40561
Gaming / Re: Legitimate Constructive Thread: Why do we even have fanboys?
« on: April 08, 2015, 05:56:50 AM »
because it irritates me knowing that i live in a universe where people are objectively incorrect more often than not
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 40561
Gaming / Re: Legitimate Constructive Thread: Why do we even have fanboys?« on: April 08, 2015, 05:56:50 AM »
because it irritates me knowing that i live in a universe where people are objectively incorrect more often than not
40562
Gaming / Re: Is Bloodborne worth buying a PS4?« on: April 07, 2015, 10:00:33 PM »I really just wanted you guys to validate my own opinion so I'd feel better about buying a console for a single game. You've done terribly.you fucking idiot... 40563
Gaming / Re: Deus Ex Mankind Divided« on: April 07, 2015, 07:12:18 PM »
i always thought this series looked so dumb
40564
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 06:44:16 PM »
generally speaking, it's only rational to care about whether other people are getting fucked over
you don't have to weep for every single person who does--i certainly don't but when asked about the notion of never having the option to fuck another person over? your first answer should be "YES. LET'S NOT FUCK PEOPLE OVER." it's a conversation that extends far beyond just this stupid video game, and that's why i'm so passionate about it the game thinks it's okay to fuck people over, and I say, "No, it isn't. Fuck you." and if YOU think it's okay, then fuck you too 40565
Gaming / Re: 2nd Sep7agon Pokemon Tournament« on: April 07, 2015, 06:42:05 PM »
looks good to me
40566
Gaming / Re: 2nd Sep7agon Pokemon Tournament« on: April 07, 2015, 06:39:31 PM »
ummm, count me in i guess
40567
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 06:37:22 PM »Explaining why you like consensual pvps is just off the fucking subject. Justify nonconsensual pvps.the answer is probably "i'm apathetic" you know, that's just really convenient because if you admitted that it was a bad thing, you'd have to start disliking the game more and that would be a bummer, so you don't admit it that's honestly what i think the "apathy" thing is there's so many intelligent, sensible things to be apathetic about, and you pick the #1 thing you shouldn't be apathetic about 40568
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 06:33:03 PM »
Good for you. That's the only intelligent way to play.
Me, I just can't get over the fact that they allow such a feature to exist at all. 40569
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 06:28:52 PM »
I'm not saying there should be no penalty for losing a pvp, either. It wouldn't make sense if you didn't. All I'm saying is that surprise, nonconsensual pvps are batshit fucking insane. It's the cuntiest game feature ever. Pvp is okay if both players consent, but not all invasions are consensual. That's the fucking issue that I have, and that's what NOBODY can possibly fucking defend.
Explaining why you like consensual pvps is just off the fucking subject. Justify nonconsensual pvps. You can't. 40570
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 06:21:49 PM »You have a bloodstained that you walk up to an click X on to retrieve your souls. Literally the only thing that drops when you die. Yeah thatThat's still too much. You shouldn't lose anything. Invasions shouldn't be a thing. You guys are wrong. At least Luciana's honest--Aria didn't say anything about losing money (unless souls ARE your money). And no, I don't care that you can just farm it back again. 40571
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 06:14:44 PM »And I think you misunderstand somethingsee, right here so... which one is it 40572
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 06:13:04 PM »Well there is a reason. It's a risk reward to push ahead and lose the souls (money) you've collected, or turn back and go to a bonfire/merchant to buy or level up things. Otherwise you could simply farm all day without risk.i was told just a page ago that you literally just pick back up all your stuff because it spawns all around you doesn't seem that risky to me so if that's wrong, okay, yeah, that just makes me hate invasions even MORE BECAUSE YOU'RE FORCED TO RECOLLECT ALL YOUR STUFF 40573
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 06:10:20 PM »I like people invading because I know they have the intention of trying to screw me over, then I shove it back in their face.unless you don't and besides, two wrongs don't make a right the correct decision is not wanting to get invaded at all that way, you'll never have to worry about it you can still have your shitty fucking pvp, but have it all be consensual and i mean ACTUALLY consensual 40574
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 06:08:46 PM »yes, we established that earliercan invade people and steal their shitI'm not gonna argue with you since I know and understand why you dislike the game (SHOCKING WE CAN ALL HAVE DIFFERENT OPINIONS), but you can't steal stuff from other people when you invade. instead, the dumbass game has you pick back up all your stuff for... NO reason sounds stupid as fuck and the invader still gets rewarded if they beat you the only thing an invader should get is AIDS 40575
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 06:00:03 PM »
You know how much stupid shit people do for the sake of "fun"?
