20101
The Flood / Re: No one from the fucking sep7agon skype group answer my calls
« on: July 05, 2015, 05:23:53 PM »
Probably because no one wants to talk to you.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 20101
The Flood / Re: No one from the fucking sep7agon skype group answer my calls« on: July 05, 2015, 05:23:53 PM »
Probably because no one wants to talk to you.
20102
Gaming / Re: What is the manliest game you ever played?« on: July 05, 2015, 04:50:49 PM »Kingdom hearts. It made me the man I am today.WHEN YOU WALK AWAY YOU DONT HEAR ME SAY 20103
The Flood / Re: Hitler doesn't happen« on: July 05, 2015, 04:45:18 PM »Russia and America were pretty equal in terms of military power back then, so it wouldn't give up or lose quickly.US-Soviet war in the 1950s.Russia gets nuked, or gives up (nuked obviously). Japan of course doesn't attack US, but instead just continues fucking up China. The non-interventionalist American mindset at the time would pretty much allow them to do that unopposed, and they'd probably easily take the country. Russia and Japan would probably unite (Russia doesn't want a two-front war) and take on America and its allies in the 60s. Essentially, we'd still have WW2, but just later in the century. 20104
The Flood / Re: Hitler doesn't happen« on: July 05, 2015, 04:39:26 PM »
US-Soviet war in the 1950s.
20105
Serious / Re: How free is your state?« on: July 05, 2015, 04:32:31 PM »Wake up sheepleYou've literally called people sheep in a thread with a bullshit conspiracy theory.Link me to literally one post here where I attacked the OP's penis size instead of his argument. Then it would be hypocrisy. (Not irony)The ironyThread title "How free is your state?"Do you ever actually present an argument on this board, or is it all just childish personal attacks? 20106
The Flood / Re: What's your impact?« on: July 05, 2015, 04:31:44 PM »
Nonexistent, and I couldn't care less.
20107
Serious / Re: How free is your state?« on: July 05, 2015, 04:27:46 PM »Link me to literally one post here where I attacked the OP's penis size instead of his argument. Then it would be hypocrisy. (Not irony)The ironyThread title "How free is your state?"Do you ever actually present an argument on this board, or is it all just childish personal attacks? 20108
Serious / Re: How free is your state?« on: July 05, 2015, 04:25:01 PM »Thread title "How free is your state?"Do you ever actually present an argument on this board, or is it all just childish personal attacks? 20109
The Flood / Re: If there were no repercussions...« on: July 05, 2015, 03:56:03 PM »Absolutely. You have no right to tell someone they can't do something to their own body.So is that to say that we should allow people who are not of sound mind to torture themselves as they wish? Should we allow schizophrenics to dismember themselves or catatonics to starve?It doesn't fucking matter whatsoever what other people want. Your life is yours alone.Why does what someone wants matter if literally nobody else wants that?Definitely, definitely, definitely let him live. Choice and consent is all.Hypothetical situation here :Self-value is all that matters. There is no numeric scale, there's a switch. If a person wants to live, his life has value. If he doesn't, his life doesn't have value. Simple as that. Other people's opinion on the person has literally no relevance at all.Okay, what other value does a person have and why does it matter if whatever you esteem to be value has been lost?All of the value in a person's life resides in the impact they have on otherslolno 20110
The Flood / Re: If there were no repercussions...« on: July 05, 2015, 03:55:10 PM »Osama should have been taken alive and imprisoned for life, but that obviously wasn't possible when he was surrounded by armed guards. It wasn't morally righteous to kill him, but it was certainly justifiable.The only thing that matters is impact.It doesn't fucking matter whatsoever what other people want. Your life is yours alone.Why does what someone wants matter if literally nobody else wants that?Definitely, definitely, definitely let him live. Choice and consent is all.Hypothetical situation here :Self-value is all that matters. There is no numeric scale, there's a switch. If a person wants to live, his life has value. If he doesn't, his life doesn't have value. Simple as that. Other people's opinion on the person has literally no relevance at all.Okay, what other value does a person have and why does it matter if whatever you esteem to be value has been lost?All of the value in a person's life resides in the impact they have on otherslolno 20111
The Flood / Re: If there were no repercussions...« on: July 05, 2015, 03:52:00 PM »It doesn't fucking matter whatsoever what other people want. Your life is yours alone.Why does what someone wants matter if literally nobody else wants that?Definitely, definitely, definitely let him live. Choice and consent is all.Hypothetical situation here :Self-value is all that matters. There is no numeric scale, there's a switch. If a person wants to live, his life has value. If he doesn't, his life doesn't have value. Simple as that. Other people's opinion on the person has literally no relevance at all.Okay, what other value does a person have and why does it matter if whatever you esteem to be value has been lost?All of the value in a person's life resides in the impact they have on otherslolno 20112
The Flood / Re: If there were no repercussions...« on: July 05, 2015, 03:49:14 PM »Definitely, definitely, definitely let him live. Choice and consent is all.Hypothetical situation here :Self-value is all that matters. There is no numeric scale, there's a switch. If a person wants to live, his life has value. If he doesn't, his life doesn't have value. Simple as that. Other people's opinion on the person has literally no relevance at all.Okay, what other value does a person have and why does it matter if whatever you esteem to be value has been lost?All of the value in a person's life resides in the impact they have on otherslolno 20113
The Flood / Re: If there were no repercussions...« on: July 05, 2015, 03:46:00 PM »Self-value is all that matters. There is no numeric scale, there's a switch. If a person wants to live, his life has value. If he doesn't, his life doesn't have value. Simple as that. Other people's opinion on the person has literally no relevance at all.Okay, what other value does a person have and why does it matter if whatever you esteem to be value has been lost?All of the value in a person's life resides in the impact they have on otherslolno 20114
The Flood / Re: If there were no repercussions...« on: July 05, 2015, 03:42:36 PM »All of the value in a person's life resides in the impact they have on otherslolno 20115
The Flood / Re: Hey religious people, try on this theory for size« on: July 05, 2015, 03:13:21 PM »
Souls don't exist.
