Whats SJW stand for?

Social Justice Warrior, it's the malignant breed of Tumblrites that seem to be infecting the whole fucking internet lately.

Quote from: Mr Psychologist on September 13, 2014, 04:58:59 PM

Quote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 04:54:40 PM

Quote from: Mr Psychologist on September 13, 2014, 04:52:58 PM

No fucking shit that paedophiles who molested children viewed CP and vis versa. CP is utterly wrong with zero basis for argument.

What isn't CP is the fucking lolispam that seems to tweak your bonnet so, it's a fucking cartoon and it's getting ridiculously tiring to see you equating the two or claiming that lolispam is a gateway to actual CP.

Am I going to become someone who watches bestgore 24/7 because I love gory films? Am I going to become a serial killer if I do? This is how fallacious your argument is. You are doing the same old shit that the media pulls on violent video games but applying it to what perverts draw in their basements.

Jesus christ with a cross up his shrektum, will you give this malarkey a rest?

Once again, this is just another side argument, I don't care if you don't agree with me on the loli argument. Once again, this thread has to do with the people who hold the opinions listed in the top four poll options of this thread and why in the hell you and everyone else are defending them.

Because you are making a mother fucking strawman out of this, that's why.

You want me to do a piecemeal point for your precious four points? Here we fucking go.

It's okay for nude pictures of teens and kids to circulate the internet
-Not okay, zero discussion.
It's okay for nude pictures of teens 14+ to circulate the internet
-Not okay, partial discussion as AoC Laws vary from country to country. That's the trouble with the internet. On a personal level, I don't think they should.
The AoC should be significantly lower so younger people can have relationships with older people
Up for discussion as this is deliberately vague, your view of significantly lower could be either 2 years or 10. Clarify it for a clarified response.
It's okay to spread nude photos of children around because they shouldn't have taken the photo in the first place
Of course it's not okay, and this argument is another example of the ridiculous strawman you have going.

You then blanket it off with this 'I don't agree with any of the above stances' and expect everyone to vote properly on a stupid poll rather than clog it up with stupid answers to further prolong this farce.

This isn't meant to include everyone's opinions on the issue, clearly. I listed four opinions to see who agreed with them. And it appears as if there are multiple people that do and here you are still defending them.

My last point - People will vote for the four options simply to prolong this fucking farce.
I'm not defending those four points either, I'm pointing out the flaws in your stupid logic and how you keep trying to extend this to cover lolis. I find it all distasteful, but I'm not going to have some idiot shit all over people I like to talk to simply because of some picture/gif spamming they did a while back. So if you want to split this thread at this point, be my guest.

Once again, I'm not defending the four points but I am providing counter-points to the extensions and >implications you have previously thrown towards lolicons.

To put it even more simply, find another group to lynch you insufferable SJW phaggot.

Or post the troll face and claim this was a ruse simply to raise my blood pressure.

Quote from: Mr Psychologist on September 13, 2014, 04:54:58 PM

Quote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 04:51:18 PM

Quote from: Mr Psychologist on September 13, 2014, 04:45:40 PM

Quote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 04:41:43 PM

Quote from: Mr Psychologist on September 13, 2014, 04:37:24 PM

Quote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 04:33:37 PM

I honestly don't know why I expected anything different.

Take your persecution complex and cram it so hard up your ass that it comes out of your mouth. I'm done with this crap, if you still think that I'm only playing to the tune of the forum rather than expressing my opinion, then why would I waste any more time on you.

Congratulations on inheriting the position of Kinder Tier eejit.

Are you not going to address the fact that every single argument you made against wasn't even legit or did that just slip by your head? I've said a dozen times and I'll say it again: this argument is about how people hold the opinions listed in the top four poll options and people like you are defending them. That doesn't fly with me and frankly not the rest of society.

The trouble with bait is once you take a bite, the hook is in your gob.

Stop trying to attach my name to degenerates because I disagree with you. How were they not legitimate? Did you refute them? Or just dismiss them? You claim they were irrelevant and yet they are what I have picked up on from the previous threads.

Then you'll no doubt pull the I'm not trolling but I am trolling in some threads, to which I have to point out Poe's Law. If it's all the same colour of horseshit, don't act surprised when people call it all horseshit rather than pick out the slightly different texture.

