Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Verbatim

Pages: 1 ... 135113521353 13541355 ... 1601
40561
The Flood / Re: HOLY FUCKING SHIT FINALLY
« on: April 08, 2015, 09:00:40 PM »
apparently the point is to deter misbehavior or something--which is stupid, because you should probably just behave because it's the right thing to do, and not because of this... looming threat of losing some arbitrary, meaningless title

and you don't even lose your title if you get warned/banned here, so
it's pretty valueless

40562
The Flood / Re: HOLY FUCKING SHIT FINALLY
« on: April 08, 2015, 08:50:25 PM »
What are these ranks and what do they do?
nothing, and nothing

technically, Legendary allows you to get a custom titlebar, but who cares

at least on b.old, it seemed like they took a little bit of effort to get
(i've never had so much as Honorable on b.old)

40563
The Flood / Re: Adam Levine gets "attacked" on stage
« on: April 08, 2015, 08:38:53 PM »
he wasn't attacked

TMZ clickbait

40564
Is there any evidence to suggest the effect can't be nullified technologically?
You'd have to nullify it neorologically. It's an inherent part of our psychology, so... Good luck with that.

Anyway, funnily enough, I think this is the first time I've ever seen Meta talk about a video game before. Feels odd.

40565
i live in a community of generally grateful people

40566
I'm actually trying to be a gentlemen here
A supreme one?
challengerX grabbin that low hanging fruit
Verbatim hangin on my nuts
strong homophobia bro
There's nothing homophobic about that insult. It just means you're obsessed with me/you follow me around.
strong paranoid delusions bro
>randomly enters a thread to talk about me
>calls me paranoid

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
i guess i have an obsession with literally everyone then

40567
I'm actually trying to be a gentlemen here
A supreme one?
challengerX grabbin that low hanging fruit
Verbatim hangin on my nuts
strong homophobia bro
There's nothing homophobic about that insult. It just means you're obsessed with me/you follow me around.
strong paranoid delusions bro

40568
I'm actually trying to be a gentlemen here
A supreme one?
challengerX grabbin that low hanging fruit
Verbatim hangin on my nuts
strong homophobia bro

40569
first premise no
second premise yes

40570
I'm actually trying to be a gentlemen here
A supreme one?
challengerX grabbin that low hanging fruit

40571
Serious / Re: Sexism and dress codes
« on: April 08, 2015, 01:39:45 PM »
oh my god who gives a fuck what you wear

my school was very lenient about this kind of shit, so girls wearing yoga pants is considered normal

so from my perspective, this is one of those who-cares types of issues
you just look really really uptight if you honestly want to maintain dress codes in 2015--you're not wrong, but like... lighten up?

it's not a big deal

40572
i mean i'm not even necessarily a fanboy of anything

but when i find something that i actually like, it only makes sense that i'd defend it obsequiously

40573
Gaming / Re: Not enjoying Majora's Mask as much as I thought I would.
« on: April 08, 2015, 09:56:42 AM »
I feel you, I do dislike most Zelda games outside of the original Legend of Zelda. It's one of those either love or hate franchises.
never quite heard it described like that

40574
Gaming / Re: Halo CE PC mod SPV3
« on: April 08, 2015, 08:38:38 AM »
Mods are bad.

40575
because it irritates me knowing that i live in a universe where people are objectively incorrect more often than not

40576
Gaming / Re: Is Bloodborne worth buying a PS4?
« on: April 07, 2015, 10:00:33 PM »
I really just wanted you guys to validate my own opinion so I'd feel better about buying a console for a single game. You've done terribly.
you fucking idiot...

40577
Gaming / Re: Deus Ex Mankind Divided
« on: April 07, 2015, 07:12:18 PM »
i always thought this series looked so dumb

40578
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 06:44:16 PM »
generally speaking, it's only rational to care about whether other people are getting fucked over
you don't have to weep for every single person who does--i certainly don't

but when asked about the notion of never having the option to fuck another person over?
your first answer should be "YES. LET'S NOT FUCK PEOPLE OVER."

it's a conversation that extends far beyond just this stupid video game, and that's why i'm so passionate about it
the game thinks it's okay to fuck people over, and I say, "No, it isn't. Fuck you."

