This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Luciana
Pages: 1 ... 99100101 102103 ... 441
3001
« on: October 20, 2016, 10:07:25 AM »
We're wasting our time anyway. Hillary will be the next president of the united states because that's what the establishment wants.
So have you already started packing? There's screenshots and pretty clear proof of you promising you'd leave the country if Trump loses.
Unless you're just going to do as predicted and come up with the childish "it doesn't count this time" excuse and blame everyone and everything instead.
1. I said I would go to Alaska.
2. It's obvious it's rigged.
3. Why would I care about a "promise" I made to a dying forum?
I'm actually surprised. I was expecting you to at least keep it up until after the election instead of coming back on your word even three weeks before the actual vote.
100% rigged. Don't care anymore.
I'm telling ya, Trump was a democrat who wanted Hillary to win all along. He was a Democrat long before he was a "republican".
3002
« on: October 20, 2016, 10:06:34 AM »
It was a teaser. I'm glad it's coming out, but CUM on. Nothing to really flip your shit over yet.
I just hope the MP doesn't turn into Microtransaction Hero like GTA V.
3004
« on: October 20, 2016, 09:58:51 AM »
I like it. Both a mobile and home system, and they're getting the major parties back after the Wii U flop.
3005
« on: October 20, 2016, 09:56:31 AM »
People in Brussels said everything was fine before the incident and look what happened. SAD!
3006
« on: October 20, 2016, 09:54:08 AM »
I was gonna start DS3 again but... meh
Weird thing is I did so many replays of DS2 simply because of how diverse the PvP/builds were. For some reason DS3 doesn't have the same appeal to me in terms of replayability. Same with DS1, or BB.
3007
« on: October 20, 2016, 09:53:40 AM »
It's obvious it's rigged.
3. Why would I care about a "promise" I made to a dying forum?
Already going back on your words and can't accept the fact your candidate is a retard who had every opportunity to win, but couldn't get out of his own way.
You are a very delusional person if you think Trump is some no do wrong man who lost ONLY because of some rigged election.
If we wanna dive into some conspiracies, how about this one. I think Trump wants Hillary to win. Both are democrats from New York, only one is more pessimistic than the other. He joined the election to make a point, and never thought (he said this in an interview) he'd make it this far. He doesn't want to win and become president, he wanted to make a point. What better way than to do what he does?
You ever notice when something comes out for Hillary that SHOULD fuck her over (every email ever, the FBI, the quip quo pro, etc), Trump says something even more crazy to get the media focused on him, and not talking more about the Hillary thing? It happens literally every. single. time.
I've said for the longest time I think he's not wanted to win and he's trying to hand it to Hillary. That's the one conspiracy I will even give thought to, because it's been reoccurring time and time and time again.
In that sense, maybe it was really rigged all along.
bottom paged you all need to wake up and read this
3008
« on: October 20, 2016, 09:39:51 AM »
It's obvious it's rigged.
3. Why would I care about a "promise" I made to a dying forum?
Already going back on your words and can't accept the fact your candidate is a retard who had every opportunity to win, but couldn't get out of his own way. You are a very delusional person if you think Trump is some no do wrong man who lost ONLY because of some rigged election. If we wanna dive into some conspiracies, how about this one. I think Trump wants Hillary to win. Both are democrats from New York, only one is more pessimistic than the other. He joined the election to make a point, and never thought (he said this in an interview) he'd make it this far. He doesn't want to win and become president, he wanted to make a point. What better way than to do what he does? You ever notice when something comes out for Hillary that SHOULD fuck her over (every email ever, the FBI, the quip quo pro, etc), Trump says something even more crazy to get the media focused on him, and not talking more about the Hillary thing? It happens literally every. single. time. I've said for the longest time I think he's not wanted to win and he's trying to hand it to Hillary. That's the one conspiracy I will even give thought to, because it's been reoccurring time and time and time again. In that sense, maybe it was really rigged all along.
3009
« on: October 20, 2016, 09:38:30 AM »
One of the things I really don't get is how Hillary supporters smear Trump for blatantly lying/ignoring facts. Hillary's exactly the same; Trump is just more obvious about it.
