This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Not Comms Officer
Pages: 1 ... 474849 5051 ... 158
1441
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:56:42 PM »
Nah, I'm more inclined to believe that hoodlum shenanigans are in ones DNA.
Which can clearly explain how blacks in the US are significantly more rowdy than blacks in Europe, Africa, or Latin America.
#logic
Because in Europe the Muslims are keeping them in order.
In America, we don't have the Islamic population for that.
What you said right there was a social condition. So you pretty much explained in your own post that the behavior of black people here is due to social conditions rather than racial whateverism.
It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around.
Even if that were the case, which it isn't, you haven't said anything about Latin America and Africa. Which aside from northern Africa (which is already Arab-majority), there aren't any Arabs around to "hold" the blacks back.
And again, what you said made no sense. "It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around." is so arbitrary and stupid and is just an uneducated assumption at best.
Because they were bred with the Spaniards and natives. Domestic bovine are tempered nothing like their wild European ancestors.
Not really. The conditions faced by blacks in Latin America are nearly the same faced by blacks in the US. As in being transported in slave ships. And look at how different outcomes the two groups had. And no, blacks weren't really bred with Spaniards and natives on any significant scale. A full 33% percent of Brazil's population is completely black, and yet they don't really have problems there like how the blacks here have problems.
Because the brazilians were smart. They took out the troublesome ones. They controlled the gene pool. They wouldn't have let Malcom X live.
lolwut? There's so much stupid in that statement that it's nearly off the charts.
Please tell me how a country of 150 million could possibly effectively root out "the troublesome ones" from a population of 50 million. And not to mention the logistical problems with doing such a thing. Anyways, that statement is made out of pure, refined stupid.
The evidence is there. If you chose to believe otherwise, then I respect your decision.
Oh, please show me this "evidence".
I've already show you.
Here is a supplemental flyer though.
The wild claims that Arabs keep black in check and that Brazil led a campaign to root out all "problematic" black people without posting any sources proving that those claims are true?
That's not evidence, that's crap that conspiracy sites like to post. LOL
Observe social standings and social engineering and you'll note.
"I am apt to suspect the Negroes to be naturally inferior to the Whites. There scarcely ever was a civilized nation of that complexion, nor even any individual, eminent either in action or speculation. No ingenious manufactures amongst them, no arts, no sciences. On the other hand, the most rude and barbarous of the Whites, such as the ancient Germans, the present Tartars, have still something eminent about them, in their valour, form of government, or some other particular. Such a uniform and constant difference could not happen, in so many countries and ages, if nature had not made an original distinction between these breeds of men. - Hume - of National Character, 1748
"In the hot countries the human being matures in all aspects earlier, but does not, however, reach the perfection of those in the temperate zones. Humanity is at its greatest perfection in the race of the whites. The yellow Indians do have a meager talent. The Negroes are far below them and at the lowest point are a part of the American peoples." - Kant - Physical Geography, 1756
What has changed since those times other than the now Americanized spelling of valor?
>citing books about black-white comparisons from the 18th Century as if they were legitimate  Here's an example of another massive crock of BS that was taken seriously by racial theorists at the time, and this was from the 19th and 20th Centuries. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piltdown_Man
1442
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:50:15 PM »
Nah, I'm more inclined to believe that hoodlum shenanigans are in ones DNA.
Which can clearly explain how blacks in the US are significantly more rowdy than blacks in Europe, Africa, or Latin America.
#logic
Because in Europe the Muslims are keeping them in order.
In America, we don't have the Islamic population for that.
What you said right there was a social condition. So you pretty much explained in your own post that the behavior of black people here is due to social conditions rather than racial whateverism.
It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around.
Even if that were the case, which it isn't, you haven't said anything about Latin America and Africa. Which aside from northern Africa (which is already Arab-majority), there aren't any Arabs around to "hold" the blacks back.
And again, what you said made no sense. "It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around." is so arbitrary and stupid and is just an uneducated assumption at best.
Because they were bred with the Spaniards and natives. Domestic bovine are tempered nothing like their wild European ancestors.
