3241
The Flood / Re: Why did you pick your avatar(s)?
« on: March 31, 2015, 01:33:42 AM »She's my mommyfu and I wanna kiss her on the lipsShe looks like a 50-year old man wearing a wig and lipstick.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 3241
The Flood / Re: Why did you pick your avatar(s)?« on: March 31, 2015, 01:33:42 AM »She's my mommyfu and I wanna kiss her on the lipsShe looks like a 50-year old man wearing a wig and lipstick. 3242
The Flood / Re: Why did you pick your avatar(s)?« on: March 31, 2015, 01:26:30 AM »
My one is custom made, so....
Speaking of which, all of my avatars here have been custom made. 3244
Serious / Re: The Iraq War« on: March 31, 2015, 01:19:22 AM »The US kept a pretty tight grip on Iraq initially in terms of sectarian discrimination. IS really kicked into gear when Assad gave proto-IS safe refuge and an operating base in Syria out of fear that the US would come for him next and topple him.Hell, not even that. They only really kicked it into gear when the Sunni Sons of Iraq were actively marginalised.That's another remarkable failure in an ongoing bloody chapter where the West was involved.Them existing back during Saddam Hussein's rule?IS actually existed back during Saddam Hussein's rule, and really became powerful due to Syrian support. So you can thank Assad for IS. 3245
Serious / Re: The Iraq War« on: March 31, 2015, 01:01:04 AM »That's another remarkable failure in an ongoing bloody chapter where the West was involved.Them existing back during Saddam Hussein's rule?IS actually existed back during Saddam Hussein's rule, and really became powerful due to Syrian support. So you can thank Assad for IS. They were organized first in 1999. Of course proto-IS is completely unrecognizable compared to the IS we all know and love today. And why would a Sunni militant group arise to combat a Sunni-dominated Government in between 1991 and 2003? 3247
Serious / Re: The Iraq War« on: March 31, 2015, 12:55:54 AM »Did the war actually improve anything for the powers involved in the war, or the Iraqi people? I am not against conflict, but it seems that this war has costed human talent, and resources that exceed the regional interests in the area. All these years more and more terrorism bred simply due to the West's heavy influence in the area.IS actually existed back during Saddam Hussein's rule, and really became powerful due to Syrian support. So you can thank Assad for IS. 3248
News / Re: The End of Anarchy (or is it?)« on: March 31, 2015, 12:53:34 AM »
How about relaxing the rules on The Flood a little bit then. In terms of NSFW content.
If Anarchy's gonna go, then we may as well relax the rules a little bit in The Flood. Especially the stuff which didn't harm the community like, NSFW content. Mostly referring to porn and gore. 3249
The Flood / Re: Why are the only cool users here European?« on: March 30, 2015, 11:37:21 PM »har har har so funeh xDDDDGoddammit Yu, I was referring to the users in the Serious forum you fucking coon.U mad brah? I thought cool people don't lose their cool? ; ) 3250
The Flood / Re: Why are the only cool users here European?« on: March 30, 2015, 11:27:55 PM »Nope. He's Britbong.He's AustralianWait, but what about Cheese Potato?He's a Britbong now. 3251
The Flood / Re: Why are the only cool users here European?« on: March 30, 2015, 11:10:04 PM »Wait, but what about Cheese Potato?He's a Britbong now. 3252
The Flood / Re: HONORARY AMERICANS THREAD« on: March 30, 2015, 11:06:31 PM »Obama, from KenyaAlex Jones, from Tinfoilhatistan. 3253
The Flood / Re: Why are the only cool users here European?« on: March 30, 2015, 11:00:35 PM »
Goddammit Yu, I was referring to the users in the Serious forum you fucking coon.
3254
The Flood / Re: Why are the only cool users here European?« on: March 30, 2015, 10:49:00 PM »Why is this in the serious forum?Cause I'm talking about the users in the Serious forum. 3255
The Flood / Re: Why are the only cool users here European?« on: March 30, 2015, 10:48:15 PM »Do bongs count?Yeah. Or else you and Mr P wouldn't count. 3256
Serious / Re: Tonight, Jon Stewart will be ranting about the law in Indiana.« on: March 30, 2015, 10:11:16 PM »Oh. I was more implying what I thought you were implying. Which is that Black Helicopters would happen...Goddammit, just shut up with your conspiracy shit. Please.http://countercurrentnews.com/2015/03/military-admits-martial-law-test-runs-planned-throughout-u-s-this-summer/ Awkward. 3257
The Flood / Re: Why are the only cool users here European?« on: March 30, 2015, 10:10:09 PM »There are some cool yanks, unwashed though they may be.Yeah, there are a couple, but most of the cool users who often post on Serious are European. 3258
Serious / Re: The Role Space has in Modern Militaries« on: March 30, 2015, 10:09:29 PM »I dunno. I'm just throwing out thoughts. Awesome thoughts. Not that it would seriously be a practical thing though. It would be missile/EMP based...It'd probably happen in a satellite/anti-satellite context. Not gonna be starships and space battles as well.Actually a space task force would require a whole new group seperate from Seals or special forces mainly due to the man hours required to train and how you cannot fight in both space and earth. Like two different environment where adapting takes too long. 3259
Serious / Re: The Iraq War« on: March 30, 2015, 10:06:30 PM »Is that your Skype name?Yeah, we can. You can find me in the Sep7agon Chat. RisayahmedI know Meta might hate this but many people opposing the fall of Assads regime believe it would be a better choice as unlike Iraq pure chaos will just enable more extremist groups like those in Iraq to occur.We totally gotta add eachother on Skype or something... So I take it you're Middle Eastern ethnically, or what? 3260
Serious / Re: Tonight, Jon Stewart will be ranting about the law in Indiana.« on: March 30, 2015, 10:05:39 PM »
Goddammit, just shut up with your conspiracy shit. Please.
