12181
Serious / Re: Trump throws cold water on putting his assets in a blind trust
« on: November 24, 2016, 12:13:18 PM »His kids can run it in a blind trusthow is that a blind trust
fuck
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 12181
Serious / Re: Trump throws cold water on putting his assets in a blind trust« on: November 24, 2016, 12:13:18 PM »His kids can run it in a blind trusthow is that a blind trust fuck 12182
The Flood / Re: cultural appropriation« on: November 24, 2016, 11:27:07 AM »I would think most people would be delighted to see others emulate their culture.Then you're adorably naive. Some people may be delighted, but most would (and should) view it as an outright mockery. It's no different than Steve Buscemi walking up to a group of teenagers with a do-rag and a skateboard saying, "How do you do, fellow kids?" When someone who is not part of your culture tries to emulate said culture, they're just embarrassing themselves. You have to be at least partially ingrained within the culture to not come off as either a clown or someone who is trying to be offensive. 12183
The Flood / Re: Where's wyldfyre?« on: November 23, 2016, 09:49:41 PM »It creates lexical ambiguities that would look puerile and unprofessional under a formal setting. If you were reading an article about someone in the newspaper who insisted on being referred to as a "they," the average reader is going to assume that the story is referring to more than one person. It just creates unnecessary confusion.I use it all the time as a singular pronoun and I understand it's not "correct." I just don't care. It should be able to be used this way.bruh, singular they has been a thing since the 14th centuryOnly because of lazy, ungrammatical idiots. It's still considered informal and improper, and for good reason. 12184
The Flood / Re: Where's wyldfyre?« on: November 23, 2016, 08:48:13 PM »bruh, singular they has been a thing since the 14th centuryOnly because of lazy, ungrammatical idiots. It's still considered informal and improper, and for good reason. 12185
The Flood / Re: Where's wyldfyre?« on: November 23, 2016, 08:45:46 PM »If the English language had a singular gender-neutral pronoun, I would use that. But we don't, and you can't just make one up--it doesn't work like that. So, we have to settle with either "he" or "she." That's it. So pick one and be comfortable with it, because expecting people to bend over backwards for all your little idiosyncrasies is not only entitled as fuck, but also insufferable and childish. I'm not your caretaker--I don't have to give a shit about your personal comfort, and you don't have to give a shit about mine. The bottom line is that no one should care, and anyone who does is rather feeble-minded in my opinion.ok verb, social justice and english-language aficionado, how should one refer to a non-binary person?why? it's polite at best, a minor inconvenience at worst. words are just sounds anyways.grammar > your feelings, sorry not sorry Alternatively, you could just not associate yourself with such entitled little snowflakes. You won't find a bigger supporter of the trans community on this forum than me, but I draw the line at non-binary nonsense. 12186
The Flood / Re: Where's wyldfyre?« on: November 23, 2016, 08:22:48 PM »why? it's polite at best, a minor inconvenience at worst. words are just sounds anyways.grammar > your feelings, sorry not sorry if words are just sounds, then it really shouldn't make a difference how i choose to refer to you anyway and yeah, whether you're talking about ONE person or MULTIPLE people is actually a pretty fucking important distinction 12187
The Flood / Re: Where's wyldfyre?« on: November 23, 2016, 08:18:58 PM »idk his pronounsevidently, he goes by "they," "their," etc. not that you should have to break the rules of grammar just to make someone feel comfortable 12189
Gaming / Re: Pokemon Thread (Massive Spoilers Page 49 and Beyond!)« on: November 23, 2016, 05:27:37 PM »
Just made it to the fourth island. This game is so dope.
