571
The Flood / Re: Alien 3 and Alien Resurrection are no longer canon
« on: February 26, 2015, 08:22:51 AM »
YEEEEEESSSSSGHUBKIFHJVYFFHYFF
I LOVE YOU EVEN MORE BLOMKAMP.
I LOVE YOU EVEN MORE BLOMKAMP.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 571
The Flood / Re: Alien 3 and Alien Resurrection are no longer canon« on: February 26, 2015, 08:22:51 AM »
YEEEEEESSSSSGHUBKIFHJVYFFHYFF
I LOVE YOU EVEN MORE BLOMKAMP. 572
Gaming / Re: Can somebody get me up-to-date with the halo storyline?« on: February 23, 2015, 09:59:09 AM »I'd strongly discourage the use of both wikis to learn the lore, but if you're going to do it, go with Halopedia. One of the members in the Halo Archive is Halopedia's admin.Just because it's a wiki doesn't make it any good.http://www.halopedia.org/>halopedia 573
Gaming / Re: You guys ready to cringe?« on: February 23, 2015, 09:56:59 AM »It's a funny combination of delicious and depressing that the Halo community is this misguided.>the amount of brick shitting in this threadThis thread actually embodies the Halo community flawlessly. 574
Gaming / Re: You guys ready to cringe?« on: February 23, 2015, 09:53:57 AM »>the amount of brick shitting in this threadThis thread actually embodies the Halo community flawlessly. 575
Gaming / Re: Blame Bungie« on: February 23, 2015, 09:52:26 AM »
BUTTHURT ACHIEVING MAXIMUM LEVELS
576
Gaming / Re: Can somebody get me up-to-date with the halo storyline?« on: February 20, 2015, 09:13:05 AM »
State what parts you need help getting caught up on.
577
Gaming / Re: Halo 5: Guardians - Live Action Teaser Image« on: February 18, 2015, 07:29:32 PM »SourceWhere is this from?Finally got the source. (Well, not really, but the story behind the image.) Not at all. Halo 4's first live action trailer was shown at E3. 578
Gaming / Re: Halo 5: Guardians - Live Action Teaser Image« on: February 18, 2015, 07:21:26 PM »Where is this from?Finally got the source. (Well, not really, but the story behind the image.) "Sorry for the super late response, I couldn't find a good source when I posted it (saw it on reddit) and had to do something for a while. Apparently the person who posted it on reddit saw it on social media from the account of someone who is working on the commercial, and grabbed it before the image was deleted. No solid proof concerning whether it's legitimate or not, but it looks real. Then again, there's no telling what people will do with Photoshop." 579
Gaming / Re: Halo 5: Guardians - Live Action Teaser Image« on: February 18, 2015, 06:26:19 PM »mehNoelle, the master of indifference! 581
Gaming / Re: Describe the first time you went to Ravenholm?« on: February 18, 2015, 09:21:41 AM »
Friend is playing through HL2. Tells me this level is scarier than Dead Space, and I need to play it.
Play it. Cheezy as hell. Grigori is glitchy as hell. ok 582
Gaming / Re: You guys ready to cringe?« on: February 17, 2015, 11:41:50 PM »If there's any proof then bring it up to Amazon.There's a shit-ton of proof. Hell, all the proof there is is that it's not backed by Microsoft or 343i and is making money off of the brand name.I wonder when the time that gamers will be able to welcome new ideas without the act of being cynical in the first contact.FYI I don't need to though. Knowledge of this book has spread far in the lore community. Including to the original author of the fan-fic. Quote (Which is what someone did in the first place anyway, so no need to be an angry mob with pitchforks around the fire)I'm not angry about the book. I just think it's hilarious. Everyone else is angry because they think it's canon. (Which I have no idea how they thought that.) 583
Gaming / Re: You guys ready to cringe?« on: February 17, 2015, 11:36:55 PM »I wonder when the time that gamers will be able to welcome new ideas without the act of being cynical in the first contact.FYI This Josh Henderson guy stole the story from some guy who started writing it 9 years ago, and is now selling it illegally on Amazon without the authors permission, while breaking Microsoft's Terms of Use. The blurb I posted isn't even accurate of the story. There's no Spartans in it according to the author. 584
Gaming / You guys ready to cringe?« on: February 16, 2015, 06:13:35 PM »
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Halo-Heroes-Crassus-Josh-Henderson-ebook/dp/B00TG01306/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1424093920&sr=8-1&keywords=halo+heroes+of+crassus
Quote The Great War was a time of heroism. A time of sacrifice. A time of loss. One of it's most important conflicts was resolved on Crassus, a remote colony in the outer reaches of the galaxy. Oh, it also costs money. EDIT: Are you guys shitting me? You seriously thought it was a canon book? Shit, I know you guys hate contemporary Halo but at least be smart about it... 585
Gaming / Re: Sony Abandons The Last Guardian Trademark« on: February 16, 2015, 06:11:01 PM »
I considered it dead when it dropped off the grid.
586
The Flood / Re: God tier horror movies thread« on: February 16, 2015, 06:08:00 PM »
Alien and The Thing.