Why are you not even understanding what I'm saying? You gave at least three claims about what my arguments were, and I told that wasn't my argument. For example you said the root cause of this had to do with "loli" and I said that wasn't it but rather something else. Does that make sense to you now?

So define your argument clearly then. Rather than spreading it out over pages of bollocks and cherry picking ones to suit your meta-game. Or better yet, I could stop wasting my time on this crap.

Go on though, clearly and concisely explain your entire argument and I will address that rather than the flustercuck of shite you spew out.

I said it a million times, literally. I'm upset that there are so many people who hold the top four poll options of this thread and so many people are defending them. That's literally it. If I didn't care I wouldn't have sold my reputation trying to fix this problem here.

And yet, it was obviously not clear otherwise this discussion wouldn't be occuring. Or are you going to imply that I'm just bashing you for popularity points again?

Quote from: Mr Psychologist on September 13, 2014, 04:45:40 PM

Quote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 04:41:43 PM

Quote from: Mr Psychologist on September 13, 2014, 04:37:24 PM

Quote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 04:33:37 PM

I honestly don't know why I expected anything different.

Take your persecution complex and cram it so hard up your ass that it comes out of your mouth. I'm done with this crap, if you still think that I'm only playing to the tune of the forum rather than expressing my opinion, then why would I waste any more time on you.

Congratulations on inheriting the position of Kinder Tier eejit.

Are you not going to address the fact that every single argument you made against wasn't even legit or did that just slip by your head? I've said a dozen times and I'll say it again: this argument is about how people hold the opinions listed in the top four poll options and people like you are defending them. That doesn't fly with me and frankly not the rest of society.

The trouble with bait is once you take a bite, the hook is in your gob.

Stop trying to attach my name to degenerates because I disagree with you. How were they not legitimate? Did you refute them? Or just dismiss them? You claim they were irrelevant and yet they are what I have picked up on from the previous threads.

Then you'll no doubt pull the I'm not trolling but I am trolling in some threads, to which I have to point out Poe's Law. If it's all the same colour of horseshit, don't act surprised when people call it all horseshit rather than pick out the slightly different texture.

Why are you not even understanding what I'm saying? You gave at least three claims about what my arguments were, and I told that wasn't my argument. For example you said the root cause of this had to do with "loli" and I said that wasn't it but rather something else. Does that make sense to you now?

So define your argument clearly then. Rather than spreading it out over pages of bollocks and cherry picking ones to suit your meta-game. Or better yet, I could stop wasting my time on this crap.

Go on though, clearly and concisely explain your entire argument and I will address that rather than the flustercuck of shite you spew out.

A bit more centrist than I expected really.

Quote from: God on September 13, 2014, 04:32:04 PM

Quote from: Kinder_ on September 13, 2014, 04:22:40 PM

Wait, did Dustin really post nude pics?

No, he just accused this forum of having "pedophilic culture" because a few users support lowering the age of consent by a couple years or are attracted to anime characters. Then went on to spam multiple threads on the same topic and made threats to have the police investigate this site's users.

Once again, no, it has to do with the fact there are people who hold opinions stated the four top poll options. I find "loli" excruciatingly distasteful, and it's a gateway for people to start looking up more extreme porns.

I know I said that I was done, but lawd have mercy on me for going back on my word.

You simply have to be trolling at this point, there is no other explanation. You used the cardinal sin of slippery slopes and equated drawings with a gateway to looking up CP. GG Dustin, you rused us all well.

Quote from: Meta Cognition on September 13, 2014, 03:59:02 PM

Quote from: Gatsby on September 13, 2014, 03:16:34 PM

yeah they're fucking expensive

What?

The revenue from their lands is greater than their salary.

Not counting tourism benefits.

>implying that the queen would actually have to own the lands to generate revenue
>implying that it couldn't generate just as much tourism, if not more as a historical site with no monarchy

>Implying that you can simply take their land away like some kind of filthy commie
>Implying that the royalty has no tourist appeal
>implying that the royalty actually has a negative tourist appeal

Ye fookin wot m8? .-.

Quote from: Mr Psychologist on September 13, 2014, 03:45:55 PM

unfounded as the witch burnings.

THERE WEREN'T ACTUALLY ANY WITCHES?

Spoiler

I know D:

Well so far it's not been locked.

Here we go.

#1. The suspected root cause.
Suspected = blatantly obvious but anyway. You bitch about the animu spam of lolis and the like as if it condones the rape of children. So I'll pick this one apart a little.