20116
The Flood / Re: If there were no repercussions...« on: July 05, 2015, 03:04:00 PM »Yeah, it's pretty pathetic.And judging by some of the replies ITT I'm not alone.This is what Solonoid actually believes, yes.And nobody was going to miss himWhy does this even matter? Is the value of your life determined by how many people will miss you when you're dead? That's retarded. 20117
The Flood / Re: If there were no repercussions...« on: July 05, 2015, 02:54:29 PM »No one ever said it would be guilt free the lack of a family to mourn the victims death frees the killer from thoughts of guiltlol 20118
The Flood / Re: If there were no repercussions...« on: July 05, 2015, 02:50:45 PM »You've never "ended my career". You think your insults are way more witty than they actually are.Is this all you can write every time I end your pineapple?Good one?Who cares? Your life is yours, and nonexistence is worse than anyone feeling bad for you. The idea that we have to depend on others for meaning is so annoying.Mad because you're the guy OP is talking about. 20119
The Flood / Re: If there were no repercussions...« on: July 05, 2015, 02:49:49 PM »What the fuck? If you're ending a human life, and you're thinking about the family of the person you're murdering, and not, you know, the person you're fucking murdering, you have issues. Really, if someone has no family, it's guiltless to kill him? What?the lack of a family to mourn the victims death frees the killer from thoughts of guiltWho cares? Your life is yours, and nonexistence is worse than anyone feeling bad for you. The idea that we have to depend on others for meaning is so annoying.The dead are not alive to feel remorse for their death, meaning your action doesn't cause much suffering. If there are mourners, your action caused a great amount of suffering.And nobody was going to miss himWhy does this even matter? Is the value of your life determined by how many people will miss you when you're dead? That's retarded. 20120
The Flood / Re: If there were no repercussions...« on: July 05, 2015, 02:48:03 PM »Good one?Who cares? Your life is yours, and nonexistence is worse than anyone feeling bad for you. The idea that we have to depend on others for meaning is so annoying.Mad because you're the guy OP is talking about. 20121
The Flood / Re: If there were no repercussions...« on: July 05, 2015, 02:45:14 PM »Who cares? Your life is yours, and nonexistence is worse than anyone feeling bad for you. The idea that we have to depend on others for meaning is so annoying.The dead are not alive to feel remorse for their death, meaning your action doesn't cause much suffering. If there are mourners, your action caused a great amount of suffering.And nobody was going to miss himWhy does this even matter? Is the value of your life determined by how many people will miss you when you're dead? That's retarded. 20122
The Flood / Re: If there were no repercussions...« on: July 05, 2015, 02:41:27 PM »And nobody was going to miss himWhy does this even matter? Is the value of your life determined by how many people will miss you when you're dead? That's retarded. 20123
The Flood / Re: If there were no repercussions...« on: July 05, 2015, 02:29:54 PM »
In spite of sounding edgy, probably.
20124
The Flood / Re: when was comet demoted (false alarm)« on: July 05, 2015, 02:25:24 PM »
Wait Comet's a girl?
20125
The Flood / Re: What is the lowest tier of human being, as close to chimps as you can get?« on: July 05, 2015, 02:24:20 PM »
I agree with you 100% on everything you've said ITT, Chally, but don't pretend you're somehow better than the rest of us for some made up reason. Sexual deviancy? General degeneracy? Give me a break.
20126
The Flood / Re: send me on an SOS« on: July 05, 2015, 12:56:39 AM »
my goals are to be happy
its not like alcohol keeps me from that Im still content 20127
The Flood / send me on an SOS« on: July 05, 2015, 12:48:00 AM »
please help me
my life is goign well but I just dont understand the point of it all I'm suppodesly a nihilist but it cant really be for nothing....there has to be a point, right? 20128
The Flood / Re: HOW THE FUCK DID A MOTH GET INSIDE MY FUCKING ROOM?« on: July 05, 2015, 12:42:41 AM »maybe i should squish youif you were a girl I'd be all over that 20129
The Flood / Re: HOW THE FUCK DID A MOTH GET INSIDE MY FUCKING ROOM?« on: July 05, 2015, 12:39:35 AM »I still don't get how a grasshopper can bite a person.insects have mouths they use these mouths to consume food which eventually gets turned into ATP, the basic unit of energy sometime, when something is infiltrating the food or the grashoppers way of life, it instead uses that mouth to bite whatever is infiltrating it which causes pain to the person 20130
The Flood / Re: I'm pretty smashed ama« on: July 05, 2015, 12:23:18 AM »debbie is no azula for suredoes anyone remember any of the wild thornberrys other than nigeleveryone in that cartoon was ugly as fuck but her personality was pretty hot |