Not really. The conditions faced by blacks in Latin America are nearly the same faced by blacks in the US. As in being transported in slave ships. And look at how different outcomes the two groups had. And no, blacks weren't really bred with Spaniards and natives on any significant scale. A full 33% percent of Brazil's population is completely black, and yet they don't really have problems there like how the blacks here have problems.
Because the brazilians were smart. They took out the troublesome ones. They controlled the gene pool. They wouldn't have let Malcom X live.
lolwut? There's so much stupid in that statement that it's nearly off the charts.
Please tell me how a country of 150 million could possibly effectively root out "the troublesome ones" from a population of 50 million. And not to mention the logistical problems with doing such a thing. Anyways, that statement is made out of pure, refined stupid.
The evidence is there. If you chose to believe otherwise, then I respect your decision.
Oh, please show me this "evidence".
I've already show you.
Here is a supplemental flyer though.
The wild claims that Arabs keep black in check and that Brazil led a campaign to root out all "problematic" black people without posting any sources proving that those claims are true? That's not evidence, that's crap that conspiracy sites like to post. LOL
1443
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:48:32 PM »
New evidence is emerging to suggest there is in fact a biological basis for race though. We've only just started mapping the human genome which takes an astronomical amount of computational power to process, so to affirm the notion that race is purely a social construct when we've barely even begun to understand genetics is simply fallacious and unscientific.
It goes without saying that racism and discrimination are wrong as a matter of principle of course, but that doesn't mean we should disregard empirical evidence for the sake of political correctness.
I'm not saying that race is entirely a social construct, but my argument is that a significant portion of "race" is indeed a social construct.
1444
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:44:47 PM »
Nah, I'm more inclined to believe that hoodlum shenanigans are in ones DNA.
Which can clearly explain how blacks in the US are significantly more rowdy than blacks in Europe, Africa, or Latin America.
#logic
Because in Europe the Muslims are keeping them in order.
In America, we don't have the Islamic population for that.
What you said right there was a social condition. So you pretty much explained in your own post that the behavior of black people here is due to social conditions rather than racial whateverism.
It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around.
Even if that were the case, which it isn't, you haven't said anything about Latin America and Africa. Which aside from northern Africa (which is already Arab-majority), there aren't any Arabs around to "hold" the blacks back.
And again, what you said made no sense. "It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around." is so arbitrary and stupid and is just an uneducated assumption at best.
Because they were bred with the Spaniards and natives. Domestic bovine are tempered nothing like their wild European ancestors.
Not really. The conditions faced by blacks in Latin America are nearly the same faced by blacks in the US. As in being transported in slave ships. And look at how different outcomes the two groups had. And no, blacks weren't really bred with Spaniards and natives on any significant scale. A full 33% percent of Brazil's population is completely black, and yet they don't really have problems there like how the blacks here have problems.
Because the brazilians were smart. They took out the troublesome ones. They controlled the gene pool. They wouldn't have let Malcom X live.
lolwut? There's so much stupid in that statement that it's nearly off the charts.
Please tell me how a country of 150 million could possibly effectively root out "the troublesome ones" from a population of 50 million. And not to mention the logistical problems with doing such a thing. Anyways, that statement is made out of pure, refined stupid.
The evidence is there. If you chose to believe otherwise, then I respect your decision.
Oh, please show me this "evidence".
1445
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:40:22 PM »
Nah, I'm more inclined to believe that hoodlum shenanigans are in ones DNA.
Which can clearly explain how blacks in the US are significantly more rowdy than blacks in Europe, Africa, or Latin America.
#logic
Because in Europe the Muslims are keeping them in order.
In America, we don't have the Islamic population for that.
What you said right there was a social condition. So you pretty much explained in your own post that the behavior of black people here is due to social conditions rather than racial whateverism.
It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around.
Even if that were the case, which it isn't, you haven't said anything about Latin America and Africa. Which aside from northern Africa (which is already Arab-majority), there aren't any Arabs around to "hold" the blacks back.
