Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Anonymous (User Deleted)

Pages: 1 ... 656667 6869 ... 212
1981
The Flood / Re: How do you think Trevor Noah is doing on The Daily Show?
« on: October 07, 2015, 01:16:36 PM »
I haven't even watched a single episode yet.

1982
Well,I'm no military type in the first place, so I'd probably be pissing myself the whole way through.

It's difficult to say, because some places really need to have a ready military force to defend their borders. Given the right circumstances, I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with it.

But I don't think countries that that don't need it should have it anyway, like the US, for example. We're fortunate enough to not have borders with hostile countries, for one thing.

1983
Serious / Re: Gun control compromise
« on: October 07, 2015, 12:23:42 PM »
Devil's advocate: How about a well-regulated militia, instead?

We're already in one. All males aged 17 to 45 are the militia.

Besides, militias are banned in a few states like mine.
Selective service =/= active militia service.

Also, which states have banned militias? I find it difficult to believe that a state would ban the National Guard or similar organizations.

Active militia =/= National militia.
There's a Dick Act of 1912 for you to read.

California has banned the creation of civilian militias. The national guard and a militia really are not the same thing.

The national guard can be deployed. A militia us drawn from the populace.
I see no reason to differentiate between active militia and national militia if they both serve the same function. But the point is that selective service only regards prospective members. Not everybody who sends in an application is automatically considered a member.

The National Guard is literally a militia by definition of that word.

I can't find anything about California banning militias of any sort >.>

Could you maybe elaborate what I'm supposed to be looking for when I read about the Dick Act?

1985
Serious / Re: Gun control compromise
« on: October 07, 2015, 12:12:01 PM »
Devil's advocate: How about a well-regulated militia, instead?

We're already in one. All males aged 17 to 45 are the militia.

Besides, militias are banned in a few states like mine.
Selective service =/= active militia service.

Also, which states have banned militias? I find it difficult to believe that a state would ban the National Guard or similar organizations.

1986
Serious / Re: Gun control compromise
« on: October 07, 2015, 12:05:54 PM »
Devil's advocate: How about a well-regulated militia, instead?

1987
Gaming / Re: Microsoft Sucks
« on: October 07, 2015, 09:35:24 AM »
I totally believe it though. Around that time, MS was rather, er... atrocious when it came to DLC and the store in general. Cutting so many timed exclusivity DLC deals, and a reluctance to give anything away for free or for cheap. It was a pretty aggressive strategy that kept Sony in the dirt for a while, but it wasn't exactly respectable or consumer-friendly.

I didn't get an Xbox 360 until 2010 so I must've missed some of this stuff. Sounds awful, though.

I really enjoyed the PS+ method on the PS3 -- it wasn't mandatory but special benefits were available if you had it. Free games and discounts.

I'm not going to pretend Sony is some paragon of virtue in the industry but I really liked that model.
Yeah, me too. Sony was pretty great with that because for the first time, they successfully posed the idea that maybe Xbox Live wasn't actually worth the subscription. It was a devastating blow to the brand that came at a time when you needed XBL Gold just to watch Netflix on your console. That was one of those issues that had never really gotten much attention until folks starting taking a closer look at PSN vs. XBL, and stopped taking for granted the notion that XBL was all-around better.

Now Microsoft has been doing it too with Games with Gold, but the damage has already been done.

1988
Serious / Re: The Middle East is such a fuckhole.
« on: October 07, 2015, 09:23:50 AM »
I started seeing dots between the boxes from looking at it for too long >.>

Kind of makes me anxious that we're not doing more to eliminate ISIS.

Ties in with my question in another thread. It gives the impression that getting involved in the Middle East was little more than a gigantic foreign policy blunder.

1989
w-was the Middle East safer with folks like Saddam & Gaddafi in power?
Absolutely.

