This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - snurch
Pages: 1 ... 495051 5253 ... 68
1501
« on: May 10, 2016, 06:22:53 PM »
how about car
1502
« on: May 10, 2016, 05:41:31 PM »
7/10 relaxing
i like genjis design in overwatch so i rendered it for a cleaner look
1503
« on: May 10, 2016, 05:40:27 PM »
awww
1504
« on: May 10, 2016, 05:39:59 PM »
meme
1505
« on: May 10, 2016, 04:16:14 PM »
i dont like chiclet keyboards, theyre okay on laptops to save space but theyre hard to clean and when they break you gotta replace the whole thing
thing is if you do actually get a mechanical keyboard it will probably outlive you and will probably be the only keyboard youll ever need for the rest of your life
assuming it uses decent switches like topres or cherries
Yeah I personally don't care for them. I tried them, just doesn't suit my preference.
they make different types of switches for different people, cherry makes blues, reds, blacks, browns and im not sure what else but they feel different from each other there's also topres and buckling springs, alpine switches, etc though i guess some people really just prefer flat profile keyboards, they dont make any of the above like that iirc
1506
« on: May 10, 2016, 04:11:41 PM »
i dont like chiclet keyboards, theyre okay on laptops to save space but theyre hard to clean and when they break you gotta replace the whole thing
thing is if you do actually get a mechanical keyboard it will probably outlive you and will probably be the only keyboard youll ever need for the rest of your life
assuming it uses decent switches like topres or cherries
1507
« on: May 10, 2016, 03:51:17 PM »
will i bleed to death or just be in pain
1508
« on: May 10, 2016, 03:49:23 PM »
CJ because he's black
What about Franklin?
Unstoppable force vs immovable object
they will simply pass through each other the unstoppable force is not stopped and the immovable object is not moved
1509
« on: May 10, 2016, 01:02:28 PM »
l
1510
« on: May 10, 2016, 01:01:58 PM »
What a trash MG game.
Why? It was never marketed as a Metal Gear Solid title, it was a spinoff.
Which is why I called it trash. I don't think it's a good Metal Gear game. They could have made their own universe/story/characters instead of leeching off the MG name. I suppose on its own, it's not that bad of a game, but it's not a good MG game. I can agree with the music though. I liked that.
thats why its mgr and not mgs you dilweed
he never said MGS, though--he said MG
that would refer both to MGS and MGR, i imagine
exactly they already have the distinction its still an MG universe game no reason to call it anything else
1511
« on: May 10, 2016, 11:45:24 AM »
still the metal gear universe
1512
« on: May 10, 2016, 11:44:42 AM »
What a trash MG game.
Why? It was never marketed as a Metal Gear Solid title, it was a spinoff.
Which is why I called it trash. I don't think it's a good Metal Gear game. They could have made their own universe/story/characters instead of leeching off the MG name. I suppose on its own, it's not that bad of a game, but it's not a good MG game. I can agree with the music though. I liked that.
thats why its mgr and not mgs you dilweed
1513
« on: May 10, 2016, 11:41:24 AM »
we dont really need a new name
theyre all just faster cars
1514
« on: May 10, 2016, 10:35:45 AM »
old games we remember are always going to be better because they were that good
like music, nobody can tell me the top 10 of 1990 even if they were good for their time but the best music has survived centuries like tchaikovsky and mozart
we still remember the beatles, cliff richards, etc
same goes for films which at the time were groundbreaking, cult classics like casablanca or a clockwork orange
there probably millions of songs, art, films that were made but unless they were that good they simply didnt survive the test of time, they could've been really popular for that year and then never heard from again
same would go for games
1515
« on: May 09, 2016, 06:56:45 PM »
That's a tertiary reason some people read reviews, but it's certainly not the reason they exist or why people write them.
That's literally the only reason for reviews. If you think the point of them is ANYTHING apart from that, you're part of the problem.
> literally the only reason
Two different things. Learn to read.
what you dont think people write reviews thinking someone might decide whether to buy it based on what you say
is that not why people put in "if youre thinking of buying this game"
Good reviewers don't write because they want to influence game sales, they do it because they want to give their two cents on the game's quality.
they will influence game sales if you honestly dont want people to buy a bad game youll tell people to keep their money
1516
« on: May 09, 2016, 06:23:37 PM »
what about reviews on amazon
you dont think people tell people whether or not they should buy this thing
they know someones going to make their purchase decision on some of these
1517
« on: May 09, 2016, 06:23:19 PM »
That's a tertiary reason some people read reviews, but it's certainly not the reason they exist or why people write them.
That's literally the only reason for reviews. If you think the point of them is ANYTHING apart from that, you're part of the problem.
> literally the only reason
Two different things. Learn to read.
what you dont think people write reviews thinking someone might decide whether to buy it based on what you say is that not why people put in "if youre thinking of buying this game"
1518
« on: May 09, 2016, 05:34:18 PM »
That's a tertiary reason some people read reviews, but it's certainly not the reason they exist or why people write them.