Team: Decidueye, Toucannon, Butterfree, Magneton, Lycanroc, Salazzle. Currently training a Fomantis, Charjabug, Cubone, and Wimpod--they're not ready for the team yet. I used a Slowpoke briefly, and I just retired my Ledian. I caught a shiny Raticate today. 12190
The Flood / Re: ITT I demonstrate why Utilitarianism is shit in less than 5 seconds« on: November 23, 2016, 02:58:14 PM »it's shit because it allows evil to be committed for "the greater good"thank you for demonstrating your complete lack of understanding of utilitarianism 12191
The Flood / Re: Dietrichsix« on: November 23, 2016, 11:48:07 AM »Where's my prize Charles?It was only for the first three, but thank you for your interest. 12192
The Flood / Re: ITT I demonstrate why Utilitarianism is shit in less than 5 seconds« on: November 23, 2016, 11:44:31 AM »Well, my "magical utopian brand of utilitarianism" is everyone fucking dies. So yeah, of course it hasn't been tried."My magical utopian brand of Utilitarianism has never been tried"But it's not the utilitarian option. It doesn't describe a utilitarian society, because it doesn't represent the true cause behind utilitarianism. It's a society where people say, "Well, this is good enough." That's not utilitarian--that's Bentham's shitty outdated brand of utilitarianism that's been ousted for centuries.And in the scenario I described, the most utilitarian option is to allow that society to continue.utilitarianism is when the net happiness outweighs the net sufferingThe ideal being that suffering should be quashed entirely--and if this ideal is not met, it's not utilitarian. You just have a compromise--the "most" utilitarian option, but not the utilitarian option. It's not that extinction is in itself utilitarian--it's simply the only way to fully realize the utilitarian model, because existence in itself begets disutility in some form. There's nothing else. 12193
The Flood / Re: Halp! What do?« on: November 23, 2016, 10:36:12 AM »
The image may not have been photoshopped, but Trump's belief system is.
12194
The Flood / Re: "Useless as nipples on a breastplate."« on: November 23, 2016, 04:31:18 AM »
haahaha, SHOTS FIRED!!! xDDD
12195
The Flood / Re: ITT I demonstrate why Utilitarianism is shit in less than 5 seconds« on: November 23, 2016, 12:56:52 AM »But it's not the utilitarian option. It doesn't describe a utilitarian society, because it doesn't represent the true cause behind utilitarianism. It's a society where people say, "Well, this is good enough." That's not utilitarian--that's Bentham's shitty outdated brand of utilitarianism that's been ousted for centuries.And in the scenario I described, the most utilitarian option is to allow that society to continue.utilitarianism is when the net happiness outweighs the net sufferingThe ideal being that suffering should be quashed entirely--and if this ideal is not met, it's not utilitarian. You just have a compromise--the "most" utilitarian option, but not the utilitarian option. God, English philosophers are such shit. 12196
Gaming / Re: Convince me to like bloodborne ITT« on: November 23, 2016, 12:40:33 AM »I will link you this video by Digibro, who I always like.why am i not surprised Spoiler he's all right 12197
The Flood / Re: ITT I demonstrate why Utilitarianism is shit in less than 5 seconds« on: November 23, 2016, 12:39:29 AM »utilitarianism is when the net happiness outweighs the net sufferingThe ideal being that suffering should be quashed entirely--and if this ideal is not met, it's not utilitarian. You just have a compromise--the "most" utilitarian option, but not the utilitarian option. 12198
The Flood / Re: ITT I demonstrate why Utilitarianism is shit in less than 5 seconds« on: November 23, 2016, 12:20:46 AM »utilitarianism is the pursuit of utopia (a perfect society where no one suffers in any way) in the most cost-efficient manner possibleexpect that would totally be in line with utilitarian idealsif you let one person be eternally tortured to allow 5,000,000,000 people to live forever in constant bliss and ecstasy, utilitarianism would encourage that.itt: no one understands what utilitarianism is if one person is suffering, you don't have a utopia, and you don't have utlitarianism 12199
The Flood / Re: ITT I demonstrate why Utilitarianism is shit in less than 5 seconds« on: November 22, 2016, 11:51:09 PM »if you let one person be eternally tortured to allow 5,000,000,000 people to live forever in constant bliss and ecstasy, utilitarianism would encourage that.itt: no one understands what utilitarianism is 12200
I don't think that's what he meant. Maybe this only applies to the Internet, but you've said before that you've essentially rid yourself of all hate towards other people, right? Because life is short and it takes too much energy--energy that could be spent doing more positive things.What else besides nearly everything? I can't exactly be more specific without droning on about my inadequacies.The two S's: shame and stigma. I hate myself, and so does everyone else. They just don't know it yet, and I'd like to keep it that way.An issue that, while given spotlight via AMA, I don't feel all too comfortable divulging; I get pangs every once and a while related to it before I bury it again. It's hard to hide yourself, you know?Typically I'll have an ounce and a half mixed into a drink, but I'm feeling less of myself tonight. What better to fill the void with than Tennessee's best?Liquid courage. I don't start typing poorly, nor do I make phonecalls to people to let them know just how much I love them. I just watch TV, then post an AMA.Go ahead. It's what the thread's for, after all.How goes your musical endevours?Hit a wall after I finished the last lp. I've got one unfinished song under my belt and that's it. Disappointed every time I think about the situation. So, he's not really asking for a list of reasons why you hate yourself--He's asking you why you spend the energy. I think. Though you may not feel comfortable discussing it publicly, I think I may have an idea of what's troubling you lately, so if you wanna talk about it with someone you can trust, I'll be up all night. 12201
The Flood / Re: ITT I demonstrate why Utilitarianism is shit in less than 5 seconds« on: November 22, 2016, 11:23:36 PM »
No it doesn't, bad joke.