All you have to do is look at the region before & after each dictator's downfall. They both kept them shits in check.
b-but muh human rights
I'm not saying they were good guys but their Iron Fist style of rule kept some kind of order in both countries. ISIS literally fucks any and everyone up.
Yeah like, my dad was the one who originally told me that they generally kept things more stable, and it seemed so ridiculously politically incorrect that I was a bit, er... afraid to actually believe it. But the more I find out about the current situation in the Middle East, the more I feel inclined to agree.

1990
Gaming / Re: Microsoft Sucks
« on: October 07, 2015, 09:11:29 AM »
I don't even know how I feel about this.

I mean, I guess I hadn't really thought much about it recently >.> I still feel like it's head-and-shoulders above PSN and NN, which seem to be made out of duct tape by comparison, but the difference is not as dramatic as it used to be.

PSN started the obligatory free old games thing, but I still can't ignore that I've had a terrible experience doing pretty much anything with it, from downloading and installing tiny updates in a timely fashion, to not having a lag slideshow, to not getting my account (and everyone else's) leaked multiple times.

Seriously, PSN keeps getting hacked and Sony still keeps users' data in fucking plaintext.

I actually haven't been having that many issues with PSN, save this Sep7agon FOX-HOUND Unit Community not showing up. I've always found myself having a better time with it than Live, even in the PS3 days.

But I suppose I was more focused on the "MS not allowing Valve to release free DLC because it set a dangerous precedent for the other developers" part of the video because it irks me more.
>.> typing this as I'm listening, and I'm still groggy from being asleep

I remember the TF2 Orange Box DLC thing being more of a technical limitation relating to RAM, and MS' approval process being slow, but the Left 4 Dead DLC thing is news to me.

I totally believe it though. Around that time, MS was rather, er... atrocious when it came to DLC and the store in general. Cutting so many timed exclusivity DLC deals, and a reluctance to give anything away for free or for cheap. It was a pretty aggressive strategy that kept Sony in the dirt for a while, but it wasn't exactly respectable or consumer-friendly.

1991
Gaming / Re: Microsoft Sucks
« on: October 07, 2015, 08:56:40 AM »
I don't even know how I feel about the Xbox Live part.

I mean, I guess I hadn't really thought much about it recently >.> I still feel like it's head-and-shoulders above PSN and NN, which seem to be made out of duct tape by comparison, but the difference is not as dramatic as it used to be.

PSN started the obligatory 'free old games with a subscription' thing thankfully, but I still can't ignore that I've had a terrible experience doing pretty much anything with it, from downloading and installing tiny updates in a timely fashion, to not having a lag slideshow, to not getting my account (and everyone else's) leaked multiple times.

Seriously, PSN keeps getting hacked and Sony still keeps users' data in fucking plaintext. There's a deliberate negligence at play that should have probably gotten someone thrown in prison by now.

But speaking of negligence, the RRoD fiasco was pretty god-awful. Only reason I was never terribly upset about it was because I managed to get one in just before MS stopped sending a free shipping box for it >.>

1993
The Flood / Re: How Is This Man Still Alive?
« on: October 07, 2015, 08:12:02 AM »

1994
The Flood / Re: i... i think i love you
« on: October 07, 2015, 08:10:56 AM »
it's okay closet-chan

1995
The Flood / Re: I just fucked what's her name
« on: October 06, 2015, 10:32:18 PM »
Now I wonder how whatsername has been

YouTube


1996
w-was the Middle East safer with folks like Saddam & Gaddafi in power?
Absolutely.

All you have to do is look at the region before & after each dictator's downfall. They both kept them shits in check.
b-but muh human rights
but ISIS tho

same shit, different assholes

1997
News / Re: Staff Changes
« on: October 06, 2015, 10:00:33 PM »
In the past, since quitting, he'd sometimes get temp powers for certain busy periods, like Anarchy.
I don't remember this.
shhh, look at the edit timestamp, then the timestamp for this thread

1998
Source

title edit for me being a tard

Yeah yeah, I try to avoid unconfirmed clickbait news, especially ones that vaguely sound like they might be from a movie, but this is from a rather reputable source, and I'm curious to see how this pans out, or doesn't.

