Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Anonymous (User Deleted)

Pages: 1 ... 106107108 109110 ... 212
3212
Gaming / Re: Speedruns?
« on: March 25, 2015, 03:59:12 PM »
ah
uh

?

Did I fly off the handle? Sorry >.>

3213
Gaming / Re: Speedruns?
« on: March 25, 2015, 03:33:57 PM »
I don't attempt speedruns, but I like watching the weirder ones.

YouTube


I like to take my time enjoying the game
I've never understood this irrational objection to speedrunning.
Chances are they've already done that... a lot of times. A lot of times. You see stuff like the video above? He's literally memorized the entire game.

Here's an excerpt from his comments on the run:
Quote
I've loved this game ever since its release in 2002, both the single-player and the multi-player versions. Although I pretty much stopped playing single-player after I completed it the first few times and then switched to the very brilliant and addictive multi-player game, I revisited the single-player version again in recent time – this time as a quite experienced strafe jumper and Jedi slayer thanks to extensive multi-player adventures. I believe it was in April 2012 that I first started looking for shortcuts and tricks for completing the levels faster. The first one I found was the canyon jump in kejim_post which shortened the level by a huge factor. I started becoming curious about how fast this game could be completed, and I suddenly came to think of some of the impressive speedruns I had seen previously, especially runs of Half-Life. I wondered if a run of JK2 had been made, and to my excitement a search quickly led to LLCoolDave's Padawan run on SDA from 2005.
[...]
Thanks also to IsraeliRD for timing the run. Last but not least, thanks to LucasArts and Raven Software for creating the best pc game I've ever played.
Speedrunning it wasn't the first thing he thought of when he bought the game. That's just silly. It's probably not even worthwhile to do that because incorporating the best routes and pickups into a run takes a lot of practice and a lot of patience, and beating the game hundreds if not thousands of time.


3214
Gaming / Re: Dragon Ball Xenoverse
« on: March 25, 2015, 03:13:52 PM »

3215
The Flood / Re: Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor
« on: March 25, 2015, 03:11:31 PM »
Wasn't this rumored like months ago?
It was confirmed that he would be Lex Luthor months ago.
derp

3216
The Flood / Re: Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor
« on: March 25, 2015, 03:08:58 PM »
Wasn't this rumored like months ago?

3217
Serious / Re: Why I'm not a feminist (let's kill the myths, people)
« on: March 25, 2015, 10:05:14 AM »
If feminism benefits everyone, I'd like to see what feminists have done to help men.

But having a feminist mother, I'm well-acquainted with the 'pit of lies' (that was a joke):

>"women should be allowed to make decisions about their own bodies"
>"but male circumcision should be mandatory because uncut is gross"
>"women should be equal to men in the family structure"
>turn a blind eye to the fact that usually, women usually get the kids in the event of divorce
>"men should treat women equally"
>"men should hold the door for women but not the other way around"
>"only men should have to physically exert themselves"
>turn a blind eye to the fact that usually in the current legal structure, women are allowed to hit men, but men aren't allowed to hit women
>turn a blind eye to the fact that only men have to sign up for selective service

I've yet to meet a feminist who's actually committed to the cause of gender equality. It's barely even a 'rights movement' so much as it's armchair activism. There's a lot of ignorance to the situations where women take privilege--it would never occur to them that that's still not a fair or equal scenario.

3218
I can't really blame him personally. I imagine one or several staff members will be fired over this, but all they did was post the data that was provided by the state department. It's not like Bush posted it himself; all he probably did was agree to the disclosure, and that was it.
Which might as well be posting it himself since he gave the OK for this to happen.
There's a pretty big difference between "yeah, you can publish the correspondence we received from our constituents to promote transparancy", and "yeah, you can publish the correspondence, including full names, email addresses, phone numbers and so forth."

