Why Aren't There Sep7 Groups?

Ghost Guy | Heroic Posting Riot
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Fun Timer
IP: Logged

978 posts
--Desu
On b.net there are groups with member chats.

Have users here asked for a similar thing?


 
Verbatim
| Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,053 posts
❧
They're planned.

I'm all for them, but most(?) of the community here seems to be generally against the idea, since we're already kind of a small group in and of ourselves, and if we had groups, there's some concern that it would kill activity in the mains.

I think that's BS, but whatever. I'll flow with the tide on this one.
Last Edit: August 11, 2015, 12:10:46 PM by Verbatim


 
Cheat
| Flora Colossus
 
more |
XBL: Cheatlancer
PSN:
Steam: Cheatlancer
ID: Cheatlancer
IP: Logged

6,668 posts
Hmm...
Been working on them, but it's a slow process as Isara isn't around to help and I keep running into issues with the original script (right now users can't edit their own posts in groups).


Ghost Guy | Heroic Posting Riot
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Fun Timer
IP: Logged

978 posts
--Desu
Been working on them, but it's a slow process as Isara isn't around to help and I keep running into issues with the original script (right now users can't edit their own posts in groups).
How would group moderation work?


 
Mat Cauthon
| Ravens
 
more |
Been working on them, but it's a slow process as Isara isn't around to help and I keep running into issues with the original script (right now users can't edit their own posts in groups).
How would group moderation work?
A user will be admin of the group, but only in that specific group.
Site mods and admins will still have powers over them.


 
Cheat
| Flora Colossus
 
more |
XBL: Cheatlancer
PSN:
Steam: Cheatlancer
ID: Cheatlancer
IP: Logged

6,668 posts
Hmm...
Been working on them, but it's a slow process as Isara isn't around to help and I keep running into issues with the original script (right now users can't edit their own posts in groups).
How would group moderation work?
A user will be admin of the group, but only in that specific group.
Site mods and admins will still have powers over them.
Pretty much this. When they're done, the group owner will be able to create admins and mods, who can ban, lock posts, and hide posts. There will also be 7 security roles you can use as a ranking system with corresponding nameplates and colors. It'll be tight.


Mattie G Indahouse | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: BerzerkCommando
PSN: BerzerkCommando
Steam: BerzerkCommando
ID: BerzerkCommando
IP: Logged

9,047 posts
Did he say glass of juice or gas the Jews?
πŸ‘ΆπŸ½:h..

πŸ‘¨πŸ½:honey, he's gonna say his first words

πŸ‘©πŸ½:!!

πŸ‘ΆπŸ½:hhh...

πŸ‘ΆπŸ½:here come dat boi 🐸!

πŸ‘¨πŸ½:o shit waddup πŸ˜‚πŸ’―

πŸ‘©πŸ½:πŸ’”
We don't have the population for groups to work right without them killing the forums. Bnet has the population for groups to be active along with the forums as well. The only thing they would do is split up the population on a site that has hardly anybody to begin with. The other thing is that groups are going to be pointless until we get a population due to there being a decent amount of groups with hardly anybody posting in them. One group may have most of the population posting in it and for the others they are just there taking up space.


 
Cheat
| Flora Colossus
 
more |
XBL: Cheatlancer
PSN:
Steam: Cheatlancer
ID: Cheatlancer
IP: Logged

6,668 posts
Hmm...
We don't have the population for groups to work right without them killing the forums. Bnet has the population for groups to be active along with the forums as well. The only thing they would do is split up the population on a site that has hardly anybody to begin with. The other thing is that groups are going to be pointless until we get a population due to there being a decent amount of groups with hardly anybody posting in them. One group may have most of the population posting in it and for the others they are just there taking up space.
I feel like I've regurgitated the answer to this concern like 10 times. I'm not about to risk the forum for groups.


R o c k e t | Mythic Smash Master
 
more |
XBL: Rocketman287
PSN:
Steam: Rocketman287
ID: Rocketman287
IP: Logged

22,970 posts
I neither fear, nor despise.
Been working on them, but it's a slow process as Isara isn't around to help and I keep running into issues with the original script (right now users can't edit their own posts in groups).
How would group moderation work?
A user will be admin of the group, but only in that specific group.
Site mods and admins will still have powers over them.
Pretty much this. When they're done, the group owner will be able to create admins and mods, who can ban, lock posts, and hide posts. There will also be 7 security roles you can use as a ranking system with corresponding nameplates and colors. It'll be tight.

Why can't I upvote this?


 
TB
| Hero of the Wild
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: TBlocks
IP: Logged

17,217 posts
#13
I'm excited for them. They could be really cool and might even net us some more members!


Thun | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam: Thunder
ID: Suarez
IP: Logged

8,991 posts
 
There's like only 10 people here dude. This entire site is THE group.


 
Cheat
| Flora Colossus
 
more |
XBL: Cheatlancer
PSN:
Steam: Cheatlancer
ID: Cheatlancer
IP: Logged

6,668 posts
Hmm...
There's like only 10 people here dude. This entire site is THE group.
Multiply that by about 7 or 8. Not everyone is online all the time.


Mattie G Indahouse | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: BerzerkCommando
PSN: BerzerkCommando
Steam: BerzerkCommando
ID: BerzerkCommando
IP: Logged

9,047 posts
Did he say glass of juice or gas the Jews?
πŸ‘ΆπŸ½:h..

