Quote from: Frigid Farts™ on August 30, 2015, 01:32:51 AM>.>- Harsher punishments (24 hr base ban, etc....)- Clearer rules, Spoiler rule- One week ban for intentional spoilers- Thread Specific Permissions- Forum-only Monitors with special powersWhat elseI want my sundae.
>.>- Harsher punishments (24 hr base ban, etc....)- Clearer rules, Spoiler rule- One week ban for intentional spoilers- Thread Specific Permissions- Forum-only Monitors with special powersWhat else
Quote from: Korra Valentine on August 30, 2015, 01:33:58 AMQuote from: Frigid Farts™ on August 30, 2015, 01:32:51 AM>.>- Harsher punishments (24 hr base ban, etc....)- Clearer rules, Spoiler rule- One week ban for intentional spoilers- Thread Specific Permissions- Forum-only Monitors with special powersWhat elseI want my sundae.I ate it
>.>- Harsher punishments (24 hr base ban, etc....)- Clearer rules, Spoiler rule- One week ban for intentional spoilers- Thread Specific Permissions- Forum-only Monitors with special powers- More staffWhat else
Quote from: Frigid Farts™ on August 30, 2015, 01:32:51 AM>.>- Harsher punishments (24 hr base ban, etc....)- Clearer rules, Spoiler rule- One week ban for intentional spoilers- Thread Specific Permissions- Forum-only Monitors with special powers- More staffWhat elseEwwwnot these pls
So all of us agree that the rules need to be applied more consistently. Everyone seems to be "for" increasing the length of punishments, but that varies anywhere from three days to a month. The topic of repeat offenders seems split between continuing the current progression (increasingly long ban times) and a permaban after x amount of bans (no decided number given, other than comparing it to baseball).Overall, the rules need to be revisited on three accounts: consistency in application, consistency in severity of punishment, and finding other loop/holes that haven't been discovered yet.
Quote from: Prime Snake on August 30, 2015, 01:34:44 AMSo all of us agree that the rules need to be applied more consistently. Everyone seems to be "for" increasing the length of punishments, but that varies anywhere from three days to a month. The topic of repeat offenders seems split between continuing the current progression (increasingly long ban times) and a permaban after x amount of bans (no decided number given, other than comparing it to baseball).Overall, the rules need to be revisited on three accounts: consistency in application, consistency in severity of punishment, and finding other loop/holes that haven't been discovered yet.Prime Snake for mod.
spoiling a game deserves a week ban at least, depending on how many spoilers were given, a fucking month is retarded. if this was a game like, i dont know, call of duty or battlefield, im sure as fuck would expect most of you to say "hurdur no one like those games they dont deserve a ban."
What a fuckin' gem eh?
I appreciate the thought, though.
Perhaps in just an advisory capacity, then.Also, what do you prefer I call you? Prime Snake? CIA?
Quote from: Prime Snake on August 30, 2015, 01:41:18 AMI appreciate the thought, though.Perhaps in just an advisory capacity, then.Also, what do you prefer I call you? Prime Snake? CIA?
Quote from: Naru on August 30, 2015, 01:38:16 AMspoiling a game deserves a week ban at least, depending on how many spoilers were given, a fucking month is retarded. if this was a game like, i dont know, call of duty or battlefield, im sure as fuck would expect most of you to say "hurdur no one like those games they dont deserve a ban."because that's differentcod games aren't story heavy and thus aren't spoiler heavythis is the last metal gear game by kojimayeah, i kinda want to go in blindand tbh i would champion your argument, too
soooo.... just because CoD is CoD, people can say the spoilers for it and people are gonna be ok with that?
but if its a game like mgs, oh, its the second coming of christ.
in the future, i expect all of you to bitch about future games being spoiled if the rules change on this, not over MGSV only
Naru does make a point; I'd further extend it to media in general, though. If someone posts leaked spoilers from the Walking Dead, or the next Marvel movie, or the next Neptunia game: it doesn't matter. Spoilers are spoilers, and you can't reasonably provide favoritism in the rules when one of the core problems at the moment is the lack of consistent application.
in the future, i expect all of you to bitch about future games being spoiled if the rules change on this, not over MGSV only.
What I can reveal was that Movies are slated to have a spoiler-free window of about two weeks, while Games will be closer to a month.
Quote from: Frigid Farts™ on August 30, 2015, 01:49:54 AMWhat I can reveal was that Movies are slated to have a spoiler-free window of about two weeks, while Games will be closer to a month.Because it's generally easier (and cheaper) to go see a movie than it is to purchase and play a game all the way through?
I didn't even want to give Verb the level names since they generally provide a snippet of what the level is about. And I don't even fucking like Halo anymore.
Regarding Spoilers
