Give users the ability to lock their own threads.

Verb's giving way better points to his argument than you guys are. Basically your only argument has been "But we can't do that because then we would actually have to ban people for spam *gasp*!" I mean fucking come on. A user has certain rights to the threads they create, one of those being if they want to end a thread prematurely then let them fucking do so. It is their thread.

No, the argument is we have enough staff available to negate the need for such a feature.
Monitors can lock threads now too. That's 4 more people you can talk to about getting your thread locked by request.

But I can just lock my thread quicker if I can do it myself. Its more efficient, your point is invalid.

Send a PM to someone online, in less than a minute your thread is locked.
That happened today actually. So my point has merit.

But locking it myself is STILL quicker

And as Nuka pointed out in this thread, that ability can be abused.
People could spam locked threads.

The current method is barely slower, and much more effective.

Why are you arguing against making your job easier in the first place? Instead of having to go out of your way to go lock a thread, the OP can do it himself, which like / said is much more efficient. And if people start spamming locked threads? Just ban them, it's that simple.

Just ban them, it's that simple.

"muh activity"

Just ban them, it's that simple.

"muh activity"

But spamming is negative activity...

Just ban them, it's that simple.

"muh activity"

But spamming is negative activity...

And yet, look at the majority of the top posters.

But spamming is negative activity...

Exactly.

And yet, look at the majority of the top posters.

...Yes. Spamming tends to inflate your post count.

What an insipid observation.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

And yet, look at the majority of the top posters.

...Yes. Spamming tends to inflate your post count.

What an insipid observation.

That response wasn't directed at you.

ITT:

"Hey Cheat, can you please give us this minor feature to add a bit more convenience to the forum? Thanks"

"NOOO CHEAT DONT DO THIS I DONT WANT TO GIVE AWAY THE ONLY POWER THAT MONITORS HAVE"

You're barely holding on to your title as monitor anyway, just fucking quit it.

>Whines about being "harassed" by people

>Harasses people


Anyways, this is a double-edged sword.  There's potential for it to be successfully used, and successfully abused.  If someone's thread starts getting derailed, or people get angry and start assaulting each other in the thread and there's no monitors online, the person can then lock their own thread.

Then there's the spam of lock threads in the Flood, like "LOL I LOCKED THIS THREAD;  LOL I LOCKED ANOTHER THREAD".

I don't particularly have a stance on this issue, but whatever happens happens.  Wouldn't mind either way.

People could spam locked threads.

Ban. Them.

It shouldn't be a monitor's or moderator's job to lock threads on request. It should be their job to lock threads when things get out of hand. That's it.

The OP of the thread ought to have some discretion to that end.

Banning people for using a tool I gave them? No. You don't suddenly own a thread when you make it; it's not yours, it belongs to the community once it's out. That's the point of a forum. Giving everyone locking power over their own threads would cause aggravation if the OP gets upset and locks the thread.

And I'm not talking about people spamming locked threads here. I'm saying that in one of the very popular hot topics, the OP could essentially shut down discussion at any point in time, regardless of if they're contributing or not.

Not going to happen, sorry.

EDIT: and I'm not sure I phrased that properly so I'll rephrase it. I'm saying that by giving everyone locking abilities, it's implied that the OP can lock threads at their discretion as long as they're not obnoxious about it (as with spamming the report button to flood the system). And so I couldn't ban them for being a shit and locking a popular thread, because I would have given them the ability and license to do so.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

ITT:

"Hey Cheat, can you please give us this minor feature to add a bit more convenience to the forum? Thanks"

"NOOO CHEAT DONT DO THIS I DONT WANT TO GIVE AWAY THE ONLY POWER THAT MONITORS HAVE"

You're barely holding on to your title as monitor anyway, just fucking quit it.

>Whines about being "harassed" by people

>Harasses people


Anyways, this is a double-edged sword.  There's potential for it to be successfully used, and successfully abused.  If someone's thread starts getting derailed, or people get angry and start assaulting each other in the thread and there's no monitors online, the person can then lock their own thread.

Then there's the spam of lock threads in the Flood, like "LOL I LOCKED THIS THREAD;  LOL I LOCKED ANOTHER THREAD".

I don't particularly have a stance on this issue, but whatever happens happens.  Wouldn't mind either way.

First of all that's not harassment. If minor things like that were harassment then I'd have tons of users here banned in an instant. Anyway, Rocket's already been confronted about his behavior and I haven't seen him act immaturely towards me since. So fuck off.

>implying you shouldn't be banned yourself for the exact same kind of thing

Not going to happen, sorry.

Dumb.

Whatever.

Discussion over.

WISH I COULD LOCK THE THREAD!

Not going to happen, sorry.

Dumb.

Whatever.

Discussion over.

WISH I COULD LOCK THE THREAD!

Nah we still talking about it.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

Not going to happen, sorry.

WISH I COULD LOCK THE THREAD!

No, but I can. But, I'll leave it open so you can continue discussion - so long as it remains on the topic and not straying into discussion on harassment >.>

*place arbitrary and inconvient lock request here*

*place arbitrary and inconvient lock request here*

Do you want it locked?

Do I have to fucking say it three times now? Christ.