Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ๐Ÿ Aria ๐Ÿ”ฎ

Pages: 1 ... 303304305 306307 ... 352
9121
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 05:35:59 PM »
And I think you misunderstand something

The invader doesn't take your souls

They get dropped on the ground for you to pick back up
...

HUH?

what the fuck is the point of that, then?
They get x amount of souls for winning, or humanity, or whatever kind of item it is for the covenant they're in.

9122
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 05:34:38 PM »
You asked why I like it, and I told you.

9123
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 05:32:44 PM »
And I think you misunderstand something

The invader doesn't take your souls

They get dropped on the ground for you to pick back up

9124
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 05:31:57 PM »
And you're assuming it pisses me off- it doesn't.
you didn't get pissed off the first time you were ever invaded, nonconsensually, and lost your shit

you weren't pissed off at that

see, this is the problem
No, I wasn't. I was surprised, I admit, but I wasn't pissed. It was adrenaline pumping because every fight I had before that was against AI that could be beaten by just doing slash > back step > slash. For the first time in the game (at the time), I was fighting something that actually made me play smart.

9125
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 05:27:23 PM »
I'm playing a game that features being invaded by other players. To make sure it happens, I make sure I'm human/ring the beckoning bell and wait in heavily populated areas.

Because fighting AI gets boring sometimes and fighting people is fun. I like the combat, but outside of hunter/red phantom fights, I never feel like I'm toe-to-toe. My enemies are either way above me or way below me. The former are fun sure, but again, the scenario can only run so many ways when you're fighting AI.

And you're assuming it pisses me off- it doesn't.

9126
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 05:20:24 PM »
Verb, please reread that first sentence. I like to be invaded . Meaning I'm consenting to invasion, and the invader is consenting to invade. I WANT to be invaded, otherwise I wouldn't hang around in major PVP zones and waiting for someone to take the bait.

9127
Gaming / Re: Is Bloodborne worth buying a PS4?
« on: April 07, 2015, 05:19:02 PM »
InFamous SS is good but short with very little replayability. Evil Delsin is a cartoon villain.

Bloodborne is pretty great so far. Only complaint is the length of loading screens.

9128
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 05:16:14 PM »
And make no mistake, I'm not trying to get you to like it. I stopped that foolish notion years ago. I was just queuing you in on how Bloodborne changed how invasions work. Funny enough, most people I've talked to are pissed about it because it makes PVP sessions take a lot longer to start up.

9129
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 05:13:00 PM »
1) I enjoy PVP, so it goes without saying that I like being invaded? And if I don't feel like it at a time, I just avoid activating it. So yeah, I like invasion and summoning. Besides, most of the time the person has a summon so it ends up either 2v1, 3v1, or now in DaS2, 6v1. Its more of a challenge on the invading side than the invaded.

2) I never pay attention to messages unless it's pertinent like "ambush ahead"; if it's a lie I was cautious but still alive, if it's true I'm cautious but still alive. So really I'm not for or against it, it's just... there.

9130
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 04:29:18 PM »
You don't have to prevent them

Just don't ring the summoning bell

9131
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 04:18:13 PM »
seems a little convoluted

or at least, not something i'd want to keep having to do just to keep the fucktards out, when i don't think invasions should be a part of the experience in the first place
Ring summoning bell > kill NPC / get summon > jolly cooperation

9132
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 03:27:06 PM »
Well on invading, in Bloodborne you summon people by use of a beckoning bell and respond with a resonant bell. By the same token, you invade by using a sinister resonant bell. So summoning people online also opens up the portal for invasions. If you wanted to play online (maybe this hypothetical person likes messages) but not be invaded, don't ring the beckoning bell.

If you want to summon someone but not he invaded? An NPC appears in your area ringing the sinister beckoning bell. Kill that enemy and nobody can come through.

9133
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 01:41:42 PM »
He has a PS3, Sandtrap.

9134
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 12:26:23 PM »
STOP TRIGGERING ME

9135
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 12:21:13 PM »
Let's be real though

Invading undead burg as a fucking dragon at level 5 was some tight ass shit, I've never had that much fun in PVP before
you're one of those people, huh?
I use my claws and breathe fire, which are both really weak attacks. I don't care how long you've played, if you can't kill someone like that after the Asylum, then maybe you just need to

Spoiler
keep trying and be patient, you'll learn how to play it and have fun if you work hard.
Stop trying to get Verb to play a game that he no like Ariaaaaa
I'm not?

9136
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 11:26:51 AM »
but what if literally nothing i've ever worked hard for in my life was worth it in the end
Then in the end
It doesn't even matter

/cutswrists

9137
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 11:23:47 AM »
Let's be real though

Invading undead burg as a fucking dragon at level 5 was some tight ass shit, I've never had that much fun in PVP before
you're one of those people, huh?
I use my claws and breathe fire, which are both really weak attacks. I don't care how long you've played, if you can't kill someone like that after the Asylum, then maybe you just need to

Spoiler
keep trying and be patient, you'll learn how to play it and have fun if you work hard.

9138
Say we scrap the minimum wage, there's a huge risk of employees being abusedand not being given a fair wage. Unless they put a system in place to make sure that doesn't happen.
Honestly, I see companies still sticking to the "minimum wage" even if it ceased to exist. The only difference is that "at least you're getting paid the minimum" wouldn't be an argument anymore; if they can't fall back on the default, it would increase the likeliness of companies working to give the best price for the work.

Excuse me if it isn't a perfect analogy, but I'd compare it to gas prices between two rival gas stations. Each one tries to undercut the other, even if it's by a fraction of a cent. Even still, it promotes competitive pricing which works out well for the consumer (or employee, in the real case).

