Starch on May 09, 2015, 07:50:58 AMQuote from: challengerX on May 08, 2015, 05:45:33 PMQuote from: Lord Starch on May 08, 2015, 04:28:03 AMIt's unfortunate what happened, but hasn't this always been a reaction when Muhammad was involved? I feel like the whole thing really could have been avoided with a little respect for their religion. But, it's a little late. Really a shame though.Good old victim blaming. How about they respect our culture, where we value freedom and not censorship instead of killing us.I'm just being realistic. You can't poke a lion and expect him not to maul you. We live in an imperfect world so we need to adjust our actions accordingly.You sound like such a faggot for advocating censorship. You're one of the things going very wrong in this country with that kind of mindset, causing dangerous steps in the wrong direction.
Quote from: ////\\\\ on May 09, 2015, 01:50:20 PMQuote from: Lord Starch on May 09, 2015, 07:50:58 AMQuote from: challengerX on May 08, 2015, 05:45:33 PMQuote from: Lord Starch on May 08, 2015, 04:28:03 AMIt's unfortunate what happened, but hasn't this always been a reaction when Muhammad was involved? I feel like the whole thing really could have been avoided with a little respect for their religion. But, it's a little late. Really a shame though.Good old victim blaming. How about they respect our culture, where we value freedom and not censorship instead of killing us.I'm just being realistic. You can't poke a lion and expect him not to maul you. We live in an imperfect world so we need to adjust our actions accordingly.You sound like such a faggot for advocating censorship. You're one of the things going very wrong in this country with that kind of mindset, causing dangerous steps in the wrong direction.Now wait a minute, don't we already censor certain things anyway? When we do its for the better of the people. I get what you're saying, but look at it this way. When you draw Muhammad, there's a possibility you'll get killed. Now if we censor that, it'll result in less death. I mean yeah we shouldn't have to, but it's for the better of the people and to maintain peace.
"They shouldn't have drawn Mohammed" is literally the equivalent of "she shouldn't have worn that skirt."
Quote from: Lord Starch on May 09, 2015, 05:01:49 PMQuote from: ////\\\\ on May 09, 2015, 01:50:20 PMQuote from: Lord Starch on May 09, 2015, 07:50:58 AMQuote from: challengerX on May 08, 2015, 05:45:33 PMQuote from: Lord Starch on May 08, 2015, 04:28:03 AMIt's unfortunate what happened, but hasn't this always been a reaction when Muhammad was involved? I feel like the whole thing really could have been avoided with a little respect for their religion. But, it's a little late. Really a shame though.Good old victim blaming. How about they respect our culture, where we value freedom and not censorship instead of killing us.I'm just being realistic. You can't poke a lion and expect him not to maul you. We live in an imperfect world so we need to adjust our actions accordingly.You sound like such a faggot for advocating censorship. You're one of the things going very wrong in this country with that kind of mindset, causing dangerous steps in the wrong direction.Now wait a minute, don't we already censor certain things anyway? When we do its for the better of the people. I get what you're saying, but look at it this way. When you draw Muhammad, there's a possibility you'll get killed. Now if we censor that, it'll result in less death. I mean yeah we shouldn't have to, but it's for the better of the people and to maintain peace.You're a coward. I'd gladly martyr myself drawing Mohammed.
Quote from: DAS B(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻ on May 09, 2015, 06:34:27 PM"They shouldn't have drawn Mohammed" is literally the equivalent of "she shouldn't have worn that skirt."Not really. Because they knew drawing Muhammad would make this happen. I mean how much proof do we need that Muslims will kill when people disrespect their religion? They literally kill themselves to take out infidels. Now what logical reason is there to mess with these people and get nothing in return for it?
Quote from: Not Comms Officer on May 10, 2015, 12:16:26 AMQuote from: DAS B(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻ on May 09, 2015, 06:34:27 PM"They shouldn't have drawn Mohammed" is literally the equivalent of "she shouldn't have worn that skirt."There's a difference between wearing a short skirt, and walking around in rural Afghanistan or Syria by yourself.Of which these people did neither, so I have no idea where the fuck you're trying to go with this.
Quote from: DAS B(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻ on May 09, 2015, 06:34:27 PM"They shouldn't have drawn Mohammed" is literally the equivalent of "she shouldn't have worn that skirt."There's a difference between wearing a short skirt, and walking around in rural Afghanistan or Syria by yourself.
