1801
The Flood / Re: Does Halo and Star Trek exist withing themselves?
« on: December 02, 2016, 01:38:12 PM »swords and shotties in Blood Gulch?Casual.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 1801
The Flood / Re: Does Halo and Star Trek exist withing themselves?« on: December 02, 2016, 01:38:12 PM »swords and shotties in Blood Gulch?Casual. 1802
The Flood / Re: How did you find out Santa wasn't real?« on: December 02, 2016, 01:34:39 PM »
Was a gradual deduction. As I got older the story started to make no real sense and finally my parents asked me if I believed in him and I was like naaaah. Then they confirmed and told me not to tell my sister.
1803
The Flood / Re: Can someone prove to me that cancer is real?« on: December 01, 2016, 06:55:42 PM »How a point is perceived doesn't always align with what is trying to be conveyed. It's wise to understand that and not make assumptions.Yeah, when what they say contradicts itself and doesn't add up.Don't you think it's arrogant to assume you understand someone better than they understand themselves? Especially someone you've hardly interacted with at all? I thought you valued humility."the truth is still the truth and that's all that matters to me." ironicYou're reading into this far too much. It's just an expression that's been going around lately as a response to censorship and close mindedness. I haven't dug myself into any hole, although it appears that you're attempting to dig one for me.Okay, that's a pretty stupid definition. I think you actually meant something else when you said facts>feelings, and feelings don't only apply to "being offended", there's plenty of people who "feel in their heart that god exists" or "feel a presence of a ghost" or whatever. That's what you mean, and you can't just become a contortionist of meaning to try to escape the hole you dug yourself into here.I'm not talking about faith at all. I'm talking about emotions.Okay, then it's still hypocritical. If you believe in things which can't be supported by evidence then that's listening to your feelings over facts.I'm not atheist but I don't follow any Abrahamic religions nor am I a very religious person in general.Sure, you can believe whatever you want. Regardless,Okay, you better not be religious, because if you were then this would be hugely hypocritical. Which wouldn't be surprising, because you wouldn't be the first religious person to say something hypocritical of an atheist. 1804
The Flood / Re: Can someone prove to me that cancer is real?« on: December 01, 2016, 06:33:20 PM »Don't you think it's arrogant to assume you understand someone better than they understand themselves? Especially someone you've hardly interacted with at all? I thought you valued humility."the truth is still the truth and that's all that matters to me." ironicYou're reading into this far too much. It's just an expression that's been going around lately as a response to censorship and close mindedness. I haven't dug myself into any hole, although it appears that you're attempting to dig one for me.Okay, that's a pretty stupid definition. I think you actually meant something else when you said facts>feelings, and feelings don't only apply to "being offended", there's plenty of people who "feel in their heart that god exists" or "feel a presence of a ghost" or whatever. That's what you mean, and you can't just become a contortionist of meaning to try to escape the hole you dug yourself into here.I'm not talking about faith at all. I'm talking about emotions.Okay, then it's still hypocritical. If you believe in things which can't be supported by evidence then that's listening to your feelings over facts.I'm not atheist but I don't follow any Abrahamic religions nor am I a very religious person in general.Sure, you can believe whatever you want. Regardless,Okay, you better not be religious, because if you were then this would be hugely hypocritical. Which wouldn't be surprising, because you wouldn't be the first religious person to say something hypocritical of an atheist. 1805
The Flood / Re: Can someone prove to me that cancer is real?« on: December 01, 2016, 06:29:55 PM »You're reading into this far too much. It's just an expression that's been going around lately as a response to censorship and close mindedness. I haven't dug myself into any hole, although it appears that you're attempting to dig one for me.Okay, that's a pretty stupid definition. I think you actually meant something else when you said facts>feelings, and feelings don't only apply to "being offended", there's plenty of people who "feel in their heart that god exists" or "feel a presence of a ghost" or whatever. That's what you mean, and you can't just become a contortionist of meaning to try to escape the hole you dug yourself into here.I'm not talking about faith at all. I'm talking about emotions.Okay, then it's still hypocritical. If you believe in things which can't be supported by evidence then that's listening to your feelings over facts.I'm not atheist but I don't follow any Abrahamic religions nor am I a very religious person in general.Sure, you can believe whatever you want. Regardless,Okay, you better not be religious, because if you were then this would be hugely hypocritical. Which wouldn't be surprising, because you wouldn't be the first religious person to say something hypocritical of an atheist. I know exactly what I meant when I said that, and it was exactly as I explained. You can believe otherwise but the truth is still the truth and that's all that matters to me. 1806