And again, what you said made no sense. "It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around." is so arbitrary and stupid and is just an uneducated assumption at best.
Because they were bred with the Spaniards and natives. Domestic bovine are tempered nothing like their wild European ancestors.
Not really. The conditions faced by blacks in Latin America are nearly the same faced by blacks in the US. As in being transported in slave ships. And look at how different outcomes the two groups had. And no, blacks weren't really bred with Spaniards and natives on any significant scale. A full 33% percent of Brazil's population is completely black, and yet they don't really have problems there like how the blacks here have problems.
Because the brazilians were smart. They took out the troublesome ones. They controlled the gene pool. They wouldn't have let Malcom X live.
lolwut? There's so much stupid in that statement that it's nearly off the charts. Please tell me how a country of 150 million could possibly effectively root out "the troublesome ones" from a population of 50 million. And not to mention the logistical problems with doing such a thing. Anyways, that statement is made out of pure, refined stupid.
1446
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:36:07 PM »
Of course not.
Why would the death of innocents be justified?
You're talking to Kiyo. The same Kiyo that cheered on ISIS, called for the deaths of all Americans because of the death penalty, and supports Hamas.
1447
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:34:55 PM »
Nah, I'm more inclined to believe that hoodlum shenanigans are in ones DNA.
Which can clearly explain how blacks in the US are significantly more rowdy than blacks in Europe, Africa, or Latin America.
#logic
Because in Europe the Muslims are keeping them in order.
In America, we don't have the Islamic population for that.
What you said right there was a social condition. So you pretty much explained in your own post that the behavior of black people here is due to social conditions rather than racial whateverism.
It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around.
Even if that were the case, which it isn't, you haven't said anything about Latin America and Africa. Which aside from northern Africa (which is already Arab-majority), there aren't any Arabs around to "hold" the blacks back.
And again, what you said made no sense. "It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around." is so arbitrary and stupid and is just an uneducated assumption at best.
Because they were bred with the Spaniards and natives. Domestic bovine are tempered nothing like their wild European ancestors.
Not really. The conditions faced by blacks in Latin America are nearly the same faced by blacks in the US. As in being transported in slave ships. And look at how different outcomes the two groups had. And no, blacks weren't really bred with Spaniards and natives on any significant scale. A full 33% percent of Brazil's population is completely black, and yet they don't really have problems there like how the blacks here have problems.
1448
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:27:07 PM »
there were a bunch of students of all sorts of races who took a DNA test, which involved blood samples
and all of their results matched almost entirely
Yeah, humans have significantly less genetic diversity among themselves than other species do.
1449
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:20:00 PM »
Nah, I'm more inclined to believe that hoodlum shenanigans are in ones DNA.
Which can clearly explain how blacks in the US are significantly more rowdy than blacks in Europe, Africa, or Latin America.
#logic
Because in Europe the Muslims are keeping them in order.
In America, we don't have the Islamic population for that.
What you said right there was a social condition. So you pretty much explained in your own post that the behavior of black people here is due to social conditions rather than racial whateverism.
It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around.
Even if that were the case, which it isn't, you haven't said anything about Latin America and Africa. Which aside from northern Africa (which is already Arab-majority), there aren't any Arabs around to "hold" the blacks back. And again, what you said made no sense. "It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around." is so arbitrary and stupid and is just an uneducated assumption at best.
1450
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:13:22 PM »
Nah, I'm more inclined to believe that hoodlum shenanigans are in ones DNA.
Which can clearly explain how blacks in the US are significantly more rowdy than blacks in Europe, Africa, or Latin America.
#logic
Because in Europe the Muslims are keeping them in order.
In America, we don't have the Islamic population for that.
What you said right there was a social condition. So you pretty much explained in your own post that the behavior of black people here is due to social conditions rather than racial whateverism.
1451
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:09:24 PM »
Race is an indicator of certain physical, heredity traits, no? Perception of races could be social, sure, but races are natural.