πŸ‘¨πŸ½:honey, he's gonna say his first words

πŸ‘©πŸ½:!!

πŸ‘ΆπŸ½:hhh...

πŸ‘ΆπŸ½:here come dat boi 🐸!

πŸ‘¨πŸ½:o shit waddup πŸ˜‚πŸ’―

πŸ‘©πŸ½:πŸ’”
There's like only 10 people here dude. This entire site is THE group.
Multiply that by about 7 or 8. Not everyone is online all the time.
And when these people are online the site still feels dead and empty. There's been a few times where we had at least two dozen people online and hardly anybody was posting.


 
Cheat
| Flora Colossus
 
more |
XBL: Cheatlancer
PSN:
Steam: Cheatlancer
ID: Cheatlancer
IP: Logged

6,668 posts
Hmm...
There's like only 10 people here dude. This entire site is THE group.
Multiply that by about 7 or 8. Not everyone is online all the time.
And when these people are online the site still feels dead and empty. There's been a few times where we had at least two dozen people online and hardly anybody was posting.
Thats really beyond my power. I can't force you guys to post.


 
TB
| Hero of the Wild
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: TBlocks
IP: Logged

17,217 posts
#13
There's like only 10 people here dude. This entire site is THE group.
Hardly.
Even at 4 am there's still at least 15 people online.
That's the minimum.


 
Mat Cauthon
| Ravens
 
more |
There's like only 10 people here dude. This entire site is THE group.
Hardly.
Even at 4 am there's still at least 15 people online.
That's the minimum.
Well, it depends on timezones.
The quietest I've seen was with 4 people.


 
TB
| Hero of the Wild
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: TBlocks
IP: Logged

17,217 posts
#13
There's like only 10 people here dude. This entire site is THE group.
Hardly.
Even at 4 am there's still at least 15 people online.
That's the minimum.
Well, it depends on timezones.
The quietest I've seen was with 4 people.
Wow really?
But that must have been late night for NA right? Like 2 - 4 am?


 
Mat Cauthon
| Ravens
 
more |
There's like only 10 people here dude. This entire site is THE group.
Hardly.
Even at 4 am there's still at least 15 people online.
That's the minimum.
Well, it depends on timezones.
The quietest I've seen was with 4 people.
Wow really?
But that must have been late night for NA right? Like 2 - 4 am?
IIRC, it would've been between 8am and 10am at GMT 00.


 
TB
| Hero of the Wild
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: TBlocks
IP: Logged

17,217 posts
#13
There's like only 10 people here dude. This entire site is THE group.
Hardly.
Even at 4 am there's still at least 15 people online.
That's the minimum.
Well, it depends on timezones.
The quietest I've seen was with 4 people.
Wow really?
But that must have been late night for NA right? Like 2 - 4 am?
IIRC, it would've been between 8am and 10am at GMT 00.
Makes sense I suppose.


Girl of Mystery | Mythic Unfrigginbelievable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: TheBritishLemon
IP: Logged

23,349 posts
A flower which blooms on the battlefield
We don't have the population for groups to work right without them killing the forums. Bnet has the population for groups to be active along with the forums as well. The only thing they would do is split up the population on a site that has hardly anybody to begin with. The other thing is that groups are going to be pointless until we get a population due to there being a decent amount of groups with hardly anybody posting in them. One group may have most of the population posting in it and for the others they are just there taking up space.
I feel like I've regurgitated the answer to this concern like 10 times. I'm not about to risk the forum for groups.
so what is your big solution to prevent groups killing the mains?


 
Cheat
| Flora Colossus
 
more |
XBL: Cheatlancer
PSN:
Steam: Cheatlancer
ID: Cheatlancer
IP: Logged

6,668 posts
Hmm...
We don't have the population for groups to work right without them killing the forums. Bnet has the population for groups to be active along with the forums as well. The only thing they would do is split up the population on a site that has hardly anybody to begin with. The other thing is that groups are going to be pointless until we get a population due to there being a decent amount of groups with hardly anybody posting in them. One group may have most of the population posting in it and for the others they are just there taking up space.
I feel like I've regurgitated the answer to this concern like 10 times. I'm not about to risk the forum for groups.
so what is your big solution to prevent groups killing the mains?
I...don't...let them kill the mains?

Groups will be beta tested with established groups on Bnet that I can rope into testing. Those will be the only groups on here for a good while and they will be invite only while the bugs are squashed and I get feedback from group owners on what they need and what needs changed. Assuming these groups will share population spikes similar to Anarchy, I'm banking on getting some members from those groups to stick around in the mains.

From there, groups will be opened to high-ranking members on an application/approval basis so I can control the population flow and cut them off if it dips in the mains. Later on, like...months on, they will be opened up to the public like you guys have been assuming I'd do from the start.

Simplified version: I will pay attention and not let them kill the mains.


πŸ‚Ώ | Mythic Unfrigginbelievable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Decimator Omega
IP: Logged

21,882 posts
 
Been working on them, but it's a slow process as Isara isn't around to help and I keep running into issues with the original script (right now users can't edit their own posts in groups).

You should have me as a site tester or something. I dunno. I get bored a lot here.


XBL:
PSN: ModernLocust
Steam:
ID: SecondClass
IP: Logged

30,029 posts
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
β€”Judge Aaron Satie
β€”β€”Carmen
People seem to forget that groups will doubtlessly attract new members. It's not like the member count is in stasis.