Not that I'm saying they're qualitatively equal as candidates, but the section on national debt boiled down to the moderator noting "your plan will increase debt-to-GDP to 86pc" and Hillary replying "No it won't".
The only difference between this and Trump saying "wrong" all the time is that Clinton is willing to couch it in rhetoric.
I don't think Hillary supporters at all think she's not a liar. It's more a case of "both are pieces of shit. Which do you hate just a bit more?" If we had a viable 3rd party candidate, I'd vote for them. If there is one positive that comes from this election, it's that the two party system is broken, and it's been exposed for the power keeping that it is.
3010
« on: October 20, 2016, 09:37:09 AM »
I just watched the debate, it's nearing the end right now, but even with Hillary winning the presidency she lost this debate hard. She got BTFO several times and completely changed subjects at several points. If Trump was like this in all three debates the polls would be a little different.
Even if he did (which I don't think he did. First 30 mins or so I think he did, but then it was the same with The Don), he forever sealed his fate with him saying he'd keep people in suspense by not accepting it if Hillary wins. And before you say it's like Al Gore in 2000, yes, but that was very close, places were still getting recounts, and even after all that, he conceded and called for people to get behind Bush. If he loses by like 400-2000 votes, yes, he has every right to demand a recount and drag it out. If either side loses by 2 million or so, then I think it's clear cut the message. Trump saying he wont accept sets a dangerous precedent. One that helped dog Ukraine, and other fragile democracies. It's pretty scary, but hopefully after he loses, it all goes away and he's just a one off crazy candidate.
3011
« on: October 19, 2016, 11:07:31 PM »
Sweden is a prime example of when leftist ideology goes too far, and should serve as a highlight of just how dangerous leftists are to the prosperity of the human race.
Both sides gone too far left or right is dangerous to the prosperity of the human race. That's why they're called fringes for a reason.
muh horseshoe muh moderation muh
It's true? Good reply.
I think his point is that it's very easy to sit in the middle and say "both sides are bad when gone too far!" because it's a very common and safe belief to have. People who are afraid of having their convictions challenged tend to sit in the middle, which can be irritating for those of us who actually have the balls to say something that people will disagree with.
Not saying that's who you are, but that's sort of the mentality he's attacking.
Well I clearly said I think it's stupid. I just think going with the mentality that it's always one sides fault and the other can never do wrong, is a silly one have. Edit: And just in case I WASN'T clear, I think the fact they let the ISIS flag fly, but ban their own fucking nations flag in some schools, is just a nice way of completely undermining your own country and culture.
3012
« on: October 19, 2016, 10:53:34 PM »
Sweden is a prime example of when leftist ideology goes too far, and should serve as a highlight of just how dangerous leftists are to the prosperity of the human race.
Both sides gone too far left or right is dangerous to the prosperity of the human race. That's why they're called fringes for a reason.
muh horseshoe muh moderation muh
It's true? Good reply.
3013
« on: October 19, 2016, 10:35:09 PM »
Good weekend for me. Civ 6/Battlefield 1, and hopefully the NX not being a piece of shit
3014
« on: October 19, 2016, 10:04:15 PM »
Kasich would have been destroyed in these debates.
Zero chance.
I'm not so sure. Kasich is the voice of reason in his party, and he has a history of actually doing things. Pair that with Hillary's mass corruption, and he'd have easily been boosted in the polls. He'd also appeal to the moderate democrats, and even the Republicans not voting for Trump. His favorability rating would destroy Hillary. Her own party doesn't even like her.