and if YOU think it's okay, then fuck you too

40579
Gaming / Re: 2nd Sep7agon Pokemon Tournament
« on: April 07, 2015, 06:42:05 PM »
looks good to me

40580
Gaming / Re: 2nd Sep7agon Pokemon Tournament
« on: April 07, 2015, 06:39:31 PM »
ummm, count me in i guess

40581
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 06:37:22 PM »
Explaining why you like consensual pvps is just off the fucking subject. Justify nonconsensual pvps.
You can't.
the answer is probably "i'm apathetic"

you know, that's just really convenient

because if you admitted that it was a bad thing, you'd have to start disliking the game more
and that would be a bummer, so you don't admit it

that's honestly what i think the "apathy" thing is
there's so many intelligent, sensible things to be apathetic about, and you pick the #1 thing you shouldn't be apathetic about

40582
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 06:33:03 PM »
Good for you. That's the only intelligent way to play.

Me, I just can't get over the fact that they allow such a feature to exist at all.

40583
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 06:28:52 PM »
I'm not saying there should be no penalty for losing a pvp, either. It wouldn't make sense if you didn't. All I'm saying is that surprise, nonconsensual pvps are batshit fucking insane. It's the cuntiest game feature ever. Pvp is okay if both players consent, but not all invasions are consensual. That's the fucking issue that I have, and that's what NOBODY can possibly fucking defend.

Explaining why you like consensual pvps is just off the fucking subject. Justify nonconsensual pvps.
You can't.

40584
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 06:21:49 PM »
You have a bloodstained that you walk up to an click X on to retrieve your souls. Literally the only thing that drops when you die.
Yeah that

you don't lose your stuff, just the money you could easily farm again
That's still too much. You shouldn't lose anything. Invasions shouldn't be a thing. You guys are wrong.

At least Luciana's honest--Aria didn't say anything about losing money (unless souls ARE your money). And no, I don't care that you can just farm it back again.

40585
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 06:14:44 PM »
And I think you misunderstand something

The invader doesn't take your souls

They get dropped on the ground for you to pick back up
see, right here

so... which one is it

40586
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 06:13:04 PM »
Well there is a reason. It's a risk reward to push ahead and lose the souls (money) you've collected, or turn back and go to a bonfire/merchant to buy or level up things. Otherwise you could simply farm all day without risk.

Though there is a ring that you can equip to if you die you don't lose anything.
i was told just a page ago that you literally just pick back up all your stuff
because it spawns all around you

doesn't seem that risky to me

so if that's wrong, okay, yeah, that just makes me hate invasions even MORE
BECAUSE YOU'RE FORCED TO RECOLLECT ALL YOUR STUFF

40587
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 06:10:20 PM »
I like people invading because I know they have the intention of trying to screw me over, then I shove it back in their face.
unless you don't

and besides, two wrongs don't make a right
the correct decision is not wanting to get invaded at all

that way, you'll never have to worry about it

you can still have your shitty fucking pvp, but have it all be consensual
and i mean ACTUALLY consensual

40588
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 06:08:46 PM »
can invade people and steal their shit
I'm not gonna argue with you since I know and understand why you dislike the game (SHOCKING WE CAN ALL HAVE DIFFERENT OPINIONS), but you can't steal stuff from other people when you invade.
yes, we established that earlier

instead, the dumbass game has you pick back up all your stuff
for... NO reason

sounds stupid as fuck

and the invader still gets rewarded if they beat you
the only thing an invader should get is AIDS

40589
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 06:00:03 PM »
You know how much stupid shit people do for the sake of "fun"?
Don't act like that's a legitimate reason to do anything. People kill for fun. People steal for fun.

It's not a reason to do anything.

40590
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 05:48:55 PM »
if people were just honest with themselves and said, "i don't know why i like it" or "i'm incapable of explaining why," then that would be just fine

because otherwise, you end up with explanations that don't clear all the bases and don't make one iota of sense
and just make me ask even more questions because of how nonsensical it is

For anyone confused, the issue is now about how your own opinion justifies anything. I'm saying it doesn't. I'm saying, if you're capable of saying, "yes, I like being fucked over," that's just a little bit insane. And I know Aria's not insane. So it's frustrating for me when I ask for a good reason why she likes invasions, and I get a shitty one. "Because they're fun" is what her opinion boiled down to, and that's exactly what I said I wasn't looking for.

"Because they're fun" is a SHITTY reason to like anything.

Pages: 1 ... 135113521353 13541355 ... 1601