The Flood / Re: Can someone prove to me that cancer is real?« on: December 01, 2016, 06:03:29 PM »I'm not talking about faith at all. I'm talking about emotions.Okay, then it's still hypocritical. If you believe in things which can't be supported by evidence then that's listening to your feelings over facts.I'm not atheist but I don't follow any Abrahamic religions nor am I a very religious person in general.Sure, you can believe whatever you want. Regardless,Okay, you better not be religious, because if you were then this would be hugely hypocritical. Which wouldn't be surprising, because you wouldn't be the first religious person to say something hypocritical of an atheist. As in, someone being offended isn't grounds to ignore truth. 1807
The Flood / Re: Can someone prove to me that cancer is real?« on: December 01, 2016, 05:40:25 PM »I'm not atheist but I don't follow any Abrahamic religions nor am I a very religious person in general.Sure, you can believe whatever you want. Regardless,Okay, you better not be religious, because if you were then this would be hugely hypocritical. Which wouldn't be surprising, because you wouldn't be the first religious person to say something hypocritical of an atheist. 1808
The Flood / Re: Can someone prove to me that cancer is real?« on: December 01, 2016, 04:55:06 PM »
Sure, you can believe whatever you want. Regardless,
Facts>feelings. 1809
The Flood / Re: An atheist has more wonder for the world than any religious person« on: December 01, 2016, 04:30:02 PM »You don't have to "buy" anything. No one cares.You shouldn't speak for everyone, nor is it any concern of mine anyways. Analyzing people is just interesting to me. 1810
The Flood / Re: An atheist has more wonder for the world than any religious person« on: December 01, 2016, 04:03:10 PM »I don't. I thought I made that clear.Sorry, I don't buy it. Someone who truly doesn't care wouldn't be so purposely condescending, and come up with labels for people with dissenting points of view like "edgy kids." The fact that you entered into this conversation alludes to you having some degree of concern over loaf's topic, but your complete refusal to be empathetic to other viewpoints and your condescending nature alludes to your concern not being out of curiosity and a desire to learn other beliefs. So basically it looks like you just disagree with certain people, and their beliefs matter to you enough that you feel the need to berate them. This is a perfectly valid stance to have, honestly, you have a right to free speech. Just own up to it. Someone like verbatim takes this stance all the time, and he acknowledges it, but what really separates him from what you're doing is that he actually explains his perspective and makes an attempt to defend his beliefs, which adds to the discussion. You're just coming in here like,"no you're just an edgy kid, I don't have to explain why, you'll see one day. . ." Essentially adding nothing to the discussion. 1811
The Flood / Re: An atheist has more wonder for the world than any religious person« on: December 01, 2016, 03:09:59 PM »I don't know man, why do you care if some dude has different beliefs than you on a dead forum?See this is why you're so easily dismissed.If you're so confident in your beliefs that atheists don't matter because they'll "change their tone" eventually, then why do you feel the need to say all of this? If you're not even remotely open to the possibility of new ideas but refuse to explain and defend your own from others, then what is the point in participating in this conversation at all?Hmm, so you have nothing to say.God exists and you will realize that when you grow up and you're not an edgy little kid.Can you explain this to me in anything other than cliches and platitudes? 1812
The Flood / Re: An atheist has more wonder for the world than any religious person« on: December 01, 2016, 02:40:09 PM »See this is why you're so easily dismissed.If you're so confident in your beliefs that atheists don't matter because they'll "change their tone" eventually, then why do you feel the need to say all of this? If you're not even remotely open to the possibility of new ideas but refuse to explain and defend your own from others, then what is the point in participating in this conversation at all?Hmm, so you have nothing to say.God exists and you will realize that when you grow up and you're not an edgy little kid.Can you explain this to me in anything other than cliches and platitudes? 1813
The Flood / Re: An atheist has more wonder for the world than any religious person« on: December 01, 2016, 02:02:48 PM »If you're so confident in your beliefs that atheists don't matter because they'll "change their tone" eventually, then why do you feel the need to say all of this? If you're not even remotely open to the possibility of new ideas but refuse to explain and defend your own from others, then what is the point in participating in this conversation at all?Hmm, so you have nothing to say.God exists and you will realize that when you grow up and you're not an edgy little kid.Can you explain this to me in anything other than cliches and platitudes? You have nothing of value to contribute to the conversation and you're just wasting people's time. 1814
The Flood / Re: An atheist has more wonder for the world than any religious person« on: December 01, 2016, 01:57:54 PM »
Love science. Just think that a lot of science oriented people (not necessarily just scientists themselves) have begun to feel like they have all the answers. Seems rather arrogant.