3015
« on: October 19, 2016, 10:00:39 PM »
Why do you think Rubio could beat Hillary when he wasn't even the runner up in his own party
Well the issue with everything with the GOP this cycle was they were out of touch with their base, and didn't coalesce behind one candidate early on to stop Trump. By the time they did unite behind one candidate, it was already too late, and Trump had the momentum. What sounds more appealing to you? Bush saying "Vote for me and I'll guarantee a steady growth in our economy" or Trump going "We don't win anymore. Vote for me and I'll make us win again." That answer is easy enough. Anyway, the problem with Trump is his root message is one that could easily win anyone over. Washington is corrupt, we need to change it, you need someone who doesn't cozy up to Washington like Hillary. That message was exactly what got the Tea Party into power in 2010, though later all they did was literally nothing, rather than offer their own solutions, which only pissed the base off more. The issue is everything else Trump has said that has polarized him from winning anyone outside of the far right. The prime example I use is Kasich. If they would have voted for him, the man who helped Bill Clinton balance the budget that Hillary loves to throw around, it'd be no contest. Trump was always damaged goods. Any of those other candidates could have beat Hillary, who has proven to be corrupt, make mistakes, and be a war hawk. But I digress hugely. Your question is with Rubio. That's easy. He's young, he's charismatic, and he is the future of the Republican Party. He also was one of the few that busted his ass (and later ran from it) trying to reform Immigration that has always been promised to be reformed for decades. Basically, he'd have the Obama vs McCain effect. Old vs New. A change vs the same ole same ole.
3016
« on: October 19, 2016, 09:56:42 PM »
Trump all but sealed his fate when he went against his VP, and daughter in saying he will or will not accept the results.
3017
« on: October 19, 2016, 09:51:26 PM »
Nope not Donalds fault at all.
Could have been Rubio or Cruz, Hillary was winning no matter what.
Not... really. Anyone but Cruz or the Donald could have easily beaten Clinton. Going too far right, or too far left, is suicide, because most people in the country will relate to a moderate position. If you honestly don't think it wasn't Trump not being able to get out of his own way, idk what to tell you. Anyway, it's getting late. As much as we do bicker over this, it is enjoyable to have these discussions with you (and others). So I'm gonna call it a night. I just want this election done with.
3018
« on: October 19, 2016, 09:49:08 PM »
We're wasting our time anyway. Hillary will be the next president of the united states because that's what the establishment wants.
Yeah and it was never Donald's fault. None of his outbursts or far right rhetoric has done him in. Nope. He did no wrong. Never mind the history of moderate strategy winning the most because they can win enough votes from both sides, rather than just always stay far right or far left.
3019
« on: October 19, 2016, 09:48:03 PM »
2-1 Trump.
Hillary won the 1st.
Trump won the last 2.
In all seriousness, like the second debate, I consider this one a stalemate.
Emphasis on "stale."
I'm surprised you even gave the first one to Hillary.
It honestly doesn't even matter. Everyone already has their minds made up. I doubt there is an undecided at this point.
3020
« on: October 19, 2016, 09:45:32 PM »
No, it's the refusal of people like you to listen to the evidence these sites present, disregarding them wholly because of the website they're on.
I refuse to listen to them because these websites promote conspiracy theories. If they were actually credible, I'd buy into it. Hell, even Fox News isn't drumming up it's corrupt. That should be saying something. Even REPUBLICANS THEMSELVES are saying it's not. I don't know why you refuse to believe so.
Oh the republican establishment who hate trump and don't want their own party to win the election?
No? A lot of governors who have proclaimed their support for Trump. Iowa is a prime example.
3021
« on: October 19, 2016, 09:44:41 PM »
No, it's the refusal of people like you to listen to the evidence these sites present, disregarding them wholly because of the website they're on.
I refuse to listen to them because these websites promote conspiracy theories.
There you go. Labelling it all as a conspiracy theory without looking at the evidence.
I'm talking about conspiracy theories in general, not specifically the election. But yes, I will also say the election thing is a conspiracy as well considering both parties, including people vehemently against Hillary, won't say it's corrupt. Plus it's controlled at the state level, and the federal government holds no control over ANY of the elections. If that was the case, swing states wouldn't exist in places that are usually red. Same with usually blue. If that's the case, North Carolina would have gone to Obama both times, rather than just once.
3022
« on: October 19, 2016, 09:42:19 PM »
No, it's the refusal of people like you to listen to the evidence these sites present, disregarding them wholly because of the website they're on.
I refuse to listen to them because these websites promote conspiracy theories. If they were actually credible, I'd buy into it. Hell, even Fox News isn't drumming up it's corrupt. That should be saying something. Even REPUBLICANS THEMSELVES are saying it's not. I don't know why you refuse to believe so.
3023
« on: October 19, 2016, 09:41:54 PM »
Womanizing? So every man ever? Cause literally every normal man talks like that to their friends.