I'm really not a fan of the guy myself, but blaming him personally is a little much. Chances are he agreed to this under the logical impression that his staff would not publish the sensitive personal information that goes with the correspondence when he gave the OK.
Not revealing personal information like that is just... the most basic thing one could possibly ask for. It's a baffling oversight that opens up thousands of Floridians to identity theft. And as is stated in the article:
Quote
"Emails that bear on public decisions should be made public, but certainly emails with social security numbers or private medical information are not relevant to that," Bruce Jacob, a constitutional and criminal law professor at Florida's Stetson University told The Verge.

3219
The Flood / Re: Dubs decides who I PM and what to give them
« on: March 25, 2015, 09:25:59 AM »
Send me a PS Vita
FUCKING YES FINALLY

of course it's probably way too late now >.>

991 isn't dubs.
fuk

3220
The Flood / Re: Dubs decides who I PM and what to give them
« on: March 25, 2015, 12:58:02 AM »
Send me a PS Vita
FUCKING YES FINALLY

of course it's probably way too late now >.>

3221
The Flood / Re: Dubs decides who I PM and what to give them
« on: March 25, 2015, 12:57:37 AM »
Send me a PS Vita

3222
The Flood / Re: Dubs decides who I PM and what to give them
« on: March 25, 2015, 12:43:37 AM »
FUCK I'M 0/2

3223
The Flood / Re: Dubs decides who I PM and what to give them
« on: March 25, 2015, 12:43:09 AM »
Send me a PS4

3224
The Flood / Re: Dubs decides who I PM and what to give them
« on: March 25, 2015, 12:09:34 AM »
PM me pic of your asshole spread open with my name written on your butt.
Rerolling for this.
Quote
http://sep7agon.net/index.php?topic=32967.msg625899#msg625899

lol rekt

3225
The Flood / Re: Dubs decides who I PM and what to give them
« on: March 25, 2015, 12:07:26 AM »
An Xbox One

3226
The Flood / Re: I've been convinced to give it another go
« on: March 24, 2015, 11:31:02 PM »
I got 3,000 posts.

3227
Gaming / Re: Pokemon you like using that other's don't use much?
« on: March 24, 2015, 11:28:40 PM »
I always liked Mew for casual battles. Being able to know pretty much any move makes it unpredictable, and Transform is just lulzy.

3228
The Flood / Re: I GOT THA POWERS THAT B
« on: March 24, 2015, 11:24:19 PM »
YouTube

3229
The Flood / Re: Cooler people post in this thread
« on: March 24, 2015, 09:26:03 PM »





3230
I can't really blame him personally. I imagine one or several staff members will be fired over this, but all they did was post the data that was provided by the state department. It's not like Bush posted it himself; all he probably did was agree to the disclosure, and that was it.
>.> stop being logical

But at any rate, I don't think he or his office had the authority to do so in the first place, unless he went around and specifically asked each and every one of those people.

Well since the emails are considered public record, sending an email is, itself, tacit consent to publication. Just looking over a few examples in the article, they were all instances of people disclosing that information on behalf of another, such a legal adviser or medical representative -- which is kind of shocking in itself, given their responsibility to protect that information.

On a whole I think it's an egg in his face, but not particularly damaging or dramatic to his campaign. Also, I wasn't aware of his publication of his email address to get closer to his constituents --  that's pretty commendable, in my opinion. Sounds like his good intentions were muddied by a careless staff member.
I just... I can't fathom what they were thinking. That's a humongous oversight. Being a Politician 101.

Oh but yeah, a lot of politicians have some way to contact them >.> Jeb did go the extra mile by talking to them directly, apparently.

3231
I can't really blame him personally. I imagine one or several staff members will be fired over this, but all they did was post the data that was provided by the state department. It's not like Bush posted it himself; all he probably did was agree to the disclosure, and that was it.
>.> stop being logical

But at any rate, I don't think he or his office had the authority to do so in the first place, unless he went around and specifically asked each and every one of those people.

