This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Lemy the Lizerd
Pages: 1 ... 141516 1718 ... 67
451
« on: January 09, 2015, 06:46:04 AM »
452
« on: January 09, 2015, 02:20:26 AM »
Yeah we've known for a while now that Russia is transphobic, homophobic and just about every other phobic under the Sun. Nothing new here.
They're not Russophobic though ;^)
453
« on: January 09, 2015, 02:19:43 AM »
I know this is kind of fucked up, but for some reason I find that hilarious.
454
« on: January 08, 2015, 10:56:44 PM »
I still have a BB gun I got when I was seven.
I killed a Bobcat with it when I was camping in South Dakota. Those were the days..
>bobcat >BB gun >killed bobcat with BB gun >killed bobcat >with >BB >gun 
455
« on: January 08, 2015, 10:50:25 PM »
I pretty much decided what my first gun is (something discernible here). Since I can not just be a fucking defensive carry piece (fuck North Carolina), my family thinks I am somehow more likely to accidentally kill myself if I do not own half, and my only interest is historical weapons, I 've decided I'm going to start off with an affordable, military surplus bolt -action rifle.
In particular, the Finnish M39 .
Because they're nice. And the ammunition is cheap. And Russia is fucked.
Hey I just moved to North Carolina
What city do you live in?
The outer edge of Fayetteville, right next to Eastover but not technically in Eastover.
I live in Raleigh
No idea where that is in relation to you but not close I guess
like an hour or so depending on traffic
456
« on: January 08, 2015, 10:46:38 PM »
I pretty much decided what my first gun is (something discernible here). Since I can not just be a fucking defensive carry piece (fuck North Carolina), my family thinks I am somehow more likely to accidentally kill myself if I do not own half, and my only interest is historical weapons, I 've decided I'm going to start off with an affordable, military surplus bolt -action rifle.
In particular, the Finnish M39 .
Because they're nice. And the ammunition is cheap. And Russia is fucked.
Hey I just moved to North Carolina
What city do you live in?
The outer edge of Fayetteville, right next to Eastover but not technically in Eastover.
457
« on: January 08, 2015, 10:41:41 PM »
Olen melko paljon päätti mitä minun ensimmäinen ase on . Koska en voi vain ollavitun puolustava carry pala ( vittu , North Carolina ) , perheeni mielestä olen jotenkin todennäköisemmin vahingossa tappaa itseni , jos en omistapuoliksi , ja minun ainoa etu on historiallinen aseet , olen ve päätti aion aloittaa poisedullinen , sotilaallinen ylijäämä pultti -action kivääri .
ErityisestiSuomen M39 .
Koska he mukavia . Ja ammukset on halpaa . Ja Venäjä on perseestä .
ITT : Fuck Venäjä Operaatio Barbarossa paras päivä elämässäni
458
« on: January 08, 2015, 10:14:11 PM »
there is something very disturbing about people who are into guns. its off-putting and more than a little creepy.
How so?
it seems like they're acting out a power fantasy. guns only have one purpose: killing or maiming. sure, competitive shooting is ultimately harmless- shooting some clay discs or paper targets isnt hurting anyone, and its an interesting and nuanced sport, but at the very core of the issue, guns are horrifying, evil things.
I own 6 rifles and I'm far from acting out a power fantasy. Some people like to collect cars but I like to collect guns. The primary purpose of all my guns is for defense, but they serve as decorations, collectibles, and things to tinker with. They're simply beautiful and elegant
>slav guns >beautiful ever >elegant ever I mean, I can definitely appreciate utilitarianism and simplicity over traditional aesthetics, but come the fuck on.
459
« on: January 08, 2015, 10:12:27 PM »
there is something very disturbing about people who are into guns. its off-putting and more than a little creepy.
How so?
it seems like they're acting out a power fantasy. guns only have one purpose: killing or maiming. sure, competitive shooting is ultimately harmless- shooting some clay discs or paper targets isnt hurting anyone, and its an interesting and nuanced sport, but at the very core of the issue, guns are horrifying, evil things.
You should probably stop projecting.
460
« on: January 08, 2015, 09:57:20 PM »
as trolly is this is, there is something very disturbing about people who are into guns. its off-putting and more than a little creepy.
elaborate
461
« on: January 08, 2015, 09:54:23 PM »
oooh oooh oooh.
How small is her penis?
Is the the right size for cuddling in the back of a truck during a cold night after a long day of shooting and lovemaking under the open skies?
>implying women who pose for these photoshoots even like guns
462
« on: January 08, 2015, 08:22:23 PM »
463
« on: January 08, 2015, 08:08:28 PM »
Yeah
464
« on: January 08, 2015, 07:57:21 PM »
465
« on: January 08, 2015, 07:52:08 PM »
>thigh gap
and nothing of value was lost
466
« on: January 08, 2015, 06:53:02 PM »
wow i bet this thread is gonna be so deep dude lol xD
467
« on: January 08, 2015, 06:50:06 PM »
I know for sure this will be met with massive public support because it is based entirely on feels.
