3211
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 3213
Gaming / Re: Speedruns?« on: March 25, 2015, 03:33:57 PM »
I don't attempt speedruns, but I like watching the weirder ones.
YouTube I like to take my time enjoying the gameI've never understood this irrational objection to speedrunning. Chances are they've already done that... a lot of times. A lot of times. You see stuff like the video above? He's literally memorized the entire game. Here's an excerpt from his comments on the run: Quote I've loved this game ever since its release in 2002, both the single-player and the multi-player versions. Although I pretty much stopped playing single-player after I completed it the first few times and then switched to the very brilliant and addictive multi-player game, I revisited the single-player version again in recent time – this time as a quite experienced strafe jumper and Jedi slayer thanks to extensive multi-player adventures. I believe it was in April 2012 that I first started looking for shortcuts and tricks for completing the levels faster. The first one I found was the canyon jump in kejim_post which shortened the level by a huge factor. I started becoming curious about how fast this game could be completed, and I suddenly came to think of some of the impressive speedruns I had seen previously, especially runs of Half-Life. I wondered if a run of JK2 had been made, and to my excitement a search quickly led to LLCoolDave's Padawan run on SDA from 2005.Speedrunning it wasn't the first thing he thought of when he bought the game. That's just silly. It's probably not even worthwhile to do that because incorporating the best routes and pickups into a run takes a lot of practice and a lot of patience, and beating the game hundreds if not thousands of time. 3215
The Flood / Re: Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor« on: March 25, 2015, 03:11:31 PM »derpWasn't this rumored like months ago?It was confirmed that he would be Lex Luthor months ago. 3216
The Flood / Re: Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor« on: March 25, 2015, 03:08:58 PM »
Wasn't this rumored like months ago?
3217
Serious / Re: Why I'm not a feminist (let's kill the myths, people)« on: March 25, 2015, 10:05:14 AM »
If feminism benefits everyone, I'd like to see what feminists have done to help men.
But having a feminist mother, I'm well-acquainted with the 'pit of lies' (that was a joke): >"women should be allowed to make decisions about their own bodies" >"but male circumcision should be mandatory because uncut is gross" >"women should be equal to men in the family structure" >turn a blind eye to the fact that usually, women usually get the kids in the event of divorce >"men should treat women equally" >"men should hold the door for women but not the other way around" >"only men should have to physically exert themselves" >turn a blind eye to the fact that usually in the current legal structure, women are allowed to hit men, but men aren't allowed to hit women >turn a blind eye to the fact that only men have to sign up for selective service I've yet to meet a feminist who's actually committed to the cause of gender equality. It's barely even a 'rights movement' so much as it's armchair activism. There's a lot of ignorance to the situations where women take privilege--it would never occur to them that that's still not a fair or equal scenario. 3218
Serious / Re: Jeb Bush doxxes over 12,000 Floridians in the name of "transparency"« on: March 25, 2015, 09:42:43 AM »Not revealing personal information like that is just... the most basic thing one could possibly ask for. It's a baffling oversight that opens up thousands of Floridians to identity theft. And as is stated in the article:There's a pretty big difference between "yeah, you can publish the correspondence we received from our constituents to promote transparancy", and "yeah, you can publish the correspondence, including full names, email addresses, phone numbers and so forth."I can't really blame him personally. I imagine one or several staff members will be fired over this, but all they did was post the data that was provided by the state department. It's not like Bush posted it himself; all he probably did was agree to the disclosure, and that was it.Which might as well be posting it himself since he gave the OK for this to happen. Quote "Emails that bear on public decisions should be made public, but certainly emails with social security numbers or private medical information are not relevant to that," Bruce Jacob, a constitutional and criminal law professor at Florida's Stetson University told The Verge. 3219
The Flood / Re: Dubs decides who I PM and what to give them« on: March 25, 2015, 09:25:59 AM »fukSend me a PS VitaFUCKING YES FINALLY 3220
The Flood / Re: Dubs decides who I PM and what to give them« on: March 25, 2015, 12:58:02 AM »Send me a PS VitaFUCKING YES FINALLY of course it's probably way too late now >.> 3221
The Flood / Re: Dubs decides who I PM and what to give them« on: March 25, 2015, 12:57:37 AM »
Send me a PS Vita
3222
The Flood / Re: Dubs decides who I PM and what to give them« on: March 25, 2015, 12:43:37 AM »
FUCK I'M 0/2
3223
The Flood / Re: Dubs decides who I PM and what to give them« on: March 25, 2015, 12:43:09 AM »
Send me a PS4
3224
The Flood / Re: Dubs decides who I PM and what to give them« on: March 25, 2015, 12:09:34 AM »PM me pic of your asshole spread open with my name written on your butt.Rerolling for this. Quote http://sep7agon.net/index.php?topic=32967.msg625899#msg625899 lol rekt 3225
The Flood / Re: Dubs decides who I PM and what to give them« on: March 25, 2015, 12:07:26 AM »
An Xbox One
3226
The Flood / Re: I've been convinced to give it another go« on: March 24, 2015, 11:31:02 PM »
I got 3,000 posts.
