This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Turkey
Pages: 1 ... 262263264 265266 ... 271
7891
« on: October 26, 2014, 07:44:30 AM »
How did I know Hurt was gonna be in the OP... like always...
I could've linked tons of other songs, but this cover is amazing. Here's stuff that isn't from the 1960's.
Johnny Cash's America albums were released around 2000, and is some of the best country out there. The stuff you linked is fine, but I'm not huge on country rock. I prefer wizened old dudes singing about loss. Folk country's where it's at
7892
« on: October 26, 2014, 06:35:17 AM »
I couldn't help but laugh at his accent. Ffs american accents are so funny
brb new thread.
7893
« on: October 26, 2014, 06:33:31 AM »
(Skip to 2:50) Well, not really, since America didn't exist then, but the ye-olde British accent sounded a lot closer to the current American accent than it does to the modern accent. I made this thread because Gatsby pointed out how funny a southern American accent sounds, even though that accent originates from Southern English speakers several hundred years ago. And the old British accent was much closer to a current American accent (which makes sense, because the country was originally a colony of Britain), and that the current British accent was a result of de-emphasizing r's, sort of the way southern accents slur letters. The example the article use is this: "Park your car in the Harvard Yard". In the past, the Brits had a 'rhotic' accent which pronounced the r's: “paRk youR caR in HaRvaRd YaRd”. In the last few hundred years, the Brits moved away from r's after vowels: "pahk youh cah in Hahvahd Yahd". Or, removing the h's for accent, you get the more phonetic "pak you ca in havad yad". Incidentally, the Great British De-Rhoticization (a term I just made up) also explains why Australian, New Zealand, and South African English are all non-rhotic, because these areas were settled after the British switched off their Rs, while Canada and the USA were first settled while everyone was still R-full. http://the-toast.net/2014/03/19/a-linguist-explains-british-accents-of-yore/tl;dr Brits used to speak with an accent closer to American or Scottish than their current accent.
7894
« on: October 26, 2014, 06:15:10 AM »
A cure is far more profitable than inferior treatments. This is evidenced by the continued development of new and more efficient treatments, based on legitimate medical science and reviewed studies. The idea that a single plant can magically cure all cancer in its natural state is absurd; the articles you linked do nothing to establish a causal link between cannabis and remission, and where there's one example of cannabis being involved in a 'cure', there are hundreds more of cannabis not working that way.
Persistence that 'big pharma' is suppressing a cure and marketing ineffective treatments to cash a check is ultimately dangerous as it propagates a false reality and encourages self-treatment.
I consider myself a scientist; I like data. I like data that has a correlation statistic even more. I like data with a correlation statistic that has been reviewed by the community's peers and published in a respected medium most.
7895
« on: October 26, 2014, 06:03:27 AM »
I hear cannabis can help you with that.
7896
« on: October 26, 2014, 05:54:19 AM »
How dare you ignore our love.
All I need is Rush, Black Sabbath, Yes, Jimi Hendrix, Judas Priest and Led Zeppelin.
Why are you awake?
7897
« on: October 26, 2014, 05:48:53 AM »
I'm on board with cannabis as a treatment when it's investigated in a legitimate, peer-reviewed study on humans.
7898
« on: October 26, 2014, 05:21:24 AM »
youth in society pls Rap: Blue Scholars Rap: Brother Ali Rap: Common Market Rap/Hip Hop: Hopsin Country: Johnny Fucking Cash Country: Willie Nelson
7899
« on: October 26, 2014, 05:08:23 AM »
hemp which literally cures cancer
bruh
It does.
nuh uh
7900
« on: October 26, 2014, 05:02:28 AM »
Those who are seriously interested in artificial intelligence, and not just in the trendy pop-sci mindset afflicting society, should check out the work of Douglas Hofstadter, particular the book Gödel, Escher, Bach. A lot will go over your head, and that's okay, but he is an absolutely brilliant writer that manages to cleverly explain difficult concepts without taking away from the academic weight of his statements. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/11/the-man-who-would-teach-machines-to-think/309529/
7901
« on: October 26, 2014, 04:58:42 AM »
Having a background in industrial engineering, I'm all for optimizing politics, but there's also a great degree of complexity in this system that has been shown to deter the general population. A lot of this is also negated by primary elections, though those assume that a voter will still stick with their party even if their preferred candidate wins.