Embrace the unknown and our lack of understanding, that's how we keep progressing. Humility is a good thing. 1815
The Flood / Re: The Flood Megathread« on: November 30, 2016, 04:41:59 PM »
10000 pages or bust
1816
The Flood / Re: Cheat explain this« on: November 29, 2016, 04:01:34 PM »That doesn't have anything to do with emulating the design.its just a poor shitty emulation.It's an emulation but it's not shitty nig. We're not trying to emulate the community. 1817
The Flood / Re: Cheat explain this« on: November 29, 2016, 03:56:09 PM »its just a poor shitty emulation.It's an emulation but it's not shitty nig. 1818
The Flood / Re: Cheat explain this« on: November 29, 2016, 03:47:33 PM »
It's not like parody threads haven't been done on every off-topic board ever. .
1819
The Flood / Re: If you threw a piano down a flight of stairs...« on: November 29, 2016, 01:41:28 PM »I'm not specifying what kind of man. I'm saying man as in all of humanity.Music is defined by man thus he is the most efficient in creating the apex of its quality. 1820
The Flood / Re: If you threw a piano down a flight of stairs...« on: November 29, 2016, 12:58:43 PM »
Music is defined by man thus he is the most efficient in creating the apex of its quality.
1821
The Flood / Re: My girl is literally more mentally unstable than me and I'm spiraling downwards« on: November 29, 2016, 12:36:54 PM »
Why is deci making an ass of himself again? Hasn't he learned anything?
1822
The Flood / Re: What do you think about this?« on: November 28, 2016, 05:27:44 PM »
It makes sense to me. You don't have to be a good person to be influential.
1823
The Flood / Re: hello sep7 ama« on: November 28, 2016, 03:23:54 PM »
Why do peeps always make ama threads when they're drunk?
1824
The Flood / Re: Fucking Black Friday« on: November 28, 2016, 02:54:14 PM »
My nephew makes pickle juice popsicles.
1825
The Flood / Re: Discord server has been moved here« on: November 27, 2016, 01:07:36 PM »why the FUCK did this rumor about me doing this even fucking startProbably because peeps don't care about being right so much as they do about provoking a response. 1826
The Flood / Re: Discord server has been moved here« on: November 27, 2016, 01:45:32 AM »
I guess I got kicked but I was never on there anyways.
1827
The Flood / Re: Degenerate Thanksgiving« on: November 26, 2016, 04:02:04 PM »Why does shit from insignificant kids on a backwater forum offend you? Don't pull a deci now.Boo hoo you seriously have nothing better to do than insult a girl online. I bet you've never even seen a vagina. Virgin waste of fucking space.Holy fuck mixed emotions about this thread in general. Had a feeling someone would call me fat (thanks fat uncle Das), and expecting degenerate comments, but never did I think someone would say I look like a dude. Go fuck yourself Atticus. You're a low life piece of shit. I hope you choke on a cock while getting a rod rammed up your ass.At your service. 1828
The Flood / Re: Dietrichsix« on: November 24, 2016, 01:27:57 PM »Surprised mouth? Not sexy lip bite?Quick sketch. Pretty happy with this one I think. 1830
The Flood / Re: cultural appropriation« on: November 23, 2016, 07:32:07 PM »
When there's a lack of significant real oppression, something else must be made up to fill the void for these people.
|