3227
Gaming / Re: Pokemon you like using that other's don't use much?« on: March 24, 2015, 11:28:40 PM »
I always liked Mew for casual battles. Being able to know pretty much any move makes it unpredictable, and Transform is just lulzy.
3230
Serious / Re: Jeb Bush doxxes over 12,000 Floridians in the name of "transparency"« on: March 24, 2015, 08:37:23 PM »I just... I can't fathom what they were thinking. That's a humongous oversight. Being a Politician 101.I can't really blame him personally. I imagine one or several staff members will be fired over this, but all they did was post the data that was provided by the state department. It's not like Bush posted it himself; all he probably did was agree to the disclosure, and that was it.>.> stop being logical Oh but yeah, a lot of politicians have some way to contact them >.> Jeb did go the extra mile by talking to them directly, apparently. 3231
Serious / Re: Jeb Bush doxxes over 12,000 Floridians in the name of "transparency"« on: March 24, 2015, 08:29:59 PM »I can't really blame him personally. I imagine one or several staff members will be fired over this, but all they did was post the data that was provided by the state department. It's not like Bush posted it himself; all he probably did was agree to the disclosure, and that was it.>.> stop being logical But at any rate, I don't think he or his office had the authority to do so in the first place, unless he went around and specifically asked each and every one of those people. 3232
Serious / Jeb Bush doxxes over 12,000 Floridians in the name of "transparency"« on: March 24, 2015, 08:05:41 PM »
This turns into a bit of a rant at the end, but stay with me >.>
Politicians accept correspondence (letters and email, etc) from their constituents (the people, specifically voters in the politician's jurisdiction) to get an idea of what they want, to help them navigate the many departments of government, and to expedite their cases. In the latter instances, personal information is sometimes necessary, including name, address, phone number, and Social Security number. There is a legally binding document signed by the constituent to ensure that the office does not share this information with any third parties, lest the office be held accountable. These correspondences can be of a very sensitive nature, so the guarantee of privacy is an important one. Jeb Bush fucked that all to hell. In an attempt to one-up Hillary Clinton, currently defending herself from her personal email server controversy, the former Florida governor released email correspondence from his time in office. What makes this so completely incompetent is that his office did not redact a single piece of information from these correspondences... whatsoever. And that's a huge problem. (Follow the link for the pictures) http://www.theverge.com/2015/2/10/8013531/jeb-bush-florida-email-dump-privacy Spoiler Quote Jeb Bush dumps emails including social security numbers of Florida residents online While the data is off Bush's site now, the damage has already been done, because it's already out there on the Internet. Keep in mind, this is a candidate who also supports the NSA's mass surveillance programs--though he seems to have great difficulty grasping the concept of privacy, or he just doesn't care. On a related note, Ted Cruz's campaign also seems to be technologically illiterate, unable to prevent the most basic of mishaps. Is he not aware of whitehouse.com? Watching the GOP in 2016 could be like watching a grandparent learn how to use a computer for the first time... except that grandparent is also your tech support. Don't get me wrong, I feel sorry for the Jeb Bush emailers--he violated their trust and screwed them over while doing so, all for political gain. It'll just be humorous, though, to watch the GOP (metaphorically) shoot themselves in the foot again. Is there any question now that Jeb Bush is not qualified to be president (along with Hillary)? 3234
Serious / Re: US intelligence agencies will stop the bulk collection of metadata« on: March 24, 2015, 04:49:45 PM »But Price made clear the administration now has no intention of doing so, and that the future of metadata collection after June 1 was up to Congress. 3235