First off, I don't like it. I like Anime, but I dislike lolicon related materials and the whole bunch of material that falls under ecchi/etc. That's just me, but I don't care if other people like it. Not everyone likes bloody gorey dismemberment but I do, I don't have people bitch at me for liking that so the courtesy is returned.

Then there is another point to consider, about the wider implications of loli art/materials. Japan is a very different place to the west (Stating the fecking obvious here) with lower AoC laws because that's how their society rolls. The loli shit is creepy, sure, but it doesn't make them all paedophiles anymore than westerners ... I hate to say this... 'enjoying' that stuff. I'm not going to go any further on that part because frankly I find the whole area distasteful but I'm sure someone else has already pointed out why lolicons aren't full on kiddy fiddlers.

Then there is the point to raise about the harmfulness of such material.
Who does it harm? Kids? As far as I know it doesn't. It might offend the sensibilities of some people but that's not going to cause any lasting damage. Computers for displaying them? (I'm not going to go all technotheocratic but you get the point) It's one of those rare, genuine, victimless non-crimes. It doesn't harm anyone full stop.

#2 AoC discussion =/= Hurr lez raep kidzzzzz
This one should be self evident. Discussing the altering of a law does not mean that it's going to lead to horrific consequences. This is called a slippery slope and I'm fairly certain you yourself get pissed off with slippery slopes when it comes to things like marriage equality or genuine social justice (Not SJWs).

#3 Mental Illness.
I try not to get pissy over this but it irks me when it's waved around as a smear. People holding different and controversial opinions doesn't make them mentally ill. Nor does discussing the AoC make them a paedophile (Bear in mind that most of the people on here are only barely over it themselves - Region dependant), so pulling out the DSM definitions (If this wasn't you, then apologies) to try to claim that the people on this site either support paedophilia or actively bugger toddlers - This is also something I try to avoid saying. Fuck off and die. Use your words, don't make false claims about diseases to try to undermine the opponent.

#4 Following on from 3.
Paedophile =/= Child Molester
Not all paedos are kiddy fiddlers, they are all mentally ill and should be treated as such.
Where I say that it's fine to shoot the ones who fuck toddlers doesn't come from 'hurr muh intolerance of illnuss' but from a utilitarian standpoint. They've done it once, they will probably do it again. They will actively partake in real material consumption and will continue to be a dangerous corruptive influence. Locking them up in jail to be Bubba'd until they die is as inhumane as allowing them to hurt another child. Shooting them and burning the body speeds everything up with the least harm done. Those who haven't hurt children shouldn't be demonized, but should be given help without prejudice. PM me if you want to hear more on that one specifically, but I won't put it on the mains.

So, with that all said.

Kindly stop your one man witchhunt against the forum, it's as pathetic and unfounded as the witch burnings.

Oh and if you decide to try the ol' hurr mr psy supports teh pedoz, which you seem to have used against everyone else in these threads. Just save us both the bother and don't reply with anything longer than a paragraph. If you actually want to discuss it properly, then fire away. I won't get pissy if you name call like I have done, but I won't have my time wasted on this any more. I'll happily spend time on forums, all day infact, but I won't waste it.

ONCE MORE UNTO THE BREACH YOU DOGS!

LET THE SHITSTORM COMMENCE.

eugh

royalty

do they also have dragons and wizards there?

ye

Quote from: Mr Psychologist on September 13, 2014, 02:38:41 PM

Quote from: Ryle on September 13, 2014, 02:37:16 PM

i kinda want to talk about aircraft here again

What goes neeeeyooooowwwwwm?

mr psychologist, apparently

Ha. Incorrect though.

It's the sound of an eejit flying an aeroplane.

i kinda want to talk about aircraft here again

What goes neeeeyooooowwwwwm?

Quote from: Mr Psychologist on September 13, 2014, 02:26:30 PM

I'll put this plainly.

Fuck. No.

English Civil War: Round 2 if they try.

lolbutyoulikegeorgegallowayyoumassivefage

So? <.<

I don't have to agree with 100% of someone's views to like them.

Noelle said
So why is this even relevant to bring up? Especially when you say that you know there are a lot of transphobic fucktards here. Are you trying to make others hate on her?

To lure them out so we can all laugh at their idiocy/fear?

*shrugs*