This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Not Comms Officer
91
« on: May 23, 2015, 09:57:39 PM »
ayy
92
« on: May 23, 2015, 09:50:48 PM »
93
« on: May 23, 2015, 09:47:47 PM »
stop flirting with me
i meant you have the mind of a child, B O Y!
Spoiler i only flirt with the COOL kids 
I have a job as a manager. Will you flirt with me?
94
« on: May 23, 2015, 09:40:53 PM »
I don't work so much as I get paid to drink beer and fly planes.
Typically not in that order.
wut?
95
« on: May 23, 2015, 09:32:31 PM »
But when Obama does it, it's okay.
no it wasnt.
Why not?
you know good and god damn well why not.
Nope. I'd like you to articulate why it's wrong for people to spend money on campaigns.
Cause a tiny group of people have a greatly disproportionate influence the outcome of elections, and then all future people who wish to be elected will rely on that money. So it's a vicious cycle where you need more and more big corporate backing to win elections, because you need more and more money to respond to the fact that the people you're competing against get more and more money. 2012's Presidential election has had the highest campaign costs yet.
96
« on: May 23, 2015, 09:11:03 PM »
This thread is kinda disappointing.
*sips tea*
How so?
97
« on: May 23, 2015, 09:10:47 PM »
>employment
l0l
>getting anywhere in life l0l
98
« on: May 23, 2015, 09:09:16 PM »
I'm in.
99
« on: May 23, 2015, 09:06:33 PM »
One of three FBO's at KRDG as an aviation fueler/ground feet maintainer.
dem acronyms i dont kno tho
100
« on: May 23, 2015, 09:03:15 PM »
Not a surprise at all, unfortunately.
Politics in this country are freaking horrible. You need to market yourself as pro-big money to get anywhere politically in the US.
101
« on: May 23, 2015, 09:01:49 PM »
haha
work
haha being able to afford living
102
« on: May 23, 2015, 08:42:33 PM »
work?
Well, you need a job to earn money. And you need money to make memes. Simply math.
103
« on: May 23, 2015, 08:31:17 PM »
in ur mom
Unemployed it is.
104
« on: May 23, 2015, 08:22:16 PM »
And as what position?
Ah, and if you want to, say your pay per hour as well.
105
« on: May 23, 2015, 07:21:56 PM »
What in the absolute twatting fuck are you on about? It's been dead for months now. What's the point of telling everyone this? I don't understand.
So the insults would finally stop. I know it's been dead for months. I just thought I'd make an announcement.
Why do you care so much?
106
« on: May 23, 2015, 07:14:55 PM »
Ad hominem and tu quoque are my two least favorite ones I can think of at the moment. Though ad hominem can be quite funny when you're clearly winning an argument, and then the other person resorts to using that.
107
« on: May 23, 2015, 06:27:43 PM »
Chinese over everything
I'm going to Chinese cause Gootsby said so.
108
« on: May 23, 2015, 06:18:14 PM »
Maybe that's cause it's shit.
109
« on: May 23, 2015, 06:17:15 PM »
I honestly have never actually conisdered what consists of hawain cooking. The only mental image I get is pineapples. Pineapples in everything.
Go hawian.
It's sort of like a fusion between American, Japanese, and Korean, and Pacific Island cuisines. It's a hybrid cuisine really.
This seriously doesn't help me. Now I just imagine fat, seafood, grease, and pineapples.
That's pretty much Hawaiian cuisine right there.
110
« on: May 23, 2015, 06:11:54 PM »
I honestly have never actually conisdered what consists of hawain cooking. The only mental image I get is pineapples. Pineapples in everything.
Go hawian.
It's sort of like a fusion between American, Japanese, and Korean, and Pacific Island cuisines. It's a hybrid cuisine really.
111
« on: May 23, 2015, 06:10:53 PM »
This site is slow in activity.
112
« on: May 23, 2015, 06:09:51 PM »
wat
It's Comms. He's sick. He makes edits and has this "Who will win this final dual" bullshit all the time.
Good god he's a meme that's even worse than Camnator!
You probably voted that you have sex with your parents, you disgusting fuck. I'm the only one who voted that I don't have sex with my parents so far.
113
« on: May 23, 2015, 06:08:22 PM »
Help me decide which place I should eat at, you fucking faggots.
114
« on: May 23, 2015, 06:00:13 PM »
Final memebump for final duel.
115
« on: May 23, 2015, 05:57:25 PM »
The final duel came first.