12202
I don't need a lectureYeah, you do. You've heard enough from me on the subject though. 12203
Gaming / Re: Overwatch« on: November 22, 2016, 11:16:54 PM »hahahaThis has been an incredibly stupid and trivial discussion. I hope you recognize that.It is in the context of a game with 22 characters.That's not maining fam.As a filthy Symmetra main, I'm absolutely pumped about her new ult and ability. Now I won't feel like a dick picking her in comp.>maining in Overwatch What's up your ass? 12206
Gaming / Re: Convince me to like bloodborne ITT« on: November 22, 2016, 10:59:44 PM »I doubt he means it. He says shit like that all the time, and if you let it affect you, you're weak in the head.i will do this by linking you a video i haven't watchedI actually saw this video a couple days ago and stopped when he bases his entire argument on asserting that his favorite playable is objectively more fun than any other and that people who don't agree are somehow stupid. I know here on Sep7 we say shit in games is objectively better all the time as a joke or as hyperbole and shoot shit at each other, but holy shit this guy ACTUALLY REALLY means it. 12207
The Flood / Re: choose my avatar« on: November 22, 2016, 08:46:22 PM »But I do style my hair, when I wake up it's legit standing straight up. Same with taking a "nice" picture, I take like ten to try to get the right angle before I'm content with the photo I post. I guess I just suck at taking them.Looking into the camera isn't always a bad idea, but when you're making an avatar, you have to take into account the fact that people are constantly going to be seeing this picture when they interact with you--and what they're gonna see is you, staring intently into their soul. It kinda creeps people out. So unless that's what you're going for, I'd avoid that. Part of the reason I had my eyes obscured in that one picture is because I didn't want to create that effect. I didn't want to create the impression that I was looking at anything or anybody in particular, so I blocked that element out of the photo entirely. Looking away from the camera tends to draw attention away from your eyes, which is (generally) what you want. Self-photography IS hard because, like you said, it's difficult not to "force" an expression. The best thing to do, I suppose, would have other people take pictures of you during your most natural/human moments. You can have a professional take photos of you, but that's expensive and impractical. Or you could meticulously study models' expressions on professionally-taken photos and try to emulate them (not recommended). 12208
Gaming / Re: Convince me to like bloodborne ITT« on: November 22, 2016, 08:32:50 PM »
i will do this by linking you a video i haven't watched
YouTube but it's made by the same guy who made "fallout 3 is garbage" and he's very articulate and thorough in his analysis 12209
The Flood / Re: I just wanna beat the fuck out of a republican« on: November 22, 2016, 08:30:58 PM »Say it with me one last time, before you go back to your goats.He's not my president. 12210
The Flood / Re: So jojo is actually pretty spectacular« on: November 22, 2016, 08:29:20 PM »I read the phantom blood before it was cool. The artwork is fucking beautiful, I'm talking Shin Angyo Onshi levels of good.STOP BEING WRONG IT WILL NOT HURT YOU |