This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Turkey
Pages: 1 ... 101102103 104105 ... 270
3062
« on: March 04, 2016, 02:46:22 PM »
How many eps are out? Is it a season drop or weekly drip feeding shit?
All 13 episodes are out now.
3063
« on: March 04, 2016, 02:22:06 PM »
ooooo yeah i'd agree with that, currently on season 3 episode 11 season 4 came out just in time
I really didn't like 3. Slog through it, because 4 is really great so far.
3064
« on: March 04, 2016, 02:19:36 PM »
Season 1 > 4 > 2 > 3
3065
« on: March 04, 2016, 01:07:35 PM »
tbh OJ was probably covering for his son, anyway.
3066
« on: March 04, 2016, 11:06:31 AM »
Renting is fucking stupid and you're wasting your money.
It's more expensive monthly, but you're definitely not guaranteed a return on investment, and if you go underwater on your mortgage or start missing payments, your credit is fucked. Miss a payment on rent? Typically not a big deal and the worst case is you leave and have none of your assets tied down to the place. There's no right answer in whether to own or rent; it depends on the situation.
3067
« on: March 04, 2016, 09:05:53 AM »
Mortgage payments are also typically 50-70% the rental price, too. Buying is smart if you have the financial ability to do so...mortgage should be a week's paycheck, so renting is smart for low-income earners or people that move frequently.
3068
« on: March 03, 2016, 08:53:18 PM »
Don't restaurants usually just number tables?
Yeah, the whole "shirt color" thing seems weird.
3069
« on: March 03, 2016, 08:49:47 PM »
http://www.fox7austin.com/news/local-news/99068143-storytl;dr they label customers using a word or two to identify them, typically a number or shirt color (per the article). During a busy day, a black waiter used the label "BLACK PPL" on the ticket to identify their order. The couple says the waiter doesn't deserve the job. They will never go back to that IHOP again.
“That's kind of messed up that you have to put your own people down,” Sparkman said. Dwayne Williams said the restaurant let him go, shortly after the incident occurred. It's unprofessional, but it's obviously not racist or derogatory in any way.
3070
« on: March 03, 2016, 07:14:54 PM »
3071
« on: March 03, 2016, 07:06:07 PM »
It's weird that Romney thinks he's still relevant.
3072
« on: March 03, 2016, 06:28:22 PM »
Yep
3073
« on: March 03, 2016, 06:21:57 PM »
In all seriousness race/gender swapping rarely goes over well.
They did both of those in White Chicks, and that's probably the greatest movie ever made though.
3074
« on: March 03, 2016, 06:21:06 PM »
I'm just letting you know that complaining about a comedian making a joke on a comedy show is kind of foolish.
Cool. Thanks for sharing.
3075
« on: March 03, 2016, 06:02:12 PM »
Sounds like it's not just a colorful Elite: Dangerous clone, which is cool. Looks really good so far.
3076
« on: March 03, 2016, 05:59:16 PM »
"It's just comedy bro, stop taking it so seriously"
Shit, I made one post about it. Nobody's butthurt or getting worked up.
Your responses including the part you edited out in your last one indicate otherwise.
You're getting really worked up over this, huh?
3077
« on: March 03, 2016, 05:52:23 PM »
"It's just comedy bro, stop taking it so seriously" Shit, I made one post about it. Nobody's butthurt or getting worked up. If you don't have anything to say then just don't comment.
3078
« on: March 03, 2016, 05:39:07 PM »
18 minutes of well-reasoned arguments and then the last three minutes were just shitting on his ancestor's last name, basically just insulting his fans' intelligence.
You realize that it's a comedy show right?
This is a really stupid defense of the Drumpf meme. The show was funny and poignant, but then he topped it all off with a extravagant punchline about his ancestors' name that was really just a lowbrow attempt at character assassination.
3079
« on: March 03, 2016, 12:55:15 PM »
Maybe they'll prove me wrong, but female fart humor and ghosts don't really mix... But I've been wrong before.
That's kind of a trend lately, so it may be popular at the time but I doubt it'll turn into the classic that the original is.
3080
« on: March 03, 2016, 12:20:25 PM »
That's just backwards. It should be most qualified,not special treatment.
To clarify the title, the article specifies that those considered for roles or jobs should be proportional, not necessarily resulting in total proportionality.
3081
« on: March 03, 2016, 11:46:03 AM »
Acting like his quality as a character has more to do with him being black than the fact he's just written better than Anakin or Obi-wan is placing undue emphasis on race and therefor is racist. Nobody is doing that, and I have no idea why you keep saying anybody is. The sole reason I brought up Finn in my first reply was to demonstrate a recent film's use of an audience character. When personality, class, circumstance, and a whole host of other, more behavior defining aspects exist? I'd say if all those criteria are met, They're not, though. The average black American (or Asian, or Latino, etc) has a significantly different experience than an average white American. Abrams' requiring staffers to set aside bias to try to give a proportional chance to everyone is fantastic, and again, it's about giving them a chance, not giving them a role just because they're a minority. I'm just refusing to recognize the idea that "I can't relate to white people" is a premise for any action.
That's an incredibly disingenuous way to describe Abrams' stated motivations.
3082
« on: March 03, 2016, 11:35:13 AM »
Can't replicate Bill Murray.