Don't act like that's a legitimate reason to do anything. People kill for fun. People steal for fun. It's not a reason to do anything. 40576
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 05:48:55 PM »
if people were just honest with themselves and said, "i don't know why i like it" or "i'm incapable of explaining why," then that would be just fine
because otherwise, you end up with explanations that don't clear all the bases and don't make one iota of sense and just make me ask even more questions because of how nonsensical it is For anyone confused, the issue is now about how your own opinion justifies anything. I'm saying it doesn't. I'm saying, if you're capable of saying, "yes, I like being fucked over," that's just a little bit insane. And I know Aria's not insane. So it's frustrating for me when I ask for a good reason why she likes invasions, and I get a shitty one. "Because they're fun" is what her opinion boiled down to, and that's exactly what I said I wasn't looking for. "Because they're fun" is a SHITTY reason to like anything. 40577
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 05:44:05 PM »Okay, you know what? This is honestly frustrating me Verb. I've given my explanation, whether you like it or not is up to you. I'm done talking about this.it's really not up to me in the sense that i operate on... logic? i don't get to decide how logic works it's not up to me to decide if your explanation works logically it just doesn't work logically invasions are bad period--i used to be open to the possibility of that notion being wrong, but now i'm dead certain that it isn't i'm sorry it frustrates you, but really, the bottom line is liking invasions is wrong 40578
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 05:41:31 PM »Its essentially drop in-drop out PVP. You don't even have to stop playing to search, it just throws the person in your game when he connects. Plus, if I haven't cleared an area, I have to be mindful of the AI as well. So I get a two front battle, which is even more fun.you're still not getting to the consent issue not everyone is willing to consent to getting fucked over especially me why isn't there a "FUCK YOU, CUNT" button that would really liven the experience for me better yet, implement a way to give the invader cancer or some shit yeah, that would be great does it have that feature 40579
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 05:37:31 PM »They get x amount of souls for winning, or humanity, or whatever kind of item it is for the covenant they're in.well, they shouldn't you shouldn't get ANYTHING for fucking a player over and i was more asking why your shit is just... on the floor, ready to be picked up again what's the point sounds like shit design to me 40580
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 05:36:13 PM »You asked why I like it, and I told you.well, sorry, i don't think that's a good enough reason the game clearly has ways of "making you feel smart"--it doesn't need invasions to do that and if it does, then... bad game 40581
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 05:34:16 PM »And I think you misunderstand something... HUH? what the fuck is the point of that, then? 40582
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 05:33:33 PM »No, I wasn't. I was surprised, I admit, but I wasn't pissed. It was adrenaline pumping because every fight I had before that was against AI that could be beaten by just doing slash > back step > slash. For the first time in the game (at the time), I was fighting something that actually made me play smart.well, i'll just say it outright, then--you were wrong for not being pissed off but that's not really the point anyway just because YOU are okay with being invaded doesn't mean other people are that doesn't make it a good feature that needs to stay in the game 40583
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 05:29:18 PM »And you're assuming it pisses me off- it doesn't.you didn't get pissed off the first time you were ever invaded, nonconsensually, and lost your shit you weren't pissed off at that see, this is the problem 40584
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 05:25:57 PM »
that's like being stolen from, catching the thief, and then being like... "hey, i know you stole my shit, and that really pissed me off, but in hindsight, chasing you around was kind of fun--we should do this again sometime"
pbbtbtbhtthtbtbhh 40585
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 05:23:34 PM »And make no mistake, I'm not trying to get you to like it.i'm not under that delusion--right now, i'm just trying to get you to explain why you don't mind it because i still don't understand you're calling red "blue", and it's just... ughghghgh Verb, please reread that first sentence. I like to be invaded . Meaning I'm consenting to invasion, and the invader is consenting to invade. I WANT to be invaded, otherwise I wouldn't hang around in major PVP zones and waiting for someone to take the bait.well, not everybody consents to it and you have a very loose definition of "consent" there if it's like in street fighter where you can create a lobby and have people join, then yeah, okay if it's not, that's not really consent--that's just you sort of accepting the fact that you're playing a game that doesn't have that which is consent, sure, but that's... asinine 40586
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 05:18:11 PM »I enjoy PVP, so it goes without saying that I like being invaded?no... it doesn't pvp is fucking GREAT... ...if it's consensual i play street fighter--the game is purely pvp that's the point of the game but you can't "invade" people in that game so no, obviously, invading 1. is not a necessary part of a pvp experience 2. does NOT go without saying why anyone would enjoy it it's like saying, "i like getting raped--it goes without saying, i just like getting raped. no explanation needed" "i like being stolen from--it goes without saying why i would" ? ? ? ? ? Quote 2) I never pay attention to messages unless it's pertinent like "ambush ahead"; if it's a lie I was cautious but still alive, if it's true I'm cautious but still alive. So really I'm not for or against it, it's just... there.i don't see anything to be neutral about, but whatever 40587
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 04:48:06 PM »
if you don't have a good reason to do something, you shouldn't do it
"because i enjoy it" is not a good reason 40588
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 04:45:45 PM »Holy shit that's dumbif you fail to demonstrate how or why i'm wrong then from what fucking sorcery should i contrive that i'm wrong "hating popular things is bad" "expressing unpopular opinions is bad" "challenging the popular opinion is bad" that's all you're saying 40589
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 04:44:07 PM »
no one has given me any reasons as to why they approve of it/don't disapprove of it
all anyone ever tries to do is tell me why i should think a different way which would be fine, if it didn't make you look like you have no ground to stand on 40590
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 04:40:56 PM »People shouldn't enjoy things I don't approve ofcorrect unless they can explain to me, through logic, why i should either 1. approve of it 2. not disapprove of it literally everyone on earth thinks like this i'm just more vocal about it |