When sci-fi horror is pulled off correctly, it's phenomenal. 587
Gaming / Re: My Inquisitor Is better looking than yours.« on: February 12, 2015, 02:35:22 PM »
The true face of beauty.
588
Gaming / Re: Does anyone remember this beautiful and true full video.« on: February 12, 2015, 10:45:07 AM »
It's frightening that every year it gets more true and true.
589
Gaming / Re: Big Team Campaign confirmed for Halo: TMCC« on: February 11, 2015, 09:29:13 PM »Imagine how fast you could speedrun Halo with that many players. Everyone going to a different group of Marines.Ha! Could you imagine 16 players simaltaneously getting out of their cryopods?I want this playing with 15 other Johns 590
Gaming / Re: Big Team Campaign confirmed for Halo: TMCC« on: February 11, 2015, 02:53:03 PM »
Ha! Could you imagine 16 players simaltaneously getting out of their cryopods?
591
Gaming / Re: Found a bunch of old Halo 3 screenshots I had.« on: February 11, 2015, 02:51:03 PM »Still proud of this one. 592
Gaming / Re: Found a bunch of old Halo 3 screenshots I had.« on: February 11, 2015, 02:47:23 PM »Like your picture of Halo's inclement weather generators. 593
Gaming / Re: The Order 1886 gets its first Review... Sorta.« on: February 11, 2015, 02:44:46 PM »
I suspect it to be a fun ride, nothing more.
594
The Flood / Re: Which tragedy, recent or historical, affects you the most emotionally?« on: February 11, 2015, 02:43:45 PM »
Everyone I've known that's died. I feel my soul weighted down by them.
595
The Flood / Re: Post an OST that you're not getting tired of« on: February 09, 2015, 02:37:38 PM »YouTube I've been listening to it every day since classes started. 596
The Flood / Re: so i finally watched Interstellar« on: February 09, 2015, 09:06:18 AM »
Favorite movie right now. Gonna be hard to top.
597
Gaming / Re: OFFICIAL Changes Made to Halo 5 Based on the Beta« on: February 05, 2015, 04:41:46 PM »A real shame. So much friction between us could be easily avoidable. Of course, I'm not putting the blame on you, I am also guilty of doing that.Probably because I have a habit of sometimes sucking dick at wording things in a way that is understandable to other people.I'm not saying I'll erase it. What I mean is that if you have a problem with the generalization I made, I can specify the statement further.I don't really care, but out of principle I'd say don't erase things just because it was a mistake.A humane flaw I have. One that I know about and a occasionally "let happen". Which is why I have given you the option to request edit of that post if you find it unsatisfactory.You always get anal and finnicky about details and exact statements, so why are you surprised when it happens to you?Of course I am singled out for making an obvious exaggeration. One that the vast majority of people here on this site, and elsewhere have made about any game that has a very low population.For somebody not wanting to make stupid assumptions, you sure are contradicting yourself.Because no one plays Reach anymore.Wow. Some fanbase I chose to be a part of.Then why aren't you? 598
Gaming / Re: OFFICIAL Changes Made to Halo 5 Based on the Beta« on: February 05, 2015, 04:36:20 PM »I'm not saying I'll erase it. What I mean is that if you have a problem with the generalization I made, I can specify the statement further.I don't really care, but out of principle I'd say don't erase things just because it was a mistake.A humane flaw I have. One that I know about and a occasionally "let happen". Which is why I have given you the option to request edit of that post if you find it unsatisfactory.You always get anal and finnicky about details and exact statements, so why are you surprised when it happens to you?Of course I am singled out for making an obvious exaggeration. One that the vast majority of people here on this site, and elsewhere have made about any game that has a very low population.For somebody not wanting to make stupid assumptions, you sure are contradicting yourself.Because no one plays Reach anymore.Wow. Some fanbase I chose to be a part of.Then why aren't you? By the way, have you noticed that we seem to have difficulty parsing each other's sentences and meanings? 599
Gaming / Re: OFFICIAL Changes Made to Halo 5 Based on the Beta« on: February 05, 2015, 04:23:09 PM »A humane flaw I have. One that I know about and a occasionally "let happen". Which is why I have given you the option to request edit of that post if you find it unsatisfactory.You always get anal and finnicky about details and exact statements, so why are you surprised when it happens to you?Of course I am singled out for making an obvious exaggeration. One that the vast majority of people here on this site, and elsewhere have made about any game that has a very low population.For somebody not wanting to make stupid assumptions, you sure are contradicting yourself.Because no one plays Reach anymore.Wow. Some fanbase I chose to be a part of.Then why aren't you? I do that to reconcile the error I have made. So, do you want the post to be edited? 600
Gaming / Re: OFFICIAL Changes Made to Halo 5 Based on the Beta« on: February 05, 2015, 03:57:21 PM »I assume the post is passive aggressive.Well, good for you then.I'm not admitting anything.So, are you admitting that the poll results that 343i put up are skewed or BS based on every other bit of evidence there is?I never said Waypoint wasn't credible.If the Waypoint site isn't credible, then what makes 343i's poll any more credible? You asked if I was admitting something. I responded. Is this response unsatisfactory as well? |