1741
Serious / Re: Denying a problem exists
« on: November 07, 2014, 12:40:49 PM »
This is news?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 1742
Serious / Re: Americans, which do you think is more important?« on: November 07, 2014, 12:15:43 PM »House represents the views of people far betterOne of the rare instances where I agree with you. Large urban centers like NYC and Los Angeles really distort things. 1743
Serious / Re: Why are liberals so easy to offend?« on: November 07, 2014, 12:03:16 PM »Why don't rename this forum to The Coliseum?holy shit, that's actually a great idea 1744
Serious / Re: The Duggars are fucking scary« on: November 07, 2014, 11:48:27 AM »I'm not so sure there are that many people seeing this and thinking "What a wonderful lifestyle!"But the backward hicks have these things further ingrained with shows like this.Are you sure about that?Since when do these freaks have any political power?They don't have ACTUAL political power, but televising their crazy lives somehow justifies their beliefs to a lot of people. I mean yeah the world is full of retards, but there aren't that many who are as retarded as these people. 1745
Serious / Re: The Duggars are fucking scary« on: November 07, 2014, 11:39:59 AM »Are you sure about that?Since when do these freaks have any political power?They don't have ACTUAL political power, but televising their crazy lives somehow justifies their beliefs to a lot of people. This seems more like that Honey Boo Boo bullshit, people like to laugh at backwards hicks to feel better about their own worthless proletarian lives. 1746
Serious / Re: The Duggars are fucking scary« on: November 07, 2014, 11:37:06 AM »
Since when do these freaks have any political power?
I've never heard of them before. 1747
Serious / Re: Trojan Horse in U.S. computers set to cause economic catastrophe« on: November 07, 2014, 11:33:21 AM »A little surprised it wasn't China. They've been looking into cyberwarefare for awhile now.Russians take to computers like a leech takes to flesh. 1748
Serious / Re: Trojan Horse in U.S. computers set to cause economic catastrophe« on: November 07, 2014, 11:32:31 AM »
Russians are the absolute scummiest people in the tech world. They make the worst fucking mods.
1749
Serious / Re: Americans, which do you think is more important?« on: November 07, 2014, 08:23:42 AM »
I'm not sure which is more powerful in policy, but the Senate is certainly more prominent in our media. Senators are much more well known than their counterparts.
1750
The Flood / Re: Bionicle turns /k/ommando gay« on: November 07, 2014, 08:19:15 AM »Daily reminder that /k/ is fucking retarded.>>>/lgbt/ >>>/out/ 1751
The Flood / Re: Bionicle turns /k/ommando gay« on: November 07, 2014, 08:18:44 AM »>/k/>>>/lgbt/ >>>/out/ 1752
The Flood / Re: How to have consensual sex in 2014« on: November 06, 2014, 10:53:56 PM »
How to come off as a hesitant weirdo
1754
Serious / Re: Americans, do you believe in Concealed Carry Reciprocity?« on: November 06, 2014, 06:03:13 PM »Doesn't seem like there is any basis for it since states don't have to recognize people's marriages. Forcing states to recognize other states laws seems to defeat the point of having states. Haven't read up on it though. I'm sure there are plenty of counter examples, so I don't really have a solid opinion yet.I'm more concerned with the confiscation and loss of property (guns are fucking expensive), along with criminal charges. Gay couples don't get arrested when they enter states that won't recognize their marriage. 1755
Serious / Re: Americans, do you believe in Concealed Carry Reciprocity?« on: November 06, 2014, 05:50:49 PM »...what exactly is that?The idea that states should honor CC permits of other states while the holder is traveling through them. There have been some legal disputes over this. I for one think it should apply for those passing through the state, but not anyone staying for an extended period. 1756
Serious / Americans, do you believe in Concealed Carry Reciprocity?« on: November 06, 2014, 05:47:37 PM »
Well?
1757
Serious / Re: Do you care about beliefs of actors/musicians/etc that you like?« on: November 06, 2014, 04:12:49 PM »You really don't realize what is wrong with that?Because both are correct. It's correct by virtue and contentHow on earth was it a loaded question? It was really quite simple. A constitution can only be valid in one of two ways. The first being by its own virtue; it being axiomatic. The second is that is codifies the correct content.Well when you give a loaded question, I can only pick one of two I believevirtue of being the constitutionWhich the amendment process shows to be self-evidently false. The fact that you'd place such stock in a document, regardless of what it says, says a lot about you. I wouldn't want you to be a citizen of an Orwellian State. 1758
Serious / Re: If you KNEW your country was going to be conquered...« on: November 06, 2014, 03:38:08 PM »
If my government loses but my buddies and I kick enough ass do I have the ability to establish a new independent government in my area or are these invaders totally unstoppable?