Serious / Re: FEMA to stop funding states with climate change-denying governors« on: March 24, 2015, 04:09:15 PM »What about ordering schools on a federal level and making climate change questions a part of Common Core?Honestly, that sounds ideal (especially to this FEMA stuff), but it's already been pointed out that conservatives think the Common Core is some liberal agenda to indoctrinate our children. And who knows how they'll somehow turn it in their favor? shit sucks 3236
Serious / Re: Cruz to Announce Presidential Run Monday« on: March 24, 2015, 11:10:50 AM »
lolCruz
For starters, I think calling any country that's not yours a 'backwater country' only proves his point.general lack of knowledge and understanding of the outside world that is rather prevalent in the USChrist you Eurofags are arrogant. 3237
The Flood / Re: >Randomly matched with a person in the south of the US« on: March 24, 2015, 10:43:33 AM »>He believes Ted Cruz is a good presidentHe's not even a president. And by his own logic, he's ineligible for the presidency, considering he was born in Canada. 3238
Serious / Re: FEMA to stop funding states with climate change-denying governors« on: March 24, 2015, 09:10:53 AM »That's what's happening, but it's moving at a snail's pace. As in the case of Texas, climate change deniers have tried to change the curriculum to cast doubt on the veracity of climate change. A similar situation happened in West Virginia. There's very little indication that climate deniers have plans to stop anytime soon. Even universities are pandering to climate deniers. The biggest major news network in the country constantly touts the climate denial perspective. A current member and former chairman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works receives money from BP. Climate deniers actively attempt to discredit their opponents. (And that's just one example.) Good luck finding a GOP candidate who hasn't tried to cast doubt on climate change.Order schools to educate their students about climate change.Alright, if denying FEMA funding to them isn't the answer, what is? Climate denial is deeply ingrained in our society, and there's no sign of it going away. Worst case, trying to discredit them will just encourage them to play the victim card, and it'll work just like it always has. There's a strong wave of anti-intellectualism at play here. And a lot of it's not even about 'ignorance,' but about pushing an agenda because there's money in doing so. It's clear that no amount of disasters such as hurricanes will change their minds. How much longer will we wait to do something about it? 3239
Serious / Re: FEMA to stop funding states with climate change-denying governors« on: March 24, 2015, 08:33:51 AM »Exacerbating? As I've already said on this page, the governors were not effectively preparing their states. Taking away one part of FEMA funding isn't even going to make a difference, because having it barely made a difference in the first place.The feds are exacerbating the situation. This sets a dangerous precedent for things moving forward.As I've already shown with evidence, the governors are already harming their own states with their climate denial.AND DENYING PREPAREDNESS FUNDS BECAUSE SOME DUMBFUCK DOESN'T BELIEVE IN CLIMATE CHANGE ALSO HAPPENS TO BE A DANGEROUS FUCKING POLITICAL MOVE.Do you really think they're just going to change their stance over this?It is a political move that just so happens to be a dangerous one, too. It's more like taking airbags from a car because the driver disabled them. Having them or not having them--it's not going to matter either way. But I hate analogies, I don't know why we're even attempting them >.> 3240
Serious / Re: FEMA to stop funding states with climate change-denying governors« on: March 24, 2015, 08:25:50 AM »I don't know what else to tell you. Even if that were to be a generalization, it would hardly undermine my argument, seeing as you've left the rest of it unchallenged.I did not generalize whatsoeverUm, no amount of preparations and evacuations can prevent house floodings and other property damage.Um, no amount of preparationsUm, no amount of preparations and evacuations can prevent house floodings and other property damage. |