9139
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 11:10:10 AM »
no
but veeeerb

You can BREATHE FIRE

9140
Serious / Re: Sexism and dress codes
« on: April 07, 2015, 11:06:40 AM »
This is why I got homeschooled
...so you can wear yoga pants?
Yoga pants are really comfy, okay?

9141
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 11:03:52 AM »
Let's be real though

Invading undead burg as a fucking dragon at level 5 was some tight ass shit, I've never had that much fun in PVP before

9142
Thanks for the condescending response,
I think you telling me that is condescending. Everybody knows that. I obviously know that, otherwise I wouldn't be fucking talking about tax brackets.
Well I'm sorry that happened. It is worth bringing up, however, considering that my argument is that minimum is already paying less relative to every other rate.

Quote
Quote
it is a very important part of the discussion. I'm saying that minimum wage works already pay the lowest amount of tax possible, and have the potential to pay absolutely no federal tax.
I know this. But it's still not enough.
Minimum wage doesn't make a lot, yes. But would being paid $7.50 instead of $7.25 (the federal minimum wage) really be a big enough jump to justify losing that deduction you want?

Quote
Taxes are too damn high.
We can agree on that. To be honest, I'd rather minimum wage not be a thing. A lot of places that support it offer "competitive wages"; I'd like to see a system in place where they have to act on those words.

9143
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 10:49:08 AM »
I died on my first run through, when he jumped down. Then I learned that I needed to run.
>Not beating him with the broken sword that deals like 3dmg per hit

I didn't realize you were a C A S U L who doesn't want to spend ten hours on an easy boss fight by inflating the difficulty unnecessarily.

9144
I bet you're the same dude who balks at raising the minimum wage, huh?
Everybody should.
Wrong.

The minimum wage (in America) is at the same point as it was in the 1960's while the cost of living has skyrocketed. This in turn causes more people to be on welfare, more crime, more desperation, less hope (which means not preparing for or caring about the future), resulting in a weaker country.

In fact, I'd go so far as to say that those living on minimum wage shouldn't be taxed. Unless there are several people in the family working minimum wage, in which case the tax should be 5% max.
Minimum wage is already in the lowest tax bracket.
No shit. Really?

 ::)
Thanks for the condescending response, it is a very important part of the discussion. I'm saying that minimum wage works already pay the lowest amount of tax possible, and have the potential to pay absolutely no federal tax.
Quote
Quote
For example, I pay 12% tax. That's for a full year; if I averaged 20 hours a week vs 30, I wouldn't pay anything in tax.
And you should be able to work 40 hours a week without paying any taxes if you live by yourself.
Sure, that would be great, I love having more money. But I wouldn't go as far as to say that there isn't anything that is eased on minimum wage. Even if you work 40 hours a week, you still only pay 13%.

9145
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 10:41:36 AM »
I can understand BSB in a way, but not the attack itself. The animation to take an antidote takes way too long; by the time you're almost done you're either dead by poison or the boss caught up to you.

Gascoigne is different though. The only move that stun locks you is the blunderbuss, and you can do the same to him with your gun.

9146
Serious / Re: Sexism and dress codes
« on: April 07, 2015, 10:38:16 AM »
If the school says no yoga pants outside of gym class, like my school did, thems the rules.
I think that's what's being contested here. Why things like yoga pants are against the rules while other things aren't.

I'm not saying that this leans against women, though. There are plenty of things boys can't wear either that I think are silly.

9147
I bet you're the same dude who balks at raising the minimum wage, huh?
Everybody should.
Wrong.

The minimum wage (in America) is at the same point as it was in the 1960's while the cost of living has skyrocketed. This in turn causes more people to be on welfare, more crime, more desperation, less hope (which means not preparing for or caring about the future), resulting in a weaker country.

In fact, I'd go so far as to say that those living on minimum wage shouldn't be taxed. Unless there are several people in the family working minimum wage, in which case the tax should be 5% max.
Minimum wage is already in the lowest tax bracket. For example, I pay 12% tax. That's for a full year; if I averaged 20 hours a week vs 30, I wouldn't pay anything in tax.

9148
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 10:26:28 AM »
And Gascoigne really isn't that complicated of a name lol.

9149
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 10:25:52 AM »
]You know you can roll in any direction and instantly get back up if you get knocked down, right?

And just dodge behind a pillar to antidote and heal.
No no, when you get grabbed by the BEAST, you get locked with her throwing up on you, then the moment you get up you die. I understand you can avoid attacks, but when you get hit yeah.

And I tried to dodge with father GAHGHSGFOSG hit you, but yeah you can't. There is one animation where when you get knocked down, he gets a free hit on you.
I've fought him five times across three characters, I know what move you mean lol. I'm saying that the second you get knocked down, and you can click roll and a direction and you'll move out of the way. You're not stunned when you're on the ground.

Also that sounds like you haven't put anything in vitality. I would be very low on health after that attack, yeah, but I always survived it if I had full health.

9150
Serious / Re: John Oliver interviews Edward Snowden
« on: April 07, 2015, 10:22:57 AM »
It's not that it's infallible, it's a part of our law that we cannot change or override.
As you very well know, we've changed and overridden laws before, so, you already know that that's false.
That's right, my bad there; but the point I was trying to make is still there. It's not that it's infallible, it's a law contradicting a long held law. At the very least, this would require the supreme court to overlook it and decide to either:

1) Repeal the new law.
2) Add another amendment to the constitution revoking the 4th.

To note, I'm not saying that the Patriot Act is against the constitution. I'm just trying to explain why mentioning the constitution is one way to argue a law to be repealed.

Pages: 1 ... 303304305 306307 ... 352