Sometimes I wish I had mass brainwashing technology.
468
« on: January 08, 2015, 05:18:51 PM »
The "Freedom of Speech" thing is blown out of so many proportions. If I recall correctly (I'll look it up later, I've got morning chores to do) it was initially installed in our Government so that a person could freely express themselves in council chambers without the wrath of the Government falling on them.
That does not mean, however, you can shout "FIRE" in a crowded theater and cause a panic.
Same goes for hate speech. What "muh free speeches" people fail to realize is the emotional trauma, harm, and social discord that comes from people like the WBC. As you probably saw in that thread, a man attacked a church member during his soldier brother's funeral because the protestor was mocking his brother, discrediting his service, and saying, "I'm glad the stupid faggot is dead." The soldier got soundly punished while the protestor got to walk away laughing.
This article is a nice thing to read through, especially the parts from the Fordham Law Professor: While free speech protects people from harm, it allows unlimited emotional harm.
So basically what your argument boils down to is "delicate sensibilities take precedence over what you can and cannot say"
Yeah no. I personally do not give two shits if you become "emotionally traumatised " as a result of what I said. I do not, and never will recognise it as a justification to curtail mine, or anyone else's speech.
Yelling fire in a crowded vicinity isn't even a relevant analogy either.
I'd really like to see you not lose your shit when somebody protests your brother's funeral.
You know what? I actually wouldn't. I wouldn't give the fuckers the time of the day, because that's all they want. A reactionary response so they can be painted as the victims.
Pshht sure.
Believe me, or don't believe me. I really don't give a shit, just like I wouldn't give a shit about the theocratic retards with all bark but no bite.
I just think you and Lemy are full of shit when it comes to this. You'd get pissed and you know it.
I never said I wouldn't. But I wouldn't give them the satisfaction of a violent response. And I definitely wouldn't try to have the expression rights of my fellow Americans suppressed.
469
« on: January 08, 2015, 05:15:06 PM »
470
« on: January 08, 2015, 05:10:44 PM »
471
« on: January 08, 2015, 03:01:45 PM »
The "Freedom of Speech" thing is blown out of so many proportions. If I recall correctly (I'll look it up later, I've got morning chores to do) it was initially installed in our Government so that a person could freely express themselves in council chambers without the wrath of the Government falling on them.
That does not mean, however, you can shout "FIRE" in a crowded theater and cause a panic.
Same goes for hate speech. What "muh free speeches" people fail to realize is the emotional trauma, harm, and social discord that comes from people like the WBC. As you probably saw in that thread, a man attacked a church member during his soldier brother's funeral because the protestor was mocking his brother, discrediting his service, and saying, "I'm glad the stupid faggot is dead." The soldier got soundly punished while the protestor got to walk away laughing.
This article is a nice thing to read through, especially the parts from the Fordham Law Professor: While free speech protects people from harm, it allows unlimited emotional harm.
So basically what your argument boils down to is "delicate sensibilities take precedence over what you can and cannot say"
Yeah no. I personally do not give two shits if you become "emotionally traumatised " as a result of what I said. I do not, and never will recognise it as a justification to curtail mine, or anyone else's speech.
Yelling fire in a crowded vicinity isn't even a relevant analogy either.
I'd really like to see you not lose your shit when somebody protests your brother's funeral.
Yeah, and I'd lose my shit if some guy fucked my girlfriend, but that doesn't mean we should make fucking illegal.
Are you seriously equating sex with calling someone's deceased relative "a stupid faggot"?
If somebody fucked your girlfriend, you'd be pretty fucking upset, right?
And if somebody called your dead brother a stupid faggot, you'd be pretty upset, right?
The thing is, though, you cannot run a country based on feels, because that's fucking retarded.
You're running a country based on respect and morality.
Sleeping with someone's spouse is not the same as protesting a funeral, first of all. Secondly, it's wrong to protest a funeral, it's not always wrong to fuck somebody's girlfriend. And thirdly, not allowing shit like that to happen at a funeral should be law.
1) Morality is entirely subjective. 2) What if it's a Nazi funeral?
472
« on: January 08, 2015, 02:43:41 PM »
This is the Serious board.
I'm 100% serious.
If I ask for sex, My wife gives it to me. Why? because that is her duty as a wife.
So, if she's not in the mood, do you force yourself on her?
Shes always in the mood. Or at least she pretends to be cause she knows whats best for her.
Most people would construe this as a threat.
Good thing I'm not most people.
Ephesians 5:22
Seriously Max drop the alt, you're the only one who finds it funny.
473
« on: January 08, 2015, 02:02:07 PM »
Why do I have the sense that loud speaking is inherently a European trait? Have you never interacted with black people ever?