That's literally the only reason for reviews. If you think the point of them is ANYTHING apart from that, you're part of the problem.
> literally the only reason
1519
« on: May 09, 2016, 05:23:26 PM »
What's the point of reviewing a 6 year old game on a forum where 99% of the posters have already played it?
The point of every review that's ever existed? To give your organized opinion on something.
or see if you want to buy a game i mean i dont do that but i know people who do
1520
« on: May 09, 2016, 05:08:58 PM »
start fuckin' dudes like sailors and prisoners
But...I'm straight.,
Then fu k dudes that look like chicks. You're on the west coast. They're everywhere over there.
Seattle to boot.
I'm in a nice city a little out of Seattle. But, if I was at Capitol Hill, I would see that daily. But out here I hardly ever see that.
maybe theyre so good you cant tell
1521
« on: May 09, 2016, 04:35:08 PM »
the shields used to be 50 but that pushed the win rate for symmetra teams up by an crazy amount
thats why they were nerfed to 25
shes still pretty good at holding a position but cant really replace a player like lucio or mercy
1522
« on: May 09, 2016, 04:18:54 PM »
and symmetra doesnt really count with those tiny ass shields
shes more defence imo
1523
« on: May 09, 2016, 03:29:56 PM »
still disagree
Your loss.
loss of what
it wasnt a bad game
it just didnt feel like the halos that came before it
It clearly feels like classic halo. One of the reasons it's population was the biggest of any halo.
just because cod has a million players doesnt make it the best game in the world
it was also a lot of peoples first halo
also, reach didnt beat halo 3 in population. i think OP is genuinely misinformed. poor guy.
I was going of legit sources. https://halo.bungie.net/stats/reach/online.aspx
Halo 3 had an average of 221 million games played per month, Reach had an average of 263 million games played per month. Get your facts straight.
h3 still beats reach in almost every other metric
I do know Halo 3 is probably the best Halo, in terms of competition, but humor me, in these other metrics.
its in that link, halo 3 beats reach in nearly everything else on that sheat
1524
« on: May 09, 2016, 03:14:52 PM »
still disagree
Your loss.
loss of what
it wasnt a bad game
it just didnt feel like the halos that came before it
It clearly feels like classic halo. One of the reasons it's population was the biggest of any halo.
just because cod has a million players doesnt make it the best game in the world
it was also a lot of peoples first halo
also, reach didnt beat halo 3 in population. i think OP is genuinely misinformed. poor guy.
I was going of legit sources. https://halo.bungie.net/stats/reach/online.aspx
Halo 3 had an average of 221 million games played per month, Reach had an average of 263 million games played per month. Get your facts straight.
h3 still beats reach in almost every other metric
1525
« on: May 09, 2016, 03:13:00 PM »
also there was bloom in every halo
it was only in reach they had a visual indicator for it
not true. there was bullet spread in every halo. bloom was a new mechanic that actively increased that spread the faster you fired (semi-auto)/longer you fired (automatic). that was not in the other games.
i see
1526
« on: May 09, 2016, 03:10:27 PM »
reach mp didnt do it for me
i had 6 times the amount of games played on h3 than reach
1527
« on: May 09, 2016, 03:06:52 PM »
also there was bloom in every halo
it was only in reach they had a visual indicator for it
1528
« on: May 09, 2016, 03:05:15 PM »
still disagree
Your loss.
loss of what
it wasnt a bad game
it just didnt feel like the halos that came before it
It clearly feels like classic halo. One of the reasons it's population was the biggest of any halo.
just because cod has a million players doesnt make it the best game in the world it was also a lot of peoples first halo
1529
« on: May 09, 2016, 03:03:47 PM »
Reach is a well polished FPS,that offers the classic Halo gameplay i disagree
that offers the classic Halo gameplay, with the addition of Armor Abilities.
Only insofar as there are guns. Armor abilities weren't the only diverging mechanic. Loadouts alone - There are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything. - with were a huge step away from core classic Halo gameplay. Across the board, map design was extremely different too - Yea, the maps were not the best, but Reach did have some really good maps, like paradiso, Spire, Countdown. Map quality is not a feature of classic halo. - (reach's maps were the worst the series had seen by a long shot before halo 4 came out). Then there's the addition of bloom & different player physics. Again... read the whole review, bloom is mentioned,
Maybe you're talking out of your ass because you never really played the good Halo games - I have played every single Halo game (spartan Assault/Strike/Halo Online are jokes so they don't count) , or maybe you have played them and are just bad/retarded - I could beat your ass anyday on Halo 2 Classic, or Reach. , but anyone with half a brain who has played CE/H2/H3 can see that Reach's default multiplayer is almost NOTHING like them. It takes some steps away from them, but is not that different.
out of the bungie halos reach was the most different
1530
« on: May 09, 2016, 02:43:33 PM »
loool
it was great until he said "OWNED"
who the fuck says that anymore
this game looks fun but i cannot get over the characters
thats almost what i said on the sub 
Pages: 1 ... 495051 5253 ... 68
|
Show Posts