Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Not Comms Officer

Pages: 1 ... 107108109 110111 ... 158
3241
The Flood / Re: Why did you pick your avatar(s)?
« on: March 31, 2015, 01:33:42 AM »
She's my mommyfu and I wanna kiss her on the lips
She looks like a 50-year old man wearing a wig and lipstick.

3242
The Flood / Re: Why did you pick your avatar(s)?
« on: March 31, 2015, 01:26:30 AM »
My one is custom made, so....

Speaking of which, all of my avatars here have been custom made.

3243
The Flood / Re: Favorite Ben and Jerrys flavor
« on: March 31, 2015, 01:24:43 AM »
>ice cream

3244
Serious / Re: The Iraq War
« on: March 31, 2015, 01:19:22 AM »
That's another remarkable failure in an ongoing bloody chapter where the West was involved.

IS actually existed back during Saddam Hussein's rule, and really became powerful due to Syrian support. So you can thank Assad for IS.
Them existing back during Saddam Hussein's rule?

They were organized first in 1999. Of course proto-IS is completely unrecognizable compared to the IS we all know and love today. And why would a Sunni militant group arise to combat a Sunni-dominated Government in between 1991 and 2003?
Hell, not even that. They only really kicked it into gear when the Sunni Sons of Iraq were actively marginalised.
The US kept a pretty tight grip on Iraq initially in terms of sectarian discrimination. IS really kicked into gear when Assad gave proto-IS safe refuge and an operating base in Syria out of fear that the US would come for him next and topple him.

3245
Serious / Re: The Iraq War
« on: March 31, 2015, 01:01:04 AM »
That's another remarkable failure in an ongoing bloody chapter where the West was involved.

IS actually existed back during Saddam Hussein's rule, and really became powerful due to Syrian support. So you can thank Assad for IS.
Them existing back during Saddam Hussein's rule?

They were organized first in 1999. Of course proto-IS is completely unrecognizable compared to the IS we all know and love today. And why would a Sunni militant group arise to combat a Sunni-dominated Government in between 1991 and 2003?

3246
The Flood / Re: Girls
« on: March 31, 2015, 12:58:12 AM »
What happened this time?

3247
Serious / Re: The Iraq War
« on: March 31, 2015, 12:55:54 AM »
Did the war actually improve anything for the powers involved in the war, or the Iraqi people? I am not against conflict, but it seems that this war has costed human talent, and resources that exceed the regional interests in the area. All these years more and more terrorism bred simply due to the West's heavy influence in the area.

And now there's ISIS. When will it end?
IS actually existed back during Saddam Hussein's rule, and really became powerful due to Syrian support. So you can thank Assad for IS.

3248
News / Re: The End of Anarchy (or is it?)
« on: March 31, 2015, 12:53:34 AM »
How about relaxing the rules on The Flood a little bit then. In terms of NSFW content.

If Anarchy's gonna go, then we may as well relax the rules a little bit in The Flood. Especially the stuff which didn't harm the community like, NSFW content. Mostly referring to porn and gore.

3249
The Flood / Re: Why are the only cool users here European?
« on: March 30, 2015, 11:37:21 PM »
Goddammit Yu, I was referring to the users in the Serious forum you fucking coon.
U mad brah? I thought cool people don't lose their cool? ; )
har har har so funeh xDDDD

3251
The Flood / Re: Why are the only cool users here European?
« on: March 30, 2015, 11:10:04 PM »
Wait, but what about Cheese Potato?
He's a Britbong now.

3252
The Flood / Re: HONORARY AMERICANS THREAD
« on: March 30, 2015, 11:06:31 PM »
Obama, from Kenya
Alex Jones, from Tinfoilhatistan.

3253
The Flood / Re: Why are the only cool users here European?
« on: March 30, 2015, 11:00:35 PM »
Goddammit Yu, I was referring to the users in the Serious forum you fucking coon.

3254
The Flood / Re: Why are the only cool users here European?
« on: March 30, 2015, 10:49:00 PM »
Why is this in the serious forum?
Cause I'm talking about the users in the Serious forum.

3255
The Flood / Re: Why are the only cool users here European?
« on: March 30, 2015, 10:48:15 PM »
Do bongs count?
Yeah. Or else you and Mr P wouldn't count.

3257
The Flood / Re: Why are the only cool users here European?
« on: March 30, 2015, 10:10:09 PM »
There are some cool yanks, unwashed though they may be.
Yeah, there are a couple, but most of the cool users who often post on Serious are European.