Quote from: Not Comms Officer on May 10, 2015, 04:16:11 AMQuote from: challengerX on May 10, 2015, 04:12:21 AMQuote from: Not Comms Officer on May 10, 2015, 12:16:26 AMQuote from: DAS B(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻ on May 09, 2015, 06:34:27 PM"They shouldn't have drawn Mohammed" is literally the equivalent of "she shouldn't have worn that skirt."There's a difference between wearing a short skirt, and walking around in rural Afghanistan or Syria by yourself.Of which these people did neither, so I have no idea where the fuck you're trying to go with this.No, my point is that there are different degrees of victim responsibility. Wearing a short skirt doesn't make the victim responsible for anything that happens, while going into a dangerous country unprepared or something similar really does give the victim some degree of responsibility, as doing that is incredibly stupid.Did you even read the OP? Or are you just writing about one of your fantasies?
Quote from: challengerX on May 10, 2015, 04:12:21 AMQuote from: Not Comms Officer on May 10, 2015, 12:16:26 AMQuote from: DAS B(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻ on May 09, 2015, 06:34:27 PM"They shouldn't have drawn Mohammed" is literally the equivalent of "she shouldn't have worn that skirt."There's a difference between wearing a short skirt, and walking around in rural Afghanistan or Syria by yourself.Of which these people did neither, so I have no idea where the fuck you're trying to go with this.No, my point is that there are different degrees of victim responsibility. Wearing a short skirt doesn't make the victim responsible for anything that happens, while going into a dangerous country unprepared or something similar really does give the victim some degree of responsibility, as doing that is incredibly stupid.
Quote from: Not Comms Officer on May 10, 2015, 04:47:48 AMQuote from: challengerX on May 10, 2015, 04:40:17 AMQuote from: Not Comms Officer on May 10, 2015, 04:16:11 AMQuote from: challengerX on May 10, 2015, 04:12:21 AMQuote from: Not Comms Officer on May 10, 2015, 12:16:26 AMQuote from: DAS B(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻ on May 09, 2015, 06:34:27 PM"They shouldn't have drawn Mohammed" is literally the equivalent of "she shouldn't have worn that skirt."There's a difference between wearing a short skirt, and walking around in rural Afghanistan or Syria by yourself.Of which these people did neither, so I have no idea where the fuck you're trying to go with this.No, my point is that there are different degrees of victim responsibility. Wearing a short skirt doesn't make the victim responsible for anything that happens, while going into a dangerous country unprepared or something similar really does give the victim some degree of responsibility, as doing that is incredibly stupid.Did you even read the OP? Or are you just writing about one of your fantasies?y chally yIt's a good point, and you know it.No, it isn't a good point. We're talking about a terrorist attack in America. Not somebody wandering around Afghanistan. The rape analogy works here because it's full on victim blaming. If it were another American journalist getting kidnapped in Acghanistan or Iraq, then I'd be more inclined to wonder why the journalist is risking his life for no reason trying to document savages. Victim blaming is disgusting. Not only that, you've been wrong the whole thread and you were talking about imaginary Twitter posts which were deleted saying these people didn't attack because of Islam. Yeah no. You have no valid points to make here and you hadn't had any valid points this entire thread. Honestly I think you sympathize with Islamic terrorists.
Quote from: challengerX on May 10, 2015, 04:40:17 AMQuote from: Not Comms Officer on May 10, 2015, 04:16:11 AMQuote from: challengerX on May 10, 2015, 04:12:21 AMQuote from: Not Comms Officer on May 10, 2015, 12:16:26 AMQuote from: DAS B(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻ on May 09, 2015, 06:34:27 PM"They shouldn't have drawn Mohammed" is literally the equivalent of "she shouldn't have worn that skirt."There's a difference between wearing a short skirt, and walking around in rural Afghanistan or Syria by yourself.Of which these people did neither, so I have no idea where the fuck you're trying to go with this.No, my point is that there are different degrees of victim responsibility. Wearing a short skirt doesn't make the victim responsible for anything that happens, while going into a dangerous country unprepared or something similar really does give the victim some degree of responsibility, as doing that is incredibly stupid.Did you even read the OP? Or are you just writing about one of your fantasies?y chally yIt's a good point, and you know it.
I'd be more inclined to wonder why the journalist is risking his life for no reason trying to document savages.
"Draw Muhammad" shooting in Garland Texas
