You're forgetting that "Isara's banner" were simple concepts, and not actual banners to be used on the forums. Please, read my posts. (This is also for Cheat, in case he mistook them as an actual attempt to replace the banners)

Use Isara's Gaming banner, but change the text to the one the rest of them use.

I am not sure what you are thinking, SecondClass. The decision was made after plenty of research, and collecting opinions. There was plenty of arguing and evidence proposed to the outcome. Do you have a more meaningful argument to fight the decision?

No, you respawn with two HE grenades, an assault rifle, and a pistol that can kill tank drivers.

Oh, the context of that banner is the case all banners were replaced. I wasn't working on an actual replacement, I just wanted thoughts on the style. That's why it's all rushed through.

Possibly take the tagline off as well, to keep each banner similar.

It's not when it's on the forum. Use your browser and check out. The title looks great, it doesn't need to be buffed up.

The title on the banner is really weak. Buff it up a touch.

Orange is taken up by the news board, green by The Flood, purple by Sep7agon, yellow by HQ, and I guess it leaves us with red. How about...

How about red or orange? Maybe even green?

Sometimes I experiment with new styles... What do you think of this one?

It's funny how some console players expect unrealistic perfomance for the hardware and platform they are forced into. That's similar to how people complain a game won't run on their shitty Pentium 4 / i3 brand computer or laptop.

Not sure who to pick.

That's terrible. How could a friendship like that go ba-- oh.

Flee's 'Wreckage' Cruiser

Something with Flee in there is a must.

Certainly, I also think that some Western governments actions are a little too lax against crimes committed by potential fundamentalists. Not sparking conflict doesn't necessarily mean hitting back on criminal actions with a plume.

That's essentially a milder way of asking whether or not printing Mohammed's picture will get you killed. Potentially, depending on the specifics, but it doesn't mean you should capitulate to these sorts of theocratic sociopathy.

What about all the followers of Islam that are not extremists, however? Isn't this what the muslims in Europe fear about, and would be willing to fight against? I think the author is either giving wrongful advice on purpose, or is being sarcastic. Nazism sparked an unspeakable monster of hatred, but so has communism, and republics at the time of World War 2.

Just to add to my earlier post about "Kinda the hypocrisy..."

This might sound like cynicism towards a number of nations. Instead, I think it's necessary to exploit whatever resources from weaker states that do not have the military to defend, or the industry to back it up. This is the same crucible that China was in the 19th century where the West was really, and heavily attempting to force China into modernization to exploit all the unused resources. (That through a lot of work, and dramatic political changes, China became a modern nation to par with the West)

I think the US, EU, Russia, China, and Turkey as powers are in a constant tension to fight terrorist actions. Maybe in some cases the actions of the governments are questionable, but the vast amount of issues creates an incredible amount of internal issues, and also stress the relationships between nations.

That more and more money is spent on the military, security, the UN and counter-intelligence is needless to say, that in the modern world, any kind of power is locked into a constant proxy war of intelligence. Meanwhile, smaller nations who are weak, or incapable of maintaining a stable system or relationship with a power are doomed to an endless spiral of violence and societal destruction by the paramount amount of issues and forces pushing against the people and government themselves.

I don't remember who specifically, but it is argued that the modern world is in fact no less violent and anarchic than the non-modern era, but in fact all the violence has been subverted, or changed meanwhile many people simply work onto establishing a distinction between the world as it was before and now. (Kinda the hypocrisy from the powers on the planet that enjoy technology that is often made with conflict resources)

World peace is impossible. Therefore, we'll be always locked in some sort of conflict.