Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - 𝑺𝒆𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒅π‘ͺ𝒍𝒂𝒔𝒔

Pages: 1 ... 697698699 700701 ... 1001
20941
Gaming / Re: When will PS3/X360 be legacy
« on: June 10, 2015, 04:39:22 PM »
hopefully forever because i don't want to upgrade
This. PS3 for life

20942
The Flood / Re: Streisand Effect
« on: June 10, 2015, 04:12:33 PM »
Spoiler

Pretty much this. I wish they'd just be honest about it.

20943
The Flood / Re: ITT: post spoilers for shows in spoiler tags
« on: June 10, 2015, 03:57:16 PM »
Spoiler
Bellamy gets killed by Finn
GOD FUCKING DAMMIT

But I actually do see it happening now that I saw this scene.
Spoiler
when Bellamy wanted to hang Finn.
Spoiler
Are you on episode 4? It may seem weird, but Murphy honestly becomes the best character on the show. Him and Jaha are my all time favorites.

20944
The Flood / Re: ITT: post spoilers for shows in spoiler tags
« on: June 10, 2015, 03:52:39 PM »
Spoiler
Bellamy gets killed by Finn

20945
Serious / Re: Lord Jamar on transgenderism
« on: June 10, 2015, 03:00:56 PM »
Cry me a river. If they can't have the self-control to keep their pathetic fantasies to themselves, then why should I keep my opinions about it to myself?
i don't ever want to hear you whine when i make fun of how retarded potheads are, then
Lol, fair enough. Being a pothead is far less embarrassing than being a trap, anyway.

20946
Serious / Re: Lord Jamar on transgenderism
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:57:16 PM »
I can't help what I do and don't find repulsive.
neither can i

i can't say i find transfolk to be repulsive, but i do find some certain parts of the LGBT community to be a little too out there for my normative cisgendered brain to handle, so i have the gut reaction of, "ew, gross"

but i'm not a bigot about it
According to MM, you're a bigot if you find them gross
You're a bigot if you find it gross and can't seem to keep it to your fucking self. I don't think you understand that you shitty points of view aren't inconsequential to the people effected by them.
Cry me a river. If they can't have the self-control to keep their pathetic fantasies to themselves, then why should I keep my opinions about it to myself?

20947
The Flood / Re: Morty Thread
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:55:50 PM »
No.


20948
Serious / Re: Lord Jamar on transgenderism
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:54:35 PM »
also, reminder that we're arguing with a person who admits to caring about nothing other than himself and his own self-interest, so

bearing that in mind
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

I thought you were older than 13, Verb

20949
Serious / Re: Lord Jamar on transgenderism
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:53:40 PM »
I can't help what I do and don't find repulsive.
neither can i

i can't say i find transfolk to be repulsive, but i do find some certain parts of the LGBT community to be a little too out there for my normative cisgendered brain to handle, so i have the gut reaction of, "ew, gross"

but i'm not a bigot about it
According to MM, you're a bigot if you find them gross

20950
The Flood / Re: Marty Thread
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:52:51 PM »

20951
The Flood / Re: why is this place so dead
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:51:07 PM »
Top ladπŸ‘Œ
πŸ‘ŒπŸ‘Œ
I can't tell if this is a British thing or a meme thing but I already hate it

20952
Serious / Re: Lord Jamar on transgenderism
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:49:56 PM »
You'll allow them to do it, but you'll berate them every step of the way? That's bigotry.
Then I'm a bigot.
Quote
why you gotta be a bigot though
I can't help what I do and don't find repulsive.

20953
Serious / Re: Favourite theologian, atheist and philosopher?
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:49:11 PM »
Jim from The Office

20954
Serious / Re: Lord Jamar on transgenderism
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:47:43 PM »
So you're telling me that the Ukrainian Barbie hasn't changed herself aesthetically to nearly the extent of someone who undergoes feminization and SRS. (Nearly meaning no SRS, obviously)
She's still a she, though. Changing your physical features and actually trying to become the gender you never got to be is comparing apples to oranges.
Do you have some sort of super vision that allows you to see people's crotches at all times?
I mean, it's pretty obvious. Most trannies look nothing like the picture you posted on the last page.

20955
Serious / Re: Lord Jamar on transgenderism
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:47:11 PM »
You'll allow them to do it, but you'll berate them every step of the way? That's bigotry.
Then I'm a bigot.

20956
Serious / Re: Lord Jamar on transgenderism
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:44:02 PM »
I'm really not. Crossdressing is just as bad, though. Egh.
"i think it's gross, therefore it's bad"

i find cross-dressing kind of gross and weird, too
it's just not my thing

why you gotta be a bigot about it though
A bigot would say "I don't like it, so you're not allowed to do it."

I've never said, once, that people shouldn't be allowed to do this bullshit. Just that it's moronic and disgusting.

20957
The Flood / Re: Just watched a couple of episodes of The 100
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:42:40 PM »
It's kinda a show that you just have to watch, you know, for entertainment. If you hold up a critical lens to it, it's cheesy, melodramatic, has generally bad acting, and is obviously a CW show. That's why you just have to unwind and cut back on your knee-jerk reaction to overjudge everything
"it's a good show besides everything about it being bad"
I didn't know that the acting and whether or not it's melodramatic occasionally was everything about shows.