116
« on: May 23, 2015, 05:49:50 PM »
T4 falling is pretty much a death sentence for SAA garrisons in Deir ez-Zor, Qamishli, and Hasakah. And it cripples the SyAAF because of all the aircraft stored there, and the regime's air supremacy is their sole decisive advantage left over the rebels. Regime would still have Deir al Zour airbase to run sorties in Hasakah, but the regime is better off letting the Kurds take Hasakah. They control most of it anyway.
For what it's worth--even though this airbase is meaningless outside of Aleppo--the regime would still have Kweres airbase. Though, like I said, it's worthless outside of Aleppo. It's primary role now is to launch barrel bombing raids and to keep any sieges at bay. Speaking of which, since IS never released anything from their attempt a few weeks back, I'm assuming it went wrong for them.
But, I concede. The loss of T4 would be major. For the record, though, I don't see this airbase falling easily. But it could go the route of Tabqa.
Kweres airbase as we both know is totally worthless to the regime. It's just a desert fortress now. The airstrip there is just littered with aircraft husks and the base is totally encircled by IS. With T4, it wouldn't even require IS having to take it. All they'd need to do would be to bring it into artillery range, and then shooting at the base enough to reduce the airbase's capacity to deploy and receive aircraft. And the barrel bombing raids actually do serve a strategic purpose, which is to prevent the opposition from setting up any effective rival administration. I don't think that T4 will be taken any time soon, but all it needs is to stop functioning as its current role is as little as a partial siege. Which is easy, since the SAA only has one village left between Tadmur and T4.
117
« on: May 23, 2015, 05:45:08 PM »
No.
The only massively exploited resource at risk now is Oil, which depending on which company or institution you subscribe to can tell you we either have or haven't reached the peak of oil production: (Hubbert's Peak, named after the dude who first thought of it in the 50's)
If there's anything to be fought over, it will be energy before water.
You people realize you don't have to seriously respond to Sentra, right? It's always been like that.
I just default give a serious answer on serious... assuming the OP was giving a serious discussion, like everyone should on his board.
He wasn't. Sentra likes to impersonate people, I think he did that to dustin once too.
I'm being dead serious, Rose. It's a legitimate question and I wanted to see what people's thoughts were on the subject and if there will be a war over resources like water or oil.
Uh huh. It's summer, find something productive to do with your life.
Not for me, it ain't. :^(
Year round schooling? Sucks man, but at least the weather is nice.
No, my college is in quarter system. So I don't get out until late June. On the other hand though, I don't get back in until late September.
118
« on: May 23, 2015, 05:44:26 PM »
Iraq still controls the Iraqi side of Al Waleed, so there's that.
That gives them like 1-2% control over their border with Syria. >___>
119
« on: May 23, 2015, 05:35:10 PM »
No.
The only massively exploited resource at risk now is Oil, which depending on which company or institution you subscribe to can tell you we either have or haven't reached the peak of oil production: (Hubbert's Peak, named after the dude who first thought of it in the 50's)
If there's anything to be fought over, it will be energy before water.
You people realize you don't have to seriously respond to Sentra, right? It's always been like that.
I just default give a serious answer on serious... assuming the OP was giving a serious discussion, like everyone should on his board.
He wasn't. Sentra likes to impersonate people, I think he did that to dustin once too.
I'm being dead serious, Rose. It's a legitimate question and I wanted to see what people's thoughts were on the subject and if there will be a war over resources like water or oil.
Uh huh. It's summer, find something productive to do with your life.
Not for me, it ain't. :^(
120
« on: May 23, 2015, 05:33:22 PM »
They need to get the fucking border secured, for starters. It's all well and good to say Iraq and Syria need to fight their own battles, but a steady flow of supplies and arms into Iraqi cities controlled by ISIS coupled with Iraq's poorly-trained and ill-equipped army means that strategy will ultimately see Iraq swallowed by ISIS, used as a staging ground against the Syrian front.
We need more SOF teams, more airstrikes, and boots on the ground. Hesitancy to deploy troops because of an upcoming campaign is holding back progress.
That's a pretty tall order when the Syrian and Iraqi Government control literally none of their borders with eachother. And the Syrian/Iraqi Armies are similarly poorly-trained and ill-equipped. But on the other hand, IS doesn't have the manpower, mobility, or resources needed to take either Baghdad or Damascus in the foreseeable future.
Well yeah it's a tall order, but control of the border should never have been allowed to degrade so far. Stopping insurgencies is very difficult with conventional tactics, but cutting off supply lines is an effective start.
This war has evolved beyond an insurgency. IS is operating as a conventional Army now. And neither the Syrian or the Iraqi Armies have their capability, let alone the desire to cut off the border crossings. On top of that, IS completely destroyed the border crossings, so they're completely useless now.
|
Show Posts