Shitpost indicator idea

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

This....really isn't a terrible idea.

The only problem is that some users don't believe what they post is shitposting.

How about a tag beside known shitposter's names?

Like:

Elegiac [Dustin]

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

The only problem is that some users don't believe what they post is shitposting.

If they were simply indicated as a shitpost, I wouldn't get as angsty and go to war with the moderators.

Oh?

Cheat, please implement this idea.

Too practical. Doesn't leave enough room for drama and modbias.

The only problem is that some users don't believe what they post is shitposting.

But you could edit posts to be labelled as a shitpost rather than locking them.

I'll admit, when my threads get locked when I think they don't deserve to be, I get pissed. If they were simply indicated as a shitpost, I wouldn't get as angsty and go to war with the moderators.

I think a better way to do it would be to give a warning to anyone who makes two lock worthy shitposts one after the other.
Which includes making one, say, now and another tomorrow.

But that would require close attention, so a timeframe would need to be added, say 20 hours.

I think a big issue with this place is that when there's something going on that needs to be sorted out, it usually just gets covered up instead of being solved.
And your idea just seems like a protective foil for shitposters, while they're already flying under the rules anyway.

Spoiler

How about deleting shitposters posts?
I've noticed one user cares about his rank quite a lot, yet when he makes a thread to shitpost and boost post count, his threads are just locked, but he gets away with boosting and keeps those posts.

That's not a bad idea.

One thing that comes to mind would simply be seeing how the community stands on the issue, via a basic poll or whatever, to gauge what people would prefer. Designated shitpost threads or a clampdown.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

i dont shitpost enough though

One thing that comes to mind would simply be seeing how the community stands on the issue, via a basic poll or whatever, to gauge what people would prefer. Designated shitpost threads or a clampdown.

... Really? Give a vote to the people that shitpost on whether they can shitpost more?
Psy pls.

i dont shitpost enough though

One thing that comes to mind would simply be seeing how the community stands on the issue, via a basic poll or whatever, to gauge what people would prefer. Designated shitpost threads or a clampdown.

... Really? Give a vote to the people that shitpost on whether they can shitpost more?
Psy pls.

The numbers of regular users to shitposters seems like it would at least balance their votes out.

i dont shitpost enough though

One thing that comes to mind would simply be seeing how the community stands on the issue, via a basic poll or whatever, to gauge what people would prefer. Designated shitpost threads or a clampdown.

... Really? Give a vote to the people that shitpost on whether they can shitpost more?
Psy pls.

The numbers of regular users to shitposters seems like it would at least balance their votes out.

I hope so.

Why would they use it though?

but i dont shitpost