Exactly. It's largely just physical traits and some heredity traits. It has nothing to do with social traits as societal expectations change between locations.
1452
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:08:41 PM »
I mean, in many cases, these children actually want the job somewhat. And this seems like a situation where you either work in a sweatshop or you starve. So this kind of stuff doesn't bother me so much in developing countries like India, Bangladesh, Pakistan (all clothing exporters). But in developed economies, sweatshops are unacceptable since there are many other alternatives.
I think that even in developed countries I think that having children ages 14-18 would still be fine to work making clothes. It would teach them not only how to make their own clothes, but responsibility, and monetary value... however, they should be paid at least minimum wage of course, and in most of the countries with these sweatshops don't seem to have an established minimum wage.
In developed countries, education plays a far more important role in being successful than in developing countries, and ages 14-18 are very important years for education. Trying to interrupt or deny a child's education during those years could have disastrous results on the child later on.
When I was that age my education had already been screwed by the system itself because our educational system is very flawed and does not have much value. It's really meaningless facts crammed into your head that you probably will never use again. I hated high school because I felt like I was being baby sat. The only reason I didn't drop out was because I was in the technical theater and fine arts programs, and I was actually learning a skill that I used in real life.
See? You were learning a useful skill right there that you would use in life later. The aim of the education system (at least) here is to flood you with as many topics as possible so the chances of you finding one or two that you're passionate about will become more and more likely. So if you were away from the education system between 14 and 18, you would have likely never been in those technical theater and fine arts programs.
1453
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:07:16 PM »
Nah, I'm more inclined to believe that hoodlum shenanigans are in ones DNA.
Which can clearly explain how blacks in the US are significantly more rowdy than blacks in Europe, Africa, or Latin America. #logic
1454
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:02:04 PM »
I mean, in many cases, these children actually want the job somewhat. And this seems like a situation where you either work in a sweatshop or you starve. So this kind of stuff doesn't bother me so much in developing countries like India, Bangladesh, Pakistan (all clothing exporters). But in developed economies, sweatshops are unacceptable since there are many other alternatives.
I think that even in developed countries I think that having children ages 14-18 would still be fine to work making clothes. It would teach them not only how to make their own clothes, but responsibility, and monetary value... however, they should be paid at least minimum wage of course, and in most of the countries with these sweatshops don't seem to have an established minimum wage.
In developed countries, education plays a far more important role in being successful than in developing countries, and ages 14-18 are very important years for education. Trying to interrupt or deny a child's education during those years could have disastrous results on the child later on.
1455
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:00:26 PM »
Significantly reduced visibility if you're in the middle and the position of the headlights in cars is why drivers seats aren't in the middle.
1456
« on: April 27, 2015, 06:59:12 PM »
t4r
1457
« on: April 27, 2015, 06:58:32 PM »
I see that this thread hasn't descended into a full-scale racist circlejerk.
1458
« on: April 27, 2015, 06:55:47 PM »
The first one is just toying with you.
And how much does the second one weigh?
This is the teacher
I can't see the image.
1459
« on: April 27, 2015, 06:55:18 PM »
I mean, in many cases, these children actually want the job somewhat. And this seems like a situation where you either work in a sweatshop or you starve. So this kind of stuff doesn't bother me so much in developing countries like India, Bangladesh, Pakistan (all clothing exporters). But in developed economies, sweatshops are unacceptable since there are many other alternatives.
1460
« on: April 27, 2015, 06:52:05 PM »
First one be nuthin but trouble, homes. Shawty #2 is your best bet, specially if she be teachin at one of them finer districts. Bank suga momma, nigga.
First one says she wants to fuck me and we sext sometimes and send pictures and videos everyday. But every time I ask hey dinner? She says idk and wants her douche ex back.
Exactly, she's toying the fuck out of you.
1461
« on: April 27, 2015, 06:49:19 PM »
The first one is just toying with you.
And how much does the second one weigh?
1462
« on: April 27, 2015, 06:21:20 PM »
ITT: Kiyo exercises his mod-proof jacket.