3258
Serious / Re: The Role Space has in Modern Militaries
« on: March 30, 2015, 10:09:29 PM »
It'd probably happen in a satellite/anti-satellite context. Not gonna be starships and space battles as well.

Which does give the interesting thought of Navy SEAL or Special Forces raids on massive Chinese/Russian military space stations. The thought of that would be pure awesome.
Actually a space task force would require a whole new group seperate from Seals or special forces mainly due to the man hours required to train and how you cannot fight in both space and earth. Like two different environment where adapting takes too long.

Personally raiding is also something that would be kind of costly. For me it would be more EMP based or targeted missile based.
I dunno. I'm just throwing out thoughts. Awesome thoughts. Not that it would seriously be a practical thing though. It would be missile/EMP based...

3259
Serious / Re: The Iraq War
« on: March 30, 2015, 10:06:30 PM »
I know Meta might hate this but many people opposing the fall of Assads regime believe it would be a better choice as unlike Iraq pure chaos will just enable more extremist groups like those in Iraq to occur.

Also the reason to go to Iraq was definitely not due to Saddam, hell we supported him in invading Iran, and when Kuwait happened we pushed and told the Kurds we had their backs if they rebelled. Well let us see what that got them. Let me see a bunch of them getting gassed and those who pushed them on did not hold their side of the bargain. Why they went to Iraq is beyond me.

So first this war was based not on any real reason, and second it had no goal that was positive if instead made more negatives unless you were in the military industry and were to sell weapons.

Why they went in because of a lie is beyond me, why did they stop supporting him all of a sudden for no reason i do not know why. But the reason they stopped supporting him was definitely not because he was an evil dictator.
We totally gotta add eachother on Skype or something...

You're like the only other person here who follows Middle East events closely.
Yeah, we can. You can find me in the Sep7agon Chat. Risayahmed
Got a guy riding a unicorn toy with a rainbow in the background.

Only problem is that i do not talk much on skype.
Is that your Skype name?

So I take it you're Middle Eastern ethnically, or what?

3260
Goddammit, just shut up with your conspiracy shit. Please.

3261
Serious / Re: The Role Space has in Modern Militaries
« on: March 30, 2015, 10:02:59 PM »
It'd probably happen in a satellite/anti-satellite context. Not gonna be starships and space battles as well.

Which does give the interesting thought of Navy SEAL or Special Forces raids on massive Chinese/Russian military space stations. The thought of that would be pure awesome.

3262
Serious / Re: The Iraq War
« on: March 30, 2015, 10:00:29 PM »
I know Meta might hate this but many people opposing the fall of Assads regime believe it would be a better choice as unlike Iraq pure chaos will just enable more extremist groups like those in Iraq to occur.

Also the reason to go to Iraq was definitely not due to Saddam, hell we supported him in invading Iran, and when Kuwait happened we pushed and told the Kurds we had their backs if they rebelled. Well let us see what that got them. Let me see a bunch of them getting gassed and those who pushed them on did not hold their side of the bargain. Why they went to Iraq is beyond me.

So first this war was based not on any real reason, and second it had no goal that was positive if instead made more negatives unless you were in the military industry and were to sell weapons.

Why they went in because of a lie is beyond me, why did they stop supporting him all of a sudden for no reason i do not know why. But the reason they stopped supporting him was definitely not because he was an evil dictator.
We totally gotta add eachother on Skype or something...

You're like the only other person here who follows Middle East events closely.

3263
The Flood / Why are the only cool users here European?
« on: March 30, 2015, 09:56:52 PM »
Ignore this thread.

I was referring to users in the Serious board, but Yu decided to move this thread over to The Flood.

3264
Serious / Re: Dear Yuropoors
« on: March 30, 2015, 09:48:50 PM »
I guess by default I'm speaking for Norway because I don't know of anyother Norwegians on this forum.

My official response is as follows:

Spise en pikk.
You tell that to Vlad when he comes knocking :^)
If you think that Russia is gonna invade Norway, you have no idea what you're talking about. They're a regional power in decline.

