Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Anonymous (User Deleted)

Pages: 1 ... 858687 8889 ... 212
2581
The Flood / Re: There's nothing morally wrong with [ ]
« on: September 01, 2015, 02:02:01 PM »

2582
The Flood / Re: Good job guys
« on: September 01, 2015, 01:59:03 PM »
there's nothing morally wrong with posting screenshots
there's nothing morally wrong with being morally wrong

2583
Gaming / Re: "Scissors. 61!" | 1 Day Remains
« on: September 01, 2015, 01:50:27 PM »
Steam is taking *forever* to download it, I knew I should have started last night.

2584
The Flood / Re: There's nothing morally wrong with [ ]
« on: September 01, 2015, 01:49:23 PM »
How can you "just be yourself"
when you don't know who you are?
deep

2585
The Flood / Re: Incest tier list
« on: September 01, 2015, 01:48:43 PM »
no

2586
The Flood / Re: There's nothing morally wrong with [ ]
« on: September 01, 2015, 01:48:07 PM »
I'm pretty sure there's still not a single piece of empirical evidence that GMOs are harmful in any way.
Keep drinking the kool aid, buddy

He's right
--Titanium oxide
--BHT
--Sodium benzoate
--Acrylamides
--Aspartame

Some chemicals that are universally in almost all GMOs. This doesn't even include extra things they put in certain kinds.
How about like, I dunno, genetically engineered crops to provide nutrients to people who would otherwise be malnourished? No chemicals necessary. That's just one application of genetic engineering, though--others include increased resistance to pests, which helps the environment and the consumer by not using pesticides; and increased resistance to droughts, which helps prevent food shortages and keeps farmers in business.

I'm 99.9% certain that aspartame is completely safe, but I'll have to look up the other ones when I can be arsed to do that. BF4 time, yo.

EDIT: What you should really be concerned about is nanoparticles in food. One effect that we don't know the consequences of (if any) is that they can penetrate the layer of blood that protects your brain. Even though the FDA insists they're completely harmless, there's an utter lack of evidence supporting or debunking that claim.
First of all, aspartame is poison. Simple as that.

And I'm not talking about the mere idea of genetically modifying food, I'm talking about how it's used in today's American society. Monsanto is the #1 distributor and producer of GMOs, and they put in everything I listed above to their "food".
1) Prove it.

2) Okay, point taken. Not all GMOs are the devil.
Here. This is the article I usually link, since it cites its sources and presents everything very clearly. There are dozens more where that came from, though.
>Dr. Joseph Mercola
>*wikis*
>"Joseph M. Mercola (born 1954) is an alternative medicine proponent"
>AIDS denialist
>is also against vaccines

Um, well the American Cancer Society also seems to think aspartame is harmless, so there's that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

Way to completely ignore the facts he brings up in the article by attacking his character. Why don't you wiki the people he cites in the article? Because very few of the things he talks about are his original ideas, just ideas compiled into one article.

And WOW. Are you really going to bring up the ACS? May as well get your information from the FDA or WTO meetings, lmao.
Fine, I'll try to give it a read. But I'm extremely skeptical. I'll dissect it in bit.

What's wrong with the ACS? I mean, I'd sooner trust them than a quack.
Alright, I'll give it a try.

>reads article
>[citations needed]

oh

2587
The Flood / Re: There's nothing morally wrong with [ ]
« on: September 01, 2015, 01:21:05 PM »
I'm pretty sure there's still not a single piece of empirical evidence that GMOs are harmful in any way.
Keep drinking the kool aid, buddy

He's right
--Titanium oxide
--BHT
--Sodium benzoate
--Acrylamides
--Aspartame

Some chemicals that are universally in almost all GMOs. This doesn't even include extra things they put in certain kinds.
How about like, I dunno, genetically engineered crops to provide nutrients to people who would otherwise be malnourished? No chemicals necessary. That's just one application of genetic engineering, though--others include increased resistance to pests, which helps the environment and the consumer by not using pesticides; and increased resistance to droughts, which helps prevent food shortages and keeps farmers in business.

I'm 99.9% certain that aspartame is completely safe, but I'll have to look up the other ones when I can be arsed to do that. BF4 time, yo.

EDIT: What you should really be concerned about is nanoparticles in food. One effect that we don't know the consequences of (if any) is that they can penetrate the layer of blood that protects your brain. Even though the FDA insists they're completely harmless, there's an utter lack of evidence supporting or debunking that claim.
First of all, aspartame is poison. Simple as that.

And I'm not talking about the mere idea of genetically modifying food, I'm talking about how it's used in today's American society. Monsanto is the #1 distributor and producer of GMOs, and they put in everything I listed above to their "food".
1) Prove it.

