This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Yu
Pages: 1 ... 777879 8081 ... 420
2341
« on: May 12, 2015, 08:25:31 PM »
>photoshop
>new canvas
>780px by 25 px
>create some shit
>save as png
>upload to imgur
>link to profile via look and layout
There ya go.
2342
« on: May 12, 2015, 05:35:03 PM »
Okay, not doing much.
2343
« on: May 12, 2015, 05:17:53 PM »
Anime, all day.
2344
« on: May 12, 2015, 04:21:27 PM »
There was a period where I had rotating avis, but I just went back to using the one I before then.
2345
« on: May 12, 2015, 02:49:47 PM »
Geh.
2346
« on: May 12, 2015, 02:48:17 PM »
Lemon juice is good
Lemon meringue pie is better.
Bake me some
K, let me just take a plane to Finland, I'm sure Casper won't mind.
Apron only
Only if you wear purple pantsu.
2347
« on: May 12, 2015, 02:44:22 PM »
Lemon juice is good
Lemon meringue pie is better.
Bake me some
K, let me just take a plane to Finland, I'm sure Casper won't mind.
2348
« on: May 12, 2015, 02:41:49 PM »
Lemon juice is good
Lemon meringue pie is better.
2349
« on: May 12, 2015, 02:31:38 PM »
So am I. Then please, elaborate how appearance alone is the best indicator of flavor.
Oh, you misinterpreted my post. Read it again. I didn't think it was that hard, but whatever.
I'm not saying YOU are using childish meat-eater logic. I'm saying Voro is. I answered for him.
Well shit, clearly I still haven't woken up.
2350
« on: May 12, 2015, 02:23:12 PM »
So am I.
Then please, elaborate how appearance alone is the best indicator of flavor.
2351
« on: May 12, 2015, 02:10:27 PM »
Since when was judging food base on appearance alone, the best indicator of flavor? Childish meat-eater logic.
I remember thinking the same way.
When I was eight.
>asking why the vegan dish doesn't look tasty because of appearance >"Childish meat-eater logic" I'm talking about all food.
2352
« on: May 12, 2015, 02:06:58 PM »
Well when my choice to eat something is this...
or this
I think I know what I'm going to to be getting.
Both look pretty tasty.
I'd eat both.
How does rice and mush look good to you?
Since when was judging food base on appearance alone, the best indicator of flavor?
2353
« on: May 12, 2015, 02:01:52 PM »
I just threw away a steak because I saw this thread again.
Chally no, thats a waste.
2354
« on: May 12, 2015, 01:25:16 PM »
2355
« on: May 12, 2015, 01:21:24 PM »
seriously did yu think we would just forget about it?
Maybe.
2356
« on: May 12, 2015, 02:45:26 AM »
Spicy Cheetos with Lime.
2357
« on: May 12, 2015, 02:14:25 AM »
Because prohibition worked well, lets try it with food options. Irrelevant. Otherwise, I guess we should legalize murder, because people still murder people every single day regardless.
Bad straw man.
I'm only pointing out that it wouldn't work, whatever her intentions are, no one would follow it, and like hell would anyone enforce it. The amount of backlash it would get would ensure it would never happen.
I think this is rather short-sighted. Nobody expects the world to turn vegan overnight; it would be a gradual shift, like every great feat of moral progress has been a gradual shift (or is currently in the process of shifting).
And hey, animal farming may never stop completely. That doesn't mean we should rest on our laurels and not even try.
Thats assuming people actually accept that being forced onto them.
2358
« on: May 12, 2015, 01:52:09 AM »
Didn't realized you had said any of that stuff.
2359
« on: May 12, 2015, 12:41:20 AM »
Never really been in the position where I had to explain Sep7.
2360
« on: May 12, 2015, 12:26:51 AM »
unless his reasons are deeply entrenched in psychological issues, then there is no harm in it for him.
That is still dependent on many tiny minute factors. It's not something that can be easily explained as black and white as that. Although whatever harm there might be, miniscule or not, doesn't necessarily mean he's abnormal.
It does have the potential to really affect people negatively though, if they're prone to being too bothered by it, which does have to possibility to affect him negatively as well. It's not as if he's untouchable.
<.<
Thanks for expanding on my point, that I already made.
Nah nigga you said that there was no harm in it, and I'm saying that there still can be even if he doesn't have some psychological issue as a factor.
Um, the part that you quoted was saying just that.
u wot. . . It literally says that if there's no psychological issues, then there's no harm in it.
w/e this isn't important.
>unless
>deeply entrenched
>no harm
Someone must be sleepy.