3232
This turns into a bit of a rant at the end, but stay with me >.>

Politicians accept correspondence (letters and email, etc) from their constituents (the people, specifically voters in the politician's jurisdiction) to get an idea of what they want, to help them navigate the many departments of government, and to expedite their cases. In the latter instances, personal information is sometimes necessary, including name, address, phone number, and Social Security number. There is a legally binding document signed by the constituent to ensure that the office does not share this information with any third parties, lest the office be held accountable. These correspondences can be of a very sensitive nature, so the guarantee of privacy is an important one.

Jeb Bush fucked that all to hell.

In an attempt to one-up Hillary Clinton, currently defending herself from her personal email server controversy, the former Florida governor released email correspondence from his time in office.

What makes this so completely incompetent is that his office did not redact a single piece of information from these correspondences... whatsoever. And that's a huge problem.

(Follow the link for the pictures)
http://www.theverge.com/2015/2/10/8013531/jeb-bush-florida-email-dump-privacy

Spoiler
Quote
Jeb Bush dumps emails including social security numbers of Florida residents online

Florida man strikes again

Jeb Bush, a rumored 2016 Republican presidential candidate, just decided to publish hundreds of thousands of emails sent to him during his time as governor of Florida. On its face it seems like a great idea in the name of transparency, but there's one huge problem: neither Bush nor those who facilitated the publication of the records, including the state government, decided to redact potentially sensitive personal information from them.

"In the spirit of transparency, I am posting the emails of my governorship here," a note on Bush's website says. "Some are funny; some are serious; some I wrote in frustration." Some also contain the email addresses, home addresses, phone numbers, and social security numbers of Florida residents. The emails are available in Outlook format, and can be searched on the web at Bush's website.

The Verge did not receive a response from Mr. Bush or his Political Action Committee's office at the time of publication.

"In the spirit of transparency, I am posting the emails of my governorship."

We reviewed many of the emails released by Bush, and found a wide variety of communications — everything from religious parables, to praise of the governor's support of creationism, to routine bureaucratic correspondence. But some of the emails appear to be highly sensitive or personal. Many, like the one excerpted below, share tales of personal struggle or sorrow.

Quote
This is just a sharing...today..i feel beaten down... ... want to help many and hope I can get there some day....through my empowerment it will be a testament to my message and the ability to share my future resources...its a lonely road...so many seem actively against you...your back is to the wall...you have many another two months of business survival...

P.S. this is just sharing with a friend... please no action or follow-up or any communications or assistance sought of nay kind...its my struggle to work through and find a way...just feeling "beaten" today...at 37 I feel like 60 today :) .....and tomorrow will be better.

Confidential communications intended for indicated recipient only

Other emails include potentially sensitive details about government operations. One email reviewed by The Verge discussed termination of a Florida Lottery employee; the email revealed the reasons for his termination, including "conduct unbecoming a public employee, insubordination, and neglect of duty." The employee had emailed then-governor Bush to appeal for reinstatement. Bush followed up with a lottery official to see if his request could be granted.

Some include personal appeals from citizens with medical or employment issues. And a subset of these messages contain sensitive data like social security numbers, as in the email shown below. (The redactions are our own.)

Another email, sent on behalf of a healthcare representative and shown below, contains information about a child with a life-threatening medical condition. The email exposes the child and mother's name, the mother's home state and phone number, her social security number, and her healthcare identification number.
     
Florida's freedom of information laws are very broad. As Bush notes in the signature of many of his emails, "Florida has a very broad public records law," and "your email communications may therefore be subject to public disclosure."  However, social security numbers in particular are protected. As Florida private attorney Richard A. Harrison tells The Verge, social security numbers are "both confidential and exempt" from public disclosure under state law. "They can be released only for the limited purposes specified in that section, of which this is not one," Harrison says. "It doesn't matter how an agency or official obtained the information; once obtained it is a public record and the SSNs are confidential and exempt under the law." But that doesn't mean the former governor is legally responsible for the data leak. Harrison says the state's legal custodian of records is charged with ensuring no confidential or exempt information is released.