3261
Serious / Re: The Role Space has in Modern Militaries« on: March 30, 2015, 10:02:59 PM »
It'd probably happen in a satellite/anti-satellite context. Not gonna be starships and space battles as well.
Which does give the interesting thought of Navy SEAL or Special Forces raids on massive Chinese/Russian military space stations. The thought of that would be pure awesome. 3262
Serious / Re: The Iraq War« on: March 30, 2015, 10:00:29 PM »I know Meta might hate this but many people opposing the fall of Assads regime believe it would be a better choice as unlike Iraq pure chaos will just enable more extremist groups like those in Iraq to occur.We totally gotta add eachother on Skype or something... You're like the only other person here who follows Middle East events closely. 3263
The Flood / Why are the only cool users here European?« on: March 30, 2015, 09:56:52 PM »
Ignore this thread.
I was referring to users in the Serious board, but Yu decided to move this thread over to The Flood. 3264
Serious / Re: Dear Yuropoors« on: March 30, 2015, 09:48:50 PM »If you think that Russia is gonna invade Norway, you have no idea what you're talking about. They're a regional power in decline.I guess by default I'm speaking for Norway because I don't know of anyother Norwegians on this forum.You tell that to Vlad when he comes knocking :^) 3265
Serious / Re: Dear Yuropoors« on: March 30, 2015, 09:37:11 PM »>1.5 trillion dollars spent on a jet that doesn't even workBut hey, it's still better than the F35 Legitimatewasteofmoneyigtning IIYou suck.But Germoney doesn't even have enough crappy plastic rifles for it's own men!But how can they pull their weight into NATO if they're Yuropoors?by spending 2% of their eurobucks on Eurofighters and crappy plastic rifles from Germany. #Americanlogic 3266
Serious / Re: Dear Yuropoors« on: March 30, 2015, 09:33:13 PM »You suck.But Germoney doesn't even have enough crappy plastic rifles for it's own men!But how can they pull their weight into NATO if they're Yuropoors?by spending 2% of their eurobucks on Eurofighters and crappy plastic rifles from Germany. 3267
Serious / Re: Dear Yuropoors« on: March 30, 2015, 09:11:40 PM »
But how can they pull their weight into NATO if they're Yuropoors?
3268
Serious / Re: Why I oppose the European Union« on: March 30, 2015, 08:52:58 PM »sux 2 b u lolI'm really not happy to see my tax dollars going to protect some irrelevant European backwater full of cucks too pussified to pay for their own defense. The US wouldn't need to spend such a fuckhueg amount on defense if it's supposed allies would stop leeching off of it.Well, yeah. I don't see how that's a problem. The US gets an excuse to spend more sums of money on their military and defense like how they always love to, and Europe doesn't have to spend as much on their military. So it's a win-win relationship.If it wasn't for the US and Article 5, you mean.If it wasn't for NATO Russia would have steamrolled eastern Europe again by now.NATO is a fucking joke right now, and will remain so until some mechanism is developed to penalize members who are not meeting their obligations.Which is one of the reasons it's not substantial enough for me to think it game-changing. I'd rather see NATO strengthened.I don't see how you list that as a positive when NATO exists for that purpose.what are the positives of being part of the EU?standing as a united bloc against the likes of Russia. Why don't you go to Europe and tell them to spend more on their militaries then? 3269
Serious / Re: Why I oppose the European Union« on: March 30, 2015, 08:42:13 PM »Well, yeah. I don't see how that's a problem. The US gets an excuse to spend more sums of money on their military and defense like how they always love to, and Europe doesn't have to spend as much on their military. So it's a win-win relationship.If it wasn't for the US and Article 5, you mean.If it wasn't for NATO Russia would have steamrolled eastern Europe again by now.NATO is a fucking joke right now, and will remain so until some mechanism is developed to penalize members who are not meeting their obligations.Which is one of the reasons it's not substantial enough for me to think it game-changing. I'd rather see NATO strengthened.I don't see how you list that as a positive when NATO exists for that purpose.what are the positives of being part of the EU?standing as a united bloc against the likes of Russia. 3270
Serious / Re: Why I oppose the European Union« on: March 30, 2015, 08:37:40 PM »I know. I just find it funny that most European countries are blatantly refusing to dump pointless sums of money into their armies in defiance of the US.lolHe isn't wrong. The US has essentially been subsidising European defence since the Cold War. |