2) Okay, point taken. Not all GMOs are the devil.
Here. This is the article I usually link, since it cites its sources and presents everything very clearly. There are dozens more where that came from, though.
>Dr. Joseph Mercola
>*wikis*
>"Joseph M. Mercola (born 1954) is an alternative medicine proponent"
>AIDS denialist
>is also against vaccines

Um, well the American Cancer Society also seems to think aspartame is harmless, so there's that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

Way to completely ignore the facts he brings up in the article by attacking his character. Why don't you wiki the people he cites in the article? Because very few of the things he talks about are his original ideas, just ideas compiled into one article.

And WOW. Are you really going to bring up the ACS? May as well get your information from the FDA or WTO meetings, lmao.
Fine, I'll try to give it a read. But I'm extremely skeptical. I'll dissect it in bit.

What's wrong with the ACS? I mean, I'd sooner trust them than a quack.

2588
Ben Carson will cure all the homosexuals with his wizard neuroscience magic

How's Rand Paul doing for ya?
I stopped supporting Rand Paul the first time words came out of his mouth during the debate. He's not his father.
Ugh, yeah, he was disappointing, and picking a fight with Chris Christie only sealed his fate.  :'(

2589
The Flood / Re: There's nothing morally wrong with [ ]
« on: September 01, 2015, 01:12:39 PM »
I'm pretty sure there's still not a single piece of empirical evidence that GMOs are harmful in any way.
Keep drinking the kool aid, buddy

He's right
--Titanium oxide
--BHT
--Sodium benzoate
--Acrylamides
--Aspartame

Some chemicals that are universally in almost all GMOs. This doesn't even include extra things they put in certain kinds.
How about like, I dunno, genetically engineered crops to provide nutrients to people who would otherwise be malnourished? No chemicals necessary. That's just one application of genetic engineering, though--others include increased resistance to pests, which helps the environment and the consumer by not using pesticides; and increased resistance to droughts, which helps prevent food shortages and keeps farmers in business.

I'm 99.9% certain that aspartame is completely safe, but I'll have to look up the other ones when I can be arsed to do that. BF4 time, yo.

EDIT: What you should really be concerned about is nanoparticles in food. One effect that we don't know the consequences of (if any) is that they can penetrate the layer of blood that protects your brain. Even though the FDA insists they're completely harmless, there's an utter lack of evidence supporting or debunking that claim.
First of all, aspartame is poison. Simple as that.

And I'm not talking about the mere idea of genetically modifying food, I'm talking about how it's used in today's American society. Monsanto is the #1 distributor and producer of GMOs, and they put in everything I listed above to their "food".
1) Prove it.

2) Okay, point taken. Not all GMOs are the devil.
Here. This is the article I usually link, since it cites its sources and presents everything very clearly. There are dozens more where that came from, though.
>Dr. Joseph Mercola
>*wikis*
>"Joseph M. Mercola (born 1954) is an alternative medicine proponent"
>AIDS denialist
>is also against vaccines

Um, well the American Cancer Society also seems to think aspartame is harmless, so there's that.

2590
The Flood / Re: There's nothing morally wrong with [ ]
« on: September 01, 2015, 01:06:03 PM »
People actually still take SecondClass seriously?
whoops



This topic deserves a good thread in Serious though, methinks >.>

2591
The Flood / Re: There's nothing morally wrong with [ ]
« on: September 01, 2015, 01:02:50 PM »
I'm pretty sure there's still not a single piece of empirical evidence that GMOs are harmful in any way.
Keep drinking the kool aid, buddy

He's right
--Titanium oxide
--BHT
--Sodium benzoate
--Acrylamides
--Aspartame

Some chemicals that are universally in almost all GMOs. This doesn't even include extra things they put in certain kinds.
How about like, I dunno, genetically engineered crops to provide nutrients to people who would otherwise be malnourished? No chemicals necessary. That's just one application of genetic engineering, though--others include increased resistance to pests, which helps the environment and the consumer by not using pesticides; and increased resistance to droughts, which helps prevent food shortages and keeps farmers in business.

I'm 99.9% certain that aspartame is completely safe, but I'll have to look up the other ones when I can be arsed to do that. BF4 time, yo.

EDIT: What you should really be concerned about is nanoparticles in food. One effect that we don't know the consequences of (if any) is that they can penetrate the layer of blood that protects your brain. Even though the FDA insists they're completely harmless, there's an utter lack of evidence supporting or debunking that claim.
First of all, aspartame is poison. Simple as that.

And I'm not talking about the mere idea of genetically modifying food, I'm talking about how it's used in today's American society. Monsanto is the #1 distributor and producer of GMOs, and they put in everything I listed above to their "food".
1) Prove it.

2) Okay, point taken. Not all GMOs are the devil.

2592
The Flood / Re: There's nothing morally wrong with [ ]
« on: September 01, 2015, 12:56:35 PM »
I'm pretty sure there's still not a single piece of empirical evidence that GMOs are harmful in any way.
Keep drinking the kool aid, buddy

He's right
--Titanium oxide
--BHT
--Sodium benzoate
--Acrylamides
--Aspartame

Some chemicals that are universally in almost all GMOs. This doesn't even include extra things they put in certain kinds.
How about like, I dunno, genetically engineered crops to provide nutrients to people who would otherwise be malnourished? No chemicals necessary. That's just one application of genetic engineering, though--others include increased resistance to pests, which helps the environment and the consumer by not using pesticides; and increased resistance to droughts, which helps prevent food shortages and keeps farmers in business.

