Did we get a verdict on images in signatures?

BaconShelf · January 17, 2015, 09:52:47 AM

I remember cheat saying he was considering it, any news on that?

Mat Cauthon · January 17, 2015, 09:55:53 AM

Have you tried it?

I think I saw someone with an image in their sig...

BaconShelf · January 17, 2015, 10:01:00 AM

Quote from: Nagato on January 17, 2015, 09:55:53 AM

Have you tried it?

I think I saw someone with an image in their sig...

Yeah, just shows up as a link.

Quote

The following errors occurred when trying to save your profile:
The following BBC is not allowed within your signature: abbr, acronym, anchor, bdo, black, blue, br, code, color, email, flash, font, ftp, glow, green, html, hr, img, iurl, left, li, list, ltr, me, move, nobbc, php, pre, red, right, rtl, shadow, size, sub, sup, table, td, time, tr, tt, white, youtube.

Tyger · January 17, 2015, 10:23:34 AM

Cheat currently has a ditto image as a signature... Sooo who knows

Flee · January 17, 2015, 04:46:32 PM

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

Elegiac · January 18, 2015, 06:31:13 AM

We don't really need the option. At all.

Girl of Mystery · January 18, 2015, 10:56:35 AM

Quote from: Flee on January 17, 2015, 04:46:32 PM

Cheat has one in his, so it all depends on whether or not he wants to share it with you all.

Literally a nazi

Cheat · January 19, 2015, 02:31:42 AM

Eh. It could be done, but I'd have to go in and make changes to the signature code so that nothing contained in them loaded before opening. Maybe that'll happen, but it's not a priority.

But to placate your need for extra stuff in your sig (even if only a little) I've allowed the "color" bbcode to be used.

Mat Cauthon · January 19, 2015, 02:54:36 AM

Quote from: Cheat on January 19, 2015, 02:31:42 AM

Eh. It could be done, but I'd have to go in and make changes to the signature code so that nothing contained in them loaded before opening. Maybe that'll happen, but it's not a priority.

But to placate your need for extra stuff in your sig (even if only a little) I've allowed the "color" bbcode to be used.

There's also the worry some people will use NSFW content or even shock images in there, the staff would have to trawl them regularly to check for people pulling stupid shit.

BaconShelf · January 19, 2015, 04:37:50 AM

Quote from: Nagato on January 19, 2015, 02:54:36 AM

Quote from: Cheat on January 19, 2015, 02:31:42 AM
Eh. It could be done, but I'd have to go in and make changes to the signature code so that nothing contained in them loaded before opening. Maybe that'll happen, but it's not a priority.

But to placate your need for extra stuff in your sig (even if only a little) I've allowed the "color" bbcode to be used.
There's also the worry some people will use NSFW content or even shock images in there, the staff would have to trawl them regularly to check for people pulling stupid shit.

It could eb a case that the image has to be approved, or it is something you get at a certain post limit like custom titlebars.