and his private life has been put on display for everybody to laugh and gawp at.
It's his own stupid fault since nobody told him to do that.
Quote from: BerzerkCommando on May 05, 2015, 06:07:01 AMIt's his own stupid fault since nobody told him to do that.No, it's not his fault somebody ran to the media with it.
So it wouldn't be my fault for shooting my AK in a public area and a cop guns me done for it?
Quote from: Meta Cognition on May 01, 2015, 12:51:35 PM and his private life has been put on display for everybody to laugh and gawp at.Then he shouldn't have been sending nude pics of himself to people. It's his own stupid fault since nobody told him to do that.
Quote from: BerzerkCommando on May 05, 2015, 06:07:01 AMQuote from: Meta Cognition on May 01, 2015, 12:51:35 PM and his private life has been put on display for everybody to laugh and gawp at.Then he shouldn't have been sending nude pics of himself to people. It's his own stupid fault since nobody told him to do that.If a woman was sending naked pictures to her boyfriend and he shared them online, you and everyone else would blame him.It's only because he didn't vote for an anti-discrimination bill that would have led to massive overreach that any of you blame him. Victim blaming doesn't become okay just because the victim did some things you do not like.
There's a difference between sending them to your significant other and sending them to a bunch of random people who didn't even ask for or want them.
Quote from: King pesto on May 05, 2015, 12:04:26 PMQuote from: BerzerkCommando on May 05, 2015, 06:07:01 AMQuote from: Meta Cognition on May 01, 2015, 12:51:35 PM and his private life has been put on display for everybody to laugh and gawp at.Then he shouldn't have been sending nude pics of himself to people. It's his own stupid fault since nobody told him to do that.If a woman was sending naked pictures to her boyfriend and he shared them online, you and everyone else would blame him.It's only because he didn't vote for an anti-discrimination bill that would have led to massive overreach that any of you blame him. Victim blaming doesn't become okay just because the victim did some things you do not like.There's a difference between sending them to your significant other and sending them to a bunch of random people who didn't even ask for or want them.
Quote from: LC on May 05, 2015, 12:06:03 PMThere's a difference between sending them to your significant other and sending them to a bunch of random people who didn't even ask for or want them.Is that supposed to excuse the person who outed him?
Quote from: LC on May 05, 2015, 12:06:03 PMQuote from: King pesto on May 05, 2015, 12:04:26 PMQuote from: BerzerkCommando on May 05, 2015, 06:07:01 AMQuote from: Meta Cognition on May 01, 2015, 12:51:35 PM and his private life has been put on display for everybody to laugh and gawp at.Then he shouldn't have been sending nude pics of himself to people. It's his own stupid fault since nobody told him to do that.If a woman was sending naked pictures to her boyfriend and he shared them online, you and everyone else would blame him.It's only because he didn't vote for an anti-discrimination bill that would have led to massive overreach that any of you blame him. Victim blaming doesn't become okay just because the victim did some things you do not like.There's a difference between sending them to your significant other and sending them to a bunch of random people who didn't even ask for or want them.Are you implying that people who sign up for Grindr don't want to see dicks?Because that's kind of the point of Grindr.
Quote from: King pesto on May 05, 2015, 12:08:19 PMQuote from: LC on May 05, 2015, 12:06:03 PMQuote from: King pesto on May 05, 2015, 12:04:26 PMQuote from: BerzerkCommando on May 05, 2015, 06:07:01 AMQuote from: Meta Cognition on May 01, 2015, 12:51:35 PM and his private life has been put on display for everybody to laugh and gawp at.Then he shouldn't have been sending nude pics of himself to people. It's his own stupid fault since nobody told him to do that.If a woman was sending naked pictures to her boyfriend and he shared them online, you and everyone else would blame him.It's only because he didn't vote for an anti-discrimination bill that would have led to massive overreach that any of you blame him. Victim blaming doesn't become okay just because the victim did some things you do not like.There's a difference between sending them to your significant other and sending them to a bunch of random people who didn't even ask for or want them.Are you implying that people who sign up for Grindr don't want to see dicks?Because that's kind of the point of Grindr.The point of Grindr is to find and date other homosexual men. Being on a dating website =/= wanting to see everyone on it naked. If they wanted dick pics they'd either ask or go on a porn website.A less scrupulous person would accuse you of being prejudice against homosexuals for assuming that they're all a bunch of thirsty cock sluts that want to see everyones dicks.
A less scrupulous person would accuse you of being prejudice against homosexuals for assuming that they're all a bunch of thirsty cock sluts that want to see everyones dicks.
Quote from: LC on May 05, 2015, 12:13:33 PMQuote from: King pesto on May 05, 2015, 12:08:19 PMQuote from: LC on May 05, 2015, 12:06:03 PMQuote from: King pesto on May 05, 2015, 12:04:26 PMQuote from: BerzerkCommando on May 05, 2015, 06:07:01 AMQuote from: Meta Cognition on May 01, 2015, 12:51:35 PM and his private life has been put on display for everybody to laugh and gawp at.Then he shouldn't have been sending nude pics of himself to people. It's his own stupid fault since nobody told him to do that.If a woman was sending naked pictures to her boyfriend and he shared them online, you and everyone else would blame him.It's only because he didn't vote for an anti-discrimination bill that would have led to massive overreach that any of you blame him. Victim blaming doesn't become okay just because the victim did some things you do not like.There's a difference between sending them to your significant other and sending them to a bunch of random people who didn't even ask for or want them.Are you implying that people who sign up for Grindr don't want to see dicks?Because that's kind of the point of Grindr.The point of Grindr is to find and date other homosexual men. Being on a dating website =/= wanting to see everyone on it naked. If they wanted dick pics they'd either ask or go on a porn website.A less scrupulous person would accuse you of being prejudice against homosexuals for assuming that they're all a bunch of thirsty cock sluts that want to see everyones dicks.It's possible I've misunderstood Grindr or you're misrepresenting it.My understanding was that it was essentially a homosexual equivalent of Tinder, oriented more towards casual sex than dating. If I'm wrong then I'm wrong, and seding these pictures is uncool.Still doesn't make it okay to share them.
Quote from: LC on May 05, 2015, 12:13:33 PMA less scrupulous person would accuse you of being prejudice against homosexuals for assuming that they're all a bunch of thirsty cock sluts that want to see everyones dicks.They're still men.
Quote from: BerzerkCommando on May 05, 2015, 10:38:26 AMSo it wouldn't be my fault for shooting my AK in a public area and a cop guns me done for it?What a fucking specious analogy.
Quote from: Meta Cognition on May 05, 2015, 10:41:44 AMQuote from: BerzerkCommando on May 05, 2015, 10:38:26 AMSo it wouldn't be my fault for shooting my AK in a public area and a cop guns me done for it?What a fucking specious analogy.The point is that there are times when the victim should be accountable for their own actions and this guy is one of them.
"Anti-gay" Republican sent nude photos to people on Grindr