Under Florida law, that custodian might get off with just a scratch. Violation of the public records statute in this circumstance is considered a "noncriminal infraction" that's punishable by a fine "not exceeding $500." Someone who knowingly or willfully violates the privacy law is subject to harsher penalties — but it might be pretty easy to avoid those given the immense size of the records.

Jeb Bush's camp was quick to shift blame to the state. Kristy Campbell, a spokesperson for Bush, told BuzzFeed News that the release is "an exact replica of the public records on file with the Florida Department of State and are available at anyone's request under Chapter 119 sunshine laws." Of course, that statement isn't entirely true, since social security numbers are definitely exempt (and confidential) under that same chapter of the law.

Social Security Numbers are both confidential and exempt from disclosure under Florida law
Many of the same emails Bush released today may have already been available online as of December, 2014, thanks to a request made by the Florida Center for Investigative Reporting. Some publications, including The Washington Post and The Hill, combed the email records for policy insight, but did not appear to stumble upon sensitive personal information.

Obviously one of the lessons here is that you shouldn't email information to public officials that you want to keep private, at least not in Florida. But even if most of these emails are broadly subject to disclosure under the state's sunshine law, it's concerning that such a huge, indiscriminate data dump could include so much personal information. "Emails that bear on public decisions should be made public, but certainly emails with social security numbers or private medical information are not relevant to that," Bruce Jacob, a constitutional and criminal law professor at Florida's Stetson University told The Verge. "It's hard to imagine a court finding a persona guilty of a crime if it was a mistake, but certainly this is not a good thing for private information of that kind to be released."

At minimum, the data dump shows a serious ignorance of the volume of sensitive information in the records and a carelessness about their disclosure. And while a Florida bureaucrat may ultimately be to blame, it's not a good look for Jeb Bush — someone who called himself the first "eGovernor," and a man who may want to sit in the White House.

Update, 3:10 PM: This story has been updated to include additional emails from the archive, as well as prior reports on the archive from December, 2014.

Update, 3:22 PM: Updated with a statement by a spokesperson for Jeb Bush.

Update, 3:53 PM: Time reporter Zeke Miller, reporting from a Q&A with Jeb Bush, reported on Twitter that Bush is now aware of the personal information in the email dump, and that it will be removed. Miller reports that Bush's PAC posted only what is already in the public record, echoing the statement given by Bush's spokesperson to BuzzFeed News. We're not sure how long that will take, or if Bush's PAC will take down the emails temporarily in the meantime (it will presumably take a while to scan through hundreds of thousands of emails), but we'll keep you updated.
 
Update, 5:35 PM: Researchers are now poring over the email dump for personal information. It appears Bush's team, and perhaps Florida state government, will have lots of work to do if they want to purge the data from the records — and some explaining about how this happened. It's more than a few bits of personal information.
 
Update, 11:00PM: The raw .pst files have now been removed from Jeb Bush's site. "We were informed that some personal information was available in the raw data so we removed these files," reads an error message. "You may still read these emails on the email calendar link, where we have redacted personal information we have been able to locate."

While the data is off Bush's site now, the damage has already been done, because it's already out there on the Internet. Keep in mind, this is a candidate who also supports the NSA's mass surveillance programs--though he seems to have great difficulty grasping the concept of privacy, or he just doesn't care.

On a related note, Ted Cruz's campaign also seems to be technologically illiterate, unable to prevent the most basic of mishaps. Is he not aware of whitehouse.com? Watching the GOP in 2016 could be like watching a grandparent learn how to use a computer for the first time... except that grandparent is also your tech support.

Don't get me wrong, I feel sorry for the Jeb Bush emailers--he violated their trust and screwed them over while doing so, all for political gain. It'll just be humorous, though, to watch the GOP (metaphorically) shoot themselves in the foot again.

Is there any question now that Jeb Bush is not qualified to be president (along with Hillary)?

3233
Gaming / Re: Nintendo and Playboy
« on: March 24, 2015, 04:54:04 PM »

3234
But Price made clear the administration now has no intention of doing so, and that the future of metadata collection after June 1 was up to Congress.