3265
Serious / Re: Dear Yuropoors
« on: March 30, 2015, 09:37:11 PM »
But how can they pull their weight into NATO if they're Yuropoors?
by spending 2% of their eurobucks on Eurofighters and crappy plastic rifles from Germany.
But Germoney doesn't even have enough crappy plastic rifles for it's own men!

and the Eurofighter sucks.
You suck.
But hey, it's still better than the F35 Legitimatewasteofmoneyigtning II
>1.5 trillion dollars spent on a jet that doesn't even work

#Americanlogic

3266
Serious / Re: Dear Yuropoors
« on: March 30, 2015, 09:33:13 PM »
But how can they pull their weight into NATO if they're Yuropoors?
by spending 2% of their eurobucks on Eurofighters and crappy plastic rifles from Germany.
But Germoney doesn't even have enough crappy plastic rifles for it's own men!

and the Eurofighter sucks.
You suck.

3267
Serious / Re: Dear Yuropoors
« on: March 30, 2015, 09:11:40 PM »
But how can they pull their weight into NATO if they're Yuropoors?

3268
Serious / Re: Why I oppose the European Union
« on: March 30, 2015, 08:52:58 PM »
what are the positives of being part of the EU?
standing as a united bloc against the likes of Russia.
I don't see how you list that as a positive when NATO exists for that purpose.
Which is one of the reasons it's not substantial enough for me to think it game-changing. I'd rather see NATO strengthened.
NATO is a fucking joke right now, and will remain so until some mechanism is developed to penalize members who are not meeting their obligations.

A very unsettling number of members are spending less than the required 2% of their GDP on defense. I think only like four of them actually met that requirement in 2013- The US, UK, Estonia, and fucking Greece.

Europeans are happy to accuse Americans of war-mongering and dick-waving, with our troops based in so many peaceful European countries, but the sad truth is America is basically doing all of the heavy lifting.
If it wasn't for NATO Russia would have steamrolled eastern Europe again by now.
If it wasn't for the US and Article 5, you mean.
None of the European NATO countries except for France and the UK are powerful enough to make invasion a bad idea on their own, but the threat of US intervention is enough to keep Putin out.

NATO works in that sense, but the idea is supposed to be collective defense, not Daddy USA beating up whoever fucks with poor little Lithuania or Slovakia. NATO members should be pulling their own weight, or at least making an effort to. Generally, though, they are not, and the expectation seems to be for the World Police to swoop in and save the day.
Well, yeah. I don't see how that's a problem. The US gets an excuse to spend more sums of money on their military and defense like how they always love to, and Europe doesn't have to spend as much on their military. So it's a win-win relationship.
I'm really not happy to see my tax dollars going to protect some irrelevant European backwater full of cucks too pussified to pay for their own defense. The US wouldn't need to spend such a fuckhueg amount on defense if it's supposed allies would stop leeching off of it.
sux 2 b u lol

Why don't you go to Europe and tell them to spend more on their militaries then?

3269
Serious / Re: Why I oppose the European Union
« on: March 30, 2015, 08:42:13 PM »
what are the positives of being part of the EU?
standing as a united bloc against the likes of Russia.
I don't see how you list that as a positive when NATO exists for that purpose.
Which is one of the reasons it's not substantial enough for me to think it game-changing. I'd rather see NATO strengthened.
NATO is a fucking joke right now, and will remain so until some mechanism is developed to penalize members who are not meeting their obligations.

A very unsettling number of members are spending less than the required 2% of their GDP on defense. I think only like four of them actually met that requirement in 2013- The US, UK, Estonia, and fucking Greece.

Europeans are happy to accuse Americans of war-mongering and dick-waving, with our troops based in so many peaceful European countries, but the sad truth is America is basically doing all of the heavy lifting.
If it wasn't for NATO Russia would have steamrolled eastern Europe again by now.
If it wasn't for the US and Article 5, you mean.
None of the European NATO countries except for France and the UK are powerful enough to make invasion a bad idea on their own, but the threat of US intervention is enough to keep Putin out.

NATO works in that sense, but the idea is supposed to be collective defense, not Daddy USA beating up whoever fucks with poor little Lithuania or Slovakia. NATO members should be pulling their own weight, or at least making an effort to. Generally, though, they are not, and the expectation seems to be for the World Police to swoop in and save the day.
Well, yeah. I don't see how that's a problem. The US gets an excuse to spend more sums of money on their military and defense like how they always love to, and Europe doesn't have to spend as much on their military. So it's a win-win relationship.

3270
Serious / Re: Why I oppose the European Union
« on: March 30, 2015, 08:37:40 PM »
lol
He isn't wrong. The US has essentially been subsidising European defence since the Cold War.
I know. I just find it funny that most European countries are blatantly refusing to dump pointless sums of money into their armies in defiance of the US.

Pages: 1 ... 107108109 110111 ... 158