I'm 99.9% certain that aspartame is completely safe, but I'll have to look up the other ones when I can be arsed to do that. BF4 time, yo.

EDIT: What you should really be concerned about is nanoparticles in food. One effect that we don't know the consequences of (if any) is that they can penetrate the layer of blood that protects your brain. Even though the FDA insists they're completely harmless, there's an utter lack of evidence supporting or debunking that claim.

2593
Oh man, I saw this happen on Rachel Maddow last night. (First time in a very long time that I've watched her show--I mostly can't stomach MSNBC anymore.) Big game changer for the GOP race. The Muslim/birth certificate stuff was hilarious. Good stuff.

Ben Carson comes off as a lot more... normal in interviews than he does in reports about him. I used to dislike him, but now I think I just might tolerate him.

2594
The Flood / Re: There's nothing morally wrong with [ ]
« on: September 01, 2015, 12:45:08 PM »
I'm pretty sure there's still not a single piece of empirical evidence that GMOs are harmful in any way.

2595
The Flood / Re: imgur is so dumb lmao
« on: September 01, 2015, 12:44:15 PM »
That was the least funny thing I've seen in a while. Doesn't matter though, because Imgur is still functionally the only no-BS image hosting site I can think of.

2596
Gaming / Re: Battlefield 4 Summer Patch is out
« on: September 01, 2015, 12:33:42 PM »
Good, I'll have something to play while Phantom Pain downloads >.>

2597
The Flood / Re: How the fuck did "oh" become a meme?
« on: September 01, 2015, 12:34:38 AM »
Haven't touched it Verb.
you know how sometimes when you edit a post, the "last edited on [date]" thing doesn't even show up

that's clearly what happened here
oh

2598
The Flood / Re: How the fuck did "oh" become a meme?
« on: August 31, 2015, 11:37:12 PM »
the same way everything becomes a meme

do you actually know the definition of meme?

Yes I do, but this doesn't make any sense at all.



2600
The Flood / Re: Demonic was demoted.
« on: August 31, 2015, 09:00:54 PM »
Alas, poor Demonic, I hardly knew ye

2601
The Flood / Re: Does anyone remember metas suicide threads?
« on: August 31, 2015, 08:59:29 PM »
I don't know why anyone would seek out Internet randoms to help with something like that. It's like you want attention... and want to feel like shit.
That's the thing, he always felt like shit while doing it.
Ugh, that's the worst. There are certainly people around to talk to about stuff like that, but #blogposting (or even worse, lashing out at people, not that I know of Meta doing that) is simply an awful way to deal with those feelings. It's not healthy.
He said it so much that most people knew he wasn't going to do anything. It was just a gimmick to get attention, probably like the Wikipedia scholar thing he has going.
Hmm... I'm not sure how to take that but you're probably right.

2602
The Flood / Re: Does anyone remember metas suicide threads?
« on: August 31, 2015, 08:47:21 PM »
I don't know why anyone would seek out Internet randoms to help with something like that. It's like you want attention... and want to feel like shit.
That's the thing, he always felt like shit while doing it.
Ugh, that's the worst. There are certainly people around to talk to about stuff like that, but #blogposting (or even worse, lashing out at people, not that I know of Meta doing that) is simply an awful way to deal with those feelings. It's not healthy.

2603
The Flood / Re: Do you wear shoes inside your house?
« on: August 31, 2015, 04:56:04 PM »
socks tho

2604
The Flood / Re: Caster Appreciation Thread
« on: August 31, 2015, 03:28:51 PM »

2605
The Flood / Re: What shoes are you wearing right now?
« on: August 31, 2015, 03:27:02 PM »
Who the fuck wears shoes at home?
normal people
i've only ever seen cartoon characters wear shoes at home

2606
The Flood / Re: daily reminder that mcwraps are god tier fast food
« on: August 31, 2015, 03:17:35 PM »
I too enjoy world-class cuisine.

2607
Gaming / Re: BF:BC2 Game Night 9/6 @6pm EST
« on: August 31, 2015, 03:15:15 PM »
Okay, let's try this again >.> The planned date is Saturday, September 6 @6pm EST, the day after the Halo: Reach game night. Sign-ups start now!

2608
The Flood / Re: Springtime in Australia, y'know what that means...
« on: August 31, 2015, 02:19:56 PM »
what

Very angry birds that attack anything that comes within a 1/4 mile radius of their nests. They almost exclusively attack your face, are extremely durable, and only get more aggressive towards anybody who fights back.

2610
If we get 250 posts we unban Kinder

if we get 500 posts we unban Comms

1 like = 1 burger
1 share = 1 meme
ignore if you want a puppy to die

Pages: 1 ... 858687 8889 ... 212