This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Not Comms Officer
Pages: 1 ... 678 910 ... 158
211
« on: May 18, 2015, 06:27:07 AM »
So why is Cheat doing this again?
Cause private groups are obviously the logical priority given that Sep7agon has about 35% of the activity that it had at its peak.
212
« on: May 18, 2015, 06:15:43 AM »
 Try slipping this meme around your neck irl
It's not a dank enough meme. You meme is fucking shit-tier.
213
« on: May 18, 2015, 06:14:26 AM »
Oh shit, I remember hearing that one on a video that was really patriotic towards Greece.  28 October, "Ochi day" (1940), when the Greeks refused to capitulate to the Italians and then proceeded to humiliate them like crazy over the next 6 months until the Nazis had to bail them out.
214
« on: May 18, 2015, 06:12:06 AM »
idk who made this but it's pretty cool tho.
It is. I found it on Bare Naked Islam. They probably made it.
215
« on: May 18, 2015, 06:02:30 AM »
It's called "le wavy Islamic State flag gif" and it looks like this. Anyone who posts this meme without my consent is a fucking faggot.
216
« on: May 18, 2015, 06:00:04 AM »
It's not like there's a sudden and dramatic escalation between 0:33 and 0:35 in your song. And for posting a song like that, I'm gonna 4-pool you now.
217
« on: May 18, 2015, 05:33:48 AM »
#Comms4Mod2k15
األوامر 4 وزارة الدفاع 2 ك 15#
218
« on: May 18, 2015, 05:32:51 AM »
Any new developments?
...not really any good ones. Lots of mixed messages, none of them positive.
219
« on: May 18, 2015, 05:31:13 AM »
I'm a rapper. And a memer.
220
« on: May 18, 2015, 04:33:42 AM »
You don't need more than a paragraph to explain that.
Fucking schools and their essays man.
I have to write a 30-page essay on *something*. I guess I can write it on how awesome the Basij militia is then.
221
« on: May 18, 2015, 12:16:14 AM »
...for my Political Science class. It's going to be about how Iran is using the establish a hegemony in the Middle East through a mix of NGOs and terrorist organizations along with several case examples of them employing such methods successfully.
Would any of you want me to copy-paste my essay onto here once I'm finished with it so you could read it? It's 30-page double-spaced.
222
« on: May 18, 2015, 12:03:46 AM »
Fuck you and the UN and the EU
LONG LIVE AYATOLLAH KHAMENEI
223
« on: May 17, 2015, 11:01:07 PM »
This video is tribalistic as hell.
Welcome to modern politics!!! Aw, what am I saying? Politics were always like this.
224
« on: May 17, 2015, 09:29:32 PM »
b-buh muh second amendment. Nobody would goet shot if more people had guns. Guns prevent bullying
#Wakeupamerica #gunsforkids2015
-some repubican B.Net mod
But muh black choppas!!
It's Ok. I can stop the Gay Commie Muslim Nigger President's tanks with muh dad's M4
I got you covered. I have this one bolt-action rifle from wwI, and I can use it to shoot down those F-35s that would otherwise bomb the fuck out of us.
This I would believe though. The F-35 is a trash project with inadequate results and poor aerial performance. I see no reason to believe that a lucky 30-06 wouldn't fuck it over any further.
But then again, I hate any single-engine modern fighter... and multi role fighters that aren't multi role... and anything with avionics packages beyond reason for it's airframe and capabilities...
Now we need a name for our resistance group...
225
« on: May 17, 2015, 09:28:05 PM »
Some anti-sex mod locked my hbb wow 
Yutaka definitely.
226
« on: May 17, 2015, 09:27:17 PM »
But according to Corporate-made statistics, privatization would boost economic growth by 1,000,000,000%!!!
227
« on: May 17, 2015, 09:20:36 PM »
b-buh muh second amendment. Nobody would goet shot if more people had guns. Guns prevent bullying
#Wakeupamerica #gunsforkids2015
-some repubican B.Net mod
But muh black choppas!!
It's Ok. I can stop the Gay Commie Muslim Nigger President's tanks with muh dad's M4
I got you covered. I have this one bolt-action rifle from wwI, and I can use it to shoot down those F-35s that would otherwise bomb the fuck out of us.
Absolutely brilliant. We'll use the best Battlefield 3 players to shoot down them damn commie jets with our pile of wwI bolt-action rifles!
228
« on: May 17, 2015, 09:13:52 PM »
b-buh muh second amendment. Nobody would goet shot if more people had guns. Guns prevent bullying
#Wakeupamerica #gunsforkids2015
-some repubican B.Net mod
But muh black choppas!!
It's Ok. I can stop the Gay Commie Muslim Nigger President's tanks with muh dad's M4
I got you covered. I have this one bolt-action rifle from wwI, and I can use it to shoot down those F-35s that would otherwise bomb the fuck out of us.
229
« on: May 17, 2015, 09:07:42 PM »
b-buh muh second amendment. Nobody would goet shot if more people had guns. Guns prevent bullying
#Wakeupamerica #gunsforkids2015
-some repubican B.Net mod
But muh black choppas!!
230
« on: May 17, 2015, 08:52:51 PM »
Lots of the Union's military facilities and soldiers transferred over to the Confederacy,
And that wouldn't happen again in a comparable situation?
It could easily happen again, yes. But I don't see how having a restricted range of light small-arms to start out with could really help. It would really take trained soldiers defecting to really give any sort of insurgency the effectiveness that it needs. This is more for countries whose Armed Forces are well-trained like the US. My point is that semi-automatic rifles and pistols that the 2nd Amendment allows won't be effective against something like the US Army, so the purpose of it defeats itself since it couldn't possibly be fulfilled if a black helicopter scenario were to happen.