1759
Serious / Re: Do you care about beliefs of actors/musicians/etc that you like?« on: November 06, 2014, 03:24:45 PM »we PSU now?lolnoAnd evolution is divided between mico and macromacro and micro evolution is bullshit made up by the creationist community. Evolution is evolution. 1760
Serious / Re: The highs and lows of different presidents« on: November 06, 2014, 03:18:57 PM »
Whoooaaaa there Meta, you're missing a whole lot of lows with Reagan.
1761
Serious / Re: What if there was indisputable proof that God exists/doesn't exist?« on: November 06, 2014, 03:11:10 PM »
I would continue not worshipping god, in every scenario.
1762
Serious / Re: Do you care about beliefs of actors/musicians/etc that you like?« on: November 06, 2014, 03:06:09 PM »Would you support someone who lined up with everything you believe in, but wanted a total ban on all firearms?>not supporting a person because of one, minuscule beliefwow dude ur ebic meme totally changed my mindThat damn edge tipped fedora doewhen the dude is a creationist.It's certainly not as important with actors, and even less so with musicians (unless they're religious).It changes my view of them, but I can certainly still enjoy their work.Mostly the same for me. I think it's dumb that Jason Lee is a big scientologist, but it doesn't stop me from loving My Name is Earl. 1763
Serious / Re: Do you care about beliefs of actors/musicians/etc that you like?« on: November 06, 2014, 02:33:08 PM »wow dude ur ebic meme totally changed my mindThat damn edge tipped fedora doewhen the dude is a creationist.It's certainly not as important with actors, and even less so with musicians (unless they're religious).It changes my view of them, but I can certainly still enjoy their work.Mostly the same for me. I think it's dumb that Jason Lee is a big scientologist, but it doesn't stop me from loving My Name is Earl. ur so smart 1764
Serious / Re: Do you care about beliefs of actors/musicians/etc that you like?« on: November 06, 2014, 02:31:34 PM »wow dude ur ebic meme totally changed my mindThat damn edge tipped fedora doewhen the dude is a creationist.It's certainly not as important with actors, and even less so with musicians (unless they're religious).It changes my view of them, but I can certainly still enjoy their work.Mostly the same for me. I think it's dumb that Jason Lee is a big scientologist, but it doesn't stop me from loving My Name is Earl. ur so smart 1765
Serious / Re: Do you care about beliefs of actors/musicians/etc that you like?« on: November 06, 2014, 02:27:04 PM »This is really the problem with our two party system.I also hope to see more of Jon Huntsman. Even though he ran as a Republican, I think he only did so to get the party affiliation. He wasn't much of a Republican. I considered voting for him.As someone who identifies as a libertarian, I cannot fucking stand Paul or his supporters. He's weak on, if not against, marriage equality. He's anti-choice. He's weak on separation of church and state.Very true.It's certainly not as important with actors, and even less so with musicians (unless they're religious).It changes my view of them, but I can certainly still enjoy their work.Mostly the same for me. I think it's dumb that Jason Lee is a big scientologist, but it doesn't stop me from loving My Name is Earl. 1766
Serious / Re: Do you care about beliefs of actors/musicians/etc that you like?« on: November 06, 2014, 02:13:37 PM »As someone who identifies as a libertarian, I cannot fucking stand Paul or his supporters. He's weak on, if not against, marriage equality. He's anti-choice. He's weak on separation of church and state.Very true.It's certainly not as important with actors, and even less so with musicians (unless they're religious).It changes my view of them, but I can certainly still enjoy their work.Mostly the same for me. I think it's dumb that Jason Lee is a big scientologist, but it doesn't stop me from loving My Name is Earl. Ultimately he's no different from the other republicans, he's just more hardcore about states' rights than most. Now Gary Johnson? That guy is a real motherfucking Libertarian. 1767
Serious / Re: Do you care about beliefs of actors/musicians/etc that you like?« on: November 06, 2014, 02:05:48 PM »No, but I have far more respect for celebrities that don't spew generic CNN and MSNBC bullshit. I have high respect for Brad Pitt because he's very pro-gunSo you're saying no but actually yes. 1768
Serious / Re: Can you be an environmentalist and have kids?« on: November 06, 2014, 01:12:38 PM »This is good news. Hopefully it encourages people to have less kids.There is literally nothing that will stop people from fucking. And when people fuck, eventually, they're going to get stupid and end up with a kid. 1770
The Flood / Re: so i just received booty pictures from Isara and Kiyo« on: November 06, 2014, 01:06:27 PM »
Why would we care about Kiyo's butt? Men asses<Women asses
|