I like how Trump says something and you just believe it as if its common knowledge. It's not that normal.
Its pretty normal. I could read my group texts from the last 48 hours and its much more "womanizing" than anything Trump has said.
It sounds like college frat boys talking about women. It's not normal for a grown ass man.
3024
« on: October 19, 2016, 09:40:54 PM »
>Highest corporate tax in developed world
>"Corporations have to pay their fair share"
There's a point in voting democrat when you just become complicit in theft.
They don't care. None of them will ever be successful and contribute to their communities.
No democrat will ever be successful? Lol what sweeping statement is this? Even Verb wouldn't give a sweeping statement that all Republicans are gun toting idiots.
Nice buzzwords
You literally just said democrats are never successful. I'm just using a stereotype that not even Verb woulda said, who hates the right.
People who vote democrat and agree with their policies will never be successful contributors to their communities. Yes.
So by this logic, are you saying a democratic president has never been successful as well?
A politician who lived his/her entire life off the taxpayers? Yes.
Yeah, you really are a supporter of The Donald. Not even gonna dive down this rabbit hole with you. "It's because you know I'm right." I'll save you the trouble of that post.
3025
« on: October 19, 2016, 09:39:21 PM »
Womanizing? So every man ever? Cause literally every normal man talks like that to their friends.
I like how Trump says something and his supporters just believe it as if its common knowledge. It's not that normal.
3026
« on: October 19, 2016, 09:38:50 PM »
>Highest corporate tax in developed world
>"Corporations have to pay their fair share"
There's a point in voting democrat when you just become complicit in theft.
They don't care. None of them will ever be successful and contribute to their communities.
No democrat will ever be successful? Lol what sweeping statement is this? Even Verb wouldn't give a sweeping statement that all Republicans are gun toting idiots.
Nice buzzwords
You literally just said democrats are never successful. I'm just using a stereotype that not even Verb woulda said, who hates the right.
People who vote democrat and agree with their policies will never be successful contributors to their communities. Yes.
So by this logic, are you saying a democratic president has never been successful as well?
3027
« on: October 19, 2016, 09:38:07 PM »
Yawn. Watch the video and tell me its still a conspiracy.
Its cool. Cover your ears. LALALALALALALA wikileaks LALALALALALA emails LALALALALA
And here we see a Trumplodyte in its natural habitat. Refusing to listen to reason and credible news sources, and instead linking fringe websites to support their cause.
You're acting like I'm saying Hillary is innocent. She's not. I hate her. I just hate Trump more.
Because mainstream media is so reliable
That's always the fallback when they say the thing everyone agrees with but the far right refuses to accept. It's almost as funny as actually thinking Trump will win, or, if he loses, it's not because of his own undoing. Allah save me from this mental gymnastic train.
3028
« on: October 19, 2016, 09:37:01 PM »
You're acting like I'm saying Hillary is innocent. She's not. I hate her. I just hate Trump more.
So you agree? Shes not innocent?
In that case, shes not eligible to be the president of the united states.
And you think a tax evading, womanizing, corrupt businessman is? They're both not fit at all. None should have won their primaries.
3029
« on: October 19, 2016, 09:36:14 PM »
>Highest corporate tax in developed world
>"Corporations have to pay their fair share"
There's a point in voting democrat when you just become complicit in theft.
They don't care. None of them will ever be successful and contribute to their communities.
No democrat will ever be successful? Lol what sweeping statement is this? Even Verb wouldn't give a sweeping statement that all Republicans are gun toting idiots.
Nice buzzwords
You literally just said democrats are never successful. I'm just using a stereotype that not even Verb woulda said, who hates the right.
3030
« on: October 19, 2016, 09:33:52 PM »
Yawn. Watch the video and tell me its still a conspiracy.
Its cool. Cover your ears. LALALALALALALA wikileaks LALALALALALA emails LALALALALA
And here we see a Trumplodyte in its natural habitat. Refusing to listen to reason and credible news sources, and instead linking fringe websites to support their cause. You're acting like I'm saying Hillary is innocent. She's not. I hate her. I just hate Trump more.
Pages: 1 ... 99100101 102103 ... 441
|
Show Posts