474
« on: January 08, 2015, 01:59:25 PM »
This is the Serious board.
475
« on: January 08, 2015, 01:52:10 PM »
Calling someone a stupid faggot is an ideology?
It is for the WBC.
476
« on: January 08, 2015, 01:45:08 PM »
The "Freedom of Speech" thing is blown out of so many proportions. If I recall correctly (I'll look it up later, I've got morning chores to do) it was initially installed in our Government so that a person could freely express themselves in council chambers without the wrath of the Government falling on them.
That does not mean, however, you can shout "FIRE" in a crowded theater and cause a panic.
Same goes for hate speech. What "muh free speeches" people fail to realize is the emotional trauma, harm, and social discord that comes from people like the WBC. As you probably saw in that thread, a man attacked a church member during his soldier brother's funeral because the protestor was mocking his brother, discrediting his service, and saying, "I'm glad the stupid faggot is dead." The soldier got soundly punished while the protestor got to walk away laughing.
This article is a nice thing to read through, especially the parts from the Fordham Law Professor: While free speech protects people from harm, it allows unlimited emotional harm.
So basically what your argument boils down to is "delicate sensibilities take precedence over what you can and cannot say"
Yeah no. I personally do not give two shits if you become "emotionally traumatised " as a result of what I said. I do not, and never will recognise it as a justification to curtail mine, or anyone else's speech.
Yelling fire in a crowded vicinity isn't even a relevant analogy either.
I'd really like to see you not lose your shit when somebody protests your brother's funeral.
Yeah, and I'd lose my shit if some guy fucked my girlfriend, but that doesn't mean we should make fucking illegal.
Are you seriously equating sex with calling someone's deceased relative "a stupid faggot"?
If somebody fucked your girlfriend, you'd be pretty fucking upset, right? And if somebody called your dead brother a stupid faggot, you'd be pretty upset, right? The thing is, though, you cannot run a country based on feels, because that's fucking retarded.
477
« on: January 08, 2015, 12:24:53 PM »
The "Freedom of Speech" thing is blown out of so many proportions. If I recall correctly (I'll look it up later, I've got morning chores to do) it was initially installed in our Government so that a person could freely express themselves in council chambers without the wrath of the Government falling on them.
That does not mean, however, you can shout "FIRE" in a crowded theater and cause a panic.
Same goes for hate speech. What "muh free speeches" people fail to realize is the emotional trauma, harm, and social discord that comes from people like the WBC. As you probably saw in that thread, a man attacked a church member during his soldier brother's funeral because the protestor was mocking his brother, discrediting his service, and saying, "I'm glad the stupid faggot is dead." The soldier got soundly punished while the protestor got to walk away laughing.
This article is a nice thing to read through, especially the parts from the Fordham Law Professor: While free speech protects people from harm, it allows unlimited emotional harm.
So basically what your argument boils down to is "delicate sensibilities take precedence over what you can and cannot say"
Yeah no. I personally do not give two shits if you become "emotionally traumatised " as a result of what I said. I do not, and never will recognise it as a justification to curtail mine, or anyone else's speech.
Yelling fire in a crowded vicinity isn't even a relevant analogy either.
I'd really like to see you not lose your shit when somebody protests your brother's funeral.
Yeah, and I'd lose my shit if some guy fucked my girlfriend, but that doesn't mean we should make fucking illegal.
478
« on: January 08, 2015, 11:55:33 AM »
The solution to WBC faggotry is to establish a law or legal precedent that treats a funeral as a private event and allows the Christfags to be removed from the premises, not to violate their right to freedom of expression.
Michigan Criminal Law and Proceedure book, chapter 18
Disorderly Conduct at Funerals - MCL 750.167d (felony)
A person shall not do any of the following within 500 feet of a building or other location where a funeral, memorial service, or viewing of a deceased person is being conducted or within 500 feet of a funeral procession or burial:
(A) Make any statement or gesture or engage in any conduct that would make a reasonable person attending the funeral, memorial service, or viewing, ect, under the circumstances feel intimidated threatened, or harassed.
(B) Make any statement or gesture or engage in any conduct intended to incite or produce a breach of the peace among those attending that funeral, memorial service, viewing, or burial or traveling in that procession and that causes a breach of the peace among those attending that funeral, memorial service ect.
(C) Make any statement or gesture or engage in any contact intended to disrupt the funeral, memorial service ECT.
First offence 2 year felony
Second offence 4 year felony
500ft is still a little too close
479
« on: January 08, 2015, 11:36:38 AM »
hey
hey OP
hey
everyone already knows that nickelback sucks
if the choir is singing the right song, you shouldn't be preaching to it
from what I understand, Ark was getting shit for not liking it in the Plug But then the plug is cancerous anyway
480
« on: January 08, 2015, 11:32:56 AM »
I turn 18 on the 10th.
Pages: 1 ... 141516 1718 ... 67
|
Show Posts