231
« on: May 17, 2015, 08:42:14 PM »
>civilian or militia forces would never be a threat to government or military
Never underestimate the private sector.
Oh, so a pre-existing insurgency with a significant amount of support being a threat to an unstable and barely established Government with a poorly trained army.
What a shocker.
Arab armies are trash. Why the fuck do you think they could never overrun Israel despite the fact that they greatly outnumbered them and even outgunned them on several occasions.
Because the Israeli war machine was a US money sink. Can't beat that with shitty leftover IS series tanks and sloppy Kalashnikov rifles.
Also,
Scoreboard. Rednecks with their pappy's varmint rifle should have won the civil war.
Lots of the Union's military facilities and soldiers transferred over to the Confederacy, so they already had a significant number or arms right there. And the forces participating in that war were generally poorly trained, so a civilian with a gun has similar combat capabilities to a soldier. Also, conscripts as well. On top of it all, this is also back when artillery was just barely becoming a major factor, let alone armored vehicles and aircraft really existing, so small arms alone would still make a major impact. Warfare in the 1860's is barely recognizable from warfare after the 1940's. Point is, taking things from casualty charts alone is really a poor representation of what happened during the war.
232
« on: May 17, 2015, 08:33:11 PM »
>civilian or militia forces would never be a threat to government or military
Never underestimate the private sector.
Oh, so a pre-existing insurgency with a significant amount of support being a threat to an unstable and barely established Government with a poorly trained army. What a shocker. Arab armies are trash. Why the fuck do you think they could never overrun Israel despite the fact that they greatly outnumbered them and even outgunned them on several occasions.
233
« on: May 17, 2015, 08:31:29 PM »
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
"It's to prevent tyranny"
Lol. That is fucking hilarious. That's maybe what they thought in 1787, but that's hopelessly irrelevant now.
>"tyranny is irrelevant"
>North Korea exists
LOOOOOOOL
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
"It's to prevent tyranny"
Lol. That is fucking hilarious. That's maybe what they thought in 1787, but that's hopelessly irrelevant now.
>"tyranny is irrelevant"
>North Korea exists
LOOOOOOOL
Are you both that fucking dumb as to deny North Korea as a tyrannical country
Holy shit LOOOOOOOL
>implying that North Korea and the US are related at all
Except I never said that. You said tyranny isn't relevant, I completely refuted your point by saying that North Korea exists. Lmao you act like you're so smart but you're seriously just a dumbass, I can't even tell you how many people think that of you and it's pathetic. There's no point in even trying to talk sense into that thick skull of yours. Bye.
The point is that tyranny is barely relevant to the US. And assumptions galore.
234
« on: May 17, 2015, 08:18:21 PM »
Only the gang members died.
Nothing of value was lost.
And the 16 injured?
235
« on: May 17, 2015, 07:59:56 PM »
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
Ah the age old "prevention of tyranny" excuse. Applicable to the old times, perhaps. But not now. It's a quaint little thing, those arguments. Fully fledged circles. Round and round it goes.
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
"It's to prevent tyranny"
Lol. That is fucking hilarious. That's maybe what they thought in 1787, but that's hopelessly irrelevant now.
>"tyranny is irrelevant"
>North Korea exists
LOOOOOOOL
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
Ah the age old "prevention of tyranny" excuse. Applicable to the old times, perhaps. But not now. It's a quaint little thing, those arguments. Fully fledged circles. Round and round it goes.
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
"It's to prevent tyranny"
Lol. That is fucking hilarious. That's maybe what they thought in 1787, but that's hopelessly irrelevant now.
>"tyranny is irrelevant"
>North Korea exists
LOOOOOOOL
Are you both that fucking dumb as to deny North Korea as a tyrannical country
Holy shit LOOOOOOOL
>implying that North Korea and the US are related at all
236
« on: May 17, 2015, 07:55:13 PM »
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
Ah the age old "prevention of tyranny" excuse. Applicable to the old times, perhaps. But not now. It's a quaint little thing, those arguments. Fully fledged circles. Round and round it goes.
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
"It's to prevent tyranny"
Lol. That is fucking hilarious. That's maybe what they thought in 1787, but that's hopelessly irrelevant now.
>"tyranny is irrelevant"
>North Korea exists
LOOOOOOOL
237
« on: May 17, 2015, 07:49:14 PM »
Ayatollah Khamenei is fucking awesome and the USA sucks balls.
238
« on: May 17, 2015, 07:48:46 PM »
greece is poor
>tfw bottom 60% of Americans have less than 1% of the wealth >tfw muh middle class doesn't even exist
239
« on: May 17, 2015, 07:48:01 PM »
Of all the fucking places it had to be Waco, Texas.
Yeah, I found that funny. I was considering making the title a reference to that Waco Siege, but it's too late now.
240
« on: May 17, 2015, 07:43:49 PM »
I hope you're not indirectly implying that gun control would've prevented this.
Guns should have never been legal in the first place in the US. Gun control won't fix the massive mistake that was made when the 2nd Amendment was made, and now the only solution is going to be some crazy, outside-the-box sort of thing.
So no, gun control isn't an effective solution to gun crime.
It's to prevent tyranny. Also, there are still people like my grandfather who live out in the countryside who need a gun in order to protect their livestock.
"It's to prevent tyranny" Lol. That is fucking hilarious. That's maybe what they thought in 1787, but that's hopelessly irrelevant now.
Pages: 1 ... 678 910 ... 158
|
Show Posts