3235
What about ordering schools on a federal level and making climate change questions a part of Common Core?
Honestly, that sounds ideal (especially to this FEMA stuff), but it's already been pointed out that conservatives think the Common Core is some liberal agenda to indoctrinate our children. And who knows how they'll somehow turn it in their favor?

shit sucks  ::)

3236
Serious / Re: Cruz to Announce Presidential Run Monday
« on: March 24, 2015, 11:10:50 AM »
lolCruz

general lack of knowledge and understanding of the outside world that is rather prevalent in the US
Christ you Eurofags are arrogant.

Can barely hold one country together between two language groups, but we're the idiots for not being versed in the political realities of backwater countries.
For starters, I think calling any country that's not yours a 'backwater country' only proves his point.

3237
The Flood / Re: >Randomly matched with a person in the south of the US
« on: March 24, 2015, 10:43:33 AM »
>He believes Ted Cruz is a good president
He's not even a president. And by his own logic, he's ineligible for the presidency, considering he was born in Canada.

3238
Alright, if denying FEMA funding to them isn't the answer, what is?
Order schools to educate their students about climate change.
Encourage rival media outlets to go after conservative sources that try to deny or downplay climate change.

Basically do whatever we can to educate the remaining climate change skeptics so these idiots stop getting elected.
That's what's happening, but it's moving at a snail's pace. As in the case of Texas, climate change deniers have tried to change the curriculum to cast doubt on the veracity of climate change. A similar situation happened in West Virginia. There's very little indication that climate deniers have plans to stop anytime soon. Even universities are pandering to climate deniers. The biggest major news network in the country constantly touts the climate denial perspective. A current member and former chairman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works receives money from BP. Climate deniers actively attempt to discredit their opponents. (And that's just one example.) Good luck finding a GOP candidate who hasn't tried to cast doubt on climate change.

Climate denial is deeply ingrained in our society, and there's no sign of it going away. Worst case, trying to discredit them will just encourage them to play the victim card, and it'll work just like it always has. There's a strong wave of anti-intellectualism at play here. And a lot of it's not even about 'ignorance,' but about pushing an agenda because there's money in doing so. It's clear that no amount of disasters such as hurricanes will change their minds. How much longer will we wait to do something about it?

3239
Do you really think they're just going to change their stance over this?

If anything it will just lead to greater polarization.

The solution is education, not punishment for thoughtcrime.
It is a political move that just so happens to be a dangerous one, too.
AND DENYING PREPAREDNESS FUNDS BECAUSE SOME DUMBFUCK DOESN'T BELIEVE IN CLIMATE CHANGE ALSO HAPPENS TO BE A DANGEROUS FUCKING POLITICAL MOVE.
As I've already shown with evidence, the governors are already harming their own states with their climate denial.

But as soon as the fed threatens to do it, everyone just loses their minds.
The feds are exacerbating the situation.  This sets a dangerous precedent for things moving forward.

Just because there's an idiot behind the wheel not wearing a seatbelt doesn't mean that the passenger airbags shouldn't go off.
Exacerbating? As I've already said on this page, the governors were not effectively preparing their states. Taking away one part of FEMA funding isn't even going to make a difference, because having it barely made a difference in the first place.

It's more like taking airbags from a car because the driver disabled them. Having them or not having them--it's not going to matter either way.

But I hate analogies, I don't know why we're even attempting them >.>

3240



I did not generalize whatsoever



Um, no amount of preparations and evacuations can prevent house floodings and other property damage.

Um, no amount of preparations

Um, no amount of preparations and evacuations can prevent house floodings and other property damage.

I suppose you don't know what generalizing means.
But I'm done here, this is going nowhere.
I don't know what else to tell you. Even if that were to be a generalization, it would hardly undermine my argument, seeing as you've left the rest of it unchallenged.

Pages: 1 ... 106107108 109110 ... 212