3083
« on: March 03, 2016, 11:27:37 AM »
Vid's not available, broski.
How bout now?
Works now.
3084
« on: March 03, 2016, 11:20:08 AM »
Vid's not available, broski.
3085
« on: March 03, 2016, 11:19:30 AM »
nothing about John Boyega's performance brought in black American culture. he's just black. I'm not sure why you keep bringing up Jon Boyega, but black people enjoying seeing a black guy in Star Wars isn't racist in the slightest. the fact that a person thinks that just because Boyega's black means that he is instantly more relatable than any white person, means that person is racist. Is it really such a difficult concept to realize that a black person could relate more to another black person than a white person? And again, the idea of relatability isn't even the crux of the discussion; the real purpose behind Abrams' actions is to confront head-on the tendency for a majority-white leadership in Hollywood to favor white actors and staff members.
3086
« on: March 03, 2016, 10:58:44 AM »
Those are the Oscars. The Oscars are a statistical representation of the industry, and no statistics rebut the premise of the article. I don't know about you, but when I have trouble relating to a character, it's not because of race. I don't relate to Chris Tucker because of his style of humor, not because he's black. White people having difficulty identifying with black humor has nothing to do with race of the presenter and entirely to do with the fact that black comedy exists as a genre because it is literally a different style that has to deal with black American culture. So you don't like Chris Tucker's humor because it's related to black American culture, which you don't identify with. That's my exact point.
3087
« on: March 03, 2016, 10:45:21 AM »
Ever donated plasma before? It's a pretty easy way to make $40-50 each week.
3088
« on: March 03, 2016, 10:42:13 AM »
objectively.
Axiomatically
3089
« on: March 03, 2016, 10:39:46 AM »
Minorities should reevaluate how they judge and enjoy movies.
It's not a conscious act, for the most part. It's the same reason a lot of people dislike anime, foreign films, "black" comedies (and I'm speaking racially, not about dark humor), etc. There are movies that you undoubtedly don't relate to; if you're a white person, you probably relate to the vast majority of feature films; if you're not, you likely relate to a smaller number of those films. And in terms of staffing, it really is demonstrable that minorities are underrepresented in Hollywood.Spoiler The issue has come to a head because over the past two years some films with a particular emotional resonance were passed over. The original “Rocky” (1976) won three Oscars, and Sylvester Stallone was nominated (though he did not win) for both acting and writing. Critics and fans alike have heaped praise on 2015's new addition to the Rocky franchise, “Creed”, which sees a black fighter as the hero. But the star and the black director, Michael B. Jordan and Ryan Coogler, will have to make do with fans' appreciation and more than $100m at the box office: the film's only nomination went to Mr Stallone, this time for Best Supporting Actor. “Straight Outta Compton”, a hit film about a black hip-hop group with a black director and producer, was nominated only for its screenplay, the writers of which were white. “Beasts of No Nation” delighted our reviewer, and fans of its star, Idris Elba, hope he will be the next James Bond. It also brought a horrifying phenomenon, child soldiering in Africa, to Western audiences. But the Academy ignored it. All this happens in the shadow of last year's nominations, in which “Selma”, a film about the civil-rights movement which our reviewer found “remarkable”, was nominated but did not win Best Picture, as many thought it should. Neither its director, Ava DuVernay, nor its star, David Oyelowo, were recognised by the academy.
Fingers are pointing at the Academy’s 6,000-odd voting members, 94% of whom are white. Spike Lee, whose “Do The Right Thing” is considered one of the great movies not to have won an Oscar, has lamented “another all-white ballot”; Don Cheadle, who got a Best Actor nomination in 2004 for “Hotel Rwanda”, has joked dryly about parking cars at the event. It is possible that the only black actor onstage will be Chris Rock, who is hosting. He has already said that the Oscars seem to have become a white equivalent of the Black Entertainment Television awards.
These years are far from the first whitewashing in Oscars history: no actors from ethnic minorities were nominated in 1995 or 1997, or in an extraordinary streak between 1975 and 1980. Throughout the 20th century, 95% of Oscar nominations went to white film stars. It is an embarrassing anachronism that the prevalence of white Academy electors has been allowed to continue into the 21st century, a trend that the Academy's (black) president, Cheryl Boone Isaacs, has vowed to end.
Could the “whiteout” be a statistical glitch? If the data were random, such a glitch would be hugely unlikely. A 2013 survey of the Screen Actors Guild (SAG), an American union for film performers, suggests that 70% of its members are white. If all of the Guild’s members were equally likely to receive Oscar nominations, regardless of race, then over a two-year period 28 out of 40 nominations would be of white actors. The chances of no single person of colour being nominated across two ceremonies would be exceptionally small—even during a 15-year span, the odds of seeing at least one sequence of back-to-back whiteouts are around one in 100,000.
3090
« on: March 03, 2016, 10:27:30 AM »
In the end all this is about is people having trouble identifying with people who aren't of their race, regardless of context, class, or all the other things that matter more about how similar a character is to you.
Being able to relate to a character in a movie is pivotal -- in Episode VII, Finn was the audience character. In the original trilogy it was Luke, and in the prequels it was Obi-Wan. It's a commonly expressed opinion among minorities that seeing a bunch of white people is far less relatable than it would be with a more diverse representation in Hollywood.
Pages: 1 ... 101102103 104105 ... 270
|