This comes on the heels of reports that folks in the US government downplayed the threat posed by ISIS. If it turns out to be true, it would be a massive blow to the administration's credibility. (inb4 what credibility?)

I hate to ask, but I need an honest answer: ...w-was the Middle East safer with folks like Saddam & Gaddafi in power? Like, they were awful and all, but I felt like they came across as distinctly less unhinged than groups like ISIS.

It's a 6 page article, the first page is reproduced below:
Quote
AP INVESTIGATION: Nuclear smugglers shopped radioactive material to IS and other terrorists

By DESMOND BUTLER and VADIM GHIRDA, Associated Press

CHISINAU, Moldova (AP) — Over the pulsating beat at an exclusive nightclub, the arms smuggler made his pitch to a client: 2.5 million euros for enough radioactive cesium to contaminate several city blocks.

It was earlier this year, and the two men were plotting their deal at an unlikely spot: the terrace of Cocos Prive, a dance club and sushi bar in Chisinau, the capital of Moldova.

"You can make a dirty bomb, which would be perfect for the Islamic State," the smuggler said. "If you have a connection with them, the business will go smoothly."

But the smuggler, Valentin Grossu, wasn't sure the client was for real — and he was right to worry. The client was an informant, and it took some 20 meetings to persuade Grossu that he was an authentic Islamic State representative. Eventually, the two men exchanged cash for a sample in a sting operation that landed Grossu in jail.

The previously unpublicized case is one of at least four attempts in five years in which criminal networks with suspected Russian ties sought to sell radioactive material to extremists through Moldova, an investigation by The Associated Press has found. One investigation uncovered an attempt to sell bomb-grade uranium to a real buyer from the Middle East, the first known case of its kind.

In that operation, wiretaps and interviews with investigators show, a middleman for the gang repeatedly ranted with hatred for America as he focused on smuggling the essential material for an atomic bomb and blueprints for a dirty bomb to a Middle Eastern buyer.

In wiretaps, videotaped arrests, photographs of bomb-grade material, documents and interviews, AP found that smugglers are explicitly targeting buyers who are enemies of the West. The developments represent the fulfillment of a long-feared scenario in which organized crime gangs are trying to link up with groups such as the Islamic State and al-Qaida — both of which have made clear their ambition to use weapons of mass destruction.

The sting operations involved a partnership between the FBI and a small group of Moldovan investigators, who over five years went from near total ignorance of the black market to wrapping up four sting operations. Informants and police posing as connected gangsters penetrated the smuggling networks, using old-fashioned undercover tactics as well as high-tech gear from radiation detectors to clothing threaded with recording devices.

But their successes were undercut by striking shortcomings: Kingpins got away, and those arrested evaded long prison sentences, sometimes quickly returning to nuclear smuggling, AP found.

For strategic reasons, in most of the operations arrests were made after samples of nuclear material had been obtained rather than the larger quantities. That means that if smugglers did have access to the bulk of material they offered, it remains in criminal hands.

The repeated attempts to peddle radioactive materials signal that a thriving nuclear black market has emerged in an impoverished corner of Eastern Europe on the fringes of the former Soviet Union. Moldova, which borders Romania, is a former Soviet republic.

Moldovan police and judicial authorities shared investigative case files with the AP in an effort to spotlight how dangerous the black market has become. They say a breakdown in cooperation between Russia and the West means that it is much harder to know whether smugglers are finding ways to move parts of Russia's vast store of radioactive materials.

"We can expect more of these cases," said Constantin Malic, one of the Moldovan investigators. "As long as the smugglers think they can make big money without getting caught, they will keep doing it."

The FBI and the White House declined to comment. The U.S. State Department would not comment on the specifics of the cases.