Exactly, you're saying there's no harm for him in just trolling, as long as there's no deep psychological issue behind it. And I'm saying there there definitely can be harm for him in it.
I'm saying nearly the opposite of what you're saying. tf I can't make it any more blunt than that. .
Alright, I'm done now.
<.< I know its a trivial thing, but thats why I added the "unless" part, because it can be, but only if its based on psychological issues.
2361
« on: May 12, 2015, 12:18:38 AM »
unless his reasons are deeply entrenched in psychological issues, then there is no harm in it for him.
That is still dependent on many tiny minute factors. It's not something that can be easily explained as black and white as that. Although whatever harm there might be, miniscule or not, doesn't necessarily mean he's abnormal.
It does have the potential to really affect people negatively though, if they're prone to being too bothered by it, which does have to possibility to affect him negatively as well. It's not as if he's untouchable.
<.<
Thanks for expanding on my point, that I already made.
Nah nigga you said that there was no harm in it, and I'm saying that there still can be even if he doesn't have some psychological issue as a factor.
Um, the part that you quoted was saying just that.
u wot. . . It literally says that if there's no psychological issues, then there's no harm in it.
w/e this isn't important.
>unless >deeply entrenched >no harm Someone must be sleepy.
2362
« on: May 11, 2015, 11:40:45 PM »
For what purpose?
For the simple idea that I don't want this thread to be locked/auto locked.
At this point I'm just making sure it stays afloat.
Edit: And as if threads need to have a purpose on this site.
Mhm.
What of it though?
Nada, just passing by.
2363
« on: May 11, 2015, 11:37:17 PM »
For what purpose?
For the simple idea that I don't want this thread to be locked/auto locked.
At this point I'm just making sure it stays afloat.
Edit: And as if threads need to have a purpose on this site.
Mhm.
2364
« on: May 11, 2015, 11:33:40 PM »
unless his reasons are deeply entrenched in psychological issues, then there is no harm in it for him.
That is still dependent on many tiny minute factors. It's not something that can be easily explained as black and white as that. Although whatever harm there might be, miniscule or not, doesn't necessarily mean he's abnormal.
It does have the potential to really affect people negatively though, if they're prone to being too bothered by it, which does have to possibility to affect him negatively as well. It's not as if he's untouchable.
<.<
Thanks for expanding on my point, that I already made.
Nah nigga you said that there was no harm in it, and I'm saying that there still can be even if he doesn't have some psychological issue as a factor.
Um, the part that you quoted was saying just that.
2365
« on: May 11, 2015, 11:28:39 PM »
For what purpose?
2366
« on: May 11, 2015, 11:26:48 PM »
unless his reasons are deeply entrenched in psychological issues, then there is no harm in it for him.
That is still dependent on many tiny minute factors. It's not something that can be easily explained as black and white as that. Although whatever harm there might be, miniscule or not, doesn't necessarily mean he's abnormal.
It does have the potential to really affect people negatively though, if they're prone to being too bothered by it, which does have to possibility to affect him negatively as well. It's not as if he's untouchable.
<.< Thanks for expanding on my point, that I already made.
2367
« on: May 11, 2015, 11:14:09 PM »
Because prohibition worked well, lets try it with food options. Irrelevant. Otherwise, I guess we should legalize murder, because people still murder people every single day regardless.
Bad straw man.
I'm only pointing out that it wouldn't work, whatever her intentions are, no one would follow it, and like hell would anyone enforce it. The amount of backlash it would get would ensure it would never happen.
2368
« on: May 11, 2015, 11:12:08 PM »
Considering a person's actions don't come back to bite them, unless they're extreme, people don't limit themselves as much.
2369
« on: May 11, 2015, 11:10:01 PM »
Lemon is and of itself, a persona. A persona that thrives on funposts and bamter. May e if you weren't so autistic you would have realized that by now.
What you describe, bearing lemon in mind, is a hell of a lot closer to social or mental disorder than I ever will be.
Using a persona is a thing many do online, very few actually bother talking and acting like they do IRL, most IRL ways of conversing don't even translate well online. It would only be an issue if said individual actually believes that their persona is who they are.
Whether he believes it or not it's unhealthy.
What, shitposting and trolling? Physically, no, unless he spends all his time on his PC. Mentally, not really, its a means of blowing off steam, and escapism, or something done out of boredom. Doesn't make shitposting and trolling anymore right, but unless his reasons are deeply entrenched in psychological issues, then there is no harm in it for him.
2370
« on: May 11, 2015, 11:06:38 PM »
Because prohibition worked well, lets try it with food options.
Pages: 1 ... 777879 8081 ... 420
|
Show Posts