20958
Serious / Re: Lord Jamar on transgenderism
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:41:46 PM »
So you're telling me that the Ukrainian Barbie hasn't changed herself aesthetically to nearly the extent of someone who undergoes feminization and SRS. (Nearly meaning no SRS, obviously)
She's still a she, though. Changing your physical features and actually trying to become the gender you never got to be is comparing apples to oranges.

20959
Serious / Re: Lord Jamar on transgenderism
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:39:04 PM »
But you don't fucking know what work someone has or has not had. Do you check everyone's medical history that you meet on the street?
If a tranny is walking down the street, and you can't tell that he's one, then you need to get your eyes checked.
I think you're confusing transgender with a burly, hairy crossdresser.
I'm really not. Crossdressing is just as bad, though. Egh.

20960
Serious / Re: Lord Jamar on transgenderism
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:33:42 PM »
They didn't change their gender; if that was the problem, then you wouldn't be able to vomit over anything considering that they'd aesthetically be a normal person.

So that would mean your problem is with transsexuals. And yes, corrective surgery is all the same. Whether you go under the knife to get a new nose, boobs, chin, or a new and more feminine/masculine face, it's the same thing.
Transgender, transsexual, transwhatever. This is why I just say traps/trannies.

And no, it's not the same thing at all. One is changing yourself completely, the other is changing an insignificant part of yourself.

20961
Serious / Re: Lord Jamar on transgenderism
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:31:40 PM »
But you don't fucking know what work someone has or has not had. Do you check everyone's medical history that you meet on the street?
If a tranny is walking down the street, and you can't tell that he's one, then you need to get your eyes checked.

20962
Serious / Re: Lord Jamar on transgenderism
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:30:27 PM »
"trannies are gross (they are)"

"I'd champion your right to do it any day, but that doesn't make it any less disgusting."

Hypocritical. Would defend their right to do so. But when their back is turned call them out on it. No. You wouldn't defend shit. And, even more so. You don't respect them. Not saying you have to. But you put up a sham and a front. And as soon as you don't need it? True opinion shows.
Your entire post is too filled with baseless accusations and anger for me to even say anything, but this is such idiocy. You don't have to like someone, respect them, or even tolerate them to defend their right to do something. That's not hypocritical at all, and it's frankly moronic to say otherwise. I don't like trannies, but of course they should be allowed to change their sex. I don't like KKK protestors, but of course they should be allowed to protest.

Please enlighten me as to how this is hypocritical in any way. I can't turn my backs on them because I'm not defending them, I'm defending their right to change their sex, legally. But this thread isn't about the law.

20963
Serious / Re: Lord Jamar on transgenderism
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:26:36 PM »
This still doesn't mean that we should treat transgender people like shit. It would be a shitty thing to say "I don't want to be within 500ft of him because he has polio", what makes gender dysmorphia any different?
The sight of people with polio doesn't induce vomiting
Why do people with Gender Dysmorphia make you vomit?

Gender Dysmorphia is a subset of Body Dysmorphic Disorder; something like thinking you have an ugly nose, or are fatter than you are. Do all people who undergo "corrective" (SRS, plastic surgery) induce vomiting in you?
Are you really comparing someone who changed their entire gender to someone who got a nose job?

20964
Serious / Re: Lord Jamar on transgenderism
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:25:20 PM »
itt: people use accurate words to refer to transgender people.
pretty much
I'll never understand why people purposefully use distasteful language just to anger people.
For the same reason I say "black" instead of "African-American". One's the actual word, and the other is the politically-correct, peppered up buzzword that you have to say or you're terrible.

20965
Serious / Re: Lord Jamar on transgenderism
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:22:52 PM »
This still doesn't mean that we should treat transgender people like shit. It would be a shitty thing to say "I don't want to be within 500ft of him because he has polio", what makes gender dysmorphia any different?
The sight of people with polio doesn't induce vomiting

20966
Serious / Re: Lord Jamar on transgenderism
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:21:51 PM »
It's getting to the point where I'd be considered a bad person if I refused to sleep with someone because they're a trap.
don't be ridiculous
Give it 15 years, "transphobia" will be almost as bad as racial discrimination is considered today

20967
The Flood / Re: EXPLOSION IMMINENT
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:19:34 PM »
Poor Deci
He brings it on himself, tbh

20968
Serious / Re: Lord Jamar on transgenderism
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:17:47 PM »
itt: people use accurate words to refer to transgender people.
pretty much

20969
The Flood / Re: on the mantle of my years, my heart alights.
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:16:58 PM »
What a faggot

20970
Serious / Re: Lord Jamar on transgenderism
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:15:52 PM »
Incest is family marrying, not having sex, first of all.
No, incest implies sexual activity. I'm pretty sure it's right in the definition.
It can be used both ways, then. I've always heard incest referred to as just marrying/dating.

That's was my initial meaning when I brought up the point, regardless.

Pages: 1 ... 697698699 700701 ... 1001