7902
« on: October 26, 2014, 04:48:36 AM »
"I tell you the truth, unless a kernel of wheat is planted in the soil and dies, it remains alone. But its death will produce many new kernels—a plentiful harvest of new lives. Those who love their life in this world will lose it. Those who care nothing for their life in this world will keep it for eternity."
7903
« on: October 26, 2014, 04:34:11 AM »
Cut the hours of loyal employees who have been working there for years. I work no hours next week and have worked only 25 this week. And Walmart is STILL hiring temps. Why? Because they're cheap labor and Walmart could keep a huge amount of their own profits.
Regardless of the fairness of hiring temps (though I think it's a perfectly valid tactic when minimum wage and the ACA are strangling entry-level employers from both sides of the issue -- hours and wage), profits don't really have anything to do with salary. Basically nobody offers profit-sharing or bonuses for entry-level positions. P.S. you should quit Walmart and go to Kroger. I had over four years of experience with them and they're a pretty good employer with lots of room for advancement.
7904
« on: October 26, 2014, 04:26:38 AM »
hemp which literally cures cancer
bruh
7905
« on: October 26, 2014, 04:22:34 AM »
Contrary to popular belief, most of Texas isn't the irredeemable shithole that its often portrayed as.
7906
« on: October 26, 2014, 04:21:04 AM »
Goji, what are you studying?
7907
« on: October 26, 2014, 04:18:11 AM »
How much does it pay?
7908
« on: October 26, 2014, 04:17:16 AM »
Hopefully humans go extinct with the purpose of making room for the next stage in evolution for homo sapiens. It doesn't seem likely we'll be able to travel to a different solar system any time soon, though.
7909
« on: October 26, 2014, 04:14:09 AM »
Halo Wars
They're unworthy.
7910
« on: October 26, 2014, 04:13:32 AM »
Never been able to get into that series. Is this a good place to start?
7911
« on: October 26, 2014, 04:12:23 AM »
Is there any word on interconnectivity between the DS and Wii versions?
You mean 3DS & Wii U? You can use the 3DS as a controller when playing on the Wii u
How does that connection work?
7912
« on: October 26, 2014, 04:11:41 AM »
GT: Viva Redemption
Xbox One or gtfo.
7913
« on: October 26, 2014, 03:28:22 AM »
OP pls
7914
« on: October 26, 2014, 03:26:45 AM »
Is there any word on interconnectivity between the DS and Wii versions?
7915
« on: October 26, 2014, 03:24:59 AM »
What's sad is that probably has a better and deeper story than what Destiny has.
Hey, Destiny's story is so deep that it transcends the game; instead, it's in the Grimoire Cards and Reddit.
7916
« on: October 26, 2014, 03:20:38 AM »
*This is in serious because I'm a super srs guy*
I need groomsman gift ideas. Right now I'm thinking a big fat Churchill cigar (working on cubans) and an engraved lighter, with a nice box. My budget is approximately $50, though I don't have any hard and fast line.
My groomsmen, barring the bride's brother, are all hip young liberals (think Mad Max minus a decade or so). Anything beer related, or obscure bands, or manly in general. Stuff along those lines.
No dildos or booty, unfortunately. Also no dildos in booty.
7917
« on: October 26, 2014, 12:00:59 AM »
7918
« on: October 25, 2014, 11:06:44 PM »
If memory is stored in neurons, why are there no organelles within the cell that perform that function?
Biology isn't my thing, but I'm pretty sure the neuron is formed in result to a stimulus and that results in it sending a unique signal. There are billions of these neurons, and trillions of connections between them. A memory isn't a physical object, but it's a combination of electrical signals (which is still physical and tangible).
7919
« on: October 25, 2014, 10:53:02 PM »
We'd like to believe the memory is stored in neuron cells, but there simply isn't any place in the cell where that would happen. The individual neurons send a unique signal that, in series with other neurons, produce a unique combination resulting in memory recall. What specifically does quantum mechanics have to do with any of it?
7920
« on: October 25, 2014, 10:22:06 PM »
How the fuck do you even get banned here?
Pages: 1 ... 262263264 265266 ... 271
|