1999
The Flood / Re: Just came from b.net AMA
« on: October 06, 2015, 09:43:51 PM »
welcome aboard m80s
Can you tell me what a referral is?
When someone creates an account on this site, there's a field where they can put in the name of a member who sent them here and got them to sign up.

tl;dr a referral is when someone 'refers' someone else to this site

2000
Serious / Re: Conservatives be like...
« on: October 06, 2015, 09:42:30 PM »
I've gotten the impression that some conservatives do like government, perhaps more than they're allowed to let on, but they just don't like wasteful, bloated, ineffective government that exists as a sink of taxpayer dollars.

If conservatives actually had a rational platform based on efficient governing and spending, and steered clear of their god-awful pandering, I might be a lot more willing to vote for one.

/rant

2001
The Flood / Re: Just came from b.net AMA
« on: October 06, 2015, 09:35:26 PM »
welcome aboard m80s

2002
The Flood / Re: Nickname?
« on: October 06, 2015, 09:31:18 PM »
literally Kupo

2003
News / Re: Staff Changes
« on: October 06, 2015, 08:18:05 PM »
I'm all for giving people a second chance. It's been quite a while, let's see how he handles things this time around.
Perhaps he will surprise the critics.
Weren't you on staff when he left? >.> You should know as well as anybody that Icy only left because he was busy.

I'm referring to when he stepped down from being a Ninja, which wasn't due to being busy
Me too, I'm pretty sure it was, considering he was later granted temporary Ninja powers here and there to help out the staff.

He didn't step down because he was busy, he stepped down because he wasn't respected due to how he moderated. As to why he got temporary powers now, I'm surprised and I don't know why. Take note of Challenger's comment about there being several complaints.
>.> I have it on good authority that being busy was the reason.

In the past, since quitting, he'd sometimes get temp powers for certain busy periods, like Anarchy.

I'd just like to point out that calling people out on their behavior does not necessarily equal doing a bad job. And even if Icy's doling out the punishments, it's with input from the staff. Nobody acts unilaterally here.

2004
Gaming / Re: Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain Discussion Thread
« on: October 06, 2015, 08:02:04 PM »
All my teammates so far have been pretty good, I mean there are some shitty ones but w/e.

In the last five matches we've been doing it "professionally" (everyone is crouching or laying down all the time, the buddy system was used very well, we had people dong  that thing were two people stand on each side of the door and one person walks through, etc)

It's been pretty fun.
stop  :'(

camp omega
STOOOOOP ;_;

Man, sounds pretty hype.

Re: my game progress: 30 hours in and still haven't gone to see a certain scientist yet.

Quiet's boss fight was one of the few boss fights I've ever played that I actually enjoyed. WOW.

Otherwise, it's nice finally having a combat team to bring in extra dough. I was a bit foolish and ended up losing one A-rank guy so far, but the other guys are doing alright. Some of them got upgraded A-rank skills from getting commendations.

It's nice to finally have some GMP to spend >.> Made a few new additions to Mother Base, got an upgraded Fulton to lift vehicles now, developed a suppressed sniper rifle, and upgraded my rocket launcher. Things are quite a bit comfier than they were before.

EDIT: Also, when the heck do I get weapon customization?

2005
News / Re: Staff Changes
« on: October 06, 2015, 07:50:35 PM »
I'm all for giving people a second chance. It's been quite a while, let's see how he handles things this time around.
Perhaps he will surprise the critics.
Weren't you on staff when he left? >.> You should know as well as anybody that Icy only left because he was busy.

I'm referring to when he stepped down from being a Ninja, which wasn't due to being busy
Me too, I'm pretty sure it was, considering he was later granted temporary Ninja powers here and there to help out the staff.

2006
News / Re: Staff Changes
« on: October 06, 2015, 07:44:15 PM »
I'm all for giving people a second chance. It's been quite a while, let's see how he handles things this time around.
Perhaps he will surprise the critics.
Weren't you on staff when he left? >.> You should know as well as anybody that Icy only quit because he was busy.

