I should be working on homework right now

Where is that from?

i got it from nice board

All boys should be girls and all girls should be girls.

Do you mean all boys should look and dress like girls or they should be girls physically, because the former would be great.

>Be me
>16, beta that hangs out in the library
>live in Hick town, USA
>Highschool I go to is on a major highway
>hear some kids saying they over heard a teacher talking about a nasty wreck that happens at an intersection further up the highway
>say that they're gonna have to airlift the driver to a hospital in a nearby city
>My normal 3rd period teacher is out for the day so the sub has to get up and tell them to shut up and work.
>hear something about the helicopter landing on the football field before they go back to work
>about 30min later we hear what sounds like a low flying helicopter out side
>whole class gets up and goes for the door, nothing the sub can do to stop 30 kids from leaving at once
Theyweren'tjokeing.gif
>motherfucking helicopter fly's over and starts to descend
Greatestideaever.jpg
>as soon as it lands an ambulance roles onto the field and some paramedic dudes pull a guy on a stretcher out
>put on my best Arnold Schwarzenegger impression
>Shout as loud as I can "GET TO DA CHOPPA!"
>paramedics load dude onboard "choppa" and I can see one glances over at me with the look of disgust
>most of the class looks at me in shame
>Mfw

Feels bad man

BITCHES TF OUT

Quote from: Verbatim on April 21, 2016, 01:26:07 PM

Quote from: zenengerX on April 21, 2016, 01:02:13 PM

Honestly, I would have thought you'd be against circumcision since it exposes children to extreme pain just a week after they're born. Also, the health issues are negligible if you live in a first world country. Literally, you'll have no problems if you just wash the area when you shower.

Pain that they won't remember--no more than they'll remember having their skull squeezed through the birth canal, causing them plagiocephaly for five months. If you're willing to forcefully schlep a child into the world in the first place, circumcision is going to be the least of that newborn's problems. Especially when you consider that it does have its benefits.

I'll have to see if I can find it, but I remember reading a few articles that found that the pain the circumcision causes can have an subconscious effect on the person later on. I'm on mobile right now, so I'll look into it when I get on my laptop.

Ah, here's the post of Daz's with all the data I was thinking of.

>2001+18-3+7-7
>still caring about this non-issue
>still making consent-based arguments while openly permitting other things that violate consent
>my penis still looks better than yours
>my penis is cleaner than yours
>my penis is less likely to get an infection than yours
>wormdicks get mad

Honestly, I would have thought you'd be against circumcision since it exposes children to extreme pain just a week after they're born. Also, the health issues are negligible if you live in a first world country. Literally, you'll have no problems if you just wash the area when you shower.

Quote from: zenengerX on April 21, 2016, 11:49:57 AM

Quote from: Tsirist on April 20, 2016, 10:31:16 PM

Well considering they can cause problems (even at a very low rate) and the people in question were already prescient enough to address the issue at hand by getting an abortion, I definitely think it shouldn't be forced on them. Never hurts to inform people though in case it might save some effort the next time around.

I was thinking more along the lines of a free opt-in to have the IUD put in after the abortion. While it's heavily idealistic, there is a higher birth rate among people of a lower socioeconomic bracket and these people tend to have children younger as well, leading to children born into an environment where they won't thrive. Adding in the option for getting an IUD placed in after an abortion makes sure that people who don't understand proper contraceptive protection or don't have the proper financial stability won't have the same action occurring.

There's probably a small rate exceptional to this, but wouldn't the fact that the people in question are getting abortions suggest that they aren't the ones to have children too early? Again, I don't disagree that giving them the option would be taking anything away from them at least!

Yeah, the caveat of it all is that to my knowledge it's generally the people of higher socioeconomic bracket that tend to get the abortions when they feel like they aren't secure enough to raise a child, which may in part be due to religious and family values affecting the lower socioeconomic bracket's choice, though they do have them as well. If I recall correctly, abortion rates have increased more among the poor but has decreased overall, which in turn most likely has to do with knowledge and access of contraceptives.

This is your twelfth daily reminder. 

we [s4s] now

A fellow browser, glad to know there are more of us.

Quote from: Verbatim on April 20, 2016, 08:41:35 PM

Are not 3D women not unimportant?

No

Well, the two nots cancel each other out and 3D women are unimportant, so it would be yes.

Are not 3D women not unimportant?