*sips tea*
Eh, there aren't any rules against hate-speech or really controversial opinions. None that I know of at least...
Pretty sure it's a parody of a parody thread, even then the "overly controversial opinion" just looks like a shitpost to me.
*sips tea*
It's a parody of a thread, sort of. But Kiyo is without a shadow of a doubt the most anti-American user in here. She's posted some really crazy shit in the past as well with a serious face. So I don't think that Kiyo intends for this to be a shitpost and she believes what she's saying.
KIYO IS A HE FUCKING LOL CRY ABOUT IT
FUCK YOU
Eh. I don't really see what it matters.
That's because you're a faggot.
y chally y 
1463
« on: April 27, 2015, 06:20:49 PM »
GYRO IN THIS BITCH GYROCOPTER ON THE PUSSY
>memeposting
1464
« on: April 27, 2015, 06:19:22 PM »
ITT: Kiyo exercises his mod-proof jacket.
*sips tea*
Eh, there aren't any rules against hate-speech or really controversial opinions. None that I know of at least...
Pretty sure it's a parody of a parody thread, even then the "overly controversial opinion" just looks like a shitpost to me.
*sips tea*
It's a parody of a thread, sort of. But Kiyo is without a shadow of a doubt the most anti-American user in here. She's posted some really crazy shit in the past as well with a serious face. So I don't think that Kiyo intends for this to be a shitpost and she believes what she's saying.
KIYO IS A HE FUCKING LOL CRY ABOUT IT
FUCK YOU
Eh. I don't really see what it matters.
1465
« on: April 27, 2015, 06:12:51 PM »
ITT: Kiyo exercises his mod-proof jacket.
*sips tea*
Eh, there aren't any rules against hate-speech or really controversial opinions. None that I know of at least...
Pretty sure it's a parody of a parody thread, even then the "overly controversial opinion" just looks like a shitpost to me.
*sips tea*
It's a parody of a thread, sort of. But Kiyo is without a shadow of a doubt the most anti-American user in here. She's posted some really crazy shit in the past as well with a serious face. So I don't think that Kiyo intends for this to be a shitpost and she believes what she's saying.
1466
« on: April 27, 2015, 05:59:03 PM »
>Canada
Canada is one of the few Western, Industrialized countries I dislike more than the US. Good job Canada.
Fuck you, man. Canada is the bomb.
At least the US has a much richer diversity of climate (the only country with every climate in the world) and isn't completely depopulated outside of the major urban centers. That, and the only person from Canada I know who I actually like is Sandtrap. But he kind of lives in rural nowhere.
The USA is literally a trillion times better than Greece
>Aegean Sea
>Greek food
>Greek climate
>lol
The Pacific Ocean is a garbage cesspool. Literally. Aegean sea is fucking beautiful. I can practically live in that water.....
Literally the only great thing you listed is greek food
Love me a gyro
I bet you don't even say it correctly.
"yee-ro"
OHH SHIZZZZZZ Almost everyone I know here says it like "gyro" as in "gyrocopter". It's so fucking annoying...
1467
« on: April 27, 2015, 05:57:51 PM »
ITT: Kiyo exercises his mod-proof jacket.
*sips tea*
Eh, there aren't any rules against hate-speech or really controversial opinions. None that I know of at least...
1468
« on: April 27, 2015, 05:56:44 PM »
Kill yourself.
1469
« on: April 27, 2015, 05:48:43 PM »
No because media subliminally encourages it.
Name one time the news hasn't made something racial for no reason.
But.. Black people are just monkeys! I saw it on a Faux News documentary!
1470
« on: April 27, 2015, 05:46:14 PM »
You do know that no one in the UK really cares about the London bombings right? I mean the 9/11 thread is more about the fact American's are seen as over reacting to 9/11, though a case could be made we under react the the London bombings I suppose.
I think this thread was more of a reaction to Kiyo's thread about 9/11. But it doesn't seem like PSU is aware that Kiyo is an extremist.
Pages: 1 ... 474849 5051 ... 158
|
Show Posts