2007
Serious / Re: Joe Biden Eyes Weekend Decision on Presidential Run
« on: October 06, 2015, 07:33:09 PM »
rest in rip Barnie Sandlers

2008
Serious / Re: You Know Your Presidential Campaign is Done For When....
« on: October 06, 2015, 03:28:34 PM »
We should have used Huckabee's name instead of Santorum's for... that.

2009
Serious / Re: CA Gov Jerry Brown is on a roll
« on: October 06, 2015, 03:24:55 PM »
[vaccinating is] a fucking joke. Stupid libtards.
irony

Wrong, not what I said.

OVER-vaccinating is a fucking joke. The government telling you what you have to do with your child is a fucking joke.
There is no such thing as over-vaccination. It's a term invented by anti-vaxxers to sound legitimate.

I've personally had my son's pediatricians tell me not to get all the vaccinations that are "recommended" cause they're are far too many before the age of 3. I've also had friends who are doctors confirm this.

But you're right, let me listen to some kid on the internet. LAWL.
"kid"

I'm willing to bet your "son's pediatricians" and "friends who are doctors" are as real as your trip to England.

More importantly however, all doctors will not have infinitely valid opinions, nor opinions held by the vast majority of doctors. Some of them profit from telling people what they want to hear, when their job is really to tell them what they should hear.

You're still hung up on that dumb shit? Typical.

I agree, doctors opinions vary. Which is why I believe my personal doctors and friends over some quacks online.
I'd rather believe empirical evidence over a doctor's subjective opinion.

Its not like my doctors are telling me never to get my son vaccinated. All they told me were that some weren't needed at all and to space them out. Say, instead of getting 20 by age 3, get those same 20 by age 6 instead.

But I stand by my original point, IF someone doesn't want to vaccinate their children (Me not being one of those parents) , the government shouldn't force them to.
The government isn't forcing anyone to vaccinate their children. If you choose to skip out on some or all of your child's vaccinations, then there's no reason for your child to be entitled to government services.
hi and yes



 :P

2010
Serious / Re: CA Gov Jerry Brown is on a roll
« on: October 06, 2015, 03:21:19 PM »
[vaccinating is] a fucking joke. Stupid libtards.
irony

Wrong, not what I said.

OVER-vaccinating is a fucking joke. The government telling you what you have to do with your child is a fucking joke.
There is no such thing as over-vaccination. It's a term invented by anti-vaxxers to sound legitimate.

I've personally had my son's pediatricians tell me not to get all the vaccinations that are "recommended" cause they're are far too many before the age of 3. I've also had friends who are doctors confirm this.

But you're right, let me listen to some kid on the internet. LAWL.
"kid"

I'm willing to bet your "son's pediatricians" and "friends who are doctors" are as real as your trip to England.

More importantly however, all doctors will not have infinitely valid opinions, nor opinions held by the vast majority of doctors. Some of them profit from telling people what they want to hear, when their job is really to tell them what they should hear.

You're still hung up on that dumb shit? Typical.

I agree, doctors opinions vary. Which is why I believe my personal doctors and friends over some quacks online.
I'd rather believe empirical evidence over a doctor's subjective opinion.

Its not like my doctors are telling me never to get my son vaccinated. All they told me were that some weren't needed at all and to space them out. Say, instead of getting 20 by age 3, get those same 20 by age 6 instead.

But I stand by my original point, IF someone doesn't want to vaccinate their children (Me not being one of those parents) , the government shouldn't force them to.
Government isn't forcing you to vaccinate. They're just saying that if you want to send your kid to public school, you need to vaccinate at the proper schedule recommended by the overwhelming consensus of doctors. Homeschooling and private schooling are still perfectly valid options. Society (and vaccinated children) should not be burdened by your own negligence.

Pages